Comparative evaluation of resin-based sealers and bioceramic sealers for postoperative pain after endodontic treatment: A systematic review.

The systematic review aimed to compare and evaluate the effect of resin-based sealers and bioceramic sealers on postoperative pain after endodontic treatment. Two reviewers independently conducted electronic search in PubMed, the Web of Science, ScienceDirect, the Wiley Online Library, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library, employing a complete dual-review process to ensure the inclusion of all relevant studies in the review. The search was carried out until November 2021. After selecting eligible studies, the risk of bias assessment was carried out using the revised Cochrane risk-ofbias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). A total of 1,931 studies were identified from the electronic search, and finally 10 studies were included after full-text assessment. In all our included studies, the visual analog scale (VAS) was used for recording pain scores. Most of the studies recorded pain intensity starting from 6 h to 7 days. The results showed that there was no significant difference between resin-based sealers and bioceramic sealers in terms of incidence or intensity of postoperative pain at any point in time.

Comparative analysis of reduction in pain scores after single visit root canal treatment using endodontic irrigation protocols, namely, Conventional needle irrigation, PUI, PIPS and SWEEPS: A randomized control trial.

Introduction: To assess the effects of different irrigation activation systems on postoperative pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS), using new laser irrigation activation system shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), passive ultrasonic irrigation activation techniques, compared with the conventional irrigation (CI) method. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients suffering from symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in maxillary or mandibular molars were enrolled and randomly assigned to four different irrigation activation groups (n = 15) after chemomechanical root canal preparation. Preoperative and postoperative pain scores were recorded using VAS. The data were collected and subjected to statistical analysis using IBM SPSS 20.0 software at a level of significance being 0.05. Results: We observed that mean pain scores decreased with time in all patients in all groups. The decrease in pain score was found to be statistically significant (P < 0.05) among both the genders in Group 3 (PIPS) and Group 4 (SWEEPS). Postoperatively, pain scores decreased significantly using Group 4 (SWEEPS), followed by Group 3 (PIPS), Group 2 (ultrasonic activation), and Group 1 (conventional needle irrigation). No significant relation was observed statistically between pain scores and age groups among all groups, except for preoperative score in Group 3 and age groups. Conclusion: Postoperative scores were lower in laser-activated irrigation systems as compared to the other activation systems. The highest pain scores were observed in case of CI method, at pre- and post-operative periods.