Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 70
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surg Endosc ; 37(4): 3010-3017, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36536082

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative skills assessment is time-consuming and subjective; an efficient and objective computer vision-based approach for feedback is desired. In this work, we aim to design and validate an interpretable automated method to evaluate technical proficiency using colorectal robotic surgery videos with artificial intelligence. METHODS: 92 curated clips of peritoneal closure were characterized by both board-certified surgeons and a computer vision AI algorithm to compare the measures of surgical skill. For human ratings, six surgeons graded clips according to the GEARS assessment tool; for AI assessment, deep learning computer vision algorithms for surgical tool detection and tracking were developed and implemented. RESULTS: For the GEARS category of efficiency, we observe a positive correlation between human expert ratings of technical efficiency and AI-determined total tool movement (r = - 0.72). Additionally, we show that more proficient surgeons perform closure with significantly less tool movement compared to less proficient surgeons (p < 0.001). For the GEARS category of bimanual dexterity, a positive correlation between expert ratings of bimanual dexterity and the AI model's calculated measure of bimanual movement based on simultaneous tool movement (r = 0.48) was also observed. On average, we also find that higher skill clips have significantly more simultaneous movement in both hands compared to lower skill clips (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, measurements of technical proficiency extracted from AI algorithms are shown to correlate with those given by expert surgeons. Although we target measurements of efficiency and bimanual dexterity, this work suggests that artificial intelligence through computer vision holds promise for efficiently standardizing grading of surgical technique, which may help in surgical skills training.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Cirujanos , Humanos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Inteligencia Artificial , Cirujanos/educación , Algoritmos , Computadores , Competencia Clínica
2.
Ann Surg ; 275(3): 582-590, 2022 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34954754

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether single-cell and plasma proteomic elements of the host's immune response to surgery accurately identify patients who develop a surgical site complication (SSC) after major abdominal surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: SSCs may occur in up to 25% of patients undergoing bowel resection, resulting in significant morbidity and economic burden. However, the accurate prediction of SSCs remains clinically challenging. Leveraging high-content proteomic technologies to comprehensively profile patients' immune response to surgery is a promising approach to identify predictive biological factors of SSCs. METHODS: Forty-one patients undergoing non-cancer bowel resection were prospectively enrolled. Blood samples collected before surgery and on postoperative day one (POD1) were analyzed using a combination of single-cell mass cytometry and plasma proteomics. The primary outcome was the occurrence of an SSC, including surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, or wound dehiscence within 30 days of surgery. RESULTS: A multiomic model integrating the single-cell and plasma proteomic data collected on POD1 accurately differentiated patients with (n = 11) and without (n = 30) an SSC [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.86]. Model features included coregulated proinflammatory (eg, IL-6- and MyD88- signaling responses in myeloid cells) and immunosuppressive (eg, JAK/STAT signaling responses in M-MDSCs and Tregs) events preceding an SSC. Importantly, analysis of the immunological data obtained before surgery also yielded a model accurately predicting SSCs (AUC = 0.82). CONCLUSIONS: The multiomic analysis of patients' immune response after surgery and immune state before surgery revealed systemic immune signatures preceding the development of SSCs. Our results suggest that integrating immunological data in perioperative risk assessment paradigms is a plausible strategy to guide individualized clinical care.


Asunto(s)
Fuga Anastomótica/epidemiología , Proteínas Sanguíneas/análisis , Proteínas en la Dieta/sangre , Dehiscencia de la Herida Operatoria/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Proteoma , Análisis de la Célula Individual
3.
J Surg Res ; 273: 226-232, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35101683

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative optimization programs have demonstrated positive effects on perioperative physical function and surgical outcomes. In nonsurgical populations, physical activity and healthy diet may reduce pain and pain medication requirement, but this has not been studied in surgical patients. Our aim was to determine whether a preoperative diet and exercise intervention affects postoperative pain and pain medication use. METHODS: Patients undergoing abdominal colorectal surgery were invited to participate in a web-based patient engagement program. Those enrolling in the first and third time periods received information on the standard perioperative pathway (enhanced recovery after surgery [ERAS]). Those enrolling in the second time period also received reminders on nutrition and exercise (PREHAB + ERAS). The primary outcome was postoperative inpatient opioid use. The secondary outcomes were inpatient postoperative pain scores and nonopioid pain medication use. RESULTS: The ERAS and PREHAB + ERAS groups were similar in demographic and operative characteristics. Subgroup analysis of patients who activated their accounts demonstrated that the two groups had similar average maximum daily pain scores, but the PREHAB + ERAS group (n = 158) used 15.9 fewer oral morphine equivalents per postoperative inpatient day than the ERAS group (n = 92), representing a 30% decrease (53 mg versus 37.1 mg, P = 0.04). The two groups used comparable amounts of acetaminophen, gabapentin, and ketorolac. Generalized linear models demonstrated that PREHAB + ERAS, minimally invasive surgery, and older age were associated with lower inpatient opioid use. CONCLUSIONS: Access to a web-based preoperative diet and exercise program may reduce inpatient opioid use after major elective colorectal surgery. Further studies are necessary to determine whether the degree of adherence to nutrition and physical activity recommendations has a dose-dependent effect on opioid use.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Cirugía Colorrectal/efectos adversos , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Ejercicio Preoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Curr Opin Crit Care ; 27(6): 717-725, 2021 12 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34545029

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Postoperative complications including infections, cognitive impairment, and protracted recovery occur in one-third of the 300 million surgeries performed annually worldwide. Complications cause personal suffering along with a significant economic burden on our healthcare system. However, the accurate prediction of postoperative complications and patient-targeted interventions for their prevention remain as major clinical challenges. RECENT FINDINGS: Although multifactorial in origin, the dysregulation of immunological mechanisms that occur in response to surgical trauma is a key determinant of postoperative complications. Prior research, primarily focusing on inflammatory plasma markers, has provided important clues regarding their pathogenesis. However, the recent advent of high-content, single-cell transcriptomic, and proteomic technologies has considerably improved our ability to characterize the immune response to surgery, thereby providing new means to understand the immunological basis of postoperative complications and to identify prognostic biological signatures. SUMMARY: The comprehensive and single-cell characterization of the human immune response to surgery has significantly advanced our ability to predict the risk of postoperative complications. Multiomic modeling of patients' immune states holds promise for the discovery of preoperative predictive biomarkers, ultimately providing patients and surgeons with actionable information to improve surgical outcomes. Although recent studies have generated a wealth of knowledge, laying the foundation for a single-cell atlas of the human immune response to surgery, larger-scale multiomic studies are required to derive robust, scalable, and sufficiently powerful models to accurately predict the risk of postoperative complications in individual patients.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Proteómica , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Inmunidad , Pronóstico
5.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 63(1): 46-52, 2020 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31764247

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive approaches have been shown to reduce surgical site complications without compromising oncologic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the rates of successful oncologic resection and postoperative outcomes among laparoscopic, open, and robotic approaches to rectal cancer resection. DESIGN: This is a multicenter, quasiexperimental cohort study using propensity score weighting. SETTINGS: Interventions were performed in hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent rectal cancer resection in 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite variable indicating successful oncologic resection, defined as negative distal and radial margins with at least 12 lymph nodes evaluated. RESULTS: Among 1028 rectal cancer resections, 206 (20%) were approached laparoscopically, 192 (18.7%) were approached robotically, and 630 (61.3%) were open. After propensity score weighting, there were no significant sociodemographic or preoperative clinical differences among subcohorts. Compared to the laparoscopic approach, open and robotic approaches were associated with a decreased likelihood of successful oncologic resection (ORadj = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94 and ORadj = 0.60; 95% CI, 0.37-0.97), and the open approach was associated with an increased likelihood of surgical site complications (ORadj = 2.53; 95% CI, 1.61-3.959). Compared to the laparoscopic approach, the open approach was associated with longer length of stay (6.8 vs 8.6 days, p = 0.002). LIMITATIONS: This was an observational cohort study using a preexisting clinical data set. Despite adjusted propensity score methodology, unmeasured confounding may contribute to our findings. CONCLUSIONS: Resections that were approached laparoscopically were more likely to achieve oncologic success. Minimally invasive approaches did not lengthen operative times and provided benefits of reduced surgical site complications and decreased postoperative length of stay. Further studies are needed to clarify clinical outcomes and factors that influence the choice of approach. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B70. RESULTADOS ONCOLÓGICOS Y PERIOPERATORIOS DE LOS ABORDAJES LAPAROSCÓPICOS, ABIERTOS Y ROBÓTICOS PARA LA RESECCIÓN DEL CÁNCER RECTAL: UN ESTUDIO DE COHORTE MULTICÉNTRICO Y PONDERADO DEL PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIÓN: Se ha demostrado que los enfoques mínimamente invasivos reducen las complicaciones del sitio quirúrgico sin comprometer los resultados oncológicos.El objetivo principal de este estudio es evaluar las tasas de resección oncológica exitosa y los resultados postoperatorios entre los abordajes laparoscópico, abierto y robótico para la resección del cáncer rectal.Este es un estudio de cohorte cuasi-experimental multicéntrico que utiliza la ponderación de puntaje de propensión.Las intervenciones se realizaron en hospitales que participan en el Programa Nacional de Mejora de la Calidad Quirúrgica del Colegio Americano de Cirujanos.Se incluyeron pacientes adultos que se sometieron a resección de cáncer rectal en 2016.El resultado primario fue una variable compuesta que indicaba una resección oncológica exitosa, definida como márgenes negativos distales y radiales con al menos 12 ganglios linfáticos evaluados.Entre 1,028 resecciones de cáncer rectal, 206 (20%) fueron abordadas por vía laparoscópica, 192 (18.7%) robóticamente y 630 (61.3%) abiertas. Después de ponderar el puntaje de propensión, no hubo diferencias sociodemográficas o clínicas preoperatorias significativas entre las subcohortes. En comparación con el abordaje laparoscópico, los abordajes abiertos y robóticos se asociaron con una menor probabilidad de resección oncológica exitosa (ORadj = 0.64; IC 95%, 0.43-0.94 y ORadj = 0.60; IC 95%, 0.37-0.97), y el abordaje abierto se asoció con una mayor probabilidad de complicaciones del sitio quirúrgico (ORadj = 2.53; IC 95%, 1.61-3.959). En comparación con el abordaje laparoscópico, el abordaje abierto se asoció con una estadía más prolongada (6.8 frente a 8.6 días, p = 0.002).Este fue un estudio de cohorte observacional que utilizó un conjunto de datos clínicos preexistentes. A pesar de la metodología de puntuación de propensión ajustada, la confusión no medida puede contribuir a nuestros hallazgos.Las resecciones que se abordaron por vía laparoscópica tuvieron más probabilidades de lograr el éxito oncológico. Los enfoques mínimamente invasivos no alargaron los tiempos quirúrgicos y proporcionaron beneficios de la reducción de las complicaciones del sitio quirúrgico y la disminución de la duración de la estadía postoperatoria. Se necesitan más estudios para aclarar los resultados clínicos y los factores que influyen en la elección del enfoque. Vea video resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B70.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Proctectomía/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Periodo Perioperatorio , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
6.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 63(11): 1524-1533, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33044293

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Existing studies on the effects of biological medications on surgical complications among patients with ulcerative colitis have mixed results. Because biologicals may hinder response to infections and wound healing, preoperative exposure may increase postoperative complications. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between biological exposure within 6 months preceding colectomy or proctocolectomy and postoperative complications among patients with ulcerative colitis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study with multivariate regression analysis after coarsened exact matching. SETTINGS: A large commercial insurance claims database (2003-2016) was used. PATIENTS: A total of 1794 patients with ulcerative colitis underwent total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy, total proctocolectomy with end ileostomy, or total proctocolectomy with IPAA. Twenty-two percent were exposed to biologicals in the 6 months preceding surgery. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Healthcare use (length of stay, unplanned reoperation/procedure, emergency department visit, or readmission) and complications (infectious, hernia or wound disruption, thromboembolic, or cardiopulmonary) within 30 postoperative days were measured. RESULTS: Exposure to biological medications was associated with shorter surgical hospitalization (7 vs 8 d; p <0.001) but otherwise was not associated with differences in healthcare use or postoperative complications. PATIENTS: who underwent total proctocolectomy with IPAA had higher odds of infectious complications compared with those who underwent total abdominal colectomy with end ileostomy (adjusted OR = 2.2 (95% CI, 1.5-3.0); p < 0.001) but had lower odds of cardiopulmonary complications (adjusted OR = 0.4 (95% CI, 0.3-0.6); p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Analysis of private insurance database claims data may not represent uninsured or government-insured patients and may be limited by coding accuracy. Matched cohorts differed in age and Charlson Comorbidity Index, which could be influential even after multivariate adjustments. CONCLUSIONS: Biological exposure among patients with ulcerative colitis is not associated with higher odds of postoperative complications or healthcare resource use. These data, in combination with clinical judgment and patient preferences, may aid in complex decision-making regarding operative timing, operation type, and perioperative medication management. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B370. EL USO DE MEDICAMENTOS BIOLÓGICOS NO AUMENTA LAS COMPLICACIONES POSTOPERATORIAS ENTRE PACIENTES CON COLITIS ULCERATIVA SOMETIDOS A UNA COLECTOMÍA: UN ANÁLISIS DE COHORTE RETROSPECTIVO DE PACIENTES CON SEGURO PRIVADO: Estudios existentes sobre los efectos de medicamentos biológicos, en complicaciones quirúrgicas, en pacientes con colitis ulcerativa, presentan resultados mixtos. Debido a que los productos biológicos pueden retrasar la respuesta a las infecciones y curación de heridas, su exposición preoperatoria pueden aumentar las complicaciones postoperatorias.Evaluar las asociaciones entre la exposición biológica dentro de los seis meses anteriores a la colectomía o proctocolectomía y las complicaciones postoperatorias entre los pacientes con colitis ulcerativa.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo con análisis de regresión multivariante después de una coincidencia exacta aproximada.Una gran base de datos de reclamaciones de seguros comerciales (2003-2016).Un total de 1.794 pacientes con colitis ulcerativa, se sometieron a colectomía abdominal total con ileostomía terminal, proctocolectomía total con ileostomía terminal o proctocolectomía total con anastomosis anal y bolsa ileal. 22% estuvieron expuestos a productos biológicos, seis meses antes de la cirugía.Utilización de la atención médica (duración de la estadía, reoperación o procedimiento no planificado, visita al servicio de urgencias o reingreso) y complicaciones (infecciosas, hernias o dehiscencias de heridas, tromboembólicas o cardiopulmonares) dentro de los 30 días postoperatorios.La exposición a medicamentos biológicos se asoció con una hospitalización quirúrgica más corta (7 frente a 8 días, p <0,001), pero por lo demás, no se asoció con diferencias en la utilización de la atención médica o complicaciones postoperatorias. Los pacientes que se sometieron a proctocolectomía total con anastomosis anal y bolsa ileal, tuvieron mayores probabilidades de complicaciones infecciosas, en comparación con aquellos que se sometieron a colectomía abdominal total con ileostomía final (aOR 2.2, IC 95% [1.5-3.0], p <0.001) pero tuvieron menores probabilidades de complicaciones cardiopulmonares (aOR 0.4, IC 95% [0.3-0.6], p <0.001).El análisis de los datos de reclamaciones, de la base de datos de los seguros privados, puede no representar a pacientes no asegurados o asegurados por el gobierno, y puede estar limitado por la precisión de la codificación. Las cohortes emparejadas diferían en la edad y el índice de comorbilidad de Charlson, lo que podría influir incluso después de ajustes multivariados.La exposición biológica entre los pacientes con colitis ulcerativa, no se asocia con mayores probabilidades de complicaciones postoperatorias, o a la utilización de recursos sanitarios. Estos datos, en combinación con el juicio clínico y las preferencias del paciente, pueden ayudar en la toma de decisiones complejas con respecto al momento quirúrgico, el tipo de operación y el manejo de la medicación perioperatoria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B370. (Traducción-Dr Fidel Ruiz Healy).


Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Colitis Ulcerosa , Ileostomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Productos Biológicos/administración & dosificación , Productos Biológicos/efectos adversos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Colitis Ulcerosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Ileostomía/efectos adversos , Ileostomía/métodos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Prioridad del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/efectos adversos , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
7.
J Surg Res ; 247: 86-94, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31767277

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent data demonstrate that surgeons overprescribe opioids and vary considerably in the amount of opioids prescribed for common procedures. Limited data exist about why and how surgeons develop certain opioid prescribing habits. We sought to identify surgeons' knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about opioid prescribing and elicit barriers to guideline-based prescribing. METHODS: We conducted qualitative semistructured interviews accompanied by demographic surveys at an academic medical center. Surgical residents and faculty members were selected by maximum variation purposive sampling. We used thematic analysis to identify themes associated with opioid prescribing. RESULTS: Twenty surgical residents and twenty-one surgical faculty members were interviewed. Characteristics of individual surgeons, patients, health care teams, practice environments, and the complex interplay between these domains drove prescribing habits. Attending-resident communication about opioid prescribing was extremely limited. Surgeons received little training and feedback about opioid prescribing and were rarely aware of negative long-term consequences, limiting motivation to change prescribing habits. Although surgeons frequently interacted with pain management physicians to comanage patients postoperatively, few involved pain management physicians in preoperative planning. Perceived barriers to guideline-based prescribing included the following: limitations to electronic prescribing, cross-coverage problems, inadequate time for patient education, and impediments to use of nonopioid alternatives. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to improve compliance with opioid prescribing guidelines should include surgeon education and personal feedback. Future interventions should aim to improve attending-resident communication about opioid prescribing, reduce hurdles to electronic prescribing, provide clear pain management plans for cross-covering physicians, assess alternative methods for efficient patient education, and maximize use of nonnarcotic pain medications.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Epidemia de Opioides/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/normas , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/etiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Investigación Cualitativa , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
Gastroenterology ; 155(2): 469-478.e1, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29660323

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Epidemiologic analyses of acute pancreatitis (AP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP) provide insight into causes and strategies for prevention and affect allocation of resources to its study and treatment. We sought to determine current and accurate incidences of AP and CP, along with the prevalence of CP, in children and adults in the United States. METHODS: We collected data from the Truven MarketScan Research Databases of commercial inpatient and outpatient insurance claims in the United States from 2007 through 2014 (patients 0-64 years old). We calculated the incidences of AP and CP and prevalence of CP based on International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision diagnosis codes. Children were defined as 18 years or younger and adults as 19 to 64 years old. RESULTS: The incidence of pediatric AP was stable from 2007 through 2014, remaining at 12.3/100,000 persons in 2014. Meanwhile, the incidence for adult AP decreased from 123.7/100,000 persons in 2007 to 111.2/100,000 persons in 2014. The incidence of CP decreased over time in children (2.2/100,000 persons in 2007 to 1.9/100,000 persons in 2014) and adults (31.7/100,000 persons in 2007 to 24.7/100,000 persons in 2014). The prevalences of pediatric and adult CP were 5.8/100,000 persons and 91.9/100,000 persons, respectively, in 2014. Incidences of AP and CP increased with age. We found little change in incidence during the first decade of life but linear increases starting in the second decade. CONCLUSIONS: We performed a comprehensive epidemiologic analysis of privately insured, non-elderly adults and children with AP and CP in the United States. Changes in gallstone formation, smoking, and alcohol consumption, along with advances in pancreatitis management, may be responsible for the stabilization and even decrease in the incidences of AP and CP.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pancreatitis Crónica/epidemiología , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis/economía , Pancreatitis Crónica/economía , Prevalencia , Sector Privado/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
9.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 62(5): 586-594, 2019 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30762599

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sex-based treatment disparities occur in many diseases. Women undergo fewer procedural interventions, and their care is less consistent with guideline-based therapy. There is limited research exploring sex-based differences in ulcerative colitis treatment. We hypothesized that women are less likely to be treated with strategies consistent with long-term disease remission, including surgery and maintenance medications. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine if patient sex is associated with choice of treatment strategy for ulcerative colitis. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: Data were gathered from a large commercial insurance claims database from 2007 to 2015. PATIENTS: We identified a cohort of 38,851 patients newly diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, aged 12 to 64 years with at least 1 year of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were the differences between male and female patients in 1) rates and types of index ulcerative colitis operations, 2) rates and types of ulcerative colitis medication prescriptions, and 3) rates of opioid prescriptions. RESULTS: Men were more likely to undergo surgical treatment for ulcerative colitis (2.94% vs 1.97%, p < 0.001, OR 1.51, p < 0.001). The type of index operation performed did not vary by sex. Men were more likely to undergo treatment with maintenance medications, including biologic (12.4% vs 10.2%, p < 0.001, OR 1.22, p < 0.001), immunomodulatory (16.3% vs 14.9%, p < 0.001, OR 1.08, p = 0.006), and 5-aminosalicylate medications (67.0% vs 63.2%, p < 0.001, OR 1.18, p < 0.001). Women were more likely to undergo treatment with rescue therapies and symptomatic control with corticosteroids (55.5% vs 54.0%, p = 0.002, OR 1.07, p = 0.002) and opioids (50.2% vs 45.9%, p < 0.001, OR 1.17, p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: Claims data lack clinical characteristics acting as confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Men with ulcerative colitis were more likely to undergo treatment consistent with long-term remission or cure, including maintenance medications and definitive surgery. Women were more likely to undergo treatment consistent with short-term symptom management. Further studies to explore underlying mechanisms of sex-related differences in ulcerative colitis treatment strategies and disease trajectories are warranted. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A943.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Colitis Ulcerosa/terapia , Ileostomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Mesalamina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Adulto Joven
10.
J Surg Res ; 236: 340-344, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30694775

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Current procedural terminology (CPT) for colon and rectal surgery lacks procedural granularity and misclassification rates are unknown. However, they are used in performance measurement, for example, in surgical site infection (SSI). The objective of this study was to determine whether American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) abstraction methods accurately classify types of colorectal operations and, by extension, reported SSI rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single tertiary care center. The colectomy- and proctectomy-targeted NSQIP database from January 2011 to July 2016 was used to perform a semiautomated reclassification (SAR) of all colectomy and proctectomy cases performed by colorectal surgeons. The primary outcome was the difference in perioperative SSI rates by case classification method. RESULTS: Thousand sixty-three patients underwent a colectomy or proctectomy during the study period with a mean age of 55.7 (SD = 16.7) years. Use of the NSQIP classification scheme resulted in 849 colectomy and 214 proctectomy cases. Use of the SAR method resulted in 650 colectomy cases and 413 proctectomy cases (P < 0.001), a 23.4% reclassification of colectomy cases. The group of cases classified as colectomy by SAR had a lower rate of deep/organ space infections than those classified as colectomy by NSQIP (4.5% versus 7.1%, P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the challenges of CPT code-based patient classification and subsequent outcomes analysis. Expanding the CPT system to more accurately represent colorectal operations would allow for more representative reported outcomes, thus enabling benchmarking and quality improvement.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/clasificación , Current Procedural Terminology , Proctectomía/clasificación , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Colectomía/efectos adversos , Colon/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Recto/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Terminología como Asunto
11.
J Immunol ; 2017 Aug 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28794234

RESUMEN

Application of high-content immune profiling technologies has enormous potential to advance medicine. Whether these technologies reveal pertinent biology when implemented in interventional clinical trials is an important question. The beneficial effects of preoperative arginine-enriched dietary supplements (AES) are highly context specific, as they reduce infection rates in elective surgery, but possibly increase morbidity in critically ill patients. This study combined single-cell mass cytometry with the multiplex analysis of relevant plasma cytokines to comprehensively profile the immune-modifying effects of this much-debated intervention in patients undergoing surgery. An elastic net algorithm applied to the high-dimensional mass cytometry dataset identified a cross-validated model consisting of 20 interrelated immune features that separated patients assigned to AES from controls. The model revealed wide-ranging effects of AES on innate and adaptive immune compartments. Notably, AES increased STAT1 and STAT3 signaling responses in lymphoid cell subsets after surgery, consistent with enhanced adaptive mechanisms that may protect against postsurgical infection. Unexpectedly, AES also increased ERK and P38 MAPK signaling responses in monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells, which was paired with their pronounced expansion. These results provide novel mechanistic arguments as to why AES may exert context-specific beneficial or adverse effects in patients with critical illness. This study lays out an analytical framework to distill high-dimensional datasets gathered in an interventional clinical trial into a fairly simple model that converges with known biology and provides insight into novel and clinically relevant cellular mechanisms.

12.
J Surg Res ; 231: 69-76, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30278971

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is primarily used for rectal cancer and is associated with a high rate of complications. Though the majority of APRs are performed as open procedures, laparoscopic APRs have become more popular. The differences in short-term complications between open and laparoscopic APR are poorly characterized. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to determine the frequency and timing of onset of 30-d postoperative complications after APR and identify differences between open and laparoscopic APR. RESULTS: A total of 7681 patients undergoing laparoscopic or open APR between 2011 and 2015 were identified. The total complication rate for APR was high (45.4%). APRs were commonly complicated by blood transfusion (20.1%), surgical site infection (19.3%), and readmission (12.3%). Laparoscopic APR was associated with a 14% lower total complication rate compared to open APR (36.0% versus 50.1%, P < 0.001). This was primarily driven by a decreased rate of transfusion (10.7% versus 24.9%, P < 0.001) and surgical site infection (15.5% versus 21.2%, P < 0.001). Laparoscopic APR had shorter length of stay and decreased reoperation rate but similar rates of readmission and death. Cardiopulmonary complications occurred earlier in the postoperative period after APR, whereas infectious complications occurred later. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term complications following APR are common and occur more frequently in patients who undergo open APR. This, along with factors such as risk of positive pathologic margins, surgeon skill set, and patient characteristics, should contribute to the decision-making process when planning rectal cancer surgery.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Proctectomía/efectos adversos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
BMC Med Educ ; 18(1): 260, 2018 Nov 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30424762

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medical training occurs during peak childbearing years. However, the intense workload, long work hours, and limited financial compensation are potential barriers to having children during this time. Here, we aimed to identify gender-based differences in beliefs and experiences of having children during graduate medical education. We hypothesized that both genders face significant challenges, but women are more likely to experience stressors related to work-family conflicts. METHODS: We administered an anonymous web-based survey to all trainees at an academic medical center. Primary outcomes were gender differences in beliefs and experiences of having children during training. Multivariate logistic regression was performed using independent variables of gender, specialty type (surgical vs. medical), and parental status. RESULTS: In total, 56% of trainees responded (60% women, 40% men; n = 435). Women were more often concerned about the negative impact of having children and taking maternity leave on their professional reputation and career. The majority of women expressed concern about the potential negative impact of the physical demands of their jobs on pregnancy. Among parents, women were more likely than men to be the primary caregivers on weeknights and require weekday childcare from a non-parent. CONCLUSIONS: Women face greater work-related conflicts in their beliefs and experiences of having a family during graduate medical education. Trainees should be aware of these potential challenges when making life and career decisions. We recommend that institutions employ solutions to accommodate the needs and wellbeing of trainees with families while optimizing training and workload equity for all trainees.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Profesión , Movilidad Laboral , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Responsabilidad Parental/psicología , Médicos Mujeres/psicología , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Empleo/tendencias , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Permiso Parental , Factores Sexuales , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto Joven
15.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg ; 31(6): 353-360, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30397394

RESUMEN

Squamous cell carcinomas of the anal canal and the anal margin are rare malignancies that are increasing in incidence. Patients with these tumors often experience delayed treatment due to delay in diagnosis or misdiagnosis of the condition. Distinguishing between anal canal and anal margin tumors has implications for staging and treatment. Chemoradiation therapy is the mainstay of treatment for anal canal squamous cell, with abdominoperineal resection reserved for salvage treatment in cases of persistent or recurrent disease. Early anal margin squamous cell carcinoma can be treated with wide local excision, but more advanced tumors require a combination of chemoradiation therapy and surgical excision.

17.
J Surg Res ; 203(1): 28-33, 2016 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27338531

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Female surgeons have faced significant challenges to promotion over the past decades, with attrition rates supporting a lack of improvement in women's position in academia. We examine gender disparities in research productivity, as measured by the number of citations, publications, and h-indices, across six decades. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The online profiles of full-time faculty members of surgery departments of three academic centers were reviewed. Faculty members were grouped into six cohorts by decade, based on year of graduation from medical school. Differences between men and women across cohorts as well as by academic rank were examined. RESULTS: The profiles of 978 surgeons (234 women and 744 men) were reviewed. The number of female faculty members in the institutions increased significantly over time, reaching the current percentage of 35.3%. Significant differences in number of articles published were noted at the assistant and full but not at the associate, professor level. Women at these ranks had fewer publications than men. Gender differences were also found in all age cohorts except among the most recent who graduated in the 2000s. The impact of publications, as measured by h-index and number of citations, was not consistently significantly different between the genders at any age or rank. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a consistent gender disparity in the number of publications for female faculty members across a 60-year span. Although the youngest cohort, those who graduated in the 2000s, appeared to avoid the gender divide, our data indicate that overall women still struggle with productivity in the academic arena.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , Movilidad Laboral , Eficiencia , Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Edición/estadística & datos numéricos , Sexismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos
20.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg ; 29(2): 75-9, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27247530

RESUMEN

A range of topics are covered in this issue dedicated to complex and reoperative colorectal surgery, from radiation-induced surgical problems, to enterocutaneous fistulas and locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. Common themes include the importance of operative planning and patient counseling on the expected functional outcomes. Experts in the field offer their technical tips and clinical lessons to maximize outcomes and minimize complications in these challenging cases.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA