Drug allergy in hospitalized patients: the contribution of allergy consultation and a structured questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalized patients with an alleged history of drug allergy pose medical and economic concerns when selecting medications for treatment, possibly leading to deviations from standards of care and the use of expensive agents. Accurate history taking and clear documentation of drug allergy are essential for preventing subsequent administration of the offending drug and overdiagnosis of drug allergy. We aimed to evaluate drug allergy-related history taking by internists compared to allergists and to prospectively assess the effect of a simple, structured questionnaire on the accuracy of drug allergy diagnosis. METHODS: Consenting patients with an alleged drug allergy who were able to give a coherent history were recruited from two internal medicine wards. In both wards, the internists' drug allergy diagnosis was initially compared to that of the allergists. In the second part, in the intervention ward, after the same procedure, the internists completed the structured questionnaire. Their diagnostic conclusions with and without the questionnaire were compared. RESULTS: 202 patients labeled with a medication allergy were enrolled. In the control and intervention wards, 54 and 58% of the patients, respectively, labeled by the internists as allergic, were found not to be allergic by the allergist. In the intervention ward, after using the questionnaire, the percentage of patients tagged by the internists as allergic dropped initially by 31% and finally by 59%. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies between drug allergy diagnosis of internists and allergists are common. Allergist consultation or use of a simple structured questionnaire may be beneficial for accurate diagnosis of drug allergies.

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Pamidronate for Parathyroid Hormone-dependent Hypercalcemia in Hospitalized Patients.

CONTEXT: Bisphosphonates are effective for hypercalcemia of malignancy (HOM). Efficacy and safety data for bisphosphonates in parathyroid hormone-related hypercalcemia (PTHRH) are rare, including pamidronate (Pam), which is not indicated for this condition. OBJECTIVE: This work aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pam for moderate-to-severe PTHRH. METHODS: This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a tertiary care medical center. Patients included adults hospitalized with serum calcium levels greater than 12 mg/dL, from October 29, 2013 to December 17, 2019. Etiology was categorized as PTHRH or PTH-independent. Clinical and laboratory data of PTHRH patients treated with Pam (PTHRH-Pam+) were compared to Pam-untreated counterparts (PTHRH-Pam-). RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with 37 hospitalizations for PTHRH (Pam-treated and -untreated) met the inclusion criteria. Pam was given in 24 of 37 cases (64.8%). Admission serum calcium levels for the PTHRH-Pam+ group were higher than for PTHRH-Pam- group (14.4 mg/dL vs 13.0 mg/dL, P = .005). Median total Pam dose was 60 mg (range, 30-180 mg) in the treated group. Serum calcium decreased 3.5 mg/dL for PTHRH-Pam+ vs 1.6 mg/dL for PTHRH-Pam- (P = .003). No PTHRH-Pam+ patients developed hypocalcemia or acute kidney injury. Nadir serum phosphorus levels were lower in the PTHRH-Pam+ vs PTHRH-Pam- group (1.7 mg/dL vs 2.4 mg/dL, respectively, P = .004). Three PTHRH-Pam+ patients developed severe hypophosphatemia; all resolved with intravenous and oral supplementation. Seventeen patients underwent parathyroidectomy, of whom 10 received Pam within 28 days preoperatively. Postoperatively, 4 developed hypocalcemia and 3 hypophosphatemia. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that Pam is effective and safe for treating PTHRH, while ensuring close laboratory monitoring of calcium and phosphorus metabolism. Larger, prospective studies are needed to establish the role of Pam and other potent bisphosphonates in moderate-to-severe PTHRH.

Temporal trends in incidence, evaluation and management of neuroendocrine neoplasms of the appendix: 14 years' experience.

BACKGROUND: Information regarding temporal trends in appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANEN) is limited. This retrospective study evaluated temporal trends in ANEN incidence and management over a 14-year period. METHODS: Appendectomy pathology reports from a single tertiary center were reviewed. RESULTS: During 2005-2018, 8327 appendectomies were performed and 57 ANENs were diagnosed (average age 31.7 ± 17 years; 70.2% women; 17.5% Arab ethnicity; and 22.8% < 18 years of age). The cohort was divided according to year of diagnosis (Period A 2005-2011; Period B 2012-2018). No differences were found in ANEN incidence (0.75% and 0.62%, respectively, p = 0.104), epidemiologic or pathologic characteristics between periods. In period B, pathology reports were more comprehensive and use of specific imaging and biochemical studies was more prevalent. Hemicolectomy rates and results were similar (8 in Period A, 7 in Period B, p = 0.925). All patients remained alive for the duration of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: No temporal changes in epidemiological, clinical or pathological features of ANENs were noted. Although clinico-pathological evaluation was more detailed after 2011, there was no change in rates of hemicolectomy or disease prognosis.

Appendiceal tumor incidence and an in-depth look at appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasm in a cohort of 8,162 appendectomies: Full dataset.

Data describing appendiceal tumor incidence and epidemiology is limited. We collated data from appendectomy pathology reports between 2005 and 2018 in our institution and examined patient epidemiological and appendectomy pathological features [1]. Overall, 8,328 appendectomies were performed at our institution over the pre-specified time period and 8,162 patients had sufficient epidemiological data to be included in the analysis. A total of 153 patients (1.9%) were diagnosed with appendiceal tumors, of which 57 (37.3%) were Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Neoplasm (ANEN), 35 (22.9%) were mucinous cystadenoma and 34 (22.2%) ovarian cancer metastases. We further examined the ANEN cases in order to characterize initial patient and tumor characteristics, to evaluate the performance of further investigations and interventions, and ultimately to study the behavior of these tumors over time.