The domains of yeast eIF4G, eIF4E and the cap fine-tune eIF4A activities through an intricate network of stimulatory and inhibitory effects.

Translation initiation in eukaryotes starts with the recognition of the mRNA 5'-cap by eIF4F, a hetero-trimeric complex of eIF4E, the cap-binding protein, eIF4A, a DEAD-box helicase, and eIF4G, a scaffold protein. eIF4G comprises eIF4E- and eIF4A-binding domains (4E-BD, 4A-BD) and three RNA-binding regions (RNA1-RNA3), and interacts with eIF4A, eIF4E, and with the mRNA. Within the eIF4F complex, the helicase activity of eIF4A is increased. We showed previously that RNA3 of eIF4G is important for the stimulation of the eIF4A conformational cycle and its ATPase and helicase activities. Here, we dissect the interplay between the eIF4G domains and the role of the eIF4E/cap interaction in eIF4A activation. We show that RNA2 leads to an increase in the fraction of eIF4A in the closed state, an increased RNA affinity, and faster RNA unwinding. This stimulatory effect is partially reduced when the 4E-BD is present. eIF4E binding to the 4E-BD then further inhibits the helicase activity and closing of eIF4A, but does not affect the RNA-stimulated ATPase activity of eIF4A. The 5'-cap renders the functional interaction of mRNA with eIF4A less efficient. Overall, the activity of eIF4A at the 5'-cap is thus fine-tuned by a delicately balanced network of stimulatory and inhibitory interactions.

Determination of rate constants for conformational changes of RNA helicases by single-molecule FRET TIRF microscopy.

RNA helicases couple nucleotide-driven conformational changes to the unwinding of RNA duplexes. Interaction partners can regulate helicase activity by altering the rate constants of these conformational changes. Single-molecule FRET experiments on donor/acceptor-labeled, immobilized molecules are ideally suited to monitor conformational changes in real time and to extract rate constants for these processes. This article provides guidance on how to design, perform, and analyze single-molecule FRET experiments by TIRF microscopy. It covers the theoretical background of FRET and single-molecule TIRF microscopy, the considerations to prepare proteins of interest for donor/acceptor labeling and surface immobilization, and the principles and procedures of data analysis, including image analysis and the determination of FRET time traces, the extraction of rate constants from FRET time traces, and the general conclusions that can be drawn from these data. A case study, using the DEAD-box protein eIF4A as an example, highlights how single-molecule FRET studies have been instrumental in understanding the role of conformational changes for duplex unwinding and for the regulation of helicase activities. Selected examples illustrate which conclusions can be drawn from the kinetic data obtained, highlight possible pitfalls in data analysis and interpretation, and outline how kinetic models can be related to functionally relevant states.

What makes a type IIA topoisomerase a gyrase or a Topo IV?

Type IIA topoisomerases catalyze a variety of different reactions: eukaryotic topoisomerase II relaxes DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction, whereas the bacterial representatives gyrase and topoisomerase IV (Topo IV) preferentially introduce negative supercoils into DNA (gyrase) or decatenate DNA (Topo IV). Gyrase and Topo IV perform separate, dedicated tasks during replication: gyrase removes positive supercoils in front, Topo IV removes pre-catenanes behind the replication fork. Despite their well-separated cellular functions, gyrase and Topo IV have an overlapping activity spectrum: gyrase is also able to catalyze DNA decatenation, although less efficiently than Topo IV. The balance between supercoiling and decatenation activities is different for gyrases from different organisms. Both enzymes consist of a conserved topoisomerase core and structurally divergent C-terminal domains (CTDs). Deletion of the entire CTD, mutation of a conserved motif and even by just a single point mutation within the CTD converts gyrase into a Topo IV-like enzyme, implicating the CTDs as the major determinant for function. Here, we summarize the structural and mechanistic features that make a type IIA topoisomerase a gyrase or a Topo IV, and discuss the implications for type IIA topoisomerase evolution.

The Thermus thermophilus DEAD-box protein Hera is a general RNA binding protein and plays a key role in tRNA metabolism.

RNA helicases catalyze the ATP-dependent destabilization of RNA duplexes. DEAD-box helicases share a helicase core that mediates ATP binding and hydrolysis, RNA binding and unwinding. Most members of this family contain domains flanking the core that can confer RNA substrate specificity and guide the helicase to a specific RNA. However, the in vivo RNA substrates of most helicases are currently not defined. The DEAD-box helicase Hera from Thermus thermophilus contains a helicase core, followed by a dimerization domain and an RNA binding domain that folds into an RNA recognition motif (RRM). The RRM mediates high affinity binding to an RNA hairpin, and an adjacent duplex is then unwound by the helicase core. Hera is a cold-shock protein, and has been suggested to act as an RNA chaperone under cold-shock conditions. Using crosslinking immunoprecipitation of Hera/RNA complexes and sequencing, we show that Hera binds to a large fraction of T. thermophilus RNAs under normal-growth and cold-shock conditions without a strong sequence preference, in agreement with a structure-specific recognition of RNAs and a general function in RNA metabolism. Under cold-shock conditions, Hera is recruited to RNAs with high propensities to form stable secondary structures. We show that selected RNAs identified, including a set of tRNAs, bind to Hera in vitro, and activate the Hera helicase core. Gene ontology analysis reveals an enrichment of genes related to translation, including mRNAs of ribosomal proteins, tRNAs, tRNA ligases, and tRNA-modifying enzymes, consistent with a key role of Hera in ribosome and tRNA metabolism.

Functional interactions between gyrase subunits are optimized in a species-specific manner.

DNA gyrase is a bacterial DNA topoisomerase that catalyzes ATP-dependent negative DNA supercoiling and DNA decatenation. The enzyme is a heterotetramer comprising two GyrA and two GyrB subunits. Its overall architecture is conserved, but species-specific elements in the two subunits are thought to optimize subunit interaction and enzyme function. Toward understanding the roles of these different elements, we compared the activities of Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis gyrases and of heterologous enzymes reconstituted from subunits of two different species. We show that B. subtilis and E. coli gyrases are proficient DNA-stimulated ATPases and efficiently supercoil and decatenate DNA. In contrast, M. tuberculosis gyrase hydrolyzes ATP only slowly and is a poor supercoiling enzyme and decatenase. The heterologous enzymes are generally less active than their homologous counterparts. The only exception is a gyrase reconstituted from mycobacterial GyrA and B. subtilis GyrB, which exceeds the activity of M. tuberculosis gyrase and reaches the activity of the B. subtilis gyrase, indicating that the activities of enzymes containing mycobacterial GyrB are limited by ATP hydrolysis. The activity pattern of heterologous gyrases is in agreement with structural features present: B. subtilis gyrase is a minimal enzyme, and its subunits can functionally interact with subunits from other bacteria. In contrast, the specific insertions in E. coli and mycobacterial gyrase subunits appear to prevent efficient functional interactions with heterologous subunits. Understanding the molecular details of gyrase adaptations to the specific physiological requirements of the respective organism might aid in the development of species-specific gyrase inhibitors.

Regulation of RNA helicase activity: principles and examples.

RNA helicases are a ubiquitous class of enzymes involved in virtually all processes of RNA metabolism, from transcription, mRNA splicing and export, mRNA translation and RNA transport to RNA degradation. Although ATP-dependent unwinding of RNA duplexes is their hallmark reaction, not all helicases catalyze unwinding in vitro, and some in vivo functions do not depend on duplex unwinding. RNA helicases are divided into different families that share a common helicase core with a set of helicase signature motives. The core provides the active site for ATP hydrolysis, a binding site for non-sequence-specific interaction with RNA, and in many cases a basal unwinding activity. Its activity is often regulated by flanking domains, by interaction partners, or by self-association. In this review, we summarize the regulatory mechanisms that modulate the activities of the helicase core. Case studies on selected helicases with functions in translation, splicing, and RNA sensing illustrate the various modes and layers of regulation in time and space that harness the helicase core for a wide spectrum of cellular tasks.

Conjugates of Ciprofloxacin and Amphiphilic Block Copoly(2-alkyl-2-oxazolines)s Overcome Efflux Pumps and Are Active against CIP-Resistant Bacteria.

Conjugation of antibiotics with polymers is an emerging strategy to improve the performance of these important drugs. Here, the antibiotic ciprofloxacin (CIP) was conjugated with amphiphilic poly(2-oxazoline) (POx) block copolymers to investigate whether the activity of the antibiotic was enhanced due to additionally induced membrane activity. The resulting polymer-antibiotic conjugates (PACs) are an order of magnitude more active against the bacterial strain Staphylococcus aureus than CIP and show high activities against numerous pathogenic bacterial strains. Their high activity depends on an optimal hydrophobic/hydrophilic balance (HHB) of the POx tail. Mechanistic studies revealed that the derivatization of CIP required for the polymer conjugation lowers the affinity of the antibiotic to its target topoisomerase IV. However, the amphiphilic PACs are most likely concentrated within the bacterial cytoplasm, which overcompensates the loss of affinity and results in high antibacterial activity. In addition, the development of resistance in S. aureus and Escherichia coli is slowed down. More importantly, the amphiphilic PACs are active against CIP-resistant S. aureus and E. coli. The PACs with the highest activity are not cytotoxic toward human stem cells and do not lyse blood cells in saturated solution.

Allosteric modulation of the GTPase activity of a bacterial LRRK2 homolog by conformation-specific Nanobodies.

Mutations in the Parkinson's disease (PD)-associated protein leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) commonly lead to a reduction of GTPase activity and increase in kinase activity. Therefore, strategies for drug development have mainly been focusing on the design of LRRK2 kinase inhibitors. We recently showed that the central RocCOR domains (Roc: Ras of complex proteins; COR: C-terminal of Roc) of a bacterial LRRK2 homolog cycle between a dimeric and monomeric form concomitant with GTP binding and hydrolysis. PD-associated mutations can slow down GTP hydrolysis by stabilizing the protein in its dimeric form. Here, we report the identification of two Nanobodies (NbRoco1 and NbRoco2) that bind the bacterial Roco protein (CtRoco) in a conformation-specific way, with a preference for the GTP-bound state. NbRoco1 considerably increases the GTP turnover rate of CtRoco and reverts the decrease in GTPase activity caused by a PD-analogous mutation. We show that NbRoco1 exerts its effect by allosterically interfering with the CtRoco dimer-monomer cycle through the destabilization of the dimeric form. Hence, we provide the first proof of principle that allosteric modulation of the RocCOR dimer-monomer cycle can alter its GTPase activity, which might present a potential novel strategy to overcome the effect of LRRK2 PD mutations.

Single-stranded regions modulate conformational dynamics and ATPase activity of eIF4A to optimize 5'-UTR unwinding.

Eukaryotic translation initiation requires unwinding of secondary structures in the 5'-untranslated region of mRNA. The DEAD-box helicase eIF4A is thought to unwind structural elements in the 5'-UTR in conjunction with eIF4G and eIF4B. Both factors jointly stimulate eIF4A activities by modulation of eIF4A conformational cycling between open and closed states. Here we examine how RNA substrates modulate eIF4A activities. The RNAs fall into two classes: Short RNAs only partially stimulate the eIF4A ATPase activity, and closing is rate-limiting for the conformational cycle. By contrast, longer RNAs maximally stimulate ATP hydrolysis and promote closing of eIF4A. Strikingly, the rate constants of unwinding do not correlate with the length of a single-stranded region preceding a duplex, but reach a maximum for RNA with a single-stranded region of six nucleotides. We propose a model in which RNA substrates affect eIF4A activities by modulating the kinetic partitioning of eIF4A between futile, unproductive, and productive cycles.

Towards Conformation-Sensitive Inhibition of Gyrase: Implications of Mechanistic Insight for the Identification and Improvement of Inhibitors.

Gyrase is a bacterial type IIA topoisomerase that catalyzes negative supercoiling of DNA. The enzyme is essential in bacteria and is a validated drug target in the treatment of bacterial infections. Inhibition of gyrase activity is achieved by competitive inhibitors that interfere with ATP- or DNA-binding, or by gyrase poisons that stabilize cleavage complexes of gyrase covalently bound to the DNA, leading to double-strand breaks and cell death. Many of the current inhibitors suffer from severe side effects, while others rapidly lose their antibiotic activity due to resistance mutations, generating an unmet medical need for novel, improved gyrase inhibitors. DNA supercoiling by gyrase is associated with a series of nucleotide- and DNA-induced conformational changes, yet the full potential of interfering with these conformational changes as a strategy to identify novel, improved gyrase inhibitors has not been explored so far. This review highlights recent insights into the mechanism of DNA supercoiling by gyrase and illustrates the implications for the identification and development of conformation-sensitive and allosteric inhibitors.

Gyrase containing a single C-terminal domain catalyzes negative supercoiling of DNA by decreasing the linking number in steps of two.

The topological state of DNA in vivo is regulated by topoisomerases. Gyrase is a bacterial topoisomerase that introduces negative supercoils into DNA at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. According to the strand-passage mechanism, a double-strand of the DNA substrate is cleaved, and a second double-stranded segment is passed through the gap, converting a positive DNA node into a negative node. The correct orientation of these DNA segments for strand passage is achieved by wrapping of the DNA around gyrase, which involves the C-terminal domains (CTDs) of both GyrA subunits in the A2B2 heterotetramer. Gyrase lacking both CTDs cannot introduce negative supercoils into DNA. Here, we analyze the requirements for the two CTDs in individual steps in the supercoiling reaction. Gyrase that contains a single CTD binds, distorts, and cleaves DNA similarly to wildtype gyrase. It also shows wildtype-like DNA-dependent ATPase activity, and undergoes DNA-induced movement of the CTD as well as N-gate narrowing. Most importantly, the enzyme still introduces negative supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction, with a velocity similar to wildtype gyrase, and decreases the linking number of the DNA in steps of two. One CTD is thus sufficient to support DNA supercoiling.

Allosteric regulation of helicase core activities of the DEAD-box helicase YxiN by RNA binding to its RNA recognition motif.

DEAD-box proteins share a structurally similar core of two RecA-like domains (RecA_N and RecA_C) that contain the conserved motifs for ATP-dependent RNA unwinding. In many DEAD-box proteins the helicase core is flanked by ancillary domains. To understand the regulation of the DEAD-box helicase YxiN by its C-terminal RNA recognition motif (RRM), we investigated the effect of RNA binding to the RRM on its position relative to the core, and on core activities. RRM/RNA complex formation substantially shifts the RRM from a position close to the RecA_C to the proximity of RecA_N, independent of RNA contacts with the core. RNA binding to the RRM is communicated to the core, and stimulates ATP hydrolysis and RNA unwinding. The conformational space of the core depends on the identity of the RRM-bound RNA. Allosteric regulation of core activities by RNA-induced movement of ancillary domains may constitute a general regulatory mechanism of DEAD-box protein activity.

DNA gyrase with a single catalytic tyrosine can catalyze DNA supercoiling by a nicking-closing mechanism.

The topological state of DNA is important for replication, recombination and transcription, and is regulated in vivo by DNA topoisomerases. Gyrase introduces negative supercoils into DNA at the expense of ATP hydrolysis. It is the accepted view that gyrase achieves supercoiling by a strand passage mechanism, in which double-stranded DNA is cleaved, and a second double-stranded segment is passed through the gap, converting a positive DNA node into a negative node. We show here that gyrase with only one catalytic tyrosine that cleaves a single strand of its DNA substrate can catalyze DNA supercoiling without strand passage. We propose an alternative mechanism for DNA supercoiling via nicking and closing of DNA that involves trapping, segregation and relaxation of two positive supercoils. In contrast to DNA supercoiling, ATP-dependent relaxation and decatenation of DNA by gyrase lacking the C-terminal domains require both tyrosines and strand passage. Our results point towards mechanistic plasticity of gyrase and might pave the way for finding novel and specific mechanism-based gyrase inhibitors.

Why Two? On the Role of (A-)Symmetry in Negative Supercoiling of DNA by Gyrase.

Gyrase is a type IIA topoisomerase that catalyzes negative supercoiling of DNA. The enzyme consists of two GyrA and two GyrB subunits. It is believed to introduce negative supercoils into DNA by converting a positive DNA node into a negative node through strand passage: First, it cleaves both DNA strands of a double-stranded DNA, termed the G-segment, and then it passes a second segment of the same DNA molecule, termed the T-segment, through the gap created. As a two-fold symmetric enzyme, gyrase contains two copies of all elements that are key for the supercoiling reaction: The GyrB subunits provide two active sites for ATP binding and hydrolysis. The GyrA subunits contain two C-terminal domains (CTDs) for DNA binding and wrapping to stabilize the positive DNA node, and two catalytic tyrosines for DNA cleavage. While the presence of two catalytic tyrosines has been ascribed to the necessity of cleaving both strands of the G-segment to enable strand passage, the role of the two ATP hydrolysis events and of the two CTDs has been less clear. This review summarizes recent results on the role of these duplicate elements for individual steps of the supercoiling reaction, and discusses the implications for the mechanism of DNA supercoiling.

eIF4B stimulates eIF4A ATPase and unwinding activities by direct interaction through its 7-repeats region.

Eukaryotic translation initiation starts with binding of the eIF4F complex to the 5'-m7G cap of the mRNA. Recruitment of the 43S pre-initiation complex (PIC), formed by the 40S ribosomal subunit and other translation initiation factors, leads to formation of the 48S PIC that then scans the 5'-untranslated region (5'-UTR) toward the start codon. The eIF4F complex consists of eIF4E, the cap binding protein, eIF4A, a DEAD-box RNA helicase that is believed to unwind secondary structures in the 5'-UTR during scanning, and eIF4G, a scaffold protein that binds to both eIF4E and eIF4A. The ATPase and helicase activities of eIF4A are jointly stimulated by eIF4G and the translation initiation factor eIF4B. Yeast eIF4B mediates recruitment of the 43S PIC to the cap-bound eIF4F complex by interacting with the 40S subunit and possibly with eIF4A. However, a direct interaction between yeast eIF4A and eIF4B has not been demonstrated yet. Here we show that eIF4B binds to eIF4A in the presence of RNA and ADPNP, independent of the presence of eIF4G. A stretch of seven moderately conserved repeats, the r1-7 region, is responsible for complex formation, for modulation of the conformational energy landscape of eIF4A by eIF4B, and for stimulating the RNA-dependent ATPase- and ATP-dependent RNA unwinding activities of eIF4A. The isolated r1-7 region only slightly stimulates eIF4A conformational changes and activities, suggesting that communication of the repeats with other regions of eIF4B is required for full stimulation of eIF4A activity, for recruitment of the PIC to the mRNA and for translation initiation.

Protein cofactor competition regulates the action of a multifunctional RNA helicase in different pathways.

A rapidly increasing number of RNA helicases are implicated in several distinct cellular processes, however, the modes of regulation of multifunctional RNA helicases and their recruitment to different target complexes have remained unknown. Here, we show that the distribution of the multifunctional DEAH-box RNA helicase Prp43 between its diverse cellular functions can be regulated by the interplay of its G-patch protein cofactors. We identify the orphan G-patch protein Cmg1 (YLR271W) as a novel cofactor of Prp43 and show that it stimulates the RNA binding and ATPase activity of the helicase. Interestingly, Cmg1 localizes to the cytoplasm and to the intermembrane space of mitochondria and its overexpression promotes apoptosis. Furthermore, our data reveal that different G-patch protein cofactors compete for interaction with Prp43. Changes in the expression levels of Prp43-interacting G-patch proteins modulate the cellular localization of Prp43 and G-patch protein overexpression causes accumulation of the helicase in the cytoplasm or nucleoplasm. Overexpression of several G-patch proteins also leads to defects in ribosome biogenesis that are consistent with withdrawal of the helicase from this pathway. Together, these findings suggest that the availability of cofactors and the sequestering of the helicase are means to regulate the activity of multifunctional RNA helicases and their distribution between different cellular processes.

DEAD-box RNA helicase domains exhibit a continuum between complete functional independence and high thermodynamic coupling in nucleotide and RNA duplex recognition.

DEAD-box helicases catalyze the non-processive unwinding of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) at the expense of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) hydrolysis. Nucleotide and RNA binding and unwinding are mediated by the RecA domains of the helicase core, but their cooperation in these processes remains poorly understood. We therefore investigated dsRNA and nucleotide binding by the helicase cores and the isolated N- and C-terminal RecA domains (RecA_N, RecA_C) of the DEAD-box proteins Hera and YxiN by steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence methods. Both helicases bind nucleotides predominantly via RecA_N, in agreement with previous studies on Mss116, and with a universal, modular function of RecA_N in nucleotide recognition. In contrast, dsRNA recognition is different: Hera interacts with dsRNA in the absence of nucleotide, involving both RecA domains, whereas for YxiN neither RecA_N nor RecA_C binds dsRNA, and the complete core only interacts with dsRNA after nucleotide has been bound. DEAD-box proteins thus cover a continuum from complete functional independence of their domains, exemplified by Mss116, to various degrees of inter-domain cooperation in dsRNA binding. The different degrees of domain communication and of thermodynamic linkage between dsRNA and nucleotide binding have important implications on the mechanism of dsRNA unwinding, and may help direct RNA helicases to their respective cellular processes.

Reverse gyrase--recent advances and current mechanistic understanding of positive DNA supercoiling.

Reverse gyrases are topoisomerases that introduce positive supercoils into DNA in an ATP-dependent reaction. They consist of a helicase domain and a topoisomerase domain that closely cooperate in catalysis. The mechanism of the functional cooperation of these domains has remained elusive. Recent studies have shown that the helicase domain is a nucleotide-regulated conformational switch that alternates between an open conformation with a low affinity for double-stranded DNA, and a closed state with a high double-stranded DNA affinity. The conformational cycle leads to transient separation of DNA duplexes by the helicase domain. Reverse gyrase-specific insertions in the helicase module are involved in binding to single-stranded DNA regions, DNA unwinding and supercoiling. Biochemical and structural data suggest that DNA processing by reverse gyrase is not based on sequential action of the helicase and topoisomerase domains, but rather the result of an intricate cooperation of both domains at all stages of the reaction. This review summarizes the recent advances of our understanding of the reverse gyrase mechanism. We put forward and discuss a refined, yet simple model in which reverse gyrase directs strand passage toward increasing linking numbers and positive supercoiling by controlling the conformation of a bound DNA bubble.

eIF4B, eIF4G and RNA regulate eIF4A activity in translation initiation by modulating the eIF4A conformational cycle.

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF4A is a DEAD-box helicase that resolves secondary structure elements in the 5'-UTR of mRNAs during ribosome scanning. Its RNA-stimulated ATPase and ATP-dependent helicase activities are enhanced by other translation initiation factors, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. DEAD-box proteins alternate between open and closed conformations during RNA unwinding. The transition to the closed conformation is linked to duplex destabilization. eIF4A is a special DEAD-box protein that can adopt three different conformations, an open state in the absence of ligands, a half-open state stabilized by the translation initiation factor eIF4G and a closed state in the presence of eIF4G and eIF4B. We show here that eIF4A alone does not measurably sample the closed conformation. The translation initiation factors eIF4B and eIF4G accelerate the eIF4A conformational cycle. eIF4G increases the rate of closing more than the opening rate, and eIF4B selectively increases the closing rate. Strikingly, the rate constants and the effect of eIF4B are different for different RNAs, and are related to the presence of single-stranded regions. Modulating the kinetics of the eIF4A conformational cycle is thus central for the multi-layered regulation of its activity, and for its role as a regulatory hub in translation initiation.