Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in monitoring the efficacy of a bradykinin receptor 2 antagonist in painful knee osteoarthritis compared with MRI.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-US) as a monitoring tool to assess hypervascularisation of synovial processes in knee osteoarthritis (OA) treated with intra-articular injections of the bradykinin-receptor 2 antagonist icatibant compared to contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 41 patients with painful knee OA underwent US (12.5 MHz for B-mode and 3-8 MHz for CE-US), and 36 of the patients underwent additional MRI (0.2T) at baseline and after 3 injections of the study drug (after a mean of 22.2 days). A total of 15 patients received placebo (group A), 12 patients 500 microg icatibant (group B) and 14 patients 2000 microg icatibant (group C). Pain and the synovial process (B-mode, power Doppler US (PD-US), CE-US, CE-MRI) were assessed at both time points. RESULTS: At baseline, the placebo group showed more activity in terms of effusion in the superior and lateral recess in ultrasound as well as in PD-US in the lateral recess. Pain improved significantly in all subgroups. Effect sizes were 0.43 (pain at rest) and 0.52 (pain during activity) in group B vs 0.48 and 1.11 in group C. There was no change of US and MRI parameters. We found moderate to good correlation (r) and kappa values (kappa) for effusion in the superior recess (r = 0.591, k = 0.453), effusion in the lateral recess (r = 0.304, k = 0.440) and contrast enhancement (r = 0.601, k = 0.242) between US and MRI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that CE-US and CE-MRI have good agreement in assessing inflammatory changes in knee OA. For the 41 patients with OA, an analgesic effect of icatibant could clearly be shown, especially for pain during activity in the high dose icatibant group. However, we could not find an anti-inflammatory effect of icatibant by CE-US compared to CE-MRI.

Knee osteoarthritis. Efficacy of a new method of contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal ultrasonography in detection of synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a new method of digital synovial vascularisation quantification by using contrast-enhanced musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MUS) in detecting synovitis in patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared with healthy subjects and MRI. METHODS: Evaluation of 41 patients with painful knee OA and 6 healthy subjects. The severity of knee pain was evaluated. All patients and all 6 healthy subjects underwent contrast medium-enhanced (CE)-MUS with SonoVue, and 36 patients additionally underwent CEMRI with Magnevist. Joint effusion, synovial thickening and pain were assessed and compared with B-mode and Power Doppler sonography (PDS) as well as contrast medium enhancement. RESULTS: Pain evaluated by the visual analogue scale(VAS) hardly correlated with other markers of disease activity measured by ultrasound (US) in B-mode or MRI. US of the superior recess revealed an effusion or synovial thickening in 58%. PDS findings were positive in 63%, and CE-MUS in the superior knee recess was positive in 95%. MRI showed effusion in the superior recess in 61% and showed positive findings in 82% when using contrast medium. The kappa value was 0.48 between US and MRI with regard to the effusion in the superior recess, and 0.53 between PD signal in the superior recess and effusion in the superior recess by US. Using MRI as the reference standard, there was a sensitivity of 72% for assessing effusion in the superior recess and 81% for assessing effusion in the lateral recess. CONCLUSION: Assessment of disease activity (synovitis) in knee OA by VAS is not sufficient. US PDS was more sensitive than B-mode, and CE-MUS was more sensitive than PDS and CE-MRI in detecting synovitis in patients with painful knee OA. Also, CE-MRI was more sensitive in detecting inflammatory changes in the superior recess than without contrast medium. Using CE-MUS and performing time/intensity analysis has shown to be a good model for evaluation of an inflammatory process in the setting of knee OA in the superior recess.

[Residual particle free rough surfaces after rough blasting with steel grit in total hip arthroplasty]. / Restpartikelfreie raue Oberflächen nach Stahldrahtkornstrahlen in der Hüftendoprothetik.

INTRODUCTION: Several shot peening and grit blasting techniques are used to modify the surface in the production of hip endoprostheses. A number of publications in maxillo- facial- surgery and orthopedic surgery demonstrated significant contamination on alumina blasted surfaces. Latest research studies suspected an association between surface contamination and early failure of endoprostheses associated with third body wear. Additionally, the European standard EN 12010 requires surfaces free of residual particles. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of rough blasting using steel grit followed by a pH dependent cleaning procedures with regard to complying with EN 12010. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Ti6Al7Nb rods were rough blasted 1 time using steel grit ("Stahldrahtkorn", hardness: 56 HRC; R+K Draht GmbH, Leisnig). All blasting procedures were carried out with a special grit blasting device with direct pressure. One Ti6Al7Nb rod each was grit blasted with 3 and 4 bar pressure and 10 rods with 5 bar pressure. Surface roughness was measured by means of Mitutoyo- Surftest 301 three times before and after grit blasting. The mean value was calculated. A field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, LEO 1525) was used for the detection of residual particles on the surface of the rods with a backscattered electron detector. RESULTS: By rough blasting using steel grit a mean roughness of 54,9 microm and a maximum roughness of 61,4 microm could be achieved. The surface of all rods showed a considerable contamination with steel particles after grit blasting. After the a pH- dependent cleaning procedure a residual particle free surface was detected in all samples. DISCUSSION: The European standard EN 12010 can be fulfilled using rough blasting with steel grit followed by a pH dependent cleaning procedure.