Safety testing of infracyanine green using retinal pigment epithelium and glial cell cultures.

PURPOSE: To undertake safety testing of infracyanine green (IFCG) in a cell culture model. METHODS: Experiments were undertaken in a cell culture model used previously to perform safety testing of indocyanine green (ICG). Human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Müller cells were exposed to IFCG for 5 minutes, over a range of concentrations up to 0.5%. Experiments were repeated, using double-staining with trypan blue. Cell viability was measured at days 1, 5, and 15 using a mitochondrial dehydrogenase assay and a fluorescent live-dead probe containing calcein and ethidium homodimer-1. Viability was measured after exposure to 0.5% IFCG and 5 minutes of illumination with a vitrectomy endolight powered by a xenon light source. RESULTS: RPE viability was not reduced over the range of concentrations and follow-up intervals. RPE cells exposed to IFCG and illumination had reduced viability relative to the negative control (cells exposed to saline), but not relative to those exposed to saline and illumination. Glial cells showed reduced viability at days 1 and 5, but not day 15. Illumination did not further reduce viability. CONCLUSIONS: IFCG has been advocated as a safer macular vital stain than ICG. These results suggest that it is less likely to produce phototoxicity, but despite being nearly iso-osmolar, IFCG also produces damage in cultured glial cells.

Safety testing of indocyanine green and trypan blue using retinal pigment epithelium and glial cell cultures.

PURPOSE: Indocyanine green (ICG) and trypan blue have been advocated as vital stains for use during macular surgery. The safety of these agents was tested using a cell culture model. METHODS: Human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Müller cell lines were exposed to ICG over a range of concentrations up to 0.5%, and trypan blue up to 0.2%. Cells were exposed to each dye for 5, 15, or 30 minutes, rinsed, and incubated 24 hours. Cell viability was measured using a mitochondrial dehydrogenase-assay and fluorescent live-dead probe. Experiments were repeated using 0.5% and 1% ICG and 0.06% and 0.12% trypan blue, with follow-up at 0, 1, 5, and 15 days. ICG experiments were repeated in the presence of illumination from a xenon light-source channeled through a surgical endolight, and using reduced osmolarity solutions of 0.1%, 0.5%, and 1% (185 vs. 275 mOsM). RESULTS: There was no clear relationship between cell viability and the concentration of the agent or duration of follow-up, except in RPE cells exposed to 1% ICG. These showed a linear (R(2) 0.9952) decline in viability with time, with a significant reduction by day 15 (P = 0.016). RPE cells exposed to ICG and illumination were not significantly different from the negative control, but when illumination was combined with low osmolarity, viability was reduced (P = 0.0016). ICG and illumination reduced Müller cell viability (P < 0.0001 for both 185 and 275 mOsM). Müller cells incubated with 185 mOsM 1% ICG showed a significant reduction in viability (P < 0.0001) not seen with the 185 mOsM 0.5% or 0.1% solutions or in the low-osmolarity RPE groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of exposure to 0.5% ICG and the newer endoillumination light-sources can damage cultured Müller cells. Although the preparations of ICG most commonly used clinically did not produce significant damage, relatively small changes in ICG osmolarity and concentration did. This suggests that safety margins are not large. Trypan blue is safe in a cell culture model.

Tail-anchored and signal-anchored proteins utilize overlapping pathways during membrane insertion.

Tail-anchored proteins are a distinct class of membrane proteins that are characterized by a C-terminal membrane insertion sequence and a capacity for post-translational integration. Although it is now clear that tail-anchored proteins are inserted into the membrane at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), the molecular basis for their integration is poorly understood. We have used a cross-linking approach to identify ER components that may be involved in the membrane insertion of tail-anchored proteins. We find that several newly synthesized tail-anchored proteins are transiently associated with a defined subset of cellular components. Among these, we identify several ER proteins, including subunits of the Sec61 translocon, Sec62p, Sec63p, and the 25-kDa subunit of the signal peptidase complex. When we analyze the cotranslational membrane insertion of a comparable signal-anchored protein we find the nascent polypeptide associated with a similar set of ER components. We conclude that the pathways for the integration of tail-anchored and signal-anchored membrane proteins at the ER exhibit a substantial degree of overlap, and we propose that this reflects similarities between co- and post-translational membrane insertion.