The superior colliculus motor region does not respond to finger tapping movements in humans.

Electrophysiological studies in macaques and functional neuroimaging in humans revealed a motor region in the superior colliculus (SC) for upper limb reaching movements. Connectivity studies in macaques reported direct connections between this SC motor region and cortical premotor arm, hand, and finger regions. These findings motivated us to investigate if the human SC is also involved in sequential finger tapping movements. We analyzed fMRI task data of 130 subjects executing finger tapping from the Human Connectome Project. While we found strong signals in the SC for visual cues, we found no signals related to simple finger tapping. In subsequent experimental measurements, we searched for responses in the SC corresponding to complex above simple finger tapping sequences. We observed expected signal increases in cortical motor and premotor regions for complex compared to simple finger tapping, but no signal increases in the motor region of the SC. Despite evidence for direct anatomical connections of the SC motor region and cortical premotor hand and finger areas in macaques, our results suggest that the SC is not involved in simple or complex finger tapping in humans.

No robust online effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability.

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used for over twenty years to modulate cortical (particularly motor corticospinal) excitability both during (online) and outlasting (offline) the stimulation, with the former effects associated to the latter. However, tDCS effects are highly variable, partially because stimulation intensity is commonly not adjusted individually (in contrast to transcranial magnetic stimulation, TMS). In Experiment 1, we therefore explored an empirical approach of personalizing tDCS intensity for the primary motor cortex (M1) based on dose-response curves (DRCs), individually relating tDCS Intensity (in steps from 0.3 to 2.0 mA) and Polarity (anodal, cathodal) to the online modulation of concurrent TMS motor evoked potentials (MEP), assessing DRC reliability across two separate days. No robust DRCs could be observed, neither at the individual nor at the group level, with the only robust effect being a (paradoxical) MEP facilitation during cathodal tDCS at 2.0 mA, but no modulation at traditional intensities of or near 1 mA. In Experiment 2, we therefore attempted to replicate the classical bidirectional online MEP modulation during 1 mA tDCS that had been reported by several of the early seminal tDCS papers. We either closely recreated stimulation parameters and temporal protocol of these original studies (Experiment 2A) or slightly modernized them according to current standards (Experiment 2B). In neither experiment did we observed any significant online MEP modulation. We conclude that an empirical titration of individually effective tDCS intensities may not be feasible as online tDCS effects do not appear to be sufficiently robust.