RESUMEN
Glycogen storage disorders (GSDs) are inherited disorders of metabolism resulting from the deficiency of individual enzymes involved in the synthesis, transport, and degradation of glycogen. This literature review summarizes the development of gene therapy for the GSDs. The abnormal accumulation of glycogen and deficiency of glucose production in GSDs lead to unique symptoms based upon the enzyme step and tissues involved, such as liver and kidney involvement associated with severe hypoglycemia during fasting and the risk of long-term complications including hepatic adenoma/carcinoma and end stage kidney disease in GSD Ia from glucose-6-phosphatase deficiency, and cardiac/skeletal/smooth muscle involvement associated with myopathy +/- cardiomyopathy and the risk for cardiorespiratory failure in Pompe disease. These symptoms are present to a variable degree in animal models for the GSDs, which have been utilized to evaluate new therapies including gene therapy and genome editing. Gene therapy for Pompe disease and GSD Ia has progressed to Phase I and Phase III clinical trials, respectively, and are evaluating the safety and bioactivity of adeno-associated virus vectors. Clinical research to understand the natural history and progression of the GSDs provides invaluable outcome measures that serve as endpoints to evaluate benefits in clinical trials. While promising, gene therapy and genome editing face challenges with regard to clinical implementation, including immune responses and toxicities that have been revealed during clinical trials of gene therapy that are underway. Gene therapy for the glycogen storage diseases is under development, addressing an unmet need for specific, stable therapy for these conditions.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo II , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo I , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Animales , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo II/genética , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo II/terapia , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno/genética , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno/terapia , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno/metabolismo , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo I/genética , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo I/terapia , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo I/complicaciones , Hígado/metabolismo , Glucógeno/metabolismo , Terapia Genética/métodos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologíaRESUMEN
Glycogen storage disease type IV (GSD IV) is an ultra-rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by pathogenic variants in GBE1 which results in reduced or deficient glycogen branching enzyme activity. Consequently, glycogen synthesis is impaired and leads to accumulation of poorly branched glycogen known as polyglucosan. GSD IV is characterized by a remarkable degree of phenotypic heterogeneity with presentations in utero, during infancy, early childhood, adolescence, or middle to late adulthood. The clinical continuum encompasses hepatic, cardiac, muscular, and neurologic manifestations that range in severity. The adult-onset form of GSD IV, referred to as adult polyglucosan body disease (APBD), is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by neurogenic bladder, spastic paraparesis, and peripheral neuropathy. There are currently no consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of these patients, resulting in high rates of misdiagnosis, delayed diagnosis, and lack of standardized clinical care. To address this, a group of experts from the United States developed a set of recommendations for the diagnosis and management of all clinical phenotypes of GSD IV, including APBD, to support clinicians and caregivers who provide long-term care for individuals with GSD IV. The educational resource includes practical steps to confirm a GSD IV diagnosis and best practices for medical management, including (a) imaging of the liver, heart, skeletal muscle, brain, and spine, (b) functional and neuromusculoskeletal assessments, (c) laboratory investigations, (d) liver and heart transplantation, and (e) long-term follow-up care. Remaining knowledge gaps are detailed to emphasize areas for improvement and future research.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo IV , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno , Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas , Preescolar , Humanos , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo IV/diagnóstico , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo IV/genética , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo IV/terapia , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno/diagnóstico , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno/genética , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno/terapia , GlucógenoRESUMEN
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver condition in the United States, encompassing a wide spectrum of liver pathologies including steatosis, steatohepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis. Despite its high prevalence, there are no medications currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of NAFLD. Recent work has suggested that NAFLD has a strong genetic component and identifying causative genes will improve our understanding of the molecular mechanisms contributing to NAFLD and yield targets for future therapeutic investigations. Oxidative stress is known to play an important role in NAFLD pathogenesis, yet the underlying mechanisms accounting for disturbances in redox status are not entirely understood. To better understand the relationship between the glutathione redox system and signs of NAFLD in a genetically-diverse population, we measured liver weight, serum biomarkers aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and graded liver pathology in a large cohort of Diversity Outbred mice. We compared hepatic endpoints to those of the glutathione redox system previously measured in the livers and kidneys of the same mice, and we screened for statistical and genetic associations using the R/qtl2 software. We discovered several novel genetic loci associated with markers of liver health, including loci that were associated with both liver steatosis and glutathione redox status. Candidate genes within each locus point to possible new mechanisms underlying the complex relationship between NAFLD and the glutathione redox system, which could have translational implications for future studies targeting NAFLD pathology.
RESUMEN
BackgroundGlycogen storage disease type IV (GSD IV) is an ultrarare autosomal recessive disorder that causes deficiency of functional glycogen branching enzyme and formation of abnormally structured glycogen termed polyglucosan. GSD IV has traditionally been categorized based on primary hepatic or neuromuscular involvement, with hepatic GSD IV subclassified as discrete subtypes: classic (progressive) and nonprogressive.MethodsTo better understand the progression of liver disease in GSD IV, we present clinical and histopathology data from 23 patients from around the world and characterized the liver involvement in the Gbe1ys/ys knockin mouse model.ResultsWe propose an alternative to the established subtype-based terminology for characterizing liver disease in GSD IV and recognize 3 tiers of disease severity: (i) "severe progressive" liver disease, (ii) "intermediate progressive" liver disease, and (iii) "attenuated" liver disease. Analysis of liver pathology revealed that risk for liver failure cannot be predicted from liver biopsy findings alone in individuals affected by GSD IV. Moreover, analysis of postmortem liver pathology from an individual who died over 40 years after being diagnosed with nonprogressive hepatic GSD IV in childhood verified that liver fibrosis did not regress. Last, characterization of the liver involvement in a mouse model known to recapitulate the adult-onset neurodegenerative form of GSD IV (Gbe1ys/ys mouse model) demonstrated hepatic disease.ConclusionOur findings challenge the established subtype-based view of GSD IV and suggest that liver disease severity among patients with GSD IV represents a disease continuum.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02683512FundingNone.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo IV , Hígado , Adolescente , Adulto , Animales , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Ratones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Sistema de la Enzima Desramificadora del Glucógeno/genética , Sistema de la Enzima Desramificadora del Glucógeno/metabolismo , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo IV/genética , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo IV/patología , Enfermedad del Almacenamiento de Glucógeno Tipo IV/metabolismo , Hígado/patología , Hígado/metabolismo , Hepatopatías/patología , Hepatopatías/metabolismoRESUMEN
Glycogen storage disease Ia (GSD Ia), also known as von Gierke disease, is caused by pathogenic variants in the G6PC1 gene (OMIM 232200) which encodes glucose-6-phosphatase. Deficiency of glucose-6-phosphatase impairs the processes of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis by preventing conversion of glucose-6-phosphate to glucose. Clinical features include fasting hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperuricemia, hepatomegaly, and development of hepatocellular adenomas (HCAs) with potential for malignant transformation. Additionally, patients with GSD Ia often exhibit short stature, in some instances due to growth hormone (GH) deficiency. Patients with short stature caused by GH deficiency typically receive GH injections. Here, we review the literature and describe a female with GSD Ia who had short stature, failure of growth progression, and suspected GH deficiency. This patient received GH injections from ages 11 to 14 years under careful monitoring of an endocrinologist and developed HCAs during that time. To date, there is no reported long-term follow up data on patients with GSD Ia who have received GH therapy, and therefore the clinical outcomes post-GH therapy are unclear.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Adult polyglucosan body disease (APBD) has long been regarded as the adult-onset form of glycogen storage disease type IV (GSD IV) and is caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in GBE1. Advances in the understanding of the natural history of APBD published in recent years have led to the use of discrete descriptors ("typical" versus "atypical") based on adherence to traditional symptomatology and homozygosity for the p.Y329S variant. Although these general descriptors are helpful in summarizing common findings and symptoms in APBD, they are inherently limited and may affect disease recognition in diverse populations. Methods: This case series includes three American patients (cases 1-3) and four Brazilian patients (cases 4-7) diagnosed with APBD. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were employed to evaluate pain, fatigue, and quality of life in cases 1-3. Results: We describe the clinical course and diagnostic odyssey of seven cases of APBD that challenge the utility and efficacy of discrete descriptors. Cases 1-3 are compound heterozygotes that harbor the previously identified deep intronic variant in GBE1 and presented with "typical" APBD phenotypically, despite lacking two copies of the pathogenic p.Y329S variant. Patient-reported outcome measures in these three cases revealed the moderate levels of pain and fatigue as well as an impacted quality of life. Cases 4-7 have unique genotypic profiles and emphasize the growing recognition of presentations of APBD in diverse populations with broad neurological manifestations. Conclusion: Collectively, these cases underscore the understanding of APBD as a spectrum disorder existing on the GSD IV phenotypic continuum. We draw attention to the pitfalls of commonly used genetic testing methods when diagnosing APBD and highlight the utility of patient-reported outcome questionnaires in managing this disease.
RESUMEN
Purpose: Glycogen storage disease type IV (GSD IV) has historically been divided into discrete hepatic (classic hepatic, non-progressive hepatic) and neuromuscular (perinatal-congenital neuromuscular, juvenile neuromuscular) subtypes. However, the extent to which this subtype-based classification system accurately captures the landscape of phenotypic variation among GSD IV patients has not been systematically assessed. Methods: This study synthesized clinical data from all eligible cases of GSD IV in the published literature to evaluate whether this disorder is better conceptualized as discrete subtypes or a clinical continuum. A novel phenotypic scoring approach was applied to characterize the extent of hepatic, neuromuscular, and cardiac involvement in each eligible patient. Results: 146 patients met all inclusion criteria. The majority (61%) of those with sufficient data to be scored exhibited phenotypes that were not fully consistent with any of the established subtypes. These included patients who exhibited combined hepatic-neuromuscular involvement; patients whose phenotypes were intermediate between the established hepatic or neuromuscular subtypes; and patients who presented with predominantly cardiac disease. Conclusion: The application of this novel phenotypic scoring approach showed that-in contrast to the traditional subtype-based view-GSD IV may be better conceptualized as a multidimensional clinical continuum, whereby hepatic, neuromuscular, and cardiac involvement occur to varying degrees in different patients.