RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) represents a new classification system for fatty liver disease. In this study, we investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with MAFLD-hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in comparison with those with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and considered the validity and challenges of the new criteria. METHODS: This study included 237 untreated non-B, non-C HCC patients with hepatic steatosis. We examined the profile and laboratory findings of patients with MAFLD-HCC and NAFLD-HCC. We also classified MAFLD-HCC patients according to the factors on which the diagnosis was based and compared their clinical characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 222 (94%) and 101 (43%) patients were diagnosed with MAFLD and NAFLD, respectively. MAFLD-HCC patients were more likely to be male than NAFLD-HCC, but there were no significant differences in metabolic indices, noninvasive liver fibrosis score or HCC status. In a study of MAFLD-HCC patients by diagnostic factor, those with overweight only were younger and had advanced liver fibrosis histologically, and when limited to patients younger than 70 years, the majority were overweight. Redefinition of overweight as BMI ≥ 25 reduced the number of MAFLD-HCC patients by only 5, from 222 to 217. CONCLUSIONS: MAFLD accounted for the majority of non-B, non-C HCC cases with hepatic steatosis. Examination of additional cases and revision of the detailed criteria is needed so that it can be used to efficiently select patients with fatty liver who are at high risk of developing HCC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirrosis HepáticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and macrovascular invasion (MVI) who receive systemic chemotherapy have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to determine if one-shot cisplatin (CDDP) chemotherapy via hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) combined with radiation therapy (RT) prior to systemic chemotherapy could improve the outcomes of these patients. METHODS: This study consisted of 32 HCC patients with the following eligibility criteria: (i) portal vein invasion 3/4 and/or hepatic vein invasion 2/3; (ii) received one-shot CDDP via HAI; (iii) received RT for MVI, (iv) a Child-Pugh score ≤ 7; and (v) an Eastern Clinical Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0 or 1. To determine the therapeutic effect, we collected information on patient characteristics and took contrast-enhanced computed tomography at the start of the therapy and every 2 to 4 months after the start of therapy. We evaluated the overall response of the tumor and tumor thrombosis according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. We assessed patient data using the Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests and evaluated overall survival and progression-free survival using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The overall response rate at the first evaluation performed a median of 1.4 weeks after HAI was 16% for the main intrahepatic tumor and 59% for the MVI. The best responses were the same as those of the first-time responses. The duration of median survival was 8.6 months, and progression-free survival of the main intrahepatic tumor was 3.2 months. Predictive factors for overall survival were the relative tumor volume in the liver and the first therapeutic response of MVI. There were no severe adverse events or radiation-induced hepatic complications. CONCLUSIONS: One-shot CDDP via HAI and RT were well tolerated and showed immediate and favorable control of MVI. Thus, this combination shows potential as a bridging therapy to systemic chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study compared clinical outcomes of 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 48 patients were treated with regorafenib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty-five and 13 patients were initiated on 2nd- and 3rd-line therapy, respectively. We assessed the responses to and safety of the therapy. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in clinical characteristics at the start of 2nd- or 3rd-line regorafenib therapy. The overall response rate of 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib was 20 and 8%, respectively. The disease control rate was 57 and 54%, respectively. Median overall survival (mOS) from the start of 2nd-line regorafenib was 17.5 months. mOS from the start of 3rd-line regorafenib was not obtained. Median progression-free survival of 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib was 4.9 and 2.3 months, respectively. mOS from 1st-line therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus sorafenib-regorafenib-lenvatinib was 29.5 months; that with lenvatinib-sorafenib-regorafenib was not obtained. Patients on 3rd-line therapy tended to have better Child-Pugh scores and tumor factors at the start of 1st-line therapy than other patients. CONCLUSION: Patients on 2nd- and 3rd-line regorafenib showed favorable responses. Good Child-Pugh scores and tumor factors may be associated with a better response rate and OS.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of this study was to identify the factors that contribute to the maintenance of relative dose intensity (RDI) of lenvatinib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib were enrolled. We evaluated the relationship between maintenance of RDI and various clinical data, parameters obtained by body composition measurements with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and grip strength at the start of lenvatinib treatment. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that only the extracellular water to total body water ratio (ECW/TBW) ≤ 0.400 at initiation of treatment was associated with RDI ≥ 50% (odds ratio, 6.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-48.00; P = 0.049). When the RDI was compared between ECW/TBW ≤ 0.400 group and ECW/TBW > 0.400 group, the RDI was significantly higher in the ECW/TBW ≤ 0.400 group at each of 0-4W, 4-6W, and 6-8W points. The P value at each point was 0.003, 0.003, and 0.005, respectively. On the other hand, multivariate analysis showed that only the ECW/TBW ≤ 0.400 at initiation of treatment was associated with the extension of duration until reduction or withdrawal of lenvatinib (hazard ratio, 4.86; 95% CI, 1.52-15.50; P = 0.007). CONCLUSION: The extracellular water to total body water ratio, a parameter of body composition measurement by BIA, was significantly associated with the maintenance of RDI and the duration until reduction or withdrawal of lenvatinib in HCC patients. In addition to standard predictors such as Child-Pugh score and modified albumin-bilirubin grade that have been used to date, ECW/TBW might be a new predictor of RDI in HCC patients treated with lenvatinib.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Agua Corporal/metabolismo , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Impedancia Eléctrica , Espacio Extracelular/metabolismo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Composición Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although a strong antitumor effect of lenvatinib (LEN) has been noted for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there are still no reports on the prognosis for patients with disease progression after first-line LEN therapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 141) with unresectable HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver function, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) of 0 or 1 who were treated with LEN from March 2018 to December 2019 were enrolled. RESULTS: One hundred and five patients were treated with LEN as first-line therapy, 53 of whom had progressive disease (PD) at the radiological evaluation. Among the 53 patients with PD, there were 27 candidates for second-line therapy, who had Child-Pugh class A liver function and an ECOG-PS of 0 or 1 at progression. After progression on first-line LEN, 28 patients were treated with a molecular targeted agent (MTA) as second-line therapy (sorafenib: n = 26; ramucirumab: n = 2). Multivariate analysis identified modified albumin-bilirubin grade 1 or 2a at LEN initiation (odds ratio 5.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.465-18.31, p = 0.011) as a significant and independent factor for candidates. The median post-progression survival after PD on first-line LEN was 8.3 months. Cox hazard multivariate analysis showed that a low alpha-fetoprotein level (<400 ng/mL; hazard ratio [HR] 0.297, 95% CI 0.099-0.886, p = 0.003), a relative tumor volume <50% at the time of progression (HR 0.204, 95% CI 0.07-0.592, p = 0.03), and switching to MTAs as second-line treatment after LEN (HR 0.299, 95% CI 0.12-0.746, p = 0.01) were significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Among patients with PD on first-line LEN, good liver function at introduction of LEN was an important and favorable factor related to eligibility for second-line therapy. In addition, post-progression treatment with MTAs could improve the prognosis for patients who had been treated with first-line LEN.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Tasa de Supervivencia , RamucirumabRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The most important prognostic factor for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is liver fibrosis. The aim of this study is to examine clinical parameters involved in pathological progression in NASH patients who underwent repeated liver biopsy and to analyze the response to treatment with respect to NASH-related single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We performed longitudinal analysis of genetic and clinical factors associated with progression of NASH. METHODS: Eighty NASH patients who had undergone serial liver biopsies were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Histological exacerbation was determined based on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS) and liver fibrosis. RESULTS: About 22.5% had progression of fibrosis, 22.5% had improvement of fibrosis, and 55.0% had no change. NAS increased in 12.5%, decreased in 61.3%, and remained stable in the remaining 26.3%. We examined factors associated with histological progression versus non-progression. Poor response of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, increase in HbA1c levels, and presence of the tumor necrosis factor risk allele in the rs1799964 SNP were identified as independent risk factors contributing to histological progression in NASH patients. In addition, we found that the histological progression rate varies with ALT response, HbA1c levels, and rs1799964 genotype. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we clarified the serum ALT level and the clinical significance of HbA1c to evaluate the progression of fibrosis in Japanese NASH patients. Furthermore, the tumor necrosis factor SNP was more likely to be involved in the response than PNPLA3 SNP. By simultaneously evaluating three factors, it is possible to estimate the risk of histological progression more accurately.
Asunto(s)
Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Biopsia , Hígado/patología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/genética , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/genética , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alelos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Fibrosis , Hemoglobina Glucada , Humanos , Lipasa/genética , Masculino , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/sangre , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido Simple , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
AIM: This study investigated early tumor marker response and treatment response in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with lenvatinib. METHODS: Twenty patients with advanced HCC who received lenvatinib were enrolled in this retrospective study. α-Fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin (DCP) levels were measured before treatment as well as 2 and 4 weeks after treatment. The objective response rate was evaluated by mRECIST at 6 weeks. RESULTS: The response rate was 30% (complete response/partial response/stable disease/progressive disease: n = 0/6/6/8 cases) by mRECIST. At 4 weeks, the AFP levels of 12 patients (80%) were lower than at baseline. The AFP levels of 9 patients (60%) continued decreasing from 2 weeks to 4 weeks (sustained-reduction group). In this group, the response rate was 67%. The median AFP change rate was -39% at 4 weeks. In imaging responders, the AFP change rate significantly decreased (p = 0.02). The DCP change rate had no significant correlation with imaging response. The AFP-sustained-reduction group had significantly higher adherence to lenvatinib than the non-sustained-reduction group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: With lenvatinib therapy for HCC, the AFP levels of most patients had declined at 2 weeks, and at 4 weeks the AFP-sustained-reduction group demonstrated a higher objective response.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Precursores de Proteínas/metabolismo , Protrombina/metabolismo , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , alfa-Fetoproteínas/metabolismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/metabolismo , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcome of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy (HAIC + RT) versus sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and major portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT). METHODS: This retrospective study included 108 HCC patients with PVTT of the main trunk or first branch and Child-Pugh ≤7. Sixty-eight received HAIC + RT and 40 received sorafenib. Patients were then assigned to the HAIC + RT group (n = 36) and the sorafenib group (n = 36) through case-control matching. The decision to treat with HAIC + RT or sorafenib was left to the attending physician. RESULTS: The median overall, progression-free, and postprogression survival were significantly longer in the HAIC + RT group than in the sorafenib group (9.9 vs. 5.3, p = 0.002; 3.9 vs. 2.1, p = 0.048; and 3.7 vs. 1.9 months, p = 0.02, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified HAIC + RT (hazard ratio = 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.57; p = 0.01) as a significant and independent determinant of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced HCC and major PVTT, survival was significantly longer in those treated with HAIC + RT than with sorafenib.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Vena Porta/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Interferones/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes , Niacinamida/efectos adversos , Niacinamida/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Conformacional/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sorafenib , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
AIM: As second-line therapy, regorafenib has been shown to provide a survival benefit for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progress on sorafenib. In this retrospective study, we assessed the clinical outcomes of sorafenib treatment failure with regard to second-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 160) with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh A liver function and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0-1 treated with sorafenib between June 2009 and September 2016 were enrolled. Among 147 patients with progressive disease (PD), we defined those with Child-Pugh A liver function and ECOG PS 0-1 at progression as candidates for second-line chemotherapy and those who had tolerated sorafenib (≥400 mg/day for ≥20 of the last 28 days of treatment) as candidates eligible for regorafenib treatment. RESULTS: Among all 160 patients, median overall survival was 10 months, and median progression-free survival was 3.5 months. Among the 147 patients with PD, 74 (50.3%) were candidates for second-line chemotherapy, and 45 (30.6%) were eligible for regorafenib treatment. The median post progression survival of the candidates for second-line chemotherapy (8.8 months) was statistically longer (P = 0.0002) than that of the non-candidates (3.6 months). Predictive factors for candidates were absence of macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) (odds ratio [OR], 0.39; P = 0.009) and serum albumin >3.5 g/dL (OR, 3.3; P = 0.005) at sorafenib initiation. CONCLUSION: Among patients with PD on sorafenib, approximately 30% were eligible for regorafenib treatment, whereas few patients with MVI or hypoalbuminemia at sorafenib initiation were eligible for regorafenib treatment.
RESUMEN
AIM: The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based continuous infusion chemotherapy and low-dose cisplatin (CDDP) monotherapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Patients were grouped according to HAIC regimen (5-FU group, n = 317/CDDP group, n = 66). A two-to-one match was created using propensity score analysis (5-FU group, n = 102/CDDP group, n = 51). After matching, response rate (RR) and adverse events as primary end-points, and survival and progression-free survival as secondary end-points, were analyzed. RESULTS: In the analysis of primary end-points, the RR in the 5-FU group was significantly higher than in the CDDP group (32.4% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.033). In patients with a Child-Pugh (CP) score of 5-7, the RR in the 5-FU group was significantly higher than that in the CDDP group (36.1% vs. 15.4%, P = 0.020). In those with a CP score of 8-9, there was no significant difference in RR between the two groups (15.8% vs. 16.6%, P = 1.000). The reservoir system-related complications were 9.8% in the 5-FU group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between the two matched groups (P > 0.05). In terms of secondary end-points, the median survival time was 9.1 and 8.7 months for the 5-FU and CDDP groups, respectively (P = 0.4917). Progression-free survival was 3.9 months for the 5-FU group and 4.9 months for the CDDP group (P = 0.4). CONCLUSIONS: 5-Fluorouracil-based continuous infusion chemotherapy could be suitable for advanced HCC patients with a CP score of 5-7 considering the treatment response.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Sorafenib is the standard treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with distant metastasis, unresectable HCC, and HCC refractory to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI). Also, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been used for advanced HCC in Southeast and East Asian countries. However, clearer information is needed for choosing appropriately between these therapies. METHODS: The subjects were 391 HAIC and 431 sorafenibs administered at our hospital and related hospitals. In this case, cases that satisfy the following three conditions were targeted: (i) no extrahepatic metastasis, (ii) Child-Pugh A, and (ii) not having received treatment of both HAIC and sorafenib during the course. As a result, 150 cases of HAIC and 134 cases of sorafenib were analyzed this time. RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the HAIC and sorafenib groups. TACE refractory status and MVI were factors contributing to overall survival (OS). Therefore, this study divided all cases according to those variables. The median survival time of MVI-positive and non-TACE refractory cases was significantly better with HAIC (13 months) versus sorafenib (6 months). However, in MVI-negative and TACE refractory cases, the median survival time of HAIC (8 months) was significantly poorer than for sorafenib (20 months). CONCLUSION: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractory status with HAIC and MVI with sorafenib were factors for poor prognosis. In particular, HAIC was significantly better than sorafenib as primary treatment in MVI and non-TACE refractory cases. It is necessary to consider these factors in treatment selection.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Arteria Hepática , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Microvasos/patología , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/irrigación sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Niacinamida/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
To our knowledge, there have been no reports of first-line lenvatinib (LEN) and LEN re-challenge following atezolizumab/bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) failure in the same patient. We herein report a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who failed either 1st line LEN and 2nd line Atezo-Bev, and successfully achieved complete response to LEN rechallenge with sequencial transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE). This patient had a poor response to TACE before immunotherapy and introduction of molecular-targeted drugs but showed a good response to selective TACE after LEN rechallenge. Our findings suggest the need to reconsider the use of molecular-targeted drugs and TACE with advances in immunotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Introduction: Proteinuria is one of the adverse events of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab combination therapy (Atezo + Bev) and can cause interruption in the use of Bev. However, the risk factors for proteinuria in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are receiving Atezo + Bev have not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to identify the risk factors for early onset of proteinuria in Atezo + Bev for patients with unresectable HCC. Methods: Sixty-four patients with Child-Pugh scores of 5-7, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and low level of proteinuria (1+ or less on a dipstick test and urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) less than 2.0 g/g Cr) at the initiation of therapy were analyzed. The level of proteinuria was evaluated based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. We adopted the UPCR for the quantitative test instead of a 24-h urine collection. The incidence of proteinuria and changes in liver function were retrospectively investigated. Results: The cumulative incidence of proteinuria over a 24-week period was 34.4%. Multivariate analysis showed that a low estimated glomerular filtration rate (hazard ratio [HR], 3.807; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.579-9.180; p = 0.003), treatment for hypertension (HR, 6.224; 95% CI, 1.614-24.010; p = 0.008), and high systolic blood pressure (SBP) (HR, 2.649; 95% CI, 1.133-6.194; p = 0.025) were risk factors for proteinuria. Serum albumin levels and albumin-bilirubin scores in patients with proteinuria worsened. In addition, a mean SBP ≥135 mm Hg during treatment was the only risk factor for the development of severe proteinuria (UPCR >2 g/g Cr). Conclusion: Our study found that controlling blood pressure is extremely important for the management of proteinuria in patients with HCC who are receiving Atezo + Bev.
RESUMEN
Benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis (BRIC) is a group of genetically heterogeneous autosomal recessive liver disorders characterized by recurrent episodes of jaundice and pruritus. BRIC is divided into two groups, BRIC type 1 (BRIC1) and BRIC type 2 (BRIC2), caused by mutations in the ATP8B1 and ABCB11 genes. We show that novel nonsense mutations in ATP8B1 (c.2989G>A, c.1547T>A) are the cause of BRIC1. A 16-year-old girl presented with severe jaundice. Acute and chronic liver diseases with infectious (hepatitis virus), metabolic, and autoimmune etiologies were excluded. Imaging revealed normal intra- and extra-hepatic bile ducts. Liver biopsy revealed severe intrahepatic bile stasis with bile plugs. She had similar symptoms at the age of 0 years. The BRIC criteria were satisfied, and ATP8B1 and ABCB11 gene analyses performed. Surprisingly, novel nonsense variants of the ATP8B1 gene (c.2989G>A and c.1547T>A) in heterozygosis were found, which were identified in each of her parents. Therefore, the compound heterozygote was thought to cause BRIC1 in these patients. Genetic mutations that differ from those already known may help diagnose patients with BRIC.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between body composition before lenvatinib treatment and prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We also assessed the relationship between the rate of change in body composition after lenvatinib treatment and prognosis. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with advanced HCC who were treated with lenvatinib were enrolled. We assessed prognosis, various clinical data, body composition parameters obtained by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and handgrip strength. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis showed that an extracellular water to total body water ratio (ECW/TBW) ≤ 0.400 at treatment initiation was associated with longer overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and post-progression survival (PPS) (OS: hazard ratio [H0R], 4.72; 95% CI, 12.03-11.00; P < 0.001; PFS: HR, 2.66; 95% CI, 1.33-5.34; P = 0.0057; PPS: HR, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.32-7.18; P = 0.0093). Multivariate analysis also showed that the skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) of the arm at treatment initiation was associated with a longer PFS (HR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.23-3.64; P = 0.0069). In the group with an ECW/TBW ≤ 0.400 before lenvatinib treatment, univariate analysis showed that the rate of change in only the arm SMI was associated with a longer OS and PFS. CONCLUSION: Body composition assessment by BIA before and after lenvatinib treatment is useful in predicting prognosis in lenvatinib-treated patients with HCC.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Composición Corporal , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Impedancia Eléctrica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary cancer of the liver. It is highly malignant and its prognosis is very poor. Although there have been various reports on the effects of calcium channel blockers on cancer, the effects of calcium channel blockers on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma have not been reported so far. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma by hepatectomy between January 2002 and May 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. We compared prognosis and time to recurrence between patients treated with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) (n = 29) and those not treated with CCBs (n = 50). Propensity score matching reduced confounding biases and yielded 25 matched patient pairs. Survival between groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier analyses, logrank tests, and Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS: Overall survival and recurrence-free survival of the CCBs group were significantly longer than those of the non-CCBs group OS in the original cohort and matched cohort (98 months vs 45 months, p = 0.010; 96 months vs 22 months, p = 0.020, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that CCBs treatment was independently associated with overall survival (HR, 0.37; 95% CI 0.16-0.85; p = 0.019) and recurrence-free survival (HR, 0.39; 95% CI 0.17-0.90; p = 0.020) in the original cohort and matched cohort, respectively. CONCLUSION: CCBs treatment might improve prognosis of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/cirugía , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/patología , Conductos Biliares Intrahepáticos/cirugía , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Colangiocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Colangiocarcinoma/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The association between radiological response and overall survival (OS) was retrospectively evaluated in patients treated with lenvatinib as a first-line systemic treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. A total of 182 patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of zero or one were enrolled. Radiological evaluation was performed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Initial radiological evaluation confirmed significant stratification of OS by efficacy judgment with both RECIST and mRECIST, and that initial radiological response was an independent prognostic factor for OS on multivariate analysis. Furthermore, in patients with stable disease (SD) at initial evaluation, macrovascular invasion at the initial evaluation on RECIST and modified albumin-bilirubin grade at initial evaluation on mRECIST were independent predictors of OS on multivariate analysis. In conclusion, if objective response is obtained at the initial evaluation, continuation of treatment appears desirable because prolonged OS can be expected; but, if SD is obtained at the initial evaluation, one should determine whether to continue or switch to the next treatment, with careful consideration of factors related to the tumor and hepatic reserve at the initial evaluation.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There has been a recent surge in interest in predicting biological effects associated with genomic alterations in order to implement personalized cancer treatment strategies. However, no reports have yet evaluated the utility of profiling blood-based circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with lenvatinib (LEN). METHOD: We retrospectively performed ctDNA next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis in 24 patients with advanced HCC at baseline and 4 weeks after initiation of LEN. Association of the changes in variant allele frequencies (VAFs) during treatment and clinical outcome were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 131 single nucleotide variants, 17 indels, and 23 copy number variations were detected as somatic alterations in 28, 6, and 12 genes, respectively in 23 of 24 patients. The most frequently altered genes were TP53 (54%), CTNNB1 (42%), TERT (42%), ATM (25%), and ARID1A (13%). The reduction in the mean frequency of variants (VAFmean) following 4 weeks of LEN treatment was associated with longer progression-free survival. The specificity and sensitivity of the reduction of VAFmean for predicting partial response were 0.67 and 1.0, respectively, which were higher than those of serum α-fetoprotein level (0.10 and 0.93, respectively). No association between the mutation status at baseline and the effectiveness of LEN was observed. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that somatic alterations could be detected in the majority of advanced HCC patients by ctDNA profiling and that ctDNA-kinetics during LEN treatment was a useful marker of disease progression. These results suggest that ctDNA profiling is a promising method that provides valuable information in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , ADN Tumoral Circulante/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Mutación , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/genética , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Femenino , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to investigate the early tumor response and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world practice. Forty patients with Child-Pugh class A liver function and eastern cooperative oncology group performance status 0 or 1 were enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) at six weeks after the start of treatment, changes in α-fetoprotein (AFP) and des-γ-carboxyprothrombin, incidence of adverse events (AEs), and changes in albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score and serum ammonia level, were evaluated. Among 40 patients, 24 had histories of prior molecular targeted agents (MTAs). The ORR was 22.5% based on mRECIST. Multivariate analysis showed that an AFP ratio <1.0 at three weeks (odds ratio 39.2, 95% confidence interval CI 2.37-649.0, p = 0.0103) was the only significant factor for predicting early response. There was no significant difference in the frequency of AEs between patients receiving first-line treatments and others. Fatigue, proteinuria, and ascites were more frequent in patients who experienced prior treatment. No decrease in ALBI score or increase in serum ammonia level was observed. Our study demonstrated that AFP may be useful in assessing early response and that this treatment is safe, including in patients with prior MTA treatments.
RESUMEN
RATIONALE: Various treatments are available for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The immune checkpoint inhibitor combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab was recently approved for the treatment of unresectable HCC, but there are few reports on the failure of the combination treatment. Here, we present a case of unresectable HCC with adrenal metastasis that was eventually operated on after lenvatinib (LEN) treatment that followed failed treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 68-year-old man was diagnosed with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-based HCC with adrenal metastasis. DIAGNOSIS: Cirrhosis was classified as Child-Pugh score of 5. HCC was diagnosed as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C. INTERVENTIONS: We initiated treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Liver dysfunction appeared 2âdays after the first administration but was improved by intravenous rehydration and did not appear after the second course. The HCC shrank, but the adrenal metastasis grew bigger after the fourth course, so we changed the therapy to LEN. After HCC and adrenal metastasis were necrotic by LEN, conversion surgery was performed. OUTCOMES: After successful conversion therapy, the general condition of the patient was good, and has been carefully followed for 4âmonths to date without any evidence of further recurrences. LESSONS: This case showed that even if atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is not effective, multidisciplinary treatment such as LEN and conversion surgery is possible. Given the efficacy of LEN after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, it is important to consider that there is a possibility of cure even when first-line treatment is not effective for a patient with unresectable HCC.