RESUMEN
Cardiac involvement in light-chain amyloidosis (AL) predicts poor prognosis and is associated with higher TRM and morbidity during high-dose therapy and auto-SCT (HDT-ASCT). We studied the outcomes of 30 patients with cardiac amyloidosis undergoing HDT-ASCT at our center between January 1998 and March 2012. The median age of the patients was 53 years (range, 36-74) with a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 0.4-97 months). Twenty-seven patients (90%) had more than one organ involved besides the heart with 37% with cardiac stage ⩾3. Melphalan-based conditioning regimen (140-200 mg/m(2)) was used for HDT-ASCT. One-year TRM is 10%. Three-year OS and EFS from HDT-ASCT was 83% and 56.8%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years was 38.5%. Negative factors affecting survival included age >60 years, lack of novel induction therapy and BM plasmacytosis >10%. We conclude that HDT-ASCT is well tolerated in patients with high-risk cardiac amyloidosis and can lead to improved overall outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis , Cardiopatías , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Agonistas Mieloablativos/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Células Madre , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Adulto , Anciano , Amiloidosis/mortalidad , Amiloidosis/terapia , Autoinjertos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Cardiopatías/mortalidad , Cardiopatías/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Optimal treatment approach continues to remain a challenge for systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL). So far, Auto-SCT is the only modality associated with long-term survival. However, failure to show survival benefit in randomized study raises questions regarding its efficacy. We present a comparative outcome analysis of Auto-SCT to conventional therapies (CTR) in AL patients treated over a 14-year period at our institution. Out of the 145 AL amyloidosis patients, Auto-SCT was performed in 80 patients with 1-year non-relapse mortality rate of 12.5%. Novel agents were used as part of induction therapy in 56% of transplant recipients vs 46% of CTR patients. Hematological and organ responses were seen in 74.6% and 39% in the Auto-SCT arm vs 53% and 12% in the CTR arm, respectively. The projected 5-year survival for Auto-SCT vs CTR was 63% vs 38%, respectively. Landmark analysis of patients alive at 1-year after diagnosis showed improved 5-year OS of 72% with Auto-SCT vs 65% in the CTR arm. In the multivariate analysis, age <60 years, induction therapy with novel agents, kidney only involvement and Auto-SCT were associated with improved survival. In conclusion, Auto-SCT is associated with long-term survival for patients with AL amyloidosis.