Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 68(3): 139-48, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23421458

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cosmetic products contribute considerably to the incidence of contact dermatitis. In response to a resolution of the Council of Europe, the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) in The Netherlands set up a pilot project to report undesirable effects attributed to cosmetic products. OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of undesirable effects attributed to cosmetic products and to identify the ingredients involved. The information could contribute to the assessment of whether current EU legislation on cosmetics provides adequate protection. PATIENTS/METHODS: General practitioners, dermatologists and consumers in The Netherlands completed questionnaires on reported undesirable effects of cosmetics. Dermatologists also carried out patch tests and, where necessary, tests with specific batch ingredients of the associated cosmetic product. A website and a public awareness campaign were launched to encourage consumers to report undesirable effects. RESULTS: Between July 2009 and May 2011, the RIVM received more than 1600 reports. Severe undesirable effects were claimed in 1-4% of the cases. The most frequently reported cosmetic products were make-up and moisturisers, and the most frequently identified allergens were isothiazolinones and fragrance ingredients. Three patients tested positive for co-polymers/cross-polymers. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations are recommended on the prevalence of isothiazolinone-induced allergic contact dermatitis and the allergenic potential of co-polymers/cross-polymers.


Asunto(s)
Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto Joven
2.
Int J Nanomedicine ; 12: 6107-6129, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28883724

RESUMEN

Due to their specific properties and pharmacokinetics, nanomedicinal products (NMPs) may present different toxicity and side effects compared to non-nanoformulated, conventional medicines. To facilitate the safety assessment of NMPs, we aimed to gain insight into toxic effects specific for NMPs by systematically analyzing the available toxicity data on approved NMPs in the European Union. In addition, by comparing five sets of products with the same active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in a conventional formulation versus a nanoformulation, we aimed to identify any side effects specific for the nano aspect of NMPs. The objective was to investigate whether specific toxicity could be related to certain structural types of NMPs and whether a nanoformulation of an API altered the nature of side effects of the product in humans compared to a conventional formulation. The survey of toxicity data did not reveal nanospecific toxicity that could be related to certain types of structures of NMPs, other than those reported previously in relation to accumulation of iron nanoparticles (NPs). However, given the limited data for some of the product groups or toxicological end points in the analysis, conclusions with regard to (a lack of) potential nanomedicine-specific effects need to be considered carefully. Results from the comparison of side effects of five sets of drugs (mainly liposomes and/or cytostatics) confirmed the induction of pseudo-allergic responses associated with specific NMPs in the literature, in addition to the side effects common to both nanoformulations and regular formulations, eg, with liposomal doxorubicin, and possibly liposomal daunorubicin. Based on the available data, immunotoxicological effects of certain NMPs cannot be excluded, and we conclude that this end point requires further attention.


Asunto(s)
Nanoestructuras/efectos adversos , Nanoestructuras/toxicidad , Albúminas/efectos adversos , Anfotericina B/administración & dosificación , Anfotericina B/efectos adversos , Daunorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Daunorrubicina/efectos adversos , Doxorrubicina/análogos & derivados , Doxorrubicina/toxicidad , Portadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Liposomas/efectos adversos , Liposomas/química , Nanomedicina/métodos , Nanopartículas/toxicidad , Nanoestructuras/química , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Polietilenglicoles/toxicidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Nanomedicine (Lond) ; 10(10): 1599-608, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25694061

RESUMEN

AIM: A horizon scan of nanomedicinal product on the market or undergoing clinical investigation by analyzing the current nanomedicinal landscape. MATERIALS & METHODS: The horizon scan includes a search of literature, clinical trial registries and the internet. RESULTS: This horizon scan yielded 175 nanomedicinal products. Most products were intended for cancer treatment, followed by infectious diseases. Polymer conjugates, liposomes and protein nanoparticles were the most used structures for nanomedicinal products. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides an overview of nanomedicinal products on the market or undergoing clinical investigation, their application areas and specific properties.


Asunto(s)
Nanomedicina/tendencias , Predicción , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA