Comparing outcomes of plate augmentation, nail exchange, and nail exchange with plate augmentation in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing: a multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures, but nonunion rates have been reported to be as high as 12%. Surgical interventions for nonunion involve exchange nailing or plate augmentation. Recently, a combined treatment of exchange nailing and plate augmentation has demonstrated good results, but its comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different surgical interventions for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion, and investigate the factors that affect bone healing after reoperation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at five university hospitals involving 149 patients with aseptic atrophic nonunion after IM nailing. These patients underwent reoperation with plate augmentation, exchange nailing, or combined treatment. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed and compared according to reoperation procedure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting persistent nonunion after reoperation. RESULTS: Of the cohort, 57 patients underwent plate augmentation, 64 underwent exchange nailing, and 28 received combined treatment. There were no significant differences in patient demographics among the groups. Exchange nailing produced a significantly lower union rate than did the combined treatment (82.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.016), whereas no significant difference was observed in the union rate and time to the union between plate augmentation and the combined treatment. Combined treatment showed the longest operative time and the greatest transfusion requirements. The risk factors for persistent nonunion included age, absence of autogenous bone grafts, and use of an exchange nailing technique. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange nailing as a treatment for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing resulted in a lower union rate. The efficacy of the combined treatment requires further study, and persistent nonunion may be influenced by age, bone grafting, and surgical techniques. A comprehensive approach targeting both biological environment and mechanical stability is crucial in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion.

Comparative Short-Term Outcomes of Femoral Neck System (FNS) and Cannulated Screw Fixation in Patients with Femoral Neck Fractures: A Multicenter Study.

Background: Femoral neck fractures need to be treated in their early stages with accurate reduction and stable fixation to reduce complications. The authors compared the early radiologic outcomes of femoral neck fractures treated with the recently introduced Femoral Neck System (FNS, Depuy-Synthes) with conventional cannulated screws (CS) in a multicenter design. Furthermore, the factors associated with early failure after FNS were analyzed. Methods: The FNS group included 40 patients treated between June 2019 and January 2020, and the CS group included 65 patients treated between January 2015 and May 2019. The operation was performed in 3 university hospitals. Patient demographics, fracture classification, postoperative reduction quality, sliding distance of FNS or CS, union and time to union, and complication rates were examined. Logistic regression analysis was performed on candidate factors for early failure of the FNS group. Results: The FNS group had a 90% union rate and a mean time to union of 4.4 months, while the CS group had similar results with an 83.1% union rate and a mean time to union of 5.1 months. In the subgroup analysis of Pauwels type III fractures, the union rates were 75.0% and 58.8% in the FNS and CS groups, respectively, and the time to union was significantly shorter in the FNS group with 4.8 months compared to 6.8 months in the CS group. Early failure rate within 6 months of FNS fixation was observed to be 10%, which included 3 reduction failures and 1 excessive sliding with a broken implant. Risk factors for early failure after FNS were identified as displaced fractures (Garden classification type III or IV), poor reduction quality, longer tip-apex distance, greater sliding distance, and 1-hole implants, of which sliding distance was the only significant risk factor in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: In femoral neck fractures, FNS and CS did not show significant differences for short-term radiologic results. FNS resulted in shorter operative time than cannulated screw fixation and favorable outcomes in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. The FNS could be considered a reliable and safe alternative to CS when treating femoral neck fractures.

A retrospective cohort study of autogenous iliac strut bone grafting in large bone defects of the lower extremity.

Autogenous iliac bone graft (AIBG) is the treatment of choice for managing bone defects, and favorable results have been reported for bone defects < 5 cm in length. In large bone defects ≥ 5 cm, it is difficult to obtain good results with simple bone grafting, and other management options have drawbacks, such as long immobilization periods and high complication rates. We hypothesized that AIBG in the strut form might show favorable results in large bone defects with minimal complications. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of strut-type AIBG and evaluate its effectiveness compared to cancellous AIBG. This retrospective study included 50 patients who underwent AIBG for bone defects at a single institution between March 2011 and April 2020. We performed corticocancellous AIBG in a strut form to manage bone defects ≥ 5 cm in the lower extremities. The strut bone was harvested along the iliac crest and grafted slightly longer than the bone defect to apply a sufficient compressive force. Demographic information and radiographic and clinical results of patients who underwent strut AIBG (Group S) were analyzed. The outcomes of union, time to union, complications, and reoperation were compared with those of patients who underwent cancellous AIBG (Group C). The study population comprised 37 men (74%) and 13 women (26%), with a mean age of 50.0 (range: 19-78). The average follow-up period was 25.6 months (12-104 months). Group S included 16 patients with a mean bone defect length of 6.8 ± 1.2 cm. In Group S, union was achieved in all patients, with an average time to union of 6.7 months. Complications occurred in four cases, all related to wound problems. Group C comprised d 34 patients with a mean defect length of 2.8 ± 1.1 cm. Complications occurred in five patients in Group C, including four soft tissue problems and one implant failure. When comparing the outcomes of Groups S and C, no significant differences were observed. AIBG is an effective and safe technique for managing bone defects. Strut AIBG can be used effectively for bone defects ≥ 5 cm in the lower extremities.

Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Reduction With Cerclage Fixation in Spiral or Oblique Subtrochanteric Femoral Fractures: A Retrospective Cohort Study Comparing Cables and Wires.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the outcomes of a minimally invasive reduction (MIR) technique using a cable and wire in spiral or oblique subtrochanteric femoral fractures (SFFs). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Two University Hospitals. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Skeletally mature patients with spiral or oblique SFFs (OTA/AO 32A1 and 32A2) treated with intramedullary nailing and MIR with a cerclage wire passer using either a single-loop cable or cerclage wire or MIR without cable or wire between May 2016 and November 2021 were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Coronal and sagittal interfragmentary gap, neck-shaft angle, coronal and sagittal angulation, fracture union, time to union, and Radiographic Union Score for Hip (RUSH) at 6 months post operation were compared. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were included, with 16 each in the cable and wire groups and 14 in the non-wiring group. There were no differences in demographics ( P > 0.05), fracture classification ( P = 0.710), or operative data ( P > 0.05) between the three groups. The cable group showed significantly better coronal ( P = 0.003) and sagittal ( P = 0.003) interfragmentary gap, shorter union time ( P < 0.001), and higher 6-month RUSH score ( P < 0.001) among the three groups. There were no significant differences in outcome measures between the wire and non-wiring groups (all P > 0.05). No mechanical complications or reoperations were observed in all three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive reduction using a cable is more effective than wire or non-wiring reduction to improve reduction quality and promote bone union in the SFFs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Differences in periprosthetic bone mineral density tendencies with Types 1 and 3C stems in bipolar hemiarthroplasty following hip fracture.

The purpose of this study was to compare the periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) changes in the patients who underwent bipolar hemiarthroplasty (BPHA) for geriatric femoral neck fracture between two major different types of cementless femoral stems. A total of 93 patients (96 hips) who underwent BPHA for femoral neck fracture were categorized into two groups: Type 1 (42 patients, 44 hips), and Type 3C stem (51 patients, 52 hips). We investigated the annual follow-up trends of periprosthetic BMD at each Gruen zone during minimum postoperative 5-years; moreover, we compared the trends of periprosthetic BMD between both groups. The mean follow-up period was 7.1 years. In both groups, the overall BMD at the last follow-up had decreased compared with the baseline. In those with the Type 1 stem, BMD in the lateral femoral meta-diaphysis significantly decreased at 1-year follow-up after surgery. In those with Type 3C stem, BMD in the lateral femoral metaphysis postoperatively decreased after 3-years, whereas the BMD in the mediolateral femoral diaphysis drastically decreased postoperative 1-year period and plateaued thereafter. Different tendencies according to stem design were observed obviously in the postoperative BMD change of the proximal femur in patients who underwent BPHA for geriatric femoral neck fracture.

A multicenter study of factors affecting nonunion by radiographic analysis after intramedullary nailing in segmental femoral shaft fractures.

The factors affecting the outcomes of segmental femoral shaft fractures are currently unknown. We evaluated the outcomes of intramedullary (IM) nail fixation and investigated factors affecting nonunion of femoral shaft segmental fractures. A total of 38 patients who underwent IM nail fixation for femoral shaft segmental fractures (AO/OTA 32C2) at three university hospitals with a minimum 1-year follow-up period were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into union (n = 32) and nonunion (n = 6) groups. We analyzed smoking status, diabetes mellitus, location of the segmental fragment, segment comminution, filling of the IM nail in the medullary canal, residual gap at the fracture site, use of a cerclage wire or blocking screws as factors that may affect the surgical outcome. In the union group, the average union time was 5.4 months (4-9 months). In the nonunion group, five patients required additional surgery within an average of 7.2 months (5-10 months) postoperatively, whereas one patient remained asymptomatic and did not require further intervention. On comparing the two groups, insufficient canal filling of the IM nail (union, 25.0%; nonunion, 83.3%; p = 0.012) and the presence of a residual gap at the fracture site after reduction (union, 31.3%; nonunion, 83.3%; p = 0.027) were significantly different. In the multivariate analysis, only insufficient canal filling of the IM nail was found to be a factor affecting nonunion, with an odds ratio of 13.3 (p = 0.036). In this study, a relatively high nonunion rate (15.8%) was observed after IM nail fixation. Insufficient IM nail canal filling and a residual gap at the fracture site post reduction were factors affecting segmental femoral shaft fracture nonunion after IM nail fixation.

Outcomes of Angular Stable Locking System in Femoral Diaphyseal Fractures of Elderly Patients: A Multicenter Comparative Study.

Background: The angular stable locking system (ASLS) was developed to provide additional stability to the distal interlocking screw of the intramedullary (IM) nail. Effects of ASLS on the treatment of femoral diaphyseal fractures in the elderly remain unknown. The aim of this study was to compare radiological outcomes of IM nailing using ASLS screws to IM nails with conventional interlocking screws in elderly patients with femoral shaft fractures. Methods: A multicenter retrospective review of 129 patients (average age, 73.5 years; 98 women and 31 men) aged 65 years or older who underwent IM nail fixation for femoral diaphyseal fractures (AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association [OTA] classification 32) was conducted. Demographic information of patients, fracture site (subtrochanteric or shaft), fracture type (traumatic or atypical), and AO/OTA fracture classification were investigated. Reduction status was evaluated by postoperative plain radiography. Presence of union and time to union were evaluated through serial plain radiograph follow-up. Reoperation due to nonunion or implant failure was also evaluated. Results: ASLS was used in 65 patients (50.3%). A total of 118 patients (91.5%) achieved union without additional surgery and the mean union time was 31.8 ± 13.0 weeks. In terms of reduction status, angulation was greater in the group using ASLS. There were no statistically significant differences of union rate, time to union, and reoperation rate according to the use of ASLS (p > 0.05). There was no difference in the outcomes according to the use of ASLS even when the analysis was divided in terms of fracture site or fracture type (p > 0.05). In further subgroup analysis, only the traumatic subtrochanteric area group showed statistically significantly shorter time to union when ASLS was used (p = 0.038). Conclusions: In geriatric patients with femoral diaphyseal fractures, the use of ASLS was not considered to have a significant effect on fracture healing. Fracture healing seemed to be more affected by surgical techniques such as minimizing the gap and fracture characteristics such as atypical femoral fractures, rather than implants.

Outcomes of the use of cement-augmented cannulated pedicle screws in lumbar spinal fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: There are few studies of the radio-clinical outcomes of cement-augmented cannulated pedicle screw (CPS) fixation in osteoporotic patients. PURPOSE: To compare the radiological and clinical outcomes between groups receiving cement-augmented CPS and solid pedicle screws (SPS) in lumbar fusion surgery. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective comparative study PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 187 patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis or spondylolisthesis from 2014 to 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES: Radiological evaluation included screw failure, cage failure, rod breakage, and fusion grade at postoperative 6 months and 1 year. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scales for back pain (VAS-BP), leg pain (VAS-LP), Korean Oswestry disability index (K-ODI), and postoperative complications were also compared. METHODS: Outcomes of patients with high risk factors for implant failure [old age, osteoporosis, autoimmune disease or chronic kidney disease (CKD)] who underwent open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cement-augmented CPS fixation (Group C, n=55) or SPS fixation (Group S, n=132) were compared. RESULTS: 324 pedicle screws in Group C and 775 pedicle screws in Group S were analyzed. Group C had a significantly higher average age and lower T-score, and included more patients with autoimmune disease and CKD than group S (all p<.05). Clear zones, screw migration and loss of correction were significantly less frequent in Group C (all p<.05). Thirteen screw breakages were observed; they were only in Group C (4.0%) and all were in the proximal of the two holes. Interbody and posterolateral fusion rates were not significantly different. At last follow-up, all clinical parameters including VAS-BP, VAS-LP, and K-ODI scores had improved significantly in both groups. Postoperative complications were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSION: In lumbar fusion surgery, using cement-augmented CPS in high-risk groups for implant failure could be a useful technical option for reducing acute radiological complications and obtaining clinical results comparable to those obtained using SPS in patients with low risk of implant failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4.

Reproducibility and Accuracy of Pelvic Tilt in Predicting the Difference Between Pelvic Incidence and Lumbar Lordosis Value.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the pelvic morphologic factors that determine the degree of pelvic incidence (PI)-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch. METHODS: Overall, 306 patients were included. The regional and global sagittal parameters were measured. Linear regression analyses were performed for 4 pelvic parameters and PI-LL mismatch. E1 and E2 were defined as linear regression equations between pelvic tilt (PT) and PI-LL mismatch and PI and PI-LL mismatch, respectively. The patients were categorized by cluster analysis using the hierarchal method for the 4 pelvic parameters. RESULTS: E1 and E2 showed statistical significance; however, the coefficient of determination of E1 was higher than that of E2 (R2 = 0.675 vs. 0.238; P < 0.01). Sex, LL, E1, and E2 showed significant differences in the regional parameters. The T1 pelvic angle (TPA), spinosacral angle (SSA), and incidence angle of inflection points (IAIPs) showed significant differences in global parameters (P < 0.01). The IAIPs and TPA were low in the anteverted pelvis group and high in the retroverted pelvis group (P < 0.001). The SSA was low in the small pelvis group and high in the large pelvis group (P < 0.001). The proportion of women in the large pelvis group (93%) was significantly higher than that in the other groups (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The individual differences between the PI and LL values can be more accurately determined using the individual PT, and the optimal PT amount will differ depending on the pelvis shape. The increase in the TPA and IAIPs corresponded to the PT, and the SSA increased in accordance with the pelvic size.

Intramedullary fibula strut bone allograft in a periprosthetic humeral shaft fracture with implant loosening after total elbow arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic fracture after total elbow replacement surgery is a difficult complication to manage, especially when it comes together with implant loosening. If stem revision and internal fixation of the periprosthetic fracture are performed simultaneously, this would be a very challenging procedure. Most of total elbow replacement implants are cemented type. Cement usage at periprosthetic fracture site may interfere healing of fractured site. Authors underwent internal fixation with use of locking plate and cerclage wire for periprosthetic fracture, allogenous fibular strut bone inserted into the humerus intramedullary canal allowing the fractured site to be more stable without cement usage. At 10-month follow-up, the complete union and good clinical outcome was achieved. We present a novel technique for treating periprosthetic fracture with implant loosening after total elbow replacement surgery, using intramedullary allogenous fibula strut bone graft.