RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To analyze the toxicity profile of an intensified definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) schedule in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (Stage IIIA N2/selected IIIB) treated within a prospective multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After mediastinoscopy and routine staging procedures, three cycles of induction chemotherapy (cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), Days 1 and 8; paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) Day 1, every 21 days) were planned, followed by concurrent CRT (accelerated-hyperfractionated regimen, 45 Gy, 2 x 1.5 Gy/d, cisplatin 50 mg/m(2), Days 64 and 71, vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2), Days 64 and 71). At 45 Gy, a multidisciplinary panel decision was made regarding operability. Inoperable patients received definitive radiotherapy (total dose 65 or 71 Gy, depending on the mean lung dose) with additional concurrent chemotherapy (cisplatin 40 mg/m(2), Day 85; vinorelbine 15 mg/m(2), Days 85 and 92). RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (23 men and 5 women; median age, 58 years; range 41-73; Stage IIIA in 3 and Stage IIIB in 25) were judged ineligible for surgery by the multidisciplinary panel and underwent definitive CRT (75% of the patients received 71 Gy). The maximum toxicity (Grade 3 or greater) during induction chemotherapy included leukopenia (11%) and anemia (4%). During concurrent CRT, leukopenia (Grade 3 or greater) was observed in 39% of the patients. The maximal nonhematologic toxicity during concurrent CRT included esophagitis (Grade 3 or greater) in 18% and pneumonitis (Grade 3 or greater) in 4% of the patients. At 3 years, the locoregional control rate was 52% (95% confidence interval, 29-75%) and the overall survival rate was 31% (95% confidence interval, 12-50%). CONCLUSION: This intensified treatment protocol with induction chemotherapy and concurrent CRT, including hyperfractionated-accelerated RT, showed only moderate toxicity and proved feasible. This treatment represents the definitive CRT arm of our ongoing multicenter randomized trial comparing definitive CRT and trimodality treatment.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anemia/etiología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Esofagitis/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Leucopenia/etiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Neumonía/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Vinblastina/administración & dosificación , Vinblastina/análogos & derivados , VinorelbinaRESUMEN
An international expanded access program was initiated to provide access to treatment with pemetrexed prior registration and reimbursement for malignant mesothelioma (MM). Chemonaïve and pretreated patients with inoperable MM of the pleura or peritoneum were eligible. This report describes the results obtained in German centers. Investigators could choose between three treatments: Pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) alone (P) or in combination with cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) (PC) or carboplatin AUC 5 (PCb). From November 2002 to June 2004, a total of 567 patients (554 with pleural MM; 41% pretreated) were included. Of 548 evaluable patients with pleural MM, 191 received P, 137 PC and 220 PCb. Patients in the P group were more often pretreated (70%) and had worse performance status compared with the other groups. In the P, PC, and PCb groups overall response rate (ORR) was 16%, 24% and 18%, median time to progression (TTP) was 5.5, 8.2, and 6.9 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 8.7, 11.3 and 9.7 months respectively. Efficacy outcomes were better for chemonaïve than for pretreated patients, and P was less hematotoxic than PC or PCb. Treatment of pleural MM with pemetrexed alone or in combination with platinum was safe and active as first and second-line therapy.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Glutamatos/uso terapéutico , Guanina/análogos & derivados , Mesotelioma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Peritoneales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pleurales/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Alemania , Glutamatos/administración & dosificación , Guanina/administración & dosificación , Guanina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Masculino , Mesotelioma/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pemetrexed , Neoplasias Peritoneales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pleurales/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the role of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) within a trimodality protocol (chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, surgery) for patients with operable stage IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After mediastinoscopic staging, patients with operable stage IIIA NSCLC were enrolled to a German multicenter trial and randomly assigned to receive either primary resection followed by adjuvant thoracic radiation therapy (50 to 60 Gy; arm A) or preoperative chemotherapy (cisplatin/etoposide [PE]; three cycles) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (PE plus 45 Gy; 1.5 Gy twice per day) and definitive surgery (arm B), respectively. Patients in arm B were scheduled to receive PCI (30 Gy; 2 Gy daily fractions). RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were randomly assigned between November 1994 and July 2001. One hundred six patients were eligible (arm A: 51, arm B: 55), 90 males and 16 females, 50 with squamous cell, 16 with large cell, five with adenosquamous, and 35 with adenocarcenoma (median age, 57 years; range, 37 to 71 years). Forty-three patients received PCI as scheduled in arm B. Eleven long-term survivors (arm A: four; arm B: seven) underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological examination. PCI significantly reduced the probability of brain metastases as first site of failure (7.8% at 5 years v 34.7%; P = .02), the overall brain relapse rate was reduced comparably (9.1% at 5 years v 27.2%; P = .04). A slightly reduced neurocognitive performance in comparison with the age-matched normal population was found for patients in both treatment groups. No significant difference between patients who were treated with or without PCI could be noted. CONCLUSION: PCI is effective in preventing brain metastases following this aggressive trimodality approach. Neurocognitive late effects are not significantly different between patients treated with or without PCI.