Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 995, 2024 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39294561

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An occupational exposure, i.e. exposure incident (EI), is contact with potentially contaminated material that may contain bloodborne pathogens and that occurs during occupational activities inside or outside a health care facility, either during direct work with a patient or during contact with a patient's body fluids and tissues. This study aimed to compare the frequency of EIs in a university hospital before and during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: This was a descriptive study with a historical comparison group conducted at the Dubrava University Hospital (DUH) in Zagreb, Croatia. We compared the frequency of EIs among healthcare and non-healthcare workers before (from March 11, 2018, to March 10, 2020) and during (from March 11, 2020, to March 11, 2022) the COVID-19 pandemic, expressed as the number of EIs per number of hospitalized patients and the total number of hospital activities. We analyzed data based on the status of the hospital (a COVID-19 hospital or not) and the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) as recommended by the World Health Organization. RESULTS: During the total analyzed period, 241 EIs were reported in DUH. Before the pandemic, 128 EIs were reported, compared to 113 during the pandemic. Before the pandemic, 91% of EIs were recorded in healthcare workers, while during the pandemic, 96% of EIs were recorded in healthcare workers. Slightly more EIs were recorded during the period of mixed work form and de-escalation of PPE. The rate of EIs relative to the total number of hospital patients was significantly higher during the pandemic (3.9/1000) than in the pre-pandemic period (2.5/1000). The rate of EIs relative to the total number of hospital activities was significantly higher during the pandemic (0.4/1000) than in the pre-pandemic period (0.2/1000). CONCLUSION: The rate of EIs relative to the total number of hospitalized patients and the total number of hospital activities in DUH was significantly higher during the pandemic, and the rate of total EIs increased among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of this study show that it is necessary to constantly and effectively work on the prevention of EI.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Exposición Profesional , Equipo de Protección Personal , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/transmisión , COVID-19/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Equipo de Protección Personal/provisión & distribución , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Croacia/epidemiología , Personal de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias
2.
Int J Infect Dis ; 121: 152-156, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35562041

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Burkholderia gladioli has been associated with infections in patients with cystic fibrosis, chronic granulomatous disease, and other immunocompromising conditions. The aim of this study was to better depict the outbreak of healthcare-associated bacteremia caused by B. gladioli due to exposure to contaminated multidose vials with saline solutions. METHODS: An environmental and epidemiologic investigation was conducted by the Infection Prevention and Control Team (IPCT) to identify the source of the outbreak in three Croatian hospitals. RESULTS: During a 3-month period, 13 B. gladioli bacteremia episodes were identified in 10 patients in three Croatian hospitals. At the time of the outbreak, all three hospitals used saline products from the same manufacturer. Two 100-ml multidose vials with saline solutions and needleless dispensing pins were positive for B. gladioli. All 13 bacteremia isolates and two isolates from the saline showed the same antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis profile, demonstrating clonal relatedness. CONCLUSION: When an environmental pathogen causes an outbreak, contamination of intravenous products must be considered. Close communication between the local IPCT and the National Hospital Infection Control Advisory Committee is essential to conduct a prompt and thorough investigation and find the source of the outbreak.


Asunto(s)
Bacteriemia , Infecciones por Burkholderia , Burkholderia gladioli , Infección Hospitalaria , Bacteriemia/epidemiología , Bacteriemia/prevención & control , Infecciones por Burkholderia/epidemiología , Infecciones por Burkholderia/etiología , Infecciones por Burkholderia/prevención & control , Croacia/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud , Brotes de Enfermedades , Hospitales , Humanos , Solución Salina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA