Assessing preferences for a university-based smoking cessation program in Lebanon: a discrete choice experiment.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking prevalence rates in Lebanon are among the highest in the Eastern Mediterranean region. Few smoking cessation programs are offered in Lebanon and little is known about the preferences of Lebanese smokers for cessation treatment programs. OBJECTIVE: To establish which attributes of smoking cessation programs are most important to Lebanese smokers. METHODS: Smokers at the American University of Beirut were surveyed to elicit their preferences for, and tradeoffs between the attributes of a hypothetical university-based smoking cessation program. Preferences for medication type/mechanism, risk of benign side effects, availability of support, distance traveled to obtain medication, and price of complete treatment were assessed using the discrete choice experiment method. RESULTS: The smokers' responses (N = 191) to changes in attributes were statistically significant. Smokers were willing to make trade-offs between attributes. On average, smokers were willing to pay LBP 103,000 (USD 69) for cessation support. Respondents were willing to give up LBP 105,000 (USD 70) to avoid an additional 10% risk of minor side effects and LBP 18,000 (USD 12) to avoid an addition kilometer of travel to the nearest pharmacy. Heavy smokers were the least responsive group and had the lowest demand elasticities. CONCLUSIONS: Student smokers were willing to participate in a relatively complex exercise that weighs the advantages and disadvantages of a hypothetical smoking cessation program. Overall they were less interested in the pill form of smoking cessation treatment, but they were willing to make tradeoffs to be smoke-free.

National Hospital Initiatives to Improve Performance on Heart Failure Readmission Metrics.

BACKGROUND: The passage of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) has been associated with been associated with decreased risk-standardized readmission rates for heart failure (HF) patients. However, some quantitative analyses have shown association between HRRP and increased mortality for hospitalized HF patients. Qualitative information on what hospital programs were actually implemented can help us understand if this trend is a causal effect of the law or an unrelated trend. PURPOSE: To perform a systematic literature review to synthesize evidence on what clinical programs American hospitals implemented in response to HRRP. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review in April 2020 that included a search of PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Literature (CINAHL) for studies related to hospital strategies to reduce HF readmissions. RESULTS: Of 20 included articles, 8 were qualitative (survey and interviews), 3 were systematic reviews, 5 were single site quality improvement (QI) initiatives, 2 were plans for ongoing randomized control trials (RCTs), one was a plan for a future RCT and one was an observational analysis. We found that interventions hospitals undertook in response to HRRP to reduce HF readmissions fell into four categories: inpatient care, discharge, transitional care and data collection/administration. The majority of interventions were related to transitional care, most commonly scheduling follow up appointments within 7-14 days of discharge, performing post-discharge phone calls and partnering with community physicians. CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any published evidence of practices that could mechanistically be linked to harm to HF patients enacted by hospitals in response to HRRP. For example, no programs encouraged emergency department providers to discharge patients from emergency departments. We found QI initiatives, improved discharge planning and increased post-discharge follow up.