Favorable long-term survival in patients undergoing stent PCI of unprotected left main coronary artery compared to predicted short-term prognosis of CABG estimated by EuroSCORE: clinical determinants of long-term outcome.

AIMS/METHODS: The long-term outcome of patients (pts) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) is unclear so far. We prospectively investigated the outcome of 102 consecutive patients who underwent stent PCI of unprotected LMCA. Patients were divided according to clinical indication for PCI: stable coronary artery disease (CAD) (N = 60), NSTEMI (N = 18), STEMI (N = 24). Expected in-hospital mortality of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was calculated using the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) and compared to the observed survival rate during long-term follow-up (mean 1.8 +/- 1.2 years). RESULTS: The observed 30-day mortality was 1.7% (1/60 pts) in patients with stable CAD, 11% (2/18 pts) in NSTEMI patients, and 13% (3/24 pts) in STEMI patients. The observed mortality was lower than the predicted mortality of CABG as calculated by the logistic EuroSCORE. Using receiver-operator characteristics curves (ROC), EuroSCORE demonstrated a high predictive value for both 30-day mortality as well as 1-year mortality (AUC > 0.8; P < 0.01). Prognostically relevant patient related factors (P < 0.01) included severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HR 3.24), ACS (HR 3.18), STEMI (HR: 3.01), Killip class IV (HR 7.69), occurrence of neoplastic disease (HR 3.97), and elevated CRP (HR 3.86). CONCLUSIONS: LMCA-PCI was associated with lower long-term mortality rates compared to the estimated mortality of CABG. This prospective observational study suggests that DES-PCI of unprotected LMCA in "all-comers" can be carried out with reasonable risk.

Impact of interventional strategy for unprotected left main coronary artery percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term survival.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) is feasible. In cases involving the left anterior descending-left circumflex bifurcation, the optimal interventional strategy remains unclear. Randomized bifurcation trials in the past excluded ULMCA lesions. METHODS: A single-centre registry study with retrospective analysis of the interventional protocols and procedural angiograms of 102 patients who underwent stent PCI of ULMCA was performed in order to evaluate the impact of the interventional strategy on long-term survival. RESULTS: Isolated stenting of the ostium or mid ULMCA without bifurcation stenting was performed in 19 patients. Most interventions (n = 83) involved the left main bifurcation. Distal or bifurcation lesions were treated by provisional T-stenting in cases of single involved ostium (left anterior descending or right circumflex) or systematic T-stenting or V-stenting if both proximal coronary arteries were involved (n = 19). The majority (96%) of patients received drug-eluting stents. The long-term survival (mean follow-up = 3.4 ± 1.7 years) of patients was influenced by the interventional strategy. A single-stent strategy involving the bifurcation without side branch intervention was associated with less-favourable long-term survival (hazard ratio 4.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.91-8.69; multivariable Cox regression analysis). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective observational study suggests that single-stent PCI involving the bifurcation without side branch intervention of ULMCA is possibly associated with higher long-term mortality. ULMCA-PCI involving the bifurcation is possible with similar results compared with isolated PCI of ULMCA shaft or ostium. Large, randomized trials are warranted for comparison of optimal technical approach to LMCA interventions.