Growth characteristics in individuals with osteogenesis imperfecta in North America: results from a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) predisposes people to recurrent fractures, bone deformities, and short stature. There is a lack of large-scale systematic studies that have investigated growth parameters in OI. METHODS: Using data from the Linked Clinical Research Centers, we compared height, growth velocity, weight, and body mass index (BMI) in 552 individuals with OI. Height, weight, and BMI were plotted on Centers for Disease Control and Prevention normative curves. RESULTS: In children, the median z-scores for height in OI types I, III, and IV were -0.66, -6.91, and -2.79, respectively. Growth velocity was diminished in OI types III and IV. The median z-score for weight in children with OI type III was -4.55. The median z-scores for BMI in children with OI types I, III, and IV were 0.10, 0.91, and 0.67, respectively. Generalized linear model analyses demonstrated that the height z-score was positively correlated with the severity of the OI subtype (P < 0.001), age, bisphosphonate use, and rodding (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: From the largest cohort of individuals with OI, we provide median values for height, weight, and BMI z-scores that can aid the evaluation of overall growth in the clinic setting. This study is an important first step in the generation of OI-specific growth curves.

Mobility in osteogenesis imperfecta: a multicenter North American study.

PURPOSE: Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic connective tissue disorder that causes bone fragility. Phenotypic severity influences ability to walk, however, little is known about ambulatory characteristics of individuals with OI, especially in more severe forms. The purpose of this work was to characterize mobility in OI using standard clinical assessment tools and determine if patient characteristics could be used to predict mobility outcomes. METHODS: We collected mobility data at five clinical sites to analyze the largest cohort of individuals with OI (n = 491) to date. Linear mixed models were developed to explore relationships among subject demographics and mobility metrics. RESULTS: Results showed minor limitations in the mild group while the more severe types showed more significant limitations in all mobility metrics analyzed. Height and weight were shown to be the most significant predictors of mobility. Relationships with mobility and bisphosphonates varied with OI type and type used (oral/IV). CONCLUSION: These results are significant to understanding mobility limitations of specific types of OI and beneficial when developing rehabilitation protocols for this population. It is important for physicians, patients, and caregivers to gain insight into severity and classification of the disease and the influence of disease-related characteristics on prognosis for mobility.

A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study to Evaluate the Effects of Bisphosphonate Exposure on Bone Mineral Density and Other Health Outcomes in Osteogenesis Imperfecta.

Osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is characterized by low bone mass and bone fragility. Using data from a large cohort of individuals with OI from the Osteogenesis Imperfecta Foundation's linked clinical research centers, we examined the association between exposure to bisphosphonate (BPN) treatment (past or present) and lumbar spine (LS) areal bone mineral density (aBMD), fractures, scoliosis, and mobility. From 466 individuals, we obtained 1394 participant-age LS aBMD data points. Though all OI subtypes were examined, primary analyses were restricted to type I OI (OI-1). Using linear regression, we constructed expected OI-1 LS aBMD-for-age curves from the data from individuals who had never received BPN. LS aBMD in those who had been exposed to BPN was then compared with the computed expected aBMD. BPN exposure in preadolescent years (age <14 years) was associated with a LS aBMD that was 9% more than the expected computed values in BPN-naïve individuals (p < 0.01); however, such association was not observed across all ages. Exposure to i.v. BPN and treatment duration >2 years correlated with LS aBMD in preadolescent individuals. BPN exposure also had a significant association with non-aBMD clinical outcome variables. Logistic regression modeling predicted that with BPN exposure, a 1-year increase in age would be associated with an 8.2% decrease in fracture probability for preadolescent individuals with OI-1, compared with no decrease in individuals who had never received any BPN (p < 0.05). In preadolescent individuals with OI-1, a 0.1 g/cm2 increase in LS aBMD was associated with a 10.6% decrease in scoliosis probability, compared with a 46.8% increase in the BPN-naïve group (p < 0.01). For the same changes in age and LS aBMD in preadolescent individuals, BPN exposure was also associated with higher mobility scores (p < 0.01), demonstrating that BPN treatment may be associated with daily function. © 2018 The Authors. JBMR Plus Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Rituximab selectively suppresses specific islet antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: The TrialNet Study Group evaluated rituximab, a B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody, for its effect in new-onset patients with type 1A diabetes. Rituximab decreased the loss of C-peptide over the first year of follow-up and markedly depleted B lymphocytes for 6 months after administration. This article analyzes the specific effect of rituximab on multiple islet autoantibodies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 87 patients between the ages of 8 and 40 years received either rituximab or a placebo infusion weekly for four doses close to the onset of diabetes. Autoantibodies to insulin (IAAs), GAD65 (GADAs), insulinoma-associated protein 2 (IA2As), and ZnT8 (ZnT8As) were measured with radioimmunoassays. The primary outcome for this autoantibody analysis was the mean level of autoantibodies during follow-up. RESULTS: Rituximab markedly suppressed IAAs compared with the placebo injection but had a much smaller effect on GADAs, IA2As, and ZnT8As. A total of 40% (19 of 48) of rituximab-treated patients who were IAA positive became IAA negative versus 0 of 29 placebo-treated patients (P < 0.0001). In the subgroup (n = 6) treated within 50 days of diabetes, IAAs were markedly suppressed by rituximab in all patients for 1 year and for four patients as long as 3 years despite continuing insulin therapy. Independent of rituximab treatment, the mean level of IAAs at study entry was markedly lower (P = 0.035) for patients who maintained C-peptide levels during the first year of follow-up in both rituximab-treated and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: A single course of rituximab differentially suppresses IAAs, clearly blocking IAAs for >1 year in insulin-treated patients. For the patients receiving insulin for >2 weeks prior to rituximab administration, we cannot assess whether rituximab not only blocks the acquisition of insulin antibodies induced by insulin administration and/or also suppresses preformed insulin autoantibodies. Studies in prediabetic non-insulin-treated patients will likely be needed to evaluate the specific effects of rituximab on levels of IAAs.