Echocardiographic evaluation of patients with severe heart failure and impairment of intraventricular conduction following cardiac resynchronisation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic examination is essential for clinical assessment of patients after cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). AIM: To assess the benefit of CRT in patients with end-stage heart failure at long-term follow-up. METHODS: 28 patients with end-stage heart failure, NYHA class >or= III (>or= II in patients with indications for implantable cardioverter defibrillator and echocardiographic signs of ventricular mechanical systolic dyssynchrony), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35%, QRS duration >120 ms and left bundle branch block morphology received a biventricular device. Standard colour Doppler echocardiography examination was performed at baseline, and then every 6 months, up to 2 years. Parameters of systolic and diastolic LV function, mitral insufficiency and right ventricular (RV) pressure were evaluated. RESULTS: Following CRT, a statistically significant improvement of LV dimensions (p<0.05), and LVEF (p<0.001) was recorded. CRT also resulted in a mitral regurgitation decrement (p<0.01). Interventricular mechanical delay was shortened (p=0.0005). After 2 years, non-significant worsening of LV dimensions was observed. At long-term follow-up CRT did not result in LV volume, left atrium, RV dimension or RV pressure reduction. CONCLUSIONS: CRT is associated with reverse remodelling of the LV at mid-term follow-up.

Right ventricular apex versus right ventricular outflow tract pacing: prospective, randomised, long-term clinical and echocardiographic evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: In patients treated with permanent pacing, the electrode is typically placed in the right ventricular apex (RVA). Published data indicate that such electrode placement leads to an unfavourable ventricular depolarization pattern, while right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) pacing seems to be more physiological. AIM: To compare long-term effects of RVOT versus RVA pacing on clinical status, left ventricular (LV) function, and the degree of atrioventricular valve regurgitation. METHODS: Patients with indications for permanent pacing, admitted to hospital between 1996 and 1997, were randomised to receive RVA or RVOT pacing. In 2004 during a final control visit in 27 patients clinical status, echocardiographic parameters and QRS complex duration as well as NT-proBNP level were measured. Analysed parameters were compared between groups and in the case of data available during the perioperative period also their evolution in time was assessed. RESULTS: Out of 27 patients 14 were randomised to the RVA group and 13 to the RVOT group. No significant differences between groups were observed before the procedure with respect to age, gender, comorbidities or echocardiographic parameters. Mean duration of pacing did not differ significantly between the groups (89+/-9 months in RVA group vs 93+/-6 months in RVOT group, NS). In the RVA group significant LV ejection fraction decrease was observed (from 56+/-11% to 47+/-8%, p <0.05); in the RVOT group LV ejection fraction did not change (54+/-7% and 53+/-9%; NS). Progression of tricuspid valve regurgitation was also observed in the RVA group but not in the RVOT group. During the final visit NT-proBNP level was significantly higher in the RVA group: 1034+/-852 pg/ml vs 429+/-430 pg/ml (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with normal LV function permanent RVA pacing leads to LV systolic and diastolic function deterioration. RVOT pacing can reduce the unfavourable effect and can slow down cardiac remodelling caused by permanent RV pacing. Clinical and echocardiographic benefits observed in the RVOT group after 7 years of pacing are reflected by lower NT-proBNP levels in this group of patients.

[Safety of stress echocardiography with dobutamine used in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction]. / Bezpieczenstwo echokardiograficznego testu obciazeniowego z dobutamina zastosowanego u pacjentów ze zwezeniem zastawki aortalnej z uszkodzona lewa komora.

THE AIMS: The aim of the study was to assess the safety of dobutamine echocardiography (DE) in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 45%. METHODS: 162 patients (mean age 59 +/- 13, 64% males) with resting transvalvular peak gradient < 70 mmHg underwent standard DE (doses 5-40 micrograms/kg/min) in a multicenter study involving 10 centers from Poland and Hungary. This analysis involves a subset of 39 pts (34 M, 5 F, age 59 +/- 13) identified according to the criterion of EF < or = 45% and mean aortic gradient < or = 35 mmHg. Clinically indicated coronary arteriography was performed in all patients with left ventricular dysfunction. RESULTS: Peak dobutamine dose was 29 +/- 10 micrograms/kg/min. Peak heart rate was 112 +/- 26 bpm. Systolic arterial pressure was 148 +/- 20 mmHg and diastolic pressure 86 +/- 14 mmHg. Transaortic mean gradient and aortic valve area increased 35 +/- 34% and 19 +/- 15% during peak dobutamine dose, respectively. Ejection fraction improved 16 +/- 14%. The test was positive in 17 (43.6%) patients, negative in 11 (28.2%) patients and non diagnostic in 11 (28.2%) patients. There were no deaths, myocardial infarctions or episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia as a result of DE. The test was terminated when the following conditions were met: Target heart rate (23.%). Left ventricular asynergy (46.2%). Maximal established dose achieved (7.7%). Side effects (20.5%). The most common side effects were ventricular arrhythmias (35.9%), dyspnea (20.5%) and hypotension < 20 mmHg (10.3%). CONCLUSION: Despite frequent side effects, DE can be safely performed in patients with aortic stenosis and depressed left ventricular contractility.

[The diagnostic value of stress dobutamine echocardiography in stable coronary artery diseases]. / Wartosc diagnostyczna echokardiograficznej próby dobutaminowej w rozpoznawaniu stabilnej choroby wiencowej.

UNLABELLED: The relation of stress dobutamine echocardiography test results to angiographic features was assessed in 551 patients with chest pain regarded as definite or probable stable angina pectoris. The indications for catheterization in each patient were determined at the discretion of the attending physician. All patients underwent diagnostic coronary angiography (clinically important coronary artery disease was defined as > 50 per cent narrowing of the diameter of at least one major vessel or > or = 50 per cent of the left main coronary artery) and stress dobutamine echocardiography (DSE): Ischemia was defined as new or worsening wall motion abnormalities using a 16-segment model. Sensitivity and specificity of DSE was calculated: 85% and 69% respectively for the entire group, 79% and 71% in women, 87% and 66% in men and compared with diagnostic value of the electrocardiographic exercise test (EE) in the same population. Sensitivity and specificity of the EE was respectively: 93% and 21% for the entire group, 91% and 16% in women, 94% and 27% in men. CONCLUSIONS: 1. DSE has comparable sensitivity but significantly higher specificity than EE. 2. Variables determining false positive result of DSE are as follows: mean maximal heart rate, reached % of the target heart rate and wall motion abnormalities present in single segment. 3. Variables determining false negative results are: sex (male) and one vessel disease. 4. Treatment with beta-adrenolytic agents increases incidence of nondiagnostic results of DSE.

[Implication of probability analysis for diagnosis of stable coronary diseases. Comparison of non-invasive diagnostic tests]. / Zastosowanie analizy prawdopodobienstwa w rozpoznawaniu stabilnej choroby wiencowej. Porównanie nieinwazyjnych metod diagnostycznych.

UNLABELLED: A prospective collection of clinical (history), electrocardiography (ECG), exercise electrocardiography (EE), dobutamine stress echocardiography (SE) and catheterization data was performed in 551 patients with chest pain regarded as definite or probable stable angina pectoris. All patients (65% male) without prior history of myocardial infarction undergone clinical evaluation: chest pain classification according to Diamond, ECG, EE (regarded as positive on the basis of > or = 1 mm ST-depression), SE (ischemia was defined as new or worsening wall motion abnormalities using a 16-segment model) and coronary angiography (CA):CAD was defined as > or = 50% narrowing of at least one major vessel. Sensitivity and specificity of ECG, EE, SE was calculated: and results are as follows respectively: 23% and 87%, 93% and 21%, 85% and 69%. On the basis of these results with implication of probability analysis two algorithms were developed by computer program. They incorporated pretest variables: age, gender, chest pain classification, ECG and results of one or two non-invasive tests: EE and (or) SE. The sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm is 96% and 44%. CONCLUSIONS: 1. Chest pain characteristics remains an effective tool for estimating probability of CAD. 2. The diagnostic value of resting electrocardiography in stable CAD is low. 3. SE has comparably sensitivity but significantly higher specificity than EE. 4. We demonstrated that when the likelihood of CAD is high on the basis of initial evaluation, diagnostic non-invasive testing is not indicated before CA. 5. When the probability is intermediate or low, implementation of first choice test should be different in women (SE) and men (EE).