[Regional anesthesia - are the standards changing?] / Regionalanästhesie ­ ändern sich die Standards?

Regional anesthesia has undergone many changes over the years and the increasing use of ultrasound has certainly played an important role in this. Apart from individual case reports in the literature of very different blocking options, some new procedures seem to have become established and can be broadly applied. Among these are blockades, by which ultrasound-guided injection of local anesthetics is carried out in fascial or muscular layers rather than around target nerves (e.g. cervical plexus blocks and truncal blocks). In addition, the precision with which ultrasound can be used to identify nerve structures led to an increasingly better definition of targets exemplified for interscalene or femoral nerve blocks. The use of ultrasound also seems to be helpful in the performance of neuraxial blocks, particularly in obese patients or patients with a difficult anatomy. With the implementation 10 years ago of a registry for safety in regional anesthesia and acute pain therapy by the German Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (DGAI) and the Association of German Anesthesiologists (BDA), it has been possible to answer important safety questions and define protective measures (e.g. tunnelling, antibiotic prophylaxis and sedation). Moreover, this registry can be used as a benchmark to compare the quality of regional anesthesia in individual hospitals with all other participating centers.

Tunnelling of thoracic epidural catheters is associated with fewer catheter-related infections: a retrospective registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Catheter-related infections are a serious complication of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia. Tunnelling catheters subcutaneously may reduce infection risk. We thus tested the hypothesis that tunnelling of thoracic epidural catheters is associated with a lower risk of catheter-related infections. METHODS: Twenty-two thousand, four hundred and eleven surgical patients with continuous thoracic epidural analgesia included in the German Network for Regional Anaesthesia registry between 2007 and 2014 were grouped by whether their catheters were tunnelled (n=12 870) or not (n=9541). Catheter-related infections in each group were compared with Student's unpaired t and χ(2) tests. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated with logistic regression, adjusting for potential confounding factors, including age, ASA physical status score, use of catheter for ≥4 days, multiple skin puncture, hospital, and surgical department. RESULTS: There were fewer catheter-related infections in patients with tunnelled catheters (4.5 vs 5.5%, P<0.001). Mild infections were also less common (4.0 vs 4.6%, P=0.009), as were moderate infections (0.4 vs 0.8%, P<0.001). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, tunnelling remained an independent prevention for any grade of infection (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.42-0.61, P<0.001) and for mild infections (adjusted OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.66, P<0.001) and moderate and severe infections (adjusted OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28-0.70, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: Tunnelling was associated with a lower risk of thoracic epidural catheter-related infections.

Obesity in regional anesthesia--a risk factor for peripheral catheter-related infections.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is believed to increase the risk of surgical site infections and possibly increase the risk of catheter-related infections in regional anesthesia. We, therefore, analyzed the influence of obesity on catheter-related infections defined within a national registry for regional anesthesia. METHODS: The German Network for Regional Anesthesia database with 25 participating clinical centers was analyzed between 2007 and 2012. Exactly, 28,249 cases (13,239 peripheral nerve and 15,010 neuraxial blocks) of patients ≥ 14 years were grouped in I: underweight (BMI 13.2-18.49 kg/m(2) , n = 597), II: normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m(2) , n = 9272), III: overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m(2) , n = 10,632), and IV: obese (BMI 30.0-70.3 kg/m(2) , n = 7,744). The analysis focused on peripheral and neuraxial catheter-related infections. Differences between the groups were tested with non-parametric ANOVA and chi-square (P < 0.05). Binary logistic regression was used to compare obese, overweight, or underweight patients with normal weight patients. Odds ratios (OR and 95% confidence interval) were calculated and adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Confounders with significant influence on the risk for catheter-related infections were gender, age, ASA score, diabetes, preoperative infection, multiple skin puncture, and prolonged catheter use. The incidence (normal weight: 2.1%, obese: 3.6%; P < 0.001) and the risk of peripheral catheter-related infection was increased in obese compared to normal weight patients [adjusted OR: 1.69 (1.25-2.28); P < 0.001]. In neuraxial sites, the incidence of catheter-related infections differed significantly between normal weight and obese patients (normal weight: 3.2%, obese: 2.3%; P = 0.01), whereas the risk was comparable [adjusted OR: 0.95 (0.71-1.28); P = 0.92]. CONCLUSION: This retrospective cohort study suggests that obesity is an independent risk factor for peripheral, but not neuraxial, catheter-related infections.