Complementary strategies for directing in vivo transcription factor binding through DNA binding domains and intrinsically disordered regions.

DNA binding domains (DBDs) of transcription factors (TFs) recognize DNA sequence motifs that are highly abundant in genomes. Within cells, TFs bind a subset of motif-containing sites as directed by either their DBDs or DBD-external (nonDBD) sequences. To define the relative roles of DBDs and nonDBDs in directing binding preferences, we compared the genome-wide binding of 48 (∼30%) budding yeast TFs with their DBD-only, nonDBD-truncated, and nonDBD-only mutants. With a few exceptions, binding locations differed between DBDs and TFs, resulting from the cumulative action of multiple determinants mapped mostly to disordered nonDBD regions. Furthermore, TFs' preferences for promoters of the fuzzy nucleosome architecture were lost in DBD-only mutants, whose binding spread across promoters, implicating nonDBDs' preferences in this hallmark of budding yeast regulatory design. We conclude that DBDs and nonDBDs employ complementary DNA-targeting strategies, whose balance defines TF binding specificity along genomes.

Intrinsically Disordered Regions Direct Transcription Factor In Vivo Binding Specificity.

Transcription factors (TFs) that bind common DNA motifs in vitro occupy distinct sets of promoters in vivo, raising the question of how binding specificity is achieved. TFs are enriched with intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). Such regions commonly form promiscuous interactions, yet their unique properties might also benefit specific binding-site selection. We examine this using Msn2 and Yap1, TFs of distinct families that contain long IDRs outside their DNA-binding domains. We find that these IDRs are both necessary and sufficient for localizing to the majority of target promoters. This IDR-directed binding does not depend on any localized domain but results from a multitude of weak determinants distributed throughout the entire IDR sequence. Furthermore, IDR specificity is conserved between distant orthologs, suggesting direct interaction with multiple promoters. We propose that distribution of sensing determinants along extended IDRs accelerates binding-site detection by rapidly localizing TFs to broad DNA regions surrounding these sites.

Disordered sequences of transcription factors regulate genomic binding by integrating diverse sequence grammars and interaction types.

Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) guide transcription factors (TFs) to their genomic binding sites, raising the question of how structure-lacking regions encode for complex binding patterns. We investigated this using the TF Gln3, revealing sets of IDR-embedded determinants that direct Gln3 binding to respective groups of functionally related promoters, and enable tuning binding preferences between environmental conditions, phospho-mimicking mutations, and orthologs. Through targeted mutations, we defined the role of short linear motifs (SLiMs) and co-binding TFs (Hap2) in stabilizing Gln3 at respiration-chain promoters, while providing evidence that Gln3 binding at nitrogen-associated promoters is encoded by the IDR amino-acid composition, independent of SLiMs or co-binding TFs. Therefore, despite their apparent simplicity, TF IDRs can direct and regulate complex genomic binding patterns through a combination of SLiM-mediated and composition-encoded interactions.

The architecture of binding cooperativity between densely bound transcription factors.

The binding of transcription factors (TFs) along genomes is restricted to a subset of sites containing their preferred motifs. TF-binding specificity is often attributed to the co-binding of interacting TFs; however, apart from specific examples, this model remains untested. Here, we define dependencies among budding yeast TFs that localize to overlapping promoters by profiling the genome-wide consequences of co-depleting multiple TFs. We describe unidirectional interactions, revealing Msn2 as a central factor allowing TF binding at its target promoters. By contrast, no case of mutual cooperation was observed. Particularly, Msn2 retained binding at its preferred promoters upon co-depletion of fourteen similarly bound TFs. Overall, the consequences of TF co-depletions were moderate, limited to a subset of promoters, and failed to explain the role of regions outside the DNA-binding domain in directing TF-binding preferences. Our results call for re-evaluating the role of cooperative interactions in directing TF-binding preferences.