Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 76
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pediatr Crit Care Med ; 25(8): 710-719, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717237

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare levetiracetam and phenytoin as prophylaxis for the short-term development of status epilepticus (SE) during care of pediatric patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Nonprespecified secondary analysis using propensity score matching. SETTING: We used the Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI Trial (ADAPT NCT04077411) dataset (2014-2017). SUBJECTS: Patients less than 18 years old with Glasgow Coma Scale Score less than or equal to 8 who received levetiracetam or phenytoin as a prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 516 total patients who qualified for the case-control study, 372 (72.1%) patients received levetiracetam, and 144 (27.9%) received phenytoin. After propensity score matching, the pair-matched analysis with 133 in each group failed to identify an association between levetiracetam versus phenytoin use and occurrent of SE (3.8% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.22), or mortality (i.e., in-hospital, 30-d and 60-d). However, on closer inspection of the statistical testing, we cannot exclude the possibility that selecting levetiracetam rather than phenytoin for prophylaxis was associated with the following: up to a mean difference of 7.3% greater prevalence of SE; up to a mean difference of 13.9%, 12.1%, and 13.9% greater mortality during the hospital stay, and 30-, and 60-days after hospital arrival, respectively. Last, analysis of 6 months Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score in those without premorbid comorbidities, there was an association between favorable outcomes and use of phenytoin rather than levetiracetam prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: In ADAPT, the decision to use prophylactic levetiracetam versus phenytoin failed to show an association with occurrence of subsequent SE, or mortality. However, we are unable to exclude the possibility that selecting levetiracetam rather than phenytoin for prophylaxis was associated with greater prevalence of SE and mortality. We are unable to make any recommendation about one prophylactic anticonvulsant medication over the other, but recommend that further larger, contemporary studies in severe pediatric TBI are carried out.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Levetiracetam , Fenitoína , Estado Epiléptico , Humanos , Fenitoína/uso terapéutico , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Niño , Femenino , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Preescolar , Adolescente , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Epiléptico/prevención & control , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Lactante , Puntaje de Propensión , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 79: 152-156, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432155

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Discharge against medical advice (AMA) leads to worse patient outcomes, increased readmission rates, and higher cost. However, AMA discharge has received limited study, particularly in pediatric trauma patients. Our objective was to explore the risk factors associated with leaving AMA in pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on pediatric trauma patients from 2017 to 2019 using the National Trauma Data Bank. We examined patient characteristics including age (<18 years), race, sex, Glasgow Coma Scale, trauma type, primary payment methods, and Abbreviated Injury Scale. Multiple Logistic Regression models were utilized to determine characteristics associated with leaving AMA. RESULTS: Of the 224,196 pediatric patients included in the study, 238 left AMA (0.1%). Our study showed black pediatric trauma patients were more likely to leave AMA compared to nonblack patients (OR 1.987, 95% CI 1.501 to 2.631). Patients with self-pay coverage were more likely to leave AMA than those with other insurance coverages (OR 1.759, 95% CI 1.183 to 2.614). Blunt trauma patients were more likely to leave AMA than those with penetrating trauma (OR 1.683, 95% CI 1.216 to 2.330). Every one-year increase in age led to 15% increase in odds of AMA discharge (OR 1.150, 95% CI 1.115 to 1.186). Pediatric patients with severe abdominal injuries were less likely to leave AMA compared to those with mild abdominal injuries (OR 0.271, 95% CI 0.111 to 0.657). Patients with severe lower extremity injury were less likely to leave AMA compared to those with mild lower extremity injuries (OR 0.258, 95% CI 0.127 to 0.522). CONCLUSION: Race, insurance, injury type, and age play a role in AMA discharge of pediatric trauma patients. Black pediatric trauma patients have ∼ double the AMA discharge rate of nonblack patients. AMA discharge remains relevant, and addressing racial and socioeconomic factors provide opportunities for future interventions in pediatric trauma care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective study.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Riesgo
3.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 40(4): 314-318, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38194684

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study is to examine the outcomes of care delivered at the pediatric trauma center (PTC) in severely injured children who were intubated, mechanically ventilated, and underwent tracheostomy. METHODS: The study data were obtained from the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database for the calendar years 2017 to 2019. All children aged ≤17 years who sustained severe injury, required intubation and mechanical ventilation for more than 96 hours, and underwent tracheostomy were included in the study. Patients' characteristics, injury severity, and outcomes were compared between the care provided at the PTCs (level I or level II) and nonpediatric trauma centers (NPTCs). The propensity score matching methodology was used to perform the analysis. All P values are 2-sided, and a P value of <0.0.5 is considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of 2164 patients who were qualified for the study, 1288 (59%) of the patients were treated at PTCs, and 876 (40.5%) of the patients were treated at NPTCs. Propensity matching created 876 pairs of patients. There were no significant differences found between the 2 groups on patients' characteristics except for age. Patients who were treated at PTCs had a median age of 14 (10-16) versus 15 (11-17) years ( P < 0.001) when compared with care provided at NPTCs. A longer hospital stay was found in the PTC group when compared with the NPTC group (24 [23, 25] vs 22 [21, 24], P = 0.008). Patients who were treated at PTC were found to have significantly less sepsis occurrence (0.9% vs 2.2%), and a higher proportion of patients were discharged home without needing additional support (26.2% vs 18.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Care at the PTC was associated with a lower occurrence of sepsis complications. A higher number of patients were discharged home without additional services when the care was provided at PTC.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Centros Traumatológicos , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Traqueostomía/métodos , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
4.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 104, 2024 Jun 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38910235

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the mortality of patients who received Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of The Aorta (REBOA) in severe pelvic fracture with hemorrhagic shock. METHODS: The American College of Surgeon Trauma Quality Improvement Program (ACS-TQIP) database for the calendar years 2017-2019 was accessed for the study. The study included all patients aged 15 years and older who sustained severe pelvic fractures, defined as an injury with an abbreviated injury scale (AIS) score of ≥ 3, and who presented with the lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) of < 90 mmHg. Patients with severe brain injury were excluded from the study. Propensity score matching was used to compare the patients who received REBOA with similar characteristics to patients who did not receive REBOA. RESULTS: Out of 3,186 patients who qualified for the study, 35(1.1%) patients received REBOA for an ongoing hemorrhagic shock with severe pelvic fracture. The propensity matching created 35 pairs of patients. The pair-matched analysis showed no significant differences between the group who received REBOA and the group that did not receive REBOA regarding patients' demography, injury severity, severity of pelvic fractures, lowest blood pressure at initial assessment and laparotomies. There was no significant difference found between REBOA versus no REBOA group in overall in-hospital mortality (34.3% vs. 28.6, P = 0.789). CONCLUSION: Our study did not identify any mortality advantage in patients who received REBOA in hemorrhagic shock associated with severe pelvic fracture compared to a similar cohort of patients who did not receive REBOA. A larger sample size prospective study is needed to validate our results. CASE-CONTROL RETROSPECTIVE STUDY: Level of Evidence IV.


Asunto(s)
Oclusión con Balón , Fracturas Óseas , Huesos Pélvicos , Puntaje de Propensión , Resucitación , Choque Hemorrágico , Humanos , Choque Hemorrágico/etiología , Choque Hemorrágico/terapia , Choque Hemorrágico/mortalidad , Oclusión con Balón/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Huesos Pélvicos/lesiones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resucitación/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fracturas Óseas/complicaciones , Fracturas Óseas/terapia , Fracturas Óseas/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Aorta/lesiones , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Escala Resumida de Traumatismos
5.
J Surg Res ; 288: 350-361, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37060861

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Population data on longitudinal trends for cholecystectomies and their outcomes are scarce. We evaluated the incidence and case fatality rate of emergency and ambulatory cholecystectomies in New Jersey (NJ) and whether the Medicaid expansion changed trends. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective population cohort design was used to study the incidence of cholecystectomies and their case fatality rate from 2009 to 2018. Using linear and logistic regression we explored the trends of incidence and the odds of case fatality after versus before the January 1, 2014 Medicaid expansion. RESULTS: Overall, 93,423 emergency cholecystectomies were performed, with 644 fatalities; 87,239 ambulatory cholecystectomies were performed, with fewer than 10 fatalities. The 2009 to 2018 annual incidence of emergency cholecystectomies dropped markedly from 114.8 to 77.5 per 100,000 NJ population (P < 0.0001); ambulatory cholecystectomies increased from 93.5 to 95.6 per 100,000 (P = 0.053). The incidence of emergency cholecystectomies dropped more after than before Medicaid expansion (P < 0.0001). The odds ratio for case fatality among those undergoing emergency cholecystectomies after versus before expansion was 0.85 (95% CI, 0.72-0.99). This decrease in case fatality, apparent only in those over age 65, was not explained by the addition of Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: A marked decrease in the incidence of emergency cholecystectomies occurred after Medicaid expansion, which was not accounted for by a minimal increase in the incidence of ambulatory cholecystectomies. Case fatality from emergency cholecystectomy decreased over time due to factors other than Medicaid. Further work is needed to reconcile these findings with the previously reported lack of decrease in overall gallstone disease mortality in NJ.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Biliares , Medicaid , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , New Jersey/epidemiología
6.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 407(1): 259-265, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34455491

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Rapid source control laparotomy (RSCL) for the management of non-traumatic intra-abdominal emergencies has increased over the past 25 years when it was advocated for trauma patients. Little data, however, support its widespread use. We hypothesize that the patients with RSCL will have poorer outcomes than those treated with primary fascial closure (PFC). METHODS: Patients operated for acute diverticulitis from 2014 to 2016 using The American College of Surgeons sponsored National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data were reviewed. Two groups were identified: PFC, patients with their closed fascia but skin left open (PFC) and RSCL, patients with their left open fascia after the initial operation. The primary outcome of the study was 30-day mortality, with secondary analyses evaluating complications, discharge location and length of stay. Univariate analysis was initially performed followed by propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 460 patients were surgically treated for Hinchey IV diverticulitis of whom 101 (21.9%) had RSCL. The length of stay of the RSCL patients was significantly longer (15 versus 12 days, p, 0.02) than patients in the PFC group. Similarly, the discharge destination for the PFC group was twice as likely to be discharged home as the RSCL group. CONCLUSION: RSCL for acute diverticulitis is a widely used but is associated with prolonged hospitalizations resulting in high rates of discharge to skilled nursing or rehabilitation facilities. Its routine use for diverticulitis should be limited.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis del Colon , Diverticulitis , Perforación Intestinal , Peritonitis , Abdomen , Diverticulitis/cirugía , Diverticulitis del Colon/cirugía , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/cirugía , Laparotomía , Tiempo de Internación , Peritonitis/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(6): 103068, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33940252

RESUMEN

The effects of severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) exist on a spectrum. Clinical symptoms of smell and taste dysfunction are prominent features of COVID-19. The objective of this study was to elucidate the factors associated with smell and taste dysfunction amongst hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A retrospective review of a multi-hospital health network's COVID-19 database between March and June 2020 was performed. Patients with self-reported smell or taste loss were included. Demographic information, patient comorbidities, and mortality data was obtained. There were 2892 patients included in this analysis and 117 reported smell or taste loss (4.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4%-4.8%). The proportion of females with smell or taste loss was significantly higher than males (6.3% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001), whereas no differences existed between ethnicity or smoking status. When compared with age of 30-40 years, the age group of 10-20 years were most likely to present with smell or taste dysfunction (odds ratio [OR] 6.59, 95% CI 1.32-26.12; P = 0.01). The majority of specific comorbidities were not associated with increased incidence of smell or taste dysfunction. Outpatient healthcare workers were more likely to present with smell or taste loss (OR 3.2, CI 1.8-5.47; P < 0.001). The mortality rate among COVID-19 patients with smell or taste dysfunction was significantly lower than those without (0% vs. 20.3%; P < 0.001). Smell or taste loss is more prevalent in women, younger age groups, and healthier individuals. It may be associated with lower mortality and a milder disease trajectory compared to the overall cohort.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Hospitalización , Trastornos del Olfato/etiología , Trastornos del Olfato/fisiopatología , Olfato/fisiología , Trastornos del Gusto/etiología , Trastornos del Gusto/fisiopatología , Gusto/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/mortalidad , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos del Olfato/epidemiología , Trastornos del Olfato/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Trastornos del Gusto/epidemiología , Trastornos del Gusto/mortalidad , Adulto Joven
8.
Neurourol Urodyn ; 39(8): 2246-2252, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32761979

RESUMEN

AIMS: To validate the recommendations of the Society of Urodynamics, Female Pelvic Medicine, and Urogenital Reconstruction (SUFU) 2017 Best Practice Policy Statement (BPPS) for Urodynamic Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in high-risk patients. METHODS: After institutional review board approval, 489 patients who underwent urodynamics (UDS) in the absence of antibiotic prophylaxis were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified according to the SUFU BPPS risk factors (neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction [NLUTD], elevated postvoid residual [PVR], immunosuppression, age over 70, catheter use, and orthopedic implants). χ2 , Fisher's exact test, Student t test, and univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess the associations between these risk factors and postprocedural urinary tract infection (UTI). RESULTS: Twenty-two (4.5%) patients developed symptomatic postprocedural UTI. Univariate analysis revealed statistical differences in the incidence of UTI in patients with elevated PVR and NLUTD groups. The variables that were associated with UTI on multivariate analysis were elevated PVR (odds ratio [OR]: 4.91, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.92-12.56, P = .001) and NLUTD (OR: 4.84, 95% CI, 1.75-3.37, P = .002). The data analysis for all other high-risk groups failed to show significant correlations with UTI on univariate or multivariate analysis. Patients with three risk factors were more likely to develop UTI than patients with 1 or 2 risk factors. No patient developed pyelonephritis, sepsis, or joint infection. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated PVR, NLUTD, and possessing three risk factors were significant predictors for post-UDS UTI. All other risk factors were not associated with postprocedural UTI. Morbidity associated with UTI was low. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for these conditions should be reconsidered.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Urodinámica , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Políticas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Urinarias/etiología
9.
South Med J ; 113(7): 345-349, 2020 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32617595

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate whether early colectomy in patients who have toxic megacolon due to Clostridium difficile colitis reduces mortality. METHODS: The study was performed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2016. All patients 18 to 89 years of age who underwent colectomy for toxic megacolon resulting from C. difficile colitis were included in the study. Other variables included in the study were patient demography, comorbidities, and outcomes. Patients who underwent colectomy before the presentation of septic shock (early group) were compared with patients who underwent colectomy after the onset of septic shock (late group). The main outcome of the study is 30-day all-cause mortality. Because there were some significant differences found in patient baseline characteristics in the univariate analysis, the propensity score of each patient was calculated and pair-matched analysis was performed. All P values are reported as 2-sided, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-three patients met the inclusion criteria of the study. Approximately 85% of the patients underwent total abdominal colectomy. The average age of the patients was 65 years old, 51% of the patients were female, and 66% of the patients were white. The overall 30-day mortality was approximately 39%. The mortality rate of patients who underwent colectomy early compared to late was 13 (21%) vs 28 (45%), P = 0.009. The absolute risk difference was 0.24 with 95% CI: 0.07-0.42. CONCLUSIONS: There was a reduction of 24% in 30-day mortality when colectomies were performed before the development of septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Colectomía/métodos , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/cirugía , Megacolon Tóxico/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía/mortalidad , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Megacolon Tóxico/microbiología , Megacolon Tóxico/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
10.
Pediatr Surg Int ; 36(12): 1459-1464, 2020 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33044611

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to identify the factors associated with splenectomy in pediatric trauma patients. METHOD: Pediatric Trauma quality improvement program (P-TQIP) database calendar year 2014-2016 was accessed for the study. All patients, age ≤ 18 years old, who sustained splenic injury due to blunt mechanism, were included in the study. The primary outcome of the study was to identify the risk factors associated with splenectomy. Univariate followed by multivariate analyses were performed. A p value of < 0.05 was considered an indication of statistical significance. RESULTS: Of 1297 trauma victims, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 57 (4.4%) patients underwent total splenectomy. In Univariate analysis, there were significant differences found, in many variables, between the groups who underwent splenectomy versus those who did not have splenectomy. A multivariate logistic regression analysis showed use of blood transfusion within 4 h and severity of splenic injury were the two variables associated with splenectomy. The area under the curve (AUC) value was 0.892 and the 95% confidence intervals were [0.859, 0.923]. CONCLUSION: Blood transfusion within 4 h of patient's arrival to the hospital and high-grade splenic injury were main factors for splenectomy in the pediatric population.


Asunto(s)
Bazo/lesiones , Bazo/cirugía , Esplenectomía/efectos adversos , Heridas no Penetrantes/cirugía , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Geriatr Nurs ; 41(5): 553-558, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32216955

RESUMEN

This retrospective cohort study uses the Minimum Data Set (MDS) and Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS) to determine predictors associated with permanent transition to nursing homes among home care recipients with dementia. Study participants include older adults age 65+ with dementia who received home health services in New York State for at least 2 months prior to permanent transition to nursing homes. Multivariate logistic regression was used to quantify the association between predictors and permanent transition to nursing homes. Risk factors associated with permanent transition included increasing age (OR = 1.1; 95% CI 1.03-1.18); white compared to black (OR = 1.25; 95%CI 0.83-0.94), urinary and bowel incontinence vs. continence (OR = 1.46; 95% CI 1.37-1.56); depression vs. no depression (OR = 1.2; 95% CI 1.11-1.25); hip fracture vs. no hip fracture (OR = 2.63; 95% CI 2.27-3.05), and 3+ hospitalizations vs. no hospitalizations (OR = 3.02; 95% CI 2.77-3.29). Early diagnosis and treatment may delay or avert nursing home entry.


Asunto(s)
Envejecimiento , Demencia/enfermería , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Casas de Salud , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , New York , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
14.
HPB (Oxford) ; 16(2): 109-18, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23672270

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection is growing in popularity, but the long-term outcome of patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection for malignancy has not been established. This paper is a meta-analysis and compares the long-term survival of patients undergoing laparoscopic (LHep) versus open (OHep) liver resection for the treatment of malignant liver tumours. METHODS: A PubMed database search identified comparative human studies analysing LHep versus OHep for malignant tumours. Clinical and survival parameters were extracted. The search was last conducted on 18 March 2012. RESULTS: In total, 1002 patients in 15 studies were included (446 LHep and 556 OHep). A meta-analysis of overall survival showed no difference [1-year: odds ratio (OR) 0.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 1.20, P = 0.202; 3-years: OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.03, P = 0.076; 5-years: OR 0.8, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.10, P = 0.173]. Subset analyses of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and colorectal metastases (CRM) were performed. There was no difference in the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival for HCC or in the 1-year survival for CRM, however, a survival advantage was found for CRM at 3 years (LHep 80% versus OHep 67.4%, P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery should be considered an acceptable alternative for the treatment of malignant liver tumours.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/patología , Carcinoma/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Carcinoma/mortalidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hepatectomía/métodos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Laparoscopía/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Am Surg ; 90(5): 991-997, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38057289

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to find the factors that were associated with tracheostomy procedures in ventilated pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database of the calendar year 2017 through 2019 was accessed for the study. All patients <18 years old and who were on mechanical ventilation for more than 96 hours were included in the study. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to find the factors that were associated with a tracheostomy. RESULTS: Out of 2653 patients, 1907 (71.88%) patients underwent tracheostomy. The patients who underwent tracheostomy had a lower median [IQR] of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (3 [3-8] vs 5 [3-10], P < .001) and had a higher proportion of severe spine injury (On Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS]≥3) (11.6% vs 8.8%, P = .044) when compared with patients who did not have tracheostomy. Lower GCS scores and severe spine injury were associated with higher odds of tracheostomy, with all P values <.05. Higher proportion of tracheostomy procedures were performed at level I pediatric trauma centers as compared to non-designated pediatric centers (odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.848 [1.524-2.242], P < .001). CONCLUSION: A lower GCS score, severe spine injury and highest level trauma centers were associated with a tracheostomy.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Traqueostomía , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Traqueostomía/métodos , Respiración Artificial , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos
16.
Crit Care Explor ; 6(9): e1150, 2024 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39254656

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is one of the interventions that have been in practice for ARDS for decades. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to investigate the outcomes of ECMO in pediatric trauma patients who suffered from ARDS. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program database for years 2017 to 2019 and 2021 through 2022 was accessed for the study. All children younger than 18 years old who were admitted to the hospital after trauma and suffered from ARDS were included in the study. Other variables included in the study were patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, comorbidities, and outcomes. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: ECMO is the exposure, and the outcomes are in-hospital mortality and hospital complications (acute kidney injury [AKI], pneumonia and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]). RESULTS: Of 453 patients who qualified for the study, propensity score matching found 50 pairs of patients. There were no significant differences identified between the groups, ECMO+ vs. ECMO- on patients' age in years (16 yr; interquartile range [IQR], 13.25-17 yr vs. 16 yr [14.25-17 yr]), race (White; 62.0% vs. 66.0%), sex (male; 78% vs. 76%), ISS (23 [IQR, 9.25-34] vs. 22 [9.25-32]), and GCS (15 [IQR, 3-15] vs. 13.5 [3-15]), mechanism of injury; and comorbidities. There was no difference between the groups, ECMO+ vs. ECMO-, in-hospital mortality (10.0% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.302), hospital complications (AKI 12.0% vs. 2.0%; p = 0.131), pneumonia (10.0% vs. 20.0%; p = 0.182 > ), and DVT (16% vs. 6%; p = 0.228). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: No difference in mortality was observed in injured children who suffered from the ARDS and were placed on ECMO when compared with patients who were not placed on ECMO. Patients with trauma and ARDS who require ECMO have comparable outcomes to those who do not receive ECMO. A larger sample size study is needed to find the exact benefit of ECMO in this patients' cohort.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Heridas y Lesiones , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Resultado del Tratamiento , Niño , Puntaje de Propensión , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
17.
World J Orthop ; 15(6): 539-546, 2024 Jun 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38947263

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Open long bone fractures are a major concern for pediatric patients due to the risk of surgical site infection (SSI). Early studies have recommended irrigation and debridement of open fractures within 6 hours-8 hours for the prevention of SSI. According to the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Best Practice Guidelines, in 2015, irrigation and debridement should be done within 24 hours. AIM: To identify whether early irrigation and debridement, within 8 hours, vs late, between 8 hours and 24 hours, for pediatric open long bone fractures impacts rate of SSI. METHODS: Using retrospective data review from the National Trauma Data Bank, Trauma Quality Improvement Project (TQIP) of 2019. TQIP database is own by the ACS and it is the largest database for trauma quality program in the world. Propensity matching analysis was performed for the study. RESULTS: There were 390 pediatric patients with open long bone fractures who were included in the study. After completing propensity score matching, we had 176 patients in each category, irrigation and debridement within 8 hours and irrigation and debridement between 8 hours and 24 hours. We found no significant differences between each group for the rate of deep SSI which was 0.6% for patients who received surgical irrigation and debridement within 8 hours and 1.1% for those who received it after 8 hours [adjusted odd ratio (AOR): 0.5, 95%CI: 0.268-30.909, P > 0.99]. For the secondary outcomes studied, in terms of length of hospital stay, patients who received irrigation and debridement within 8 hours stayed for an average of 3.5 days, and those who received it after 8 hours stayed for an average of 3 days, with no significant difference found, and there were also no significant differences found between the discharge dispositions of the patients. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the recommendation for managing open long bone fractures from the ACS: Complete surgical irrigation and debridement within 24 hours.

18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38821065

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Absent pupillary reaction occasionally heralds a poor prognosis following severe head injury. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the outcome of all patients who underwent acute evacuation of epidural hematoma (EDH) despite absent bilateral pupillary reaction. METHODS: The Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) database for the calendar years 2017 and 2018 was accessed for the study. Adult patients ≥18 years of age who sustained severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) with the diagnosis of EDH and underwent evacuation of the hematoma were included in the study. The patients' characteristics, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, midline shift, and comorbidities were compared between patients who had absence of both pupillary reaction (ABPR) and those who presented with presence of both pupillary reaction (PBPR). The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score matching analyses were performed for the study. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the ABPR and PBPR groups regarding the median age (37 years [interquartile range (IQR): 26-53] vs. 40 years [IQR: 28-55]), gender (males; 81.9 vs. 79.5%), median ISS (29 [25.5-34] vs. 27 [25-33]), GCS score (3 [3-4] vs. 3 [3-3], presence of significant midline shift (75.9 vs. 79.5%), and comorbidities. The patients who presented with ABPR had a significantly higher mortality (34.9 vs. 10.8%; p = 0.002). A higher number of patients were discharged to skilled nursing and rehabilitation facilities (16.7 vs. 10.8% and 46.3 vs. 41.9%, respectively; p = 0.045). CONCLUSION: Approximately 65% of severe TBI patients survived after the evacuation of the EDH despite the absence of pupillary reaction.

19.
World Neurosurg ; 184: e195-e202, 2024 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38266987

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early operative intervention, craniotomy, and/or craniectomy are occasionally warranted in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Persistent increased intracranial pressure or accumulation of intracranial hematoma postsurgery can result in higher mortality and morbidity. There is a gap in information regarding the outcome of repeat surgery (RS) in pediatric patients with severe TBI. METHODS: An observational cohort study titled Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI Trial data was obtained from the Federal Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury Research Informatics System. All pediatric patients who underwent craniotomy or decompressive craniectomy, survived more than 44 hours and were found to have persistent elevated intracranial pressure >20 mmHg for 2 consecutive hours were included in the study. The purpose of the study was to find the outcomes of RS in pediatric severe TBI. Propensity based matching was used to find the outcomes. The primary outcome was 60-day mortality. RESULTS: Out of 1000 total patients enrolled in the Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric Trial, 160 patients qualified for this study. Propensity score matching created 13 pairs of patients. There were no significant differences found between the groups who had RS versus those who did not have repeat surgery on baseline characteristics. There were no significant differences found between the groups regarding 60-day mortality, median hospital days, median intensive care unit days, and 6-month favorable outcome on Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in mortality between patients who underwent a second surgery and patients who did not have to undergo a second surgery.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Lesiones Encefálicas , Craniectomía Descompresiva , Hipertensión Intracraneal , Humanos , Niño , Reoperación , Lesiones Encefálicas/cirugía , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/cirugía , Hipertensión Intracraneal/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(14)2024 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39061659

RESUMEN

A line-field confocal optical coherence tomography (LC-OCT) combines confocal microscopy and optical coherence tomography into a single, rapid, easy-to-use device. This meta-analysis was performed to determine the reliability of LC-OCT for diagnosing malignant skin tumors. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science databases, and the Cochrane Library were searched for research studies in the English language from inception till December 2023. To assess quality and the risk of bias, the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) was used. The sensitivity and specificity of each study were calculated. The bivariate summary sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the linear mixed model. Five studies with 904 reported per lesion analyses in our study; the specificity and sensitivity ranged from 67% to 97% and 72% to 92%, respectively. The pooled specificity and sensitivity were 91% (95% CI: 76-97%) and 86.9% (95% CI: 81.8-90.8%), respectively. The summary sensitivity and specificity from the bivariate approach are 86.9% (95% CI: 81.8-90.8%) and 91.1% (95% CI: 76.7-97.0%), respectively. The area under the curve is 0.914. LC-OCT shows great sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing malignant skin tumors. However, due to the limited number of studies included in our meta-analysis, it is premature to elucidate the true potential of LC-OCT.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA