Mechanisms of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes: Current perspectives and future challenges.

The evidence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) without asthma (EIBwA ) occurring in athletes led to speculate about different endotypes inducing respiratory symptoms within athletes. Classical postulated mechanisms for bronchial obstruction in this population include the osmotic and the thermal hypotheses. More recently, the presence of epithelial injury and inflammation in the airways of athletes was demonstrated. In addition, neuronal activation has been suggested as a potential modulator of bronchoconstriction. Investigation of these emerging mechanisms is of major importance as EIB is a significant problem for both recreational and competitive athletes and is the most common chronic condition among Olympic athletes, with obvious implications for their competing performance, health and quality of life. Hereby, we summarize the latest achievements in this area and identify the current gaps of knowledge so that future research heads toward better defining the etiologic factors and mechanisms involved in development of EIB in elite athletes as well as essential aspects to ultimately propose preventive and therapeutic measures.

Pathophysiological mechanisms of exercise-induced anaphylaxis: an EAACI position statement.

This document is the result of a consensus on the mechanisms of exercise-induced anaphylaxis (EIAn), an unpredictable and potentially fatal syndrome. A multidisciplinary panel of experts including exercise physiologists, allergists, lung physicians, paediatricians and a biostatistician reached the given consensus. Exercise-induced anaphylaxis (EIAn) describes a rare and potentially fatal syndrome in which anaphylaxis occurs in conjunction with exercise. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying EIAn have not yet been elucidated although a number of hypotheses have been proposed. This review evaluates the validity of each of the popular theories in relation to exercise physiology and immunology. On the basis of this evidence, it is concluded that proposed mechanisms lack validity, and it is recommended that a global research network is developed with a common approach to the diagnosis and treatment of EIAn in order to gain sufficient power for scientific evaluation.

Immune activation despite suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy is associated with higher risk of viral blips in HIV-1-infected individuals.

OBJECTIVES: Viral blips are thought to represent random biological variations around a steady state of residual HIV viraemia and to lack clinical significance. We aimed to assess the association of immune activation and the occurrence of blips. METHODS: HIV-infected patients from our out-patient cohort who developed a blip after having been on fully suppressive highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) for at least 180 days were matched with patients without blips according to duration of complete viral suppression (CVS), age, sex and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) stage. Frequencies of CD3(+), CD3(+) CD4(+), CD3(+) CD8(+), CD3(+) HLA-DR(+), CD4(+) CD45RA(+), CD16(+) CD56(+) CD3(-) and CD19(+) cells, as well as C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and clinical parameters, were included in conditional logistic regression models. Adherence to HAART was assessed by measuring prescribed nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) or protease inhibitor (PI) plasma levels in a sample of 57 patients. RESULTS: Eighty-two patients with viral blip were matched with 82 controls from the same cohort. The mean age was 47.2 years [standard deviation (SD) 12.1 years], 80.5% of patients were male and 42.7% had CDC stage C disease. Viral blips occurred after a median of 14 months [interquartile range (IQR) 8-34 months] of CVS. In the logistic regression, activated CD3(+) HLA-DR(+) lymphocytes [odds ratio (OR) 1.25 per 100 cells/µL; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.54; P = 0.03] were significantly associated with blips and there was a trend for an association of longer time on HAART with blips (OR 1.31 per year; 95% CI 0.96-1.78; P = 0.09). No between-group difference regarding subtherapeutic drug levels was found (P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of viral blips after suppressive HAART was associated with elevated markers of T-cell activation. Blips may identify a subset of patients with higher immune activation and increased risk for HIV disease progression.

Therapy failure following selection of enfuvirtide-resistant HIV-1 in cerebrospinal fluid.

We report the selection of enfuvirtide-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in cerebrospinal fluid, resulting in subsequent loss of viral suppression in the plasma. This case report emphasizes the potential danger of low-level penetration of entry inhibitors into the central nervous system.

Once-daily treatment with saquinavir mesylate (2000 mg) and ritonavir (100 mg) together with a fixed-dose combination of abacavir/lamivudine (600/300 mg) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (245/200 mg) in HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of a once-daily regimen of 2000 mg saquinavir mesylate boosted with 100 mg ritonavir. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients successfully treated with 1000 mg saquinavir boosted with 100 mg ritonavir twice daily together with two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors [N(t)RTIs] who were switched to 2000 mg saquinavir with 100 mg ritonavir once daily with unchanged N(t)RTI therapy were analysed. CD4 cells, HIV-RNA PCR and metabolic parameters were compared between baseline and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after the switch. Saquinavir and ritonavir drug levels were measured before and a median of 3 weeks after switching from twice to once daily at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12 and 24 h after intake of the medication. The area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24)) was calculated using the trapezoidal rule. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (16 males, median age of 41 years) with a median CD4 cell count of 464 cells/mm(3) were analysed. HIV-RNA PCR remained <500 copies/mL for all patients. After switching from 100 mg twice daily to 100 mg once daily, the AUC(0-24) for ritonavir decreased significantly [21 874 to 10 267 ng.h/mL, geometric mean ratio (GMR) = 0.47; P < 0.001], whereas the AUC(0-24) for saquinavir decreased only marginally from 35 000 to 34 490 ng.h/mL (GMR = 0.99; P = 0.426). The CD4 cell count and the fasting metabolic parameters remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily treatment with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir was well tolerated and resulted in similar saquinavir drug exposure despite much lower ritonavir concentrations when compared with a twice-daily dosing schedule.

Antiviral efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in an unselected cohort of HIV-infected children.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain data on the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz in children in clinical practice. METHODS: HIV-1-infected children received efavirenz capsules or tablets in accordance with manufacturer's dosing recommendations. Plasma was collected at regular visits and analysed by HPLC. The therapeutic range of efavirenz was defined as 1.0-4.0 mg/L. RESULTS: Thirty-three children were included. Median (range) age, body weight, dose and dose/kg were 8.2 (2.1-16.7) years, 24 (12-62) kg, 300 (200-800) mg and 13.3 (9.7-22.5) mg/kg, respectively. Median (range) efavirenz plasma concentration at first sampling was 2.8 (0.13-11.6) mg/L. Plasma concentrations were not dependent on age (P = 0.97) or dose/kg (P = 0.87). A total of 307 efavirenz plasma concentrations were determined. Forty-five samples (14.7%) contained >4.0 mg/L, and 27 samples (8.8%) contained <1.0 mg/L. Eight children (24%) reported persistent adverse events probably caused by efavirenz [concentration problems (5), sleep disorder (1), psychotic reaction (1) and seizure (1)]; six discontinued efavirenz for this reason. A non-significant trend existed towards a higher proportion of toxic efavirenz plasma concentrations (>4.0 mg/L) in subjects who reported efavirenz adverse events: 25.9% versus 12.8% (P = 0.23; t-test). Viral load was <50 copies/mL in all 27 subjects who continued efavirenz, despite occasional subtherapeutic efavirenz plasma concentrations in 12 children. The occasional subtherapeutic levels suggest that temporal non-adherence was present. CONCLUSIONS: Efavirenz as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy was highly effective in children able to tolerate the drug. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) as part of toxicity management may prevent discontinuation in a subset of patients. Temporal non-adherence occurs frequently. TDM may allow initiation of adherence interventions before viral load becomes detectable.

Increased responsiveness to toll-like receptor 4 stimulation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Cell signaling via Toll-like receptors (TLRs) leads to synovial inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to assess effects of TLR2 and TLR4 stimulation on proinflammatory cytokine production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with recent-onset RA, osteoarthrosis (OA), and healthy control (HC). METHODS: PBMCs were stimulated with LPS, biglycan and cytokine mix. Cytokines were analyzed in supernatants with ELISA. Expression of toll-like receptors mRNA in leukocytes was analyzed using real-time qPCR. RESULTS: PBMCs from RA patients spontaneously produced less IL-6 and TNFalpha than cells from OA and HC subjects. LPS increased cytokines' production in all groups. In RA patients increase was dramatic (30 to 48-fold and 17 to 31-fold, for respective cytokines) compared to moderate (2 to 8-fold) in other groups. LPS induced 15-HETE generation in PBMCs from RA (mean 251%) and OA patients (mean 43%), although only in OA group, the increase was significant. TLR2 and TLR4 gene expressions decreased in response to cytokine mix, while LPS enhanced TLR2 expression in HC and depressed TLR4 expression in OA patients. CONCLUSION: PBMCs from recent-onset RA patients are overresponsive to stimulation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide. TLR expression is differentially regulated in healthy and arthritic subjects.

Dose reduction effective in alleviating symptoms of saquinavir toxicity.

Gastrointestinal intolerance is a limitation of boosted saquinavir antiretroviral treatment. We present three HIV-infected individuals whose severe toxicity symptoms started directly after initiation of a standard dose saquinavir hard-gel capsule-containing regimen (saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg). All patients underwent immediate 12 h pharmacokinetic (PK) assessment and showed extraordinarily high saquinavir plasma exposure. All three patients did not recover until the saquinavir exposure was decreased. This pilot case study anticipates a new concept of 'direct PK'-guided individual dose interventions under close viral load monitoring. Two major reasons for symptomatic saquinavir overexposure were defined: impaired liver function in a chronic hepatitis C virus co-infected individual at normal liver performance parameters and a delayed cytochrome p450 enzyme autoinduction. Overexposure seems to be an independent intolerance factor. Although delayed autoinduction is not well established as a reason for adverse events in saquinavir therapy, this observation may be confirmed in the near future by increased use.

Differences of nine drug resistance interpretation systems in predicting short-term therapy outcomes of treatment-experienced HIV-1 infected patients: a retrospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Drug resistance interpretation systems are used to select the optimal antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients. It is unclear how the systems perform in predicting therapy success and failure and in how far the interpretations are affected by insufficient drug levels. METHODS: The accuracy of nine different interpretation systems in predicting therapy outcomes was evaluated using virological, immunological, pharmacological, and clinical data of 130 patients treated at 13 outpatient centers. Individual susceptibility scores of the interpretation systems were converted into active drug scores (ADS) and correlated with therapy success and failure, defined as viral load reduction of equal to or more (n=66) and less than 1 log10 copies/ml (n=64) at three months after drug resistance testing. RESULTS: Three interpretation systems considered the respective therapies as more active compared to the other interpretation systems (p<0.01). These systems predicted therapy success better than the other systems, while the others performed better in predicting therapy failure. Thus, the overall rate of correctly predicted treatment outcomes was comparable between the different systems (73.1-80.0 %). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis revealed significant correlations between the ADS of all interpretation systems and virological therapy outcomes (p<0.0001). In contrast, only three interpretation systems were significantly correlated with immunological therapy outcomes in univariate and just one in multivariate models (p<0.05). Among 128 determinations of drug levels in 64 patient samples, 19.4 % revealed no detectable drug levels. The consideration of insufficient drug levels significantly improved the prediction accuracy of all interpretation systems (p<0.005). CONCLUSION: Differences between interpretation systems in predicting therapy failures and success need to be considered for future consensus algorithms. The prediction accuracy of interpretation systems can be improved by consideration of plasma drug levels.

Pharmacokinetics and tolerability of a combination of indinavir, lopinavir and ritonavir in multiply pretreated HIV-1 infected adults.

OBJECTIVES: The authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics and tolerability of indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir in a protease inhibitor only combination. METHODS: Plasma drug levels of patients taking indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir 800/400/100mg twice daily (n = 24, group 1) were compared to patients taking either lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100mg (n = 35, group2) or indinavir/ritonavir 800/100mg (n = 33, group3) twice daily plus nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). Steady-state drug concentrations were measured by LC/MS/MS. Minimum and maximum concentrations (C subsetmin, C subsetmax), area under the concentration-time curve (AUC subset0-12h), total clearance (CL subsettot) and half-life (t1/2) were calculated. HIV viral load, CD4 cell count and adverse events causing early termination of therapy were correlated over a period of 48 weeks. RESULTS: Plasma levels of lopinavir/ritonavir were significantly enhanced when combined with indinavir compared to a regimen of lopinavir/ritonavir+NRTI: Mean lopinavir AUC subset(0-12h) 80,912 ng*h/mL vs. 60,548 ng*h/mL; C subsetmin 4,633 ng/mL vs. 3,258 ng/mL; C subsetmax 8,023 ng/mL vs. 6,710 ng/mL. Mean ritonavir AUC(0-12h) 6,907 ng*h/mL vs. 3,467 ng*h/mL; Cmin 220 ng/mL vs. 125 ng/mL; C subsetmax 1,059 ng/mL vs. 522 ng/mL. Indinavir levels were comparable for both indinavir containing regimen. A significantly smaller number of patients stopped indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir therapy (group1: 16.7%) than indinavir/ritonavir + NRTI treatment (group3: 45.5%) due to adverse events. Virological failure was the main reason for early termination of treatment with indinavir/lopinavir/ ritonavir before week 48 (group1: 50%). CONCLUSIONS: indinavir/lopinavir/ritonavir 800/400/ 100mg twice daily represents a therapy option with an adequate safety but only short term efficacy for extensively pretreated patients.

Long-term pharmacokinetics of amprenavir in combination with delavirdine in HIV-infected children.

Five heavily pretreated HIV-infected children were put on amprenavir and delavirdine plus two nucleoside inhibitors to reverse transcriptase to boost amprenavir levels and to use the antiretroviral activity of a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. No data are available about this combination in children. It w;as well tolerated, and the median reduction in viral load was 1.5 log after 18 months. Delavirdine boosted amprenavir trough levels more than 10-fold, and delavirdine trough levels remained i several fold above susceptible HIV strains.

Phenotypic HIV-1 resistance correlates with treatment outcome of nelfinavir salvage therapy.

In order to analyse whether drug sensitivity testing would be beneficial for clinical decision-making in heavily pretreated patients, we retrospectively studied viral genotype and phenotypic drug resistance in 12 HIV-1-infected patients, each of them with a history of failing at least one therapeutic regimen including one or two protease inhibitors (PIs). The salvage therapy included nelfinavir as new PI in all cases. Four patients showed a sustained and five patients a transient viral load decrease. Three patients failed to show a significant decline of plasma HIV-1 RNA. In the baseline samples of these cases, resistance against all components of their combination therapy could be detected, whereas at least one antiretroviral drug was still active in the cases with transient treatment response. All patients with sustained therapy response harboured viruses that were either fully sensitive or resistant to only one of the drugs administered. In our study, phenotypic drug resistance was predictive for the success of antiretroviral salvage regimens.

Initiation of HAART in drug-naive HIV type 1 patients prevents viral breakthrough for a median period of 35.5 months in 60% of the patients.

The introduction of potent combinations of antiviral drugs is a major breakthrough in the treatment of HIV. We investigated the long-term virologic outcome and the development of resistance after initiating highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) in drug-naive patients in daily clinical practice. Twenty-five treatment-naive HIV-1 patients were started on HAART. Fifteen patients responded with a drop in viral load below the limit of detection during 35.5 (interquartile range: 7) months of therapy. In 6 of 10 patients with virologic failure, virus with resistance-related mutations against the received drugs emerged. Compared with responders (R), nonresponding (NR) patients were in a later disease stage at therapy start (p = 0.0089) with lower CD4 cell counts at baseline (p = 0.040), and a lower proportion of nonresponders showed protease inhibitor (PI) levels above C(min) (p = 0.049). More NR patients showed secondary PI mutations at baseline (p = 0.079), and the CCR2-64I coreceptor polymorphism was absent among NR patients, compared with 38.5% of R patients displaying CCR2-64I (p = 0.053), although the differences were not significant. In conclusion, starting HAART in antiretroviral drug-naive HIV-infected patients followed in daily clinical practice prevented viral breakthrough for up to 44 months in 60% of the patients. Virologic failure was associated with the development of resistance-related mutations, a later stage of disease at start of therapy and lower PI drug levels.

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral uracil, ftorafur, and leucovorin in patients with advanced cancer.

A phase I and pharmacokinetics study of oral uracil, ftorafur, and leucovorin was performed in patients with advanced cancer. Uracil plus ftorafur (UFT) was given in a 4:1 molar ratio in three divided doses for 28 consecutive days. Patient cohorts were treated at 200, 250, 300, and 350 mg/m2 of UFT daily. For all patients, 150 mg of leucovorin was given daily in three oral doses. A 1-week rest period followed each 28-day treatment course. Gastrointestinal toxicity, characterized by diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, was dose-limiting at 350 mg/m2 UFT in patients who had received prior chemotherapy. Mild fatigue and transient hyperbilirubinemia were also common. In previously untreated patients, UFT at 350 mg/m2 was well-tolerated, suggesting this as an acceptable phase II dose in this schedule with leucovorin. Two of eight previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer had partial responses with UFT (350 mg/m2) plus leucovorin. Pharmacokinetic parameters [ftorafur, uracil, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-methyltetrahydrofolate] showed wide interpatient variations. Plasma levels of 5-FU (Cmax 1.4 +/- 1.9 microM) were comparable to those achieved with protracted venous infusions, and folate levels (Cmax 6.1 +/- 3.6 microM) were sufficient for biochemical modulation. Ongoing study will determine if this convenient oral regimen will compare favorably in terms of efficacy, toxicity, and cost with intravenous fluoropyrimidine programs.

Effects of pirazolac on arachidonic acid metabolism in the human synovial system.

Six patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis with massive knee joint effusions were treated with single daily doses of 600 mg pirazolac, a novel non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, for 3 days. Before the first dose, 3 hours after the second and the third dose, specimens of plasma and synovial fluid were drawn simultaneously. Plasma and synovial fluid concentrations of pirazolac, as determined by HPLC, amounted to 47.9 micrograms/ml and 19.8 micrograms/ml (Day 2) and 55.5 micrograms/ml and 18.7 micrograms/ml (Day 3), respectively. The samples were analyzed for PGE2, LTB4, LTC4 and LTD4 applying various extraction procedures and subsequent radioimmunoassays. PGE2 levels decreased during treatment from 928 pg/ml to 443 pg/ml after the third dose of pirazolac. LTB4 levels were slightly but insignificantly augmented. LTC4 and LTD4 concentrations were below the detection limit prior to and after administration of the drug.

Is Helicobacter pylori infection a risk or protective factor for mucosal lesions development in patients chronically treated with acetylsalicylic acid?

The interaction between ASA and H.p. as the strongest irritants to gastric mucosa has not been sufficiently documented to date. The aim of our study was to evaluate the frequency of mucosal lesions in stomach and duodenum and the frequency of H.p. infection in patients suffering from IHD and chronically taking ASA. We evaluated the number of mucosal lesions and the incidence rate in relation to the daily dose of ASA. We examined 96 with IHD treated with ASA in doses: 75, 150 or 300 mg per day. We assessed the number of mucosal lesions and H.p. status. The control groups included 80 patients treated for IHD who did not take ASA and 50 patients who did not suffer from IHD. The highest rate of mucosal lesions we found in the group of patients with IHD treated with ASA: 62% vs 41% in patients not using ASA and 8% in the control group. We did not find any essential difference in mucosal lesions occurrence between patients treated with 75 or 150 and 300 mg per day. In patients with IHD using ASA the frequency of H.p. infection was higher in comparison to patients not receiving ASA (68% vs 47%) and to control group (68% vs 26%). ASA users infected with H.p. had more mucosal lesions (75%) in comparison to those not using ASA (47%). Our results confirm the synergistic harmful influence of ASA and H.p. infection on gastric and duodenal mucosa. It seems to us that the frequency of mucosal lesions development does not depend on the daily dose of ASA.

The efficacy and relative bioavailability of diclofenac resinate in rheumatoid arthritis patients.

The pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of 75 mg resin-bound diclofenac (resinate) were compared with enteric-coated tablets containing 75 mg of diclofenac in a double-blind randomized crossover trial in 16 patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis. Diclofenac was significantly faster absorbed from the resinate than from the enteric coated formulation (tlag = 0.454 h vs. 0.998 h, tmax = 1.41 h vs. 2.56 h) and reached lower peak concentrations (Cmax = 1.64 micrograms/ml vs. 2.59 micrograms/ml). No significant differences were found concerning the area under the plasma level-time curves and the mean residence times. Smaller variances were found for the tmax and the mean residence times in the group treated with diclofenac resinate. Onset and duration of analgesia, as assessed by visual analogue scales were similar in both treatment groups, but did not correlate with the plasma concentrations. Four patients experienced adverse effects including gastric pain, transaminase increases, proteinuria and plasma creatinin increase. No uncommon adverse effects were observed with the new preparation.

Single daily doses of saquinavir achieve HIV-inhibitory concentrations when combined with baby-dose ritonavir.

Dual protease inhibitor (PI) therapy has been established either in order to increase plasma concentrations of one PI or to combine synergistic effects of two PI's on viral load. Studies with saquinavir (SQV) and small doses of ritonavir (RTV) as well as experiences from our therapeutic drug monitoring suggest that single daily doses may result in sufficient SQV serum levels throughout an interval of 24 h. A controlled, randomized trial with 20 healthy men was conducted for the comparison of serum levels with 1600 mg SQV (group 1) or 1600 mg SQV/200 mg RTV (group 2). The dosages were selected in order to use RTV as an inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 and SQV as protease inhibitor. The volunteers received single daily doses following a standardized breakfast on 3 consecutive days. Serum samples were analyzed for SQV and RTV employing LC-tandem mass spectrometry. The minimum concentration of saquinavir after 24 hours, the AUC, the maximum concentration and the serum half-lives on day 3 served as target parameters. The minimum SQV concentration amounted to 469.4 ng/ml, when combined with RTV and proved to be significantly higher (p <0.05) than the corresponding concentration with SQV alone (127.3 ng/ml). The SQV maximum concentration was raised approximately 6fold and the AUC 9fold when RTV was coadministered. In combination with 200 mg of RTV the predominant elimination half-life of SQV increased from 2.6 to 6.45 hours. These data prove that under single daily doses of 1600 mg SQV/200 mg RTV HIV-inhibitory concentrations of SQV can be achieved for 24 hours. Due to the high variability of the concentrations, which can be seen with all PI s, we recommend continuous therapeutic drug monitoring of serum trough levels.

Impact of amphotericin B on the cytochrome P450 system in HIV-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes are influenced by amphotericin B (Am-B) during the treatment of Candida oesophagitis in HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Twelve HIV-infected, antiretroviral-naive patients (CDC/WHO stage C3) with Candida oesophagitits were enrolled into a prospective clinical trial. The patients were treated with Am-B (0.4 mg/kg body weight) for two weeks. At baseline and after Am-B therapy the clearance of antipyrine and its metabolites were investigated by high-performance liquid chromatography. In addition, the urinary excretion of 6-beta-hydroxycortisol and 17-hydroxycorticosteroids was assessed by means of a radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: The following significant changes were observed after Am-B treatment (P < 0.01): increase of antipyrine half-life (12.4 h vs 16.8 h) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (27.9 mg min/ml vs 38.1 mg min/ml); decrease of the total body clearance (61.2 ml/min vs 43.7 ml/min); decrease of the renal clearance of antipyrine metabolites - norantipyrine (7.45 ml/min vs 5.31 ml/min), 4-hydroxyantipyrine (15.4 ml/min vs 10.3 ml/min), hydroxymethylantipyrine (4.31 ml/min vs 3.65 ml/min); decrease of urinary 6-beta-hydroxycortisol excretion (453 microg/24h vs 298 microg/24h) and the ratio of 6-beta-hydroycortisol to 17-hydroxycorticosteroids (8.8% vs 6.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that Am-B therapy has an inhibitory effect on cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes in HIV-infected patients. These results are of particular significance for HIV-infected patients who are concomitantly treated with drugs that are predominantly metabolised in the liver. A careful drug monitoring system seems advisable, especially for proteinase inhibitor experienced HIV-1-infected subjects.

Predictors of treatment failure during highly active antiretroviral therapy (racing trial).

PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with virological failure during long-term treatment with the triple combination of saquinavir soft gel capsule, zalcitabine and zidovudine. METHOD: Open-label, prospective, multicentre study undertaken in private practices and the outpatient department of the Auguste-Viktoria-Hospital. A total of 95 patients with plasma HIV RNA > 5000 copies/ml who had received no more than 6 months pre-treatment with NRTIs and no prior PI therapy received saquinavir soft gel, zalcitabine and zidovudine for 52 weeks, before being randomly assigned to either remain on therapy or switch to nelfinavir, lamivudine and zidovudine for further 52 weeks. RESULTS: Combination therapy with saquinavir, zalcitabine and zidovudine was found to be effective and well tolerated, with virological response to therapy maintained for up to 2 years. In patients responding to therapy, switching to a novel triple regimen did not result in a virological or immunological worsening, but it did not confer an additional clinical benefit. Factors predictive of early treatment failure (virological failure within 16 weeks of treatment initiation) included high viral load and presence of RT mutations at baseline (OR: 0.30, 95% CI 0.11 0.83 and OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.03 0.52, respectively), with baseline viral load and the development of genotypic mutations on therapy being predictive of late treatment failure (16 52 weeks; OR: 0.15, 95% 0.05 0.46 and OR: 0.26, 95% CI < 0.001 1.16, respectively). Plasma saquinavir concentration < 50 mg/ml at 4 weeks was also found to be an independent risk factor for both early and late treatment failure (OR: 1.80, 95% CI 1.23 2.64 and OR: 1.16, 95% CI 0.84 1.60, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: While antiretroviral drug resistance appears to be a principal cause of treatment failure, other factors such as inadequate drug plasma concentrations also play a role.