RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of oral health status at admission on in-hospital outcomes and how it varies during hospitalization in older patients with aspiration pneumonia. METHODS: This prospective cohort study involved patients aged ≥ 65 years who were admitted to an acute care hospital with a diagnosis of aspiration pneumonia. The patients' basic health information, length of hospital stay (LOS), and oral health assessment tool (OHAT), functional oral intake scale (FOIS), pneumonia severity index, and clinical frailty scale scores were recorded. Patients were divided into two groups based on their median OHAT scores, and intergroup changes were analyzed as a function of time. The relationship between the LOS, FOIS score upon discharge, and OHAT scores at admission was examined using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Of the 89 participants (52 were men, with a mean age of 84.8 ± 7.9 years), 75 were discharged. The patients' oral health was measured weekly for 3 weeks after the initial assessment via the OHAT, wherein the median score was 7, with a significant between-group difference. Moreover, OHAT scores improved within both groups throughout their stay. OHAT scores at admission were independently associated with the LOS (B = 5.51, P = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Poor oral health status at admission was associated with longer hospital stays. Both the high- and low-OHAT groups showed OHAT score improvements. Oral health status is critical in preventing the onset of and treating aspiration pneumonia.
Asunto(s)
Salud Bucal , Neumonía por Aspiración , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Hospitalización , Neumonía por Aspiración/epidemiología , Neumonía por Aspiración/diagnóstico , Neumonía por Aspiración/terapia , HospitalesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Aspiration pneumonia has a high recurrence rate, and oral care by dentists has been found effective in preventing its onset; however, this has not been evaluated using prospective studies. Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of professional oral care by dentists in reducing aspiration pneumonia recurrence in older adult patients. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated a dental oral care intervention, using a historical control group (control group). It was conducted at a single-centre regional core hospital in Japan that serves a large number of patients aged older than 80 years. Patients who were hospitalised for aspiration pneumonia were included in this study. During the study period (1 April 2021 to 31 March 2022), the clinical group received weekly professional cleaning by a dentist and the control group received standard oral care by a nurse as usual from 1 April 2020 to 31 March 2021. The dentist oral care group received weekly professional oral care from a dentist and was followed prospectively for 1 year. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate the timing of recurrent aspiration pneumonia or death. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to obtain a hazard ratio and determine the 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: There were 91 participants in the clinical group and 94 in the control group. The mean age of participants was 85 years, and 75 (40.5%) were female. The recurrence rate was 27.5% in the clinical group and 44.7% in the control group (P = .005). Professional cleaning by a dentist reduced the risk of recurrence of aspiration pneumonia by approximately 50% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.465; 95% confidence interval, 0.278-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Professional cleaning by a dentist was associated with a lower rate of aspiration pneumonia recurrence than nurse-provided conventional oral care.
Asunto(s)
Neumonía por Aspiración , Recurrencia , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Neumonía por Aspiración/prevención & control , Masculino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Japón , Anciano , Atención Odontológica , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Higiene Bucal , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Cuidado Dental para AncianosRESUMEN
Objectives: Differences in demographic factors, symptoms, and laboratory data between bacterial and non-bacterial arthritis have not been defined. We aimed to identify predictors of bacterial arthritis, excluding synovial testing. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional survey was performed at a university hospital. All patients included received arthrocentesis from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Clinical information was gathered from medical charts from the time of synovial fluid sample collection. Factors potentially predictive of bacterial arthritis were analyzed using the Student's t-test or chi-squared test, and the chi-squared automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis. The resulting subgroups were divided into three groups according to the risk of bacterial arthritis: low-risk, intermediate-risk, or high-risk groups. Results: A total of 460 patients (male/female = 229/231; mean ± standard deviation age, 70.26 ± 17.66 years) were included, of whom 68 patients (14.8%) had bacterial arthritis. The chi-squared automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis revealed that patients with C-reactive protein > 21.09 mg/dL (incidence of septic arthritis: 48.7%) and C-reactive protein ⩽ 21.09 mg/dL plus 27.70 < platelet count ⩽ 30.70 × 104/µL (incidence: 36.1%) were high-risk groups. Conclusions: Our results emphasize that patients categorized as high risk of bacterial arthritis, and appropriate treatment could be initiated as soon as possible.
RESUMEN
This is a case of subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) was diagnosed by skin biopsy in a patient who presented with fever and erythema nodosum in the umbilicum following mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination. COVID-19 vaccines may cause SPTCL and skin biopsy may help in the diagnosis of erythema nodosum.
RESUMEN
Medical interviews are expected to undergo a major transformation through the use of artificial intelligence. However, artificial intelligence-based systems that support medical interviews are not yet widespread in Japan, and their usefulness is unclear. A randomized, controlled trial to determine the usefulness of a commercial medical interview support system using a question flow chart-type application based on a Bayesian model was conducted. Ten resident physicians were allocated to two groups with or without information from an artificial intelligence-based support system. The rate of correct diagnoses, amount of time to complete the interviews, and number of questions they asked were compared between the two groups. Two trials were conducted on different dates, with a total of 20 resident physicians participating. Data for 192 differential diagnoses were obtained. There was a significant difference in the rate of correct diagnosis between the two groups for two cases and for overall cases (0.561 vs. 0.393; p = 0.02). There was a significant difference in the time required between the two groups for overall cases (370 s (352-387) vs. 390 s (373-406), p = 0.04). Artificial intelligence-assisted medical interviews helped resident physicians make more accurate diagnoses and reduced consultation time. The widespread use of artificial intelligence systems in clinical settings could contribute to improving the quality of medical care.
Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Médicos , Humanos , Teorema de Bayes , JapónRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: A 33-year-old woman presented to our hospital with a 4-month history of fever of unknown origin. Physical examination revealed a vascular murmur in the left subclavian region. Blood culture revealed bacteria and PET/CT revealed tracer accumulation in the patent ductus arteriosus area, leading to the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in this area. This case report may aid in diagnosing this disease in the future, as infective endocarditis in a patent ductus arteriosus is rare and difficult to diagnose.
Asunto(s)
Conducto Arterioso Permeable , Endocarditis Bacteriana , Endocarditis , Adulto , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/complicaciones , Conducto Arterioso Permeable/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis/complicaciones , Endocarditis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endocarditis Bacteriana/complicaciones , Endocarditis Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Fiebre/complicaciones , Humanos , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/efectos adversosRESUMEN
A 40-year-old man presented at our hospital with anaemia that had been undiagnosed for 2 years. Blood tests, endoscopy, and contrast-enhanced computed tomography were performed, but a definitive diagnosis could not be made. A subsequent bone marrow biopsy revealed basophilic stippling in transformed red blood cells, which led to a differential diagnosis of lead poisoning. Additional tests revealed elevated levels of lead in the blood. Basophilic stippling is generally found on a peripheral blood smear in lead poisoning patients; however, in this case, basophilic stippling was found only on the bone marrow smear and not in the blood smear. Even if basophilic stippling is not found in the peripheral blood, lead poisoning cannot be excluded.
Asunto(s)
Anemia , Intoxicación por Plomo , Adulto , Médula Ósea/patología , Recuento de Eritrocitos , Eritrocitos , Humanos , Intoxicación por Plomo/diagnóstico , MasculinoRESUMEN
Lower gastrointestinal perforation is rare and challenging to diagnose in patients presenting with an acute abdomen. However, no study has examined the frequency and associated factors of diagnostic errors related to lower gastrointestinal perforation. This large-scale multicenter retrospective study investigated the frequency of diagnostic errors and identified the associated factors. Factors at the level of the patient, symptoms, situation, and physician were included in the analysis. Data were collected from nine institutions, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. Timely diagnosis was defined as diagnosis at the first visit in computed tomography (CT)-capable facilities or referral to an appropriate medical institution immediately following the first visit to a non-CT-capable facility. Cases not meeting this definition were defined as diagnostic errors that resulted in delayed diagnosis. Of the 439 cases of lower gastrointestinal perforation identified, delayed diagnosis occurred in 138 cases (31.4%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between examination by a non-generalist and delayed diagnosis. Other factors showing a tendency with delayed diagnosis included presence of fever, absence of abdominal tenderness, and unavailability of urgent radiology reports. Initial misdiagnoses were mainly gastroenteritis, constipation, and small bowel obstruction. In conclusion, diagnostic errors occurred in about one-third of patients with a lower gastrointestinal perforation.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen Agudo/diagnóstico , Errores Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico , Abdomen Agudo/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Abdominal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fiebre , Humanos , Perforación Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Potencial Evento Adverso/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/clasificación , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) blindness, that is, the excessive consideration of the disease in diagnosis, has reportedly led to delayed diagnosis of some diseases. We compared several clinical measures between patients admitted for bacteremia during the two months of the COVID-19 pandemic and those admitted during the same period in 2019. We hypothesized that the pandemic has led to delayed treatment of bacteremia. METHODS: This retrospective observational study compared several measures undertaken for patients who visited the emergency unit in two hospitals between March 1 and May 31, 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic and whose blood cultures tested positive for bacteremia with those for corresponding patients treated during the same period in 2019. The primary measure was time from consultation to blood culture/antimicrobials. RESULTS: We included 29 eligible patients from 2020 and 26 from 2019. In 2020, the time from consultation to antimicrobial administration was significantly longer than in 2019 (mean [range], 222 [145-309] min vs. 139 [102-179] min, p=0.002). The frequency of chest computed tomography (CT) was significantly higher in 2020 (96.6 vs. 73.1%, p=0.021). Significant differences were not observed in the time to blood culture or chest CT preceding the blood culture between the two periods. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that due to the COVID-19 epidemic/pandemic, focusing on the exclusion of its infection using CT scans leads to an overall delay in the diagnosis and treatment of bacteremia. Medical providers must be aware of COVID-19 blindness and evaluate patients objectively based on rational criteria and take appropriate action.