Fibromyalgia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A 10-year follow-up study, results from the Oslo Rheumatoid Arthritis Register.

OBJECTIVES: To examine cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between fibromyalgia (FM) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity. METHODS: 636 patients in the observational Oslo RA register (ORAR) were invited to a clinical examination in 1999. 28-tender and swollen joint counts (TJC, SJC) and 18-tender points were assessed, the RA disease activity score (DAS-28) calculated. Fibromyalgia (FM) was diagnosed according to 1990 (FM-1990) and modified 2011 (mFM-2011) ACR criteria. At the 10-year follow-up patients completed the RA Disease Activity Index (RADAI) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID-3). Baseline and 10-year RA disease activity were compared across presence/absence of FM. Linear regression models were constructed with 10-year RADAI and RAPID-3 as outcome. RESULTS: 502 patients participated at baseline data-collection and 10-year data was available in 236. At baseline, mean (SD) age was 59.5 (12.5) years and 87% were female. 9% and 30% had FM-1990 and mFM-2011 respectively. RA-FM patients were predominantly female with higher SJC, TJC, and DAS-28 at baseline. Baseline RA-FM predicted higher levels of RADAI and RAPID-3 at the 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: RA-FM was associated with significantly higher levels of cross-sectional and longitudinal RA disease activity. FM should be considered in patients with RA not reaching remission.

The comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and radiographs to assess structural progression over 5 years in hand osteoarthritis.

Objective: . The aim was to explore the agreement between 1.0 T MRI and conventional radiography (CR) to detect progression of hand OA over 5 years and the associations between structural progression and incident joint tenderness. Methods: Paired radiographs and paired MRIs of the second-fifth IP joints of the dominant hand from 69 hand OA patients were read for osteophytes, joint space narrowing and erosions. Patients with two or more joints demonstrating progression of any structural feature(s) were classified as progressors per imaging modality. Agreement between methods to detect progressors was evaluated with κ and intraclass correlation coefficients. At the joint level, the associations between methods to detect progression were explored with generalized estimating equations. Likewise, we analysed the associations between progression per imaging modality and incident pain. Results: MRI (58.0%) and CR (62.3%) detected similar numbers of progressors. The agreement between methods to detect progressors was good (κ = 0.61). We found good agreement between methods regarding the number of progressive joints (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.43, 0.76). At the joint level, MRI progression was associated with radiographic progression (P < 0.001). Incident joint tenderness was more common in joints with progression by MRI and CR, but statistically significance was not reached. Conclusion: Both 1.0 T MRI and CR detect a similar amount of progression over 5 years in patients with hand OA, although not in exactly the same joints. As CR assesses more joints for a lower cost, CR should be the imaging modality of choice rather than 1.0 T MRI in observational studies with a long period of follow-up.

Corrigendum to "Study protocol for the follow-up examination of the Nor-Hand study: A hospital-based observational cohort study exploring pain and biomarkers in people with hand osteoarthritis" [Osteoarthr. Cartil. Open 3 (2021) 100198].

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2021.100198.].

Differences and similarities between the EULAR/ASAS-EULAR and national recommendations for treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial spondyloarthritis across Europe.

This is the first report comparing EULAR and national treatment recommendations for PsA patients across Europe, and the first this decade to compare ASAS-EULAR and national treatment recommendations in axSpA patients. An electronic survey was completed from October 2021-April 2022 by rheumatologists in 15 European countries. One and four countries followed all EULAR and ASAS-EULAR recommendations, respectively. Five countries had no national treatment recommendations for PsA and/or axSpA, but followed other regulations. In several countries, national treatment recommendations predated the most recent EULAR/ASAS-EULAR recommendations. Entry criteria for starting biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs varied considerably. In several countries, for PsA patients with significant skin involvement, interleukin-17 inhibitors were not given preference. The positioning of Janus Kinase inhibitors differed and Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors were not in use/reimbursed in most countries. This study may motivate European countries to update their national treatment recommendations, to align them better with the latest international recommendations.

Attainment of the Patient-acceptable Symptom State in 548 patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Influence of demographic factors.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the clinical and socio-demographic factors associated with Patient Acceptable Symptom Status (PASS) in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). METHODS: In a post-hoc analyses of a cross-sectional study, RA patients from 11 countries were included. PASS was assessed as acceptable/not acceptable status by the patient. Variables collected included socio-economic (gender, age and country gross domestic product (GDP) per capita) and clinical variables: DAS28-3vESR (28 joint counts and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate), the patient-reported Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score and its seven domains (scored 0 to 10). Patients in PASS or not were compared through univariable tests and factors associated with PASS assessed by multivariable forward conditional logistic regression. A similar analysis was performed in the subgroup patients in DAS28 remission (n=168). RESULTS: A total of 548 patients were included: 80.5% female, mean (±SD) age 55.8±12.8years, disease duration 13.6±10.6 years, DAS28 3.6±1.5. Overall, 360 (65.7%) considered themselves to be in PASS. Independent factors positively associated with being in PASS were age>50 years [odds ratio, OR 1.67; (95% confidence Interval: 1.04-2.67)], a lower DAS28 [OR: 1.28 (1.08-1.52)], lower pain [OR:1.45 (1.27-1.64)] and better emotional well-being [OR:1.28 (1.13-1.45)]. Among patients in remission, being in PASS was positively associated with less severe pain [OR: 2.50 (1.79-3.84)], age>50 years [OR 3.30 (1.03 to10.87)] and living in a country of the low GDP category [OR: 5.08; (1.34-19.23)]. CONCLUSIONS: Being in PASS is related to many factors besides disease activity, including age, perceived impact of the disease and national GDP.

Study protocol for the follow-up examination of the Nor-Hand study: A hospital-based observational cohort study exploring pain and biomarkers in people with hand osteoarthritis.

Objective: This study aims to increase the understanding of pain mechanisms in hand OA and explore potential risk factors for pain development or worsening in a biopsychosocial framework. Another important aim is to validate potential soluble and imaging OA biomarkers. Design: The follow-up examination of the Nor-Hand hospital-based observational cohort study started in October 2019 and was completed in May 2021. In total, 212 of the 300 participants with hand OA who were examined at baseline attended the follow-up study. The participants underwent clinical joint examinations, medical and functional assessments, quantitative sensory testing, fluorescence optical imaging, ultrasound of the hands, acromioclavicular joints, feet, knees and hips, conventional radiographs of the hands and feet and magnetic resonance imaging of the dominant hand. Blood and urine samples were collected, and all participants answered questions about demographic factors and OA-related questionnaires. Associations between disease variables and symptoms will be examined in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Longitudinal analyses will be performed to assess the predictive value of baseline variables on hand OA outcomes. Conclusion: Current knowledge about predictors for disease progression in hand OA is limited, but with longitudinal data we will be able to explore the predictive value of baseline variables on hand OA outcomes, such as changes in patient-reported outcomes or changes in soluble and imaging biomarkers. This provides a unique opportunity to gain more knowledge about the natural disease course of hand OA.

Multidisciplinary and multifaceted outpatient management of patients with osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent joint disorder with a need for efficient and evidence-based management strategies. OBJECTIVES: The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effects of a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic, including a brief group-based educational programme, with a traditional individual outpatient clinic for patients with hip, knee, hand or generalized OA. A secondary purpose is to investigate the effects of a telephone follow-up call. METHODS: This is a pragmatic randomised single-blind controlled study with a total of 400 patients with hip, knee, hand or generalized OA between 40 and 80 years referred to an outpatient rheumatology hospital clinic. The randomisation is stratified according to the diagnostic subgroups. The experimental group is exposed to a multidisciplinary and multifaceted intervention, including a 3.5 hour group-based patient education programme about OA in addition to individual consultations with members of a multidisciplinary team. The control intervention is based on regular care with an individual outpatient consultation with a rheumatologist (treatment as usual). Primary outcomes are patient satisfaction measured at 4 months and cost-effectiveness measured at 12 months. Secondary outcomes are pain and global disease activity measured on a numeric rating scales (NRS), generic and disease specific functioning and disability using Short Form-36 (SF-36) health survey, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index 3 (WOMAC), the Australian/Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN), and a patient-generated measure of disability (Patient-Specific Functional scale, PSFS). Global perceived effect of change in health status during the study period is also reported. At 4-month follow-up, patients in both groups will be randomly allocated to a 10-minute telephone call or no follow-up ("treatment as usual"). After additional 8 months (12-month follow-up) the four groups will be compared in a secondary analysis with regard to health outcomes and health care costs. DISCUSSION: This trial will provide results on how multidisciplinary and multifaceted management of patients with OA affects health outcomes and health care costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN25778426.

Validity and diagnostic performance of fluorescence optical imaging measuring synovitis in hand osteoarthritis: baseline results from the Nor-Hand cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Fluorescence optical imaging (FOI) demonstrates enhanced microcirculation in finger joints as a sign of inflammation. We wanted to assess the validity and diagnostic performance of FOI measuring synovitis in persons with hand OA, comparing it with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- and ultrasound-detected synovitis. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-one participants with hand OA underwent FOI and ultrasound (gray-scale synovitis and power Doppler activity) of the bilateral hands and contrast-enhanced MRI examination of the dominant hand. Fifteen joints in each hand were scored on semi-quantitative scales (grade 0-3) for all modalities. Four FOI images were evaluated: one composite image (Prima Vista Mode (PVM)) and three images representing phases of fluorescent dye distribution. Spearman's correlation coefficients were calculated between sum scores of FOI, MRI, and ultrasound. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated for FOI using MRI or ultrasound as reference. RESULTS: FOI did not demonstrate enhancement in the thumb base, and the joint was excluded from further analyses. FOI sum scores showed poor to fair correlations with MRI (rho 0.01-0.24) and GS synovitis sum scores (rho 0.12-0.25). None of the FOI images demonstrated both good sensitivity and specificity, and the AUC ranged from 0.50-0.61 and 0.51-0.63 with MRI and GS synovitis as reference, respectively. FOI demonstrated similar diagnostic performance with PD activity and GS synovitis as reference. CONCLUSION: FOI enhancement correlated poorly with synovitis assessed by more established imaging modalities, questioning the value of FOI for the evaluation of synovitis in hand OA.

Joint Distribution and Two-Year Outcome in 347 Patients With Monoarthritis of Less Than Sixteen Weeks' Duration.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to investigate the joint distribution and 2-year outcome of patients with recent-onset monoarthritis. METHODS: Adult patients with clinically apparent monoarthritis of ≤16 weeks' duration were included in a multicenter 2-year longitudinal study. Clinical characteristics, joint distribution, development of chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease (CIRD), as well as classification criteria according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2010 criteria for RA were studied. Predictors for development of CIRD were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The knee (49.3%), ankle (16.7%), and wrist (14.1%) were the most frequently affected joints among the 347 included patients. A total of 91 patients (26.2%) developed CIRD during follow-up; 21 (6.1%) were diagnosed with RA, and 16 (4.6%) with psoriatic arthritis. Longer duration of joint swelling, joint localization, and anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) and rheumatoid factor (RF) positivity were independent predictors of CIRD. Six of 58 patients (10.3%) with ankle monoarthritis and 21 of 49 patients (42.9%) with wrist monoarthritis developed CIRD during follow-up. The 2010 ACR/EULAR Criteria for RA identified all patients diagnosed with seropositive RA at an early stage, mostly within 3 months. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-fourth of patients with recent-onset monoarthritis developed CIRD over 2 years. Patients presenting with ankle arthritis rarely developed CIRD, whereas patients presenting with wrist arthritis more frequently did so. Longer duration of joint swelling and ACPA and RF positivity were also predictive of CIRD. Our findings facilitate the early identification of patients with monoarthritis who have an unfavorable prognosis.

Associations between certolizumab pegol serum levels, anti-drug antibodies and treatment response in patients with inflammatory joint diseases: data from the NOR-DMARD study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify a therapeutic target interval for certolizumab pegol drug levels and examine the influence of anti-drug antibodies in patients with inflammatory joint diseases. METHODS: Certolizumab pegol and anti-drug antibody levels were measured in serum samples collected after 3 months of certolizumab pegol treatment in 268 patients with inflammatory joint diseases (116 axial spondyloarthritis, 91 rheumatoid arthritis and 61 psoriatic arthritis) in the NOR-DMARD study. Treatment response was defined by Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score Clinically important improvement in axial spondyloarthritis, European League Against Rheumatism good/moderate response in rheumatoid arthritis, and improvement in 28-joint Disease Activity Score of ≥ 0.6 in PsA. Serum drug levels and anti-drug antibodies were analysed using automated in-house assays. RESULTS: Certolizumab pegol serum levels varied considerably between individuals (median (IQR) 32.9 (17.3-43.9) mg/L). Certolizumab pegol level ≥ 20 mg/L was associated with treatment response for the total inflammatory joint disease population, with odds ratio (OR) 2.3 (95% CI 1.2-4.5, P = 0.01) and OR 1.9 (95% CI 1.0-3.5, P = 0.05) after 3 and 6 months of treatment, respectively. For individual diagnoses, this association was most consistent for axial spondyloarthritis, with OR 3.4 (95% CI 1.0-11.1, P < 0.05) and OR 3.3 (95% CI 1.0-10.8, P < 0.05), respectively. Certolizumab pegol level > 40 mg/L was not associated with any additional benefit for any of the diagnoses. Anti-drug antibodies were detected in 6.1% (19/310) of samples and were associated with low certolizumab pegol levels (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Serum certolizumab pegol levels 20-40 mg/L were associated with treatment response in inflammatory joint diseases. Our study is the first to show this association in axial spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients. The results suggest a possible benefit of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory joint disease on certolizumab pegol treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01581294, April 2012.

[Functional assessment in rehabilitation]. / Funksjonsvurdering og evaluering ved rehabilitering.

The Norwegian Ministry of Health and Care Services currently defines rehabilitation as: a well planned, goal-oriented, time-limited process, where several professions or services cooperate in assisting individuals to use their own efforts to achieve best possible functioning and coping capabilities, to become independent and to participate in society. This understanding of rehabilitation includes some important changes compared to previous definitions. One is an acknowledgement of the disabled person as an expert on his/her life, who should be involved in decisions concerning rehabilitation goals and interventions. Another is an increased focus on activity and participation in community as important goals. Continuous evaluation of the content, process and outcomes of rehabilitation is needed. An important step towards an evidence-based practice in this field is the implementation of valid and systematic assessments in clinical practice. This conceptualisation of rehabilitation requires use of individualised instruments that capture the patients' priorities and evaluations.

[Bechterew disease--a consensus on diagnosis and treatment]. / Bekhterevs sykdom--en konsensus om diagnostikk og behandling.

BACKGROUND: New treatment alternatives have improved the prospects for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Experts from 10 countries developed and voted for 9 questions regarding diagnostics, monitoring and pharmacological treatment (except biological) of ankylosing spondylitis. The Norwegian group added two questions on non-pharmacological treatment. A thorough literature search was performed. 39 experts attended a Norwegian consensus meeting where they developed and voted for the final recommendations for treatment of ankylosing spondylitis. RESULTS: Statements are generally based on limited evidence, but are highly supported by the experts. Important diagnostic factors are persistent inflammatory back pain in individuals under 40 years, HLA-B27-tissue, effect of NSAIDs, peripheral arthritis, morning stiffness and elevated acute phase reactants. MRI of sacroiliac joints is important for early diagnosis, but abnormalities must be verified by conventional radiographs. Long-term follow-up should include measures of inflammation, pain and function. NSAIDs and local corticosteroids are first line drugs for treatment of enthesitis. NSAIDs/coxibs are recommended as flexible on-demand-regimens. Patients should be encouraged to adapt exercising to disease severity and individual needs. INTERPRETATION: Consensus-based processes among experts may give valuable contributions to the management of ankylosing spondylitis.

Mapping the Effect of Psoriatic Arthritis Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of a disease can be categorized by a standardized reference system: the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). The objective was to map the effect of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) from the patient's perspective to the ICF. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed. Qualitative publications reporting domains of impact important for patients with PsA were identified using the following terms: ("psoriatic arthritis") AND ("quality of life" OR "impact"). Meaningful concepts were extracted from the publications, grouped into domains and linked to the ICF categories. The number of concepts linked to each ICF category and to each ICF level was calculated. The number of concepts not linkable was also calculated. RESULTS: Eleven studies (13 articles) were included in the analysis. Twenty-five domains of impact were cited, of which the ability to work/volunteer and social participation were the most cited (both by 10 studies). In total, 258 concepts were identified, of which 217 could be linked to 136 different ICF categories; 41 concepts, mostly personal factors, could not be precisely linked. The most represented ICF component was activities and participation (42.6%) rather than body structures (10.3%) or body functions (29.4%). Ten studies (90.9%) reported impairments in the ability to work/volunteer and social participation, and 7 (63.6%) reported leisure activities, family and intimacy, pain, skin problems, and body image. CONCLUSION: PsA widely affects all aspects of patients' lives, in particular aspects related to activities and participation. The ICF is a useful approach for the classification of disease effect.

Diagnostic spectrum and 2-year outcome in a cohort of patients with very early arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the diagnostic spectrum, arthritis persistency and clinical outcomes after 2 years in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) of less than 16 weeks' duration. METHODS: Data from the Norwegian Very Early Arthritis Clinic, a 2-year longitudinal observational study of adults with IA of ≤16 weeks' duration, were used. Exclusion criteria were arthritis due to crystal deposits, trauma, osteoarthritis and septic arthritis. In all patients who had any follow-up information (population A), clinical diagnoses and persistency of arthritis were described. For patients with 2-year follow-up (population B), we also studied other clinical outcomes (disease activity, pain, fatigue, functional disability and health-related quality of life). RESULTS: In population A (n=1017) median (25th-75th percentile) duration of joint swelling was 35.0 (13.0-66.5) days, mean (SD) age 45.7 (14.8) years, 55.2% were females and 17.8% anticitrullinated protein antibodies positive. The most common final diagnoses were undifferentiated arthritis (UA) (41.7%), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (24.1%) and reactive arthritis (18.1%). After 2 years, the arthritis had resolved in 59% of the patients. The remaining 41.0% had persistent disease defined by disease modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) use (32.1%) or persistent joint swelling without DMARD use (8.9%). In population B (n=669), all clinical outcomes improved significantly (P<0.001). Baseline joint pain and fatigue were similar across diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Among 1017 patients with IA of ≤16 weeks' duration, UA was the most common diagnosis after 2 years, and less than one-fourth were diagnosed with RA. Arthritis resolved without DMARDs in the majority of the patients. All clinical parameters improved significantly over a 2-year course.

[Clinical use of COX inhibitors--a consensus]. / Klinisk bruk av COX-hemmere--en konsensus.

BACKGROUND: Many physicians have been uncertain about treatment options following reports that linked cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors to serious cardiovascular events and the subsequent withdrawal of two selective COX-2 inhibitors. Therefore, on June 14, 2005, the Norwegian Medicines Agency and the Department of Pharmacotherapeutics, University of Oslo, held an expert meeting on COX inhibitors. METHODS: Presentations and discussions based on existing literature and statements from European (EMEA) and American (FDA) medicine authorities. This constitutes the basis for the current recommendations. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION: COX inhibitors have solely symptomatic effects, and there are no differences in analgesic and anti-inflammatory efficacy between the various COX-inhibitors. These drugs should, if possible, be used at the lowest effective dose and for as short a time as possible. Some of the COX-2 selective inhibitors show a lower incidence of gastrointestinal side effects than unselective COX inhibitors, but this advantage can be outweighed by increased occurrence of cardiovascular side effects. Generally, the cardiovascular adverse effects are more serious, and more often irreversible, than the gastrointestinal adverse effects. Patients with established or increased risk of cardiovascular disease should not use COX-2-selective inhibitors. In general, COX inhibitors should, if possible, not be administered to individuals with previous peptic ulcer disease, hypertension, heart failure, or kidney disease. There is a need for more data on the effect and safety of COX inhibitors.

[Medical prophylaxis and treatment of steroid induced osteoporosis]. / Medikamentell profylakse og behandling av steroidindusert osteoporose.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoid steroids are widely used as antiinflammatory and immunosuppressive medications and are well known to induce osteoporosis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Randomised clinical trials and Cochrane reports on the use of calcium, vitamin D, bisphosphonates and hormones were reviewed and the results summarised. Additionally, national and some international recommendations were reviewed in order to propose recommendations for prophylaxis and treatment. The literature was identified by Medline searches. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION: Calcium and vitamin D prevent bone loss in low-to-medium-dose glucocorticoid steroid therapy. Bisphosphonates maintain or modestly increase lumbar and hip bone mass. The fracture risk was not significantly reduced in the spine and the hip. The clinical randomised trials and Cochrane reports conclude that bisphosphonates as well as calcium and vitamin D taken together are effective and the drugs of choice in prevention and treatment.

Association of Chest Pain and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease with Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients with Inflammatory Joint Diseases.

OBJECTIVES: The relation between chest pain and coronary atherosclerosis (CA) in patients with inflammatory joint diseases (IJD) has not been explored previously. Our aim was to evaluate the associations of the presence of chest pain and the predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) by use of several CVD risk algorithms, with CA verified by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) coronary angiography. METHODS: Detailed information concerning chest pain and CVD risk factors was obtained in 335 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. In addition, 119 of these patients underwent MDCT coronary angiography. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of the patients (104/335) reported chest pain. Only six patients (1.8%) had atypical angina pectoris (pricking pain at rest). In 69 patients without chest pain, two thirds had CA, while in those who reported chest pain (n = 50), CA was present in 48.0%. In a logistic regression analysis, chest pain was not associated with CA (dependent variable) (p = 0.43). About 30% (Nagelkerke R (2)) of CA was explained by any of the CVD risk calculators: Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation, Framingham Risk Score, or Reynolds Risk Score. CONCLUSION: The presence of chest pain was surprisingly infrequently reported in patients with IJD who were referred for a CVD risk evaluation. However, when present, chest pain was weakly associated with CA, in contrast to the predicted CVD risk by several risk calculators which was highly associated with the presence of CA. These findings suggest that clinicians treating patients with IJD should be alert of coronary atherosclerotic disease also in the absence of chest pain symptoms.

The Impact of Newer Biological Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs on Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A 12-Month Longitudinal Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Rituximab, Abatacept and Tociliziumab.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether treatment with one of three novel biological DMARDs; rituximab, abatacept or tocilizumab reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This is an open, observational and prospective study with visits at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients were assigned to receive rituximab, abatacept or tocilizumab according to clinical indications assessed by an independent rheumatologist. Disease activity was quantified by the disease activity score (DAS28) and extensive ultrasonography. CVD risk was assessed by total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c), blood pressure and arterial stiffness measurements [pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (AIx)]. Within group change in disease activity and CVD risk over 3 months was explored using paired samples bivariate tests. Predictors of change in CVD risk at 3 months were identified in linear regression models. Changes in CVD risk markers over the 12- month follow-up in patients receiving rituximab were assessed by mixed models repeated analyses. RESULTS: 24 patients on rituximab, 5 on abatacept and 7 on tocilizumab were included. At 3 months PWV was significantly reduced in the tocilizumab group only, but at 12 months rituximab patients showed a significant reduction in PWV. Reduced inflammation at 3 months was associated with increased TC and HDL-c in the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: Treatment with tocilizumab and rituximab reduces PWV, a marker of CVD risk, in patients with RA.