Long-term survival after anti-PD-1 discontinuation in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC): a proof of concept of benefit of concomitant cemiplimab and radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: In a princeps study we conducted in patients with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma treated with concomitant anti-Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and radiotherapy, we demonstrated a clinico radiological response to cemiplimab that appeared to persist over time, 1 year after treatment discontinuation. METHOD: We conducted a single-center descriptive study at Caen Hospital from September 1, 2021 to September 2023, in 14 patients with advanced carcinoma treated with cemiplimab until September 1, 2021. The aim of this update is to examine clinical and radiological follow-up 2 years after discontinuation of cemiplimab. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients with a partial or complete response, we report 8 (66.7%) persistent responses 2 years after stopping cemiplimab, with only 2 patients progressing to distant disease, one lost to follow-up, and one death a priori unrelated to the disease. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms a long-term and persistent effect despite discontinuation of cemiplimab at least up to 2 years later.

An occurrence of eosinophilic folliculitis and alopecia associated with a sustained complete response to mogamulizumab in Sézary syndrome: a case report.

Mogamulizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds to C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4), initiating antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. CCR4 is highly expressed in the cutaneous T-cell lymphoma subtypes mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (SS), and mogamulizumab has been shown to be effective in patients with these conditions who were refractory to at least one prior systemic treatment. One of the more common adverse events encountered with mogamulizumab is rash, which may mimic disease progression and lead to premature discontinuation. Moreover, there has been some evidence to suggest that mogamulizumab-associated rash (MAR) is associated with improved outcomes in some patients, particularly those with SS. This report presents the case of a 72-year-old woman with SS, which manifested with macular and papular lesions and abnormal blood cytometry, who was treated with mogamulizumab after failure of bexarotene and photopheresis combination therapy. She achieved a complete response (CR), but experienced lymphopenia associated with histologically proven eosinophilic folliculitis (EF) of the scalp and alopecia. The EF responded well to initial topical corticosteroids, defined by regression of erythema and pustular involvement and reduction in pruritus-like symptoms, but without hair regrowth. Mogamulizumab was withdrawn after 32 cycles, but CR was maintained. To date, EF persists in the form of diffuse erythema without pustules or pruritus. A link between cluster of differentiation 4 lymphopenia and EF has previously been established; therefore, EF should be considered in patients who develop rash and lymphopenia while receiving treatment with mogamulizumab. MAR has been associated with clinical response to mogamulizumab, and this case report adds to the evidence that EF may also be associated with sustained clinical response following treatment cessation. However, regular monitoring is required to prevent a relapse of SS. Prospective studies are needed to confirm whether such an association between EF and CR following mogamulizumab exists.

Cardiovascular Immunotoxicity Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Metastatic Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitors, such as PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (CD152) (ipilimumab), are widely used in metastatic melanoma, and most immune-related adverse events are known. Several cardiovascular AEs (CVAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure have been reported in post-marketing surveillance studies and represent major issues for patients with melanoma during and after cancer treatment. Data on CVAES induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors in melanoma, especially incidence and risk factors, are lacking. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature up to 31 August 2020 was performed in Medline, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the ClinicalTrials.gov register according to prespecified selection criteria from inception to 7 April 2020. Statistics were performed on 3289 patients from five randomized clinical trials on melanoma. RESULTS: Patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors had a significant risk of presenting dyslipidemia (Peto OR: 4.74, 95% CI: 2.16-10.41, p < 0.01, I2 = 0%, p = 0.94). The Peto OR was numerically significant for pericarditis, myocarditis, heart failure, myocardial infarction, cerebral ischemia, high pulmonary pressure, blood high pressure, arrhythmias, endocarditis, and conduction disturbances, but the confidence interval was not significant. The risk of CVAEs was not statistically different between melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other tumors treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (range of p-value from 0.13 to 0.95). No interaction between follow-up length and CVAE reporting was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our study underlines that checkpoint inhibitors used for melanoma increase CVAEs, especially dyslipidemia, which could pave the way to chronic inflammatory processes, atherosclerosis, and, finally, ischemic cardiopathy. These cardiovascular adverse events could be acute or delayed, justifying the monitoring of lipidic biology and a baseline cardiology consultation.

Next generation sequencing for personalized therapy: About a class III BRAF N581K mutation associated to NRAS Q61L mutation in malignant melanoma: Case report.

In metastatic stage, therapeutic approach for malignant melanoma is particularly based on performance status, metastatic sites, and BRAF V600 status (BRAF V600E/V600K or V600R (class I BRAF mutations). In most cases, BRAF mutations and NRAS mutations are mutually exclusive to each other. However, some rare BRAF mutations class III are preferentially associated with a NRAS mutation, leading to the MAP Kinase pathway activation and subsequent cell proliferation. Melanomas with this double mutation are rare and difficult to treat because of the lack of codified therapeutic options. We report a patient with metastatic melanoma, harboring class III BRAF mutation (N581K) associated to NRAS mutation (Q61L) with treatment failure. He was treated in second line, after immunotherapy, by monotherapy of MEK inhibitor (MEKi), which underline the interest of NGS (Next Generation Sequencing) to early identify all mutations and enabling onco-dermatologist to discuss a treatment. Rare BRAF non V600 mutations represent 3 to 14% of melanoma mutants and the aim of this communication is to promote the next generation sequencing to extend the paradigm of individually therapeutic approach with target therapy into different spectrum of melanoma patients.

Real-Life Study of the Benefit of Concomitant Radiotherapy with Cemiplimab in Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC): A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Cemiplimab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the PD-1, and phase II trials have shown its efficacy in the treatment of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma in patients who are not candidates for curative surgery or radiation therapy as a first- or later-line treatment. A synergistic antitumoral response has been demonstrated with concurrent radiotherapy and PD1-immunotherapy. However, no real-life study has demonstrated this effect in advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS: We conducted a real-life retrospective cohort study to investigate the benefit of concomitant therapy in 33 patients treated with cemiplimab at the University Hospital of Caen, alone (C group) or concomitant to radiotherapy (C/RT group). Our primary objectives were to evaluate the best overall response and objective response rate. Our secondary objectives were the disease control rate, median time to response, progression-free survival, overall survival, clinical benefit of radiotherapy, and safety data. After stopping cemiplimab administration, we performed a follow-up of our patients and performed a descriptive study. RESULTS: We reported an objective response rate of 45.5%, including 47.6% in the cemiplimab group versus 41.6% in the concomitant group. The addition of radiotherapy to cemiplimab enables an earlier clinico-radiological response, with a median duration of 5.5 months in the cemiplimab group versus 3 months in the concomitant therapy group. The response to treatment was prolonged despite discontinuation of cemiplimab, with 91.6% (n = 11/12) and 83.3% (n = 10/12) patients in complete or partial remission at 6 months and 1 year after cessation of cemiplimab and no switch to another oncological treatment, respectively. Radiation therapy also provided a therapeutic effect in 83.3% of the patients in the concomitant group, without increasing the occurrence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms the efficacy of cemiplimab and radiotherapy in the management of advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Concomitant therapy permitted to obtain an earlier radiological response, a beneficial local therapeutic effect of radiotherapy, without any safety alert.

Impact of Mogamulizumab in Real-Life Advanced Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas: A Multicentric Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are rare, aggressive cutaneous T-cell lymphomas that may be difficult to treat. Mogamulizumab is a recent monoclonal antibody targeting the CCR4 receptor expressed on the surface of Sézary cells. It can be prescribed in MF/SS stages III to IV in the second line after systemic therapy or in stages IB-II after two unsuccessful systemic therapies. We lack data on long-term efficiency and potential side effects in real-life conditions. Our study aims to determine efficacy considering the median PFS of advanced CTCL with mogamulizumab. Secondary objectives were to consider tolerance and estimate delay until side effects appeared. METHODS: Data on patients with advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphomas were collected since French Authorization, in six French university hospitals. Patients were followed until they stopped mogamulizumab because of relapse or toxicity. For those still treated by mogamulizumab, the end point was 1 September 2021. We excluded 3 patients as they had already been included in the MAVORIC study and data was not available. RESULTS: The median time of follow-up was 11.6 months. Of the 21 patients included, we reported four full-response patients, eight in partial response, one in stability, three in progression, and five were deceased. One patient had visceral progression, and seven had new lymphadenopathy. Progression-free survival was estimated at 22 months. Twenty patients presented adverse events, of which 10 were severe, i.e., grade III-IV. The median time between the introduction of mogamulizumab and the first adverse event was 21 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that mogamulizumab can give patients with advanced refractory CTCL a consequent PFS, estimated at 22 months. The long-term safety of mogamulizumab was determined to be acceptable since we reported few grade III-IV AEs, comparable with other studies. No other study using real-life data has been performed to investigate the AEs of mogamulizumab.

Epidemiology and characteristics of acral lentiginous melanoma compared to lentigo melanoma in France: a multicentric retrospective study from the French cohort RIC-Mel database

Background: Skin phototype, latitude and sun exposure are classic risk factors for melanomas but are not relevant to acrolentiginous melanomas (ALM). ALM is not related to chronic sun exposure because the thick stratum corneum acts as a barrier to penetration of UV rays, whereas LMM occurs in skin with high photoaging due to chronic sun exposure. Objectives: This study aimed to determine if any difference exists between "solar" melanomas and "non-solar" melanomas based on a comparison between LMM and ALM. Materials & Methods: We extracted all data for ALM and LMM patients, from March 2012 to September 2020, from the RIC-Mel national database to perform a descriptive cohort analysis of 1,056 Caucasian cases. Conclusion: The profiles of solar-related and non-solar melanoma seem to be different, and prognostic factors of ALM at diagnosis are less favourable compared to LMM, suggesting that non-solar melanoma is more aggressive than solar-related melanoma and that sentinel lymph node biopsy should be performed.

Interest in artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of non-melanoma skin cancer: a survey among French general practitioners.

General practitioners (GPs) are playing a key role in skin cancer screening. Non-melanoma skin cancer is frequent and difficult to diagnose. We aimed to assess whether GPs are facing difficulties in diagnosing non-pigmented skin tumours (NPSTs) and whether they would be interested in artificial intelligence (AI) software that could help them with this task. A questionnaire addressing the difficulties in diagnosing NPST and the potential interest in AI as a tool to help diagnose these tumours was emailed to GPs working in two French regions. In total, 147 respondents (98%) had faced difficulties diagnosing NPSTs; 86% agreed that an AI diagnostic tool could be useful in a GP's office and 83% agreed that it could change their practice. Nevertheless, 68% would not be willing to pay for this kind of software. GPs are facing difficulties in diagnosing NPSTs and would be interested in an AI tool that could help them achieve this. As referral to dermatology practices can be trying, AI diagnostic aids should be developed to help GPs in their gatekeeping task, however at limited cost to the GP.

Severe Late-Onset Grade III-IV Adverse Events under Immunotherapy: A Retrospective Study of 79 Cases.

Background: For several decades, PD-1 has been a target in malignant melanoma (MM). PD-1 inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (CD152) (ipilimumab) have revolutionized cancer therapy. PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibition leads to prolonged lymphocyte effects, which explains the cytotoxicity underlying immune-reaction-based adverse events (irAEs). Most irAEs occur in the first cycle of treatment at a median of 40 days. IrAEs of any grade have been observed in 68.2% of patients, with 10% of patients experiencing severe grade III/IV irAEs. Data on late-onset irAEs are lacking. Methods: Data on patients with advanced melanoma (N = 1862) from March 2016 to March 2021 were obtained from the RicMel database, a French national multicentric biobank dedicated to the follow-up of MM patients. Patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy or a combination therapy and experienced grade III-IV irAEs were selected and analyzed at 7 months, one year and two years after treatment was initiated. Results: Superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) and previous oncological drug administration before immunotherapy are significant risk factors for late-onset irAEs over 2 years after beginning immunotherapy in the univariate and multivariate analysis. The other parameters-sex, mutational status, association of immunotherapy (PD-1i and CTLA-4i) and overall response-were not significantly associated with late-onset irAEs. In our real-life data study, the median onset time of grade III-IV irAES was 128 days after the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) therapy. Conclusions: Our study, using real-life data, suggests that patients with SSM and those who have received previous oncological treatments are more likely to experience late-onset grade III-IV irAES. Further multicentric studies with wider recruitment of patients should be performed to confirm our findings, potentially leading to changes in the recommended treatment for carefully monitored at-risk patients.