Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Urol ; 41(4): 1147-1155, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36795146

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Current studies are focusing on the relationship between anatomical variables in preoperative prostate MRI and the development of post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). Nevertheless, there is little evidence regarding the reliability of these measurements. The objective of this study was to analyze the concordance between urologists and radiologists for anatomical measurements that might be PPI predictors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pelvic floor measurements with 3T-MRI were performed by two radiologists and two urologists independently and blindly. Interobserver agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the Bland-Altman plot. RESULTS: The concordance was good-acceptable for most measurements, except for the levator ani and puborectalis muscle thickness (some ICC values < 0.20/p value > 0.05). The anatomical parameters with the highest degree of agreement were intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) and prostate volume (most of the ICC values > 0.60). The membranous urethral length (MUL) and the angle of the membranous urethra-prostate axis (aLUMP) presented ICC > 0.40. The obturator internus muscle thickness (OIT), urethral width and intraprostatic urethral length presented a fair-moderate degree of agreement (ICC > 0.20). Regarding the agreement between different specialists, the highest degree was obtained for the two radiologists and for urologist 1-radiologist 2 (moderate median agreement), while urologist 2 with each of the radiologists had a regular median agreement. CONCLUSIONS: MUL, IPP, prostate volume, aLUMP, OIT, urethral width and prostatic length show acceptable inter-observer concordance and they would be reliable as possible predictors of PPI. Levator ani and puborectalis muscle thickness show bad agreement. Interobserver agreement might not be greatly influenced by previous professional experience.


Asunto(s)
Diafragma Pélvico , Incontinencia Urinaria , Humanos , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Diafragma Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Incontinencia Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Incontinencia Urinaria/etiología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA