On Taking a Different Route: An Unlikely Case of Malaria by Nosocomial Transmission.

Vector-borne diseases can be contracted by exposure to contaminated material. This mode of transmission is not geographically restricted to the presence of a vector. Unexpected infection in regions of low incidence potentially delays diagnosis. We report a case of severe falciparum malaria following nosocomial Plasmodium falciparum transmission in nonendemic Germany.

Hand suture versus stapler for closure of loop ileostomy--a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study are to compare the 30-day rate of bowel obstruction for stapled vs. handsewn closure of loop ileostomy, and to further assess efficacy and safety for each technique by secondary endpoints such as operative time, rates of anastomotic leakage, and other post-operative complications within 30 days. METHODS: A systematic literature search (MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, EMBASE and ISI Web of Science) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing stapled and handsewn closure of loop ileostomy after low anterior resection. Random effects meta-analyses were calculated and presented as risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals. RESULTS: Forty publications were retrieved and 4 RCTs (649 patients) were included. There was methodological and clinical heterogeneity of included trials, but statistical heterogeneity was low for most endpoints. Stapler use significantly reduced the rate of bowel obstruction compared to hand-sewn closure (RR 0.53 [0.32, 0.88]; P = 0.01). The operation time was significantly lower for stapling compared to hand suture (MD -15.5 min [-18.4, 12.6]; P < 0.001). All other secondary outcomes did not show significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows superiority of stapled closure of loop ileostomy compared to handsewn closure in terms of bowel obstruction rate and mean operation time. Other relevant complications such as anastomotic leakage are equivalent. Even so, both techniques are options with opposing advantages and disadvantages.

HAnd Suture Versus STApling for Closure of Loop Ileostomy (HASTA Trial): results of a multicenter randomized trial (DRKS00000040).

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the HASTA trial was to compare hand suture versus stapling loop ileostomy closure in a randomized controlled trial. BACKGROUND: Bowel obstruction is one of the main and the clinically and economically most relevant complication following closure of loop ileostomy after low anterior resection. The best surgical technique for closure of loop ileostomy has not been defined yet. METHODS: HASTA trial is a multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled surgical trial with 2 parallel groups to compare hand suture versus stapling for closure of loop ileostomy. The primary endpoint was the rate of bowel obstruction within 30 days after ileostomy closure. RESULTS: A total of 337 randomized patients undergoing closure of loop ileostomy after low anterior resection because of rectal cancer in 27 centers were included. The overall rate of postoperative ileus after ileostomy closure was 13.4%. Seventeen of 165 (10.3%) patients in the stapler group and 27 of 163 (16.6%) in the hand suture group developed bowel obstruction within 30 days postoperatively [odds ratio (OR) = 1.72; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.89-3.31 = 0.10]. Duration of surgical intervention was significantly shorter in the stapler group (15 minutes; P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis of potential risk factors did not reveal any significant correlation with development of postoperative ileus. Rate of anastomotic leakage (stapler: 3.0%, hand suture: 1.8%, P = 0.48) did not differ significantly as well as all other secondary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-sewn anastomosis versus stapler ileo-ileostomy for ileostomy closure are equally effective in terms of postoperative bowel obstruction, with stapler anastomosis leading to a shorter operation time. Postoperative ileus after ileostomy reversal remains a relevant complication.

Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer in the era of total mesorectal excision: is there still a chance for cure?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perioperative outcome and long-term survival of patients who underwent surgical resection for recurrent rectal cancer within a multimodal approach in the era of total mesorectal excision (TME). BACKGROUND: Introduction of TME has reduced local recurrence and improved oncological outcome of patients with rectal cancer. Local recurrence after TME still occurs in 2% to 8% of patients and presents a challenge to surgical and medical oncologists. However, there has been very limited data on the perioperative and long-term outcome of patients who are operated for local recurrence in the era of TME. METHODS: A total of 107 patients who were identified from a prospective rectal cancer database underwent surgical exploration for recurrent rectal cancer after previous TME between October 2001 and April 2009. Risk factors of perioperative morbidity were analyzed using a multivariate logistic regression model. Independent predictors of disease-specific survival were identified by a Cox proportional hazards regression model, as were those of local recurrence and disease recurrence at any site. RESULTS: Surgical resection was performed in 92 patients and negative resection margins were achieved in 54 (58.7%) of these. Recurrent disease was located intraluminally and extraluminally in 35 (38.0%) patients and 57 (62.0%) patients, respectively. A total of 19 (20.6%) patients had metastatic extrapelvic disease at the time of surgery. Perioperative surgical morbidity and in-hospital mortality accounted for 42.4% and 3.3%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, partial sacrectomy was associated with surgical morbidity (P = 0.004). Three- and 5-year disease-specific survival rates were 61% and 47%. Three-year survival rate of patients with extrapelvic disease who underwent R0 resection was 42%. On multivariate analysis, surgical morbidity (P = 0.001), presence of extrapelvic disease (P = 0.006), and noncurative (R1; R2) resection (P < 0.0001) were identified as independent adverse predictors of disease-specific survival, whereas a transabdominal resection (as opposed to an abdominoperineal resection/pelvic exenteration) was associated with a more favorable prognosis (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical resection of local recurrence from rectal cancer in the era TME can be carried out with acceptable morbidity and curative resection rates. Curative resection remains the major prognostic factor and may enable long-term survival even in patients with extrapelvic disease.

Primary and Recurrent Repair of Incisional Hernia Based on Biomechanical Considerations to Avoid Mesh-Related Complications.

Aim: Mechanical principles successfully guide the construction of polymer material composites in engineering. Since the abdominal wall is a polymer composite augmented with a textile during incisional hernia repair we ask: can incisional hernia be repaired safely and durably based on biomechanical principles? Material and Methods: Repair materials were assessed on a self-built bench test using pulse loads to elude influences on the reconstruction of the abdominal wall. Tissue elasticity was analyzed preoperatively as needed with computed tomography at rest and during Valsalva's maneuver. Preoperatively, the critical retention force of the reconstruction to pulse loads was calculated and a biomechanically durable repair was designed based on the needs of the individual patient. Intraoperatively, the design was adjusted as needed. Hernia meshes with high grip factors (Progrip®, Dahlhausen® Cicat) were used for the repairs. Mesh sizes, fixation elements and reconstructive details were oriented on the biomechanical design. All patients recieved single-shot antibiosis. Patients were discharged after full ambulation was achieved. Results: A total of 163 patients (82 males and 81 females) were treated for incisional hernia in four hospitals by ten surgeons. Primary hernia was repaired in 119 patients. Recurrent hernia was operated on in 44 cases. Recurrent hernia was significantly larger (median 161 cm2 vs. 78 cm2; u-test: p = 0.00714). Re-do surgery took significantly longer (median 229 min vs. 150 min; p < 0.00001) since recurrent disease required more often transversus abdominis release (70% vs. 47%). GRIP tended to be higher in recurrent repair (p = 0.01828). Complication rates (15%) and hospital stay were the same (6 vs. 6 days; p = 0.28462). After 1 year, no recurrence was detected in either group. Pain levels were equally low in both primary and recurrent hernia repairs (median NAS = 0 in both groups at rest and under load, p = 0.88866). Conclusion: Incisional hernia can safely and durably be repaired based on biomechanical principles both in primary and recurrent disease. The GRIP concept provides a base for the application of biomechanical principles in incisional hernia repair.

The Grip Concept of Incisional Hernia Repair-Dynamic Bench Test, CT Abdomen With Valsalva and 1-Year Clinical Results.

Incisional hernia is a frequent consequence of major surgery. Most repairs augment the abdominal wall with artificial meshes fixed to the tissues with sutures, tacks, or glue. Pain and recurrences plague at least 10-20% of the patients after repair of the abdominal defect. How should a repair of incisional hernias be constructed to achieve durability? Incisional hernia repair can be regarded as a compound technique. The biomechanical properties of a compound made of tissue, textile, and linking materials vary to a large extent. Tissues differ in age, exercise levels, and comorbidities. Textiles are currently optimized for tensile strength, but frequently fail to provide tackiness, dynamic stiction, and strain resistance to pulse impacts. Linking strength with and without fixation devices depends on the retention forces between surfaces to sustain stiction under dynamic load. Impacts such a coughing or sharp bending can easily overburden clinically applied composite structures and can lead to a breakdown of incisional hernia repair. Our group developed a bench test with tissues, fixation, and textiles using dynamic intermittent strain (DIS), which resembles coughing. Tissue elasticity, the size of the hernia under pressure, and the area of instability of the abdominal wall of the individual patient was assessed with low-dose computed tomography of the abdomen preoperatively. A surgical concept was developed based on biomechanical considerations. Observations in a clinical registry based on consecutive patients from four hospitals demonstrate low failure rates and low pain levels after 1 year. Here, results from the bench test, the application of CT abdomen with Valsalva's maneuver, considerations of the surgical concept, and the clinical application of our approach are outlined.

Induction of HSP70 shows differences in protection against I/R injury derived by ischemic preconditioning and intermittent clamping.

BACKGROUND: Ischemic preconditioning (IP) and intermittent clamping (IC) increase the ischemic tolerance of the liver. The underlying mechanisms are not completely understood. Heat shock proteins protect cellular integrity in stress and have been discussed as mediators in preconditioning. IP and IC in rat livers were compared with respect to HSP induction and postischemic microcirculation. METHODS: All animals were exposed to 70min of partial warm liver ischemia. Different clamping protocols were used: in control animals (C) 70min continuous ischemia was applied. IP was performed by 5min ischemia and 10min reperfusion before the 70min ischemia time. In IC-groups, ischemia time of 70min was divided into four intervals. Each group included 21 animals with 3 different reperfusion intervals; either 30min, 12 or 36h. Intravital microscopy was performed after 30min of reperfusion. AST-levels and HSP induction were analysed 90min, 12 and 36h after reperfusion. RESULTS: IP and IC significantly improved sinusoidal perfusion (IP: 83.4±2.8%; IC: 84.4±4.6% vs. C: 60.4±3.9%; p<0.001) and leucocyte adherence in sinusoids (IP: 51.9±12.0, IC: 40.9±4.7 vs. C: 90.1±17.7/mm(2) liver surface; p<0.001) and postsinusoidal venules. AST-levels were minimized in IP and IC compared to controls (12h after reperfusion: IP: 969±934U/l, IC: 675±562U/l vs. C: 2373±792U/l; p=0.004). In the course of reperfusion HSP70 protein expression doubled between 90min and 12h in IC (0.529±0.227 vs. 0.992±0.246; p<0.05) and control-groups (0.572±0.314 vs. 1.106±0.309; p<0.05) whereas it remained unchanged in the IP-group (0.437±0.383 vs. 0.412±0.439; n.s.). CONCLUSION: Microcirculation is similarly preserved by IP and IC. The early protection derived by IP prevents further induction of HSP70 in opposite to IC. Therefore, IP may offer a more comprehensive protection against I/R on a cellular and transcriptional level.

Long-term success rate after surgical treatment of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: Due to the considerable variety in the clinical presentation of anorectal and rectovaginal fistulas in Crohn's disease, data on treatment results for each type of fistula are limited. The aim of this study was to summarize the results after surgical treatment of such fistulas in a large consecutive series of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with anorectal or rectovaginal fistula due to Crohn's disease requiring surgery in our institution between 1991 and 2001 were extracted from a prospective database. A standardized telephone interview was conducted and patients were followed in our outpatient clinic, the department of internal medicine, or at their gastroenterologist. Type of fistula and interventions were classified and analyzed. Recurrence-free time intervals were estimated for each type of fistula and for the different surgical procedures. The influence of the surgical procedure, the number of operations performed, and the correlation to other localizations of the disease were analyzed in regard to the recurrence rate. RESULTS: From 777 patients with Crohn's disease undergoing surgery between 1991 and 2001, 147 had anorectal or rectovaginal fistula (292 operations). Ninety-eight percent of them also had Crohn's disease in the colon or rectum compared to only 21% of patients without a fistula (p value <0.001). Over long-term follow-up, 29 patients (20%) required proctectomy. Submucosal fistulas needed major surgery in only 14% of cases compared to 56% of cases with rectovaginal fistulas. After 5 years, complex fistulas showed a strong trend towards a higher recurrence rate after surgery than simple submucosal fistulas (45.6% vs. 18.8%, p = 0.079). Whereas recurrences occurred over the whole observation period in the group of patients with complex fistulas, there was no further recurrence in patients with submucosal fistulas 13 months after surgery. In rectovaginal fistulas, additional levatorplasty showed no advantage over standard endorectal advancement flap. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term follow-up demonstrates that recurrence rates after repair of complex fistulas for Crohn's disease are high and continuously increase over time. Submucosal fistulas have the best outcome; after 13 months without recurrence, definite cure can be expected.

Hand-suture versus stapling for closure of loop ileostomy: HASTA-Trial: a study rationale and design for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the second most common tumor in developed countries, with a lifetime prevalence of 5%. About one third of these tumors are located in the rectum. Surgery in terms of low anterior resection with mesorectal excision is the central element in the treatment of rectal cancer being the only option for definite cure. Creating a protective diverting stoma prevents complications like anastomotic failure and meanwhile is the standard procedure. Bowel obstruction is one of the main and the clinically and economically most relevant complication following closure of loop ileostomy. The best surgical technique for closure of loop ileostomy has not been defined yet. METHODS/DESIGN: A study protocol was developed on the basis of the only randomized controlled mono-center trial to solve clinical equipoise concerning the optimal surgical technique for closure of loop ileostomy after low anterior resection due to rectal cancer.The HASTA trial is a multi-center pragmatic randomized controlled surgical trial with two parallel groups to compare hand-suture versus stapling for closure of loop ileostomy. It will include 334 randomized patients undergoing closure of loop ileostomy after low anterior resection with protective ileostomy due to rectal cancer in approximately 20 centers consisting of German hospitals of all level of health care. The primary endpoint is the rate of bowel obstruction within 30 days after ileostomy closure. In addition, a set of surgical and general variables including quality of life will be analyzed with a follow-up of 12 months. An investigators meeting with a practical session will help to minimize performance bias and enforce protocol adherence. Centers are monitored centrally as well as on-site before and during recruitment phase to assure inclusion, treatment and follow up according to the protocol. DISCUSSION: Aim of the HASTA trial is to evaluate the efficacy of hand-suture versus stapling for closure of loop ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register Number: DRKS00000040.

Perioperative management in distal pancreatectomy: results of a survey in 23 European participating centres of the DISPACT trial and a review of literature.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant treatment in addition to intervention may influence the primary outcome, especially in complex interventions such as surgical trials. Evidence-based standards for perioperative care after distal pancreatectomy, however, have been rarely defined. This study's objective was therefore to identify and analyse the current basis of evidence for perioperative management in distal pancreatectomy. METHODS: A standardised questionnaire was sent to 23 European centres recruiting patients for a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on open distal pancreatectomy that would compare suture versus stapler closure of the pancreatic remnant (DISPACT trial, ISRCTN 18452029). Perioperative strategies (e.g., bowel preparation, pain management, administration of antibiotics, abdominal incision, drainages, nasogastric tubes, somatostatin, mobilisation and feeding regimens) were assessed. Moreover, a systematic literature search in the Medline database was performed and retrieved meta-analyses and RCTs were reviewed. RESULTS: All 23 centres returned the questionnaire. Consensus for thoracic epidural catheters (TECs), pain treatment and transverse incisions was found, as well as strong consensus for the placement of intra-abdominal drainages and perioperative single-shot antibiotics. Also, there was consensus that bowel preparation, somatostatin application, postoperative nasogastric tubes and intravenous feeding might not be beneficial. The literature search identified 16 meta-analyses and 19 RCTs demonstrating that bowel preparation, somatostatin therapy and nasogastric tubes can be omitted. Early mobilisation, feeding and TECs seem to be beneficial for patients. The value of drainages remains unclear. CONCLUSION: Most perioperative standards within the centres participating in the DISPACT trial are in accordance with current available evidence. The need for drainages requires further investigation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 18452029.

Early re-laparotomy for post-operative complications is a significant risk factor for recurrence after ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND: There is evidence suggesting that stenosing and fistulising Crohn's diseases reflect specific entities. The aim of this study was to compare these two clinical presentations with regards to anastomotic recurrence after ileocaecal resection and identify other relevant risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred consecutive patients undergoing isolated ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease were included in this follow-up study. A recurrence was either defined endoscopically, on the basis of radiological examinations or on the basis of a re-operation. In addition, patients had to complain of clinical symptoms. Recurrence-free intervals were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analysis including previously identified risk factors for recurrence were performed. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients extracted from the database, 8 patients were lost to follow-up or refused participation. There was no mortality in this patient group, the morbidity was 16.3%. The recurrence rates after 5 and 9 years were 28.7% and 56.4%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed re-laparotomy within the same hospital stay and length of resected specimen as significant factors for anastomotic recurrence. Both these factors were confirmed on multivariate analysis. But when analysing the observation period in detail, specimen length was not any more a significant factor in the later time period (1996-2000) compared to the earlier time period (1991-1995). The clinical presentation (fistulising vs stenosing) showed no significant influence on the recurrence rates. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stenosing and fistulising Crohn's disease of the ileocaecal region have no difference in recurrence rates after resection. Re-laparotomy in the same hospital stay was an independent predictor of recurrence.