Exploring disease comorbidities and temporal disease progression of psoriasis: an observational, retrospective, multi-database, cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Comorbidities associated with psoriasis are well documented. However, few studies have explored the comorbidity trajectories that patients with psoriasis commonly experience over time. This study reports the 5-year comorbidity trajectories of patients with psoriasis. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term comorbidity trajectories of patients with psoriasis in Denmark. METHODS: This observational cohort study explored the Danish National Patient Registry (DNPR) between 1999 and 2013 to identify comorbidities diagnosed 5 years prior to or after a psoriasis diagnosis. Comorbidity occurrence in patients with psoriasis (psoriasis cohort) was compared with patients without psoriasis (the N group). Comparison groups, each the same size as the psoriasis cohort, were created by selecting random patients from the N group. If a comorbidity occurrence was higher in more than nine comparison groups than in the psoriasis cohort, it was not analysed and only comorbidities that occurred in ≥ 0·8% of the psoriasis cohort were analysed. The strength of association between a psoriasis diagnosis and a comorbidity diagnosis was measured using relative risk (RR). All psoriasis and comorbidity pairs that achieved RR > 1 (P < 0·001) (known as a Diagnosed Pair) were tested for directionality to identify the sequence of diagnoses using a binomial test. Diagnosed Pairs with a statistically significant direction (Bonferroni corrected P-value < 0·025) were then used to create comorbidity trajectory clusters 5 years before and after a psoriasis diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 17 683 patients with psoriasis were compared with 10 000 comparison groups. A total of 121 comorbidities met the minimum criteria that ≥ 0·8% of the psoriasis cohort were diagnosed with the comorbidity within 5 years (before or after) of their psoriasis diagnosis. Thirty-eight of these comorbidities achieved RR > 1 (P < 0·001) with psoriasis, of which 19 achieved a significant direction from psoriasis to a comorbidity (including psoriasis to hypothyroidism), and four achieved a significant direction from a comorbidity diagnosis to a psoriasis diagnosis (including Crohn disease to psoriasis); four of five comorbidity trajectories with three sequential diagnoses achieved an RR > 1 (P < 0·001) and a significant direction from psoriasis to the first comorbidity to the second comorbidity (including psoriasis to hypertension to atrial fibrillation and flutter). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidity trajectories may support clinicians in conducting disease risk analyses of patients with psoriasis and help plan optimal treatment to prevent future high-risk comorbidities.

Validity and reliability of the Rosacea Area and Severity Index: A novel scoring system for clinical assessment of rosacea severity.

BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a common chronic inflammatory facial skin disorder. Standardized evaluation of the severity and extent of rosacea is important for baseline assessment and treatment effect. The currently used Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) is unspecific and fails to consider subtypes/phenotypes of rosacea and area involvement. The Rosacea Area and Severity Index (RASI) was developed to give a more nuanced evaluation of rosacea features in four facial skin areas adjusted to the relative importance of each area of the face to obtain an overall severity score. OBJECTIVES: To validate RASI against the IGA and to assess the inter- and intraobserver reliability for RASI. METHODS: Sixteen dermatologists evaluated photographs of 60 adult patients with rosacea (3 photographs per patient, one from the front and one from each side). IGA and RASI scores were performed for interobserver reliability assessment. To determine intraobserver reliability, 14 dermatologists evaluated 10 other patients twice with at least 1 week interval. RESULTS: The IGA and RASI correlated well (Spearman correlation coefficient (SCC) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.72-0.78). Interobserver reliability was moderate for RASI and poor to moderate for IGA. Reliability was strongest for rhinophyma, followed by papules/pustules and erythema, and rather weak for telangiectasia. For area scores, interobserver reliability was strongest for cheeks, followed by nose, chin and forehead. We found a moderate-to-strong intraobserver agreement both for IGA and RASI. CONCLUSIONS: We have designed a new practical tool to examine clinical severity of rosacea. RASI proved simple and reliable in scoring clinical severity of rosacea with an agreement comparable to the currently used IGA although RASI will provide a more nuanced view of the current rosacea extent and severity. We suggest that RASI is used in the daily clinical setting as well as in clinical studies assessing the efficacy of rosacea therapies.

Drug survival of biologics and novel immunomodulators for rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and psoriasis - A nationwide cohort study from the DANBIO and DERMBIO registries.

OBJECTIVE: Drug survival is an important proxy measure for effectiveness of treatments for inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (AxSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and psoriasis. The objective of this study was to examine the real-life drug survival of biologics and novel small-molecule therapies across various disease entities such as RA, AxSpA, PsA, and psoriasis. METHODS: We performed a nationwide cohort study using the prospective nationwide registries DANBIO and DERMBIO, comprising all patients treated with biologics or novel small-molecule therapies for RA, AxSpA, PsA, and psoriasis between January 2015 through May 2021 (DANBIO) and November 2009 to November 2019 (DERMBIO). Drug survival was visualized using Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate adjusted Hazard Ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for risk of discontinuing therapy. FINDINGS: The study comprised a total of 12,089 patients (17,903 treatment series), including 5,104 RA patients (7,867 series), 2,157 AxSpA patients (3,016 series3), 2,551 PsA patients (3,313 series), and 2,577 psoriasis patients (3,707 series). In confounder-adjusted models drug survival in RA was highest for rituximab followed by baricitinib, etanercept and tocilizumab respectively. For AxSpA, drug survival was high for golimumab compared to all other drugs, followed by secukinumab and etanercept and lowest for infliximab. For PsA, tofacitinib and infliximab had the lowest drug survival compared to all other drugs. All other drugs performed almost equally well with a tendency of a somewhat higher drug survival for golimumab, followed by secukinumab and ixekizumab. For psoriasis, drug survival was generally highest for guselkumab. INTERPRETATION: Differing treatment responses to drugs with various modes of action across RA, AxSpA, PsA and psoriasis emphasize that although these diseases have many overlaps in their pathogenesis, there is a need for an individualized treatment approach that considers the underlying disease, patient profile, and treatment history. FUNDING: None.