Cost effectiveness of a clinical pharmacist on a neurosurgical team.

OBJECTIVE: In 1999, the Society of Critical Care Medicine formally recognized that pharmacists were essential for the provision of high quality care to the critically ill population. This study is a brief quantitative analysis of the benefit provided by a clinical pharmacist in a multidisciplinary neurosurgical setting. METHODS: Patients admitted to the neurosurgical service in the 2 years before and 2 years after the implementation of dedicated neurosurgical pharmacy services were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical pharmacist was responsible for monitoring and evaluating all adult patients on the service and rounding with the team 6 days a week. RESULTS: A total of 2156 patients were admitted during the study period. No significant differences were noted among severity of illness scores between the 2 groups. During this time, 11 250 interventions were recorded by the pharmacist. The average pharmacy and intravenous therapy cost per patient between the pre- and postimplementation groups decreased from $4833 to $3239, resulting in a total savings of $1,718,260 over the duration of the study period. The average hospital stay decreased from 8.56 to 7.24 days (P = 0.003). Early hospital mortality also decreased from 3.34% to 1.95% (P = 0.06). For those patients who were discharged from the hospital, there was a significant decrease in readmission rates between the 2 groups (P < 0.05) CONCLUSION: Having a dedicated clinical pharmacist with critical care training rounding routinely with a neurosurgical team significantly reduced hospital stay, readmission rates, and pharmacy costs. Clinical pharmacists can have a significant effect on clinical and economic measures in the intensive care unit, and their participation on a multidisciplinary critical care team should be a standard of care.

Guidelines for the initial management of metastatic brain tumors: role of surgery, radiosurgery, and radiation therapy.

Brain metastases are an increasingly important determinant of survival and quality of life in patients with cancer. Current approaches to the management of brain metastases are driven by prognostic factors, including the Karnofsky Performance Status, tumor histology, number of metastases, patient age, and status of systemic disease. Most brain metastases are treated with radiosurgery, computer-assisted surgery, or whole brain radiation therapy. Remarkable advances in computer-assisted neuronavigation have made neurosurgical removal of metastases safer, even in eloquent areas of the brain. Computerization also enhances the efficacy and safety of conformal radiosurgery planning using various modern stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) technologies, including newer frameless-based systems. Controversial issues include whether to defer whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in patients undergoing SRS or image-guided surgery and when to use SRS "boost" in a patient undergoing WBRT. The determination of how best to apply these treatments for individual patients cannot be standardized to a single paradigm, but data from well-controlled studies help physicians make informed decisions about the benefits and risks of each approach.