Two-dimensional speckle tracking for the assessment of coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echo: clinical tool or merely research method.

BACKGROUND: Two-dimensional speckle tracking provides valuable information for regional wall motion abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of left ventricular longitudinal strain and torsion to diagnose coronary artery disease during dobutamine stress echocardiography. METHODS: We studied 100 patients (mean age 60.8 ± 10.7 years, 72 male) with known or suspected coronary artery disease, excluding those with prior history of transmural infraction. All of them underwent dobutamine stress echo and coronary angiography within one month. Wall-motion score index, left ventricular global longitudinal strain and torsion were measured at rest and peak stress. Additionally, the respective differences between rest and stress were also calculated. Optimal cut-offs were derived from receiver operating characteristic curves for strain and torsion values. RESULTS: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 55 ± 5.4 %. Coronary angiography revealed significant lesions in 67 patients. Values regarding sensitivity, and specificity for wall motion score index difference were 78 % and 88 % respectively (area under curve 0.84). Global longitudinal strain difference (median 0.5 %) illustrated 81 % sensitivity and 72 % specificity for disease detection (area under curve 0.80, cut-off value ≤0 %). The respective values for torsion difference (median 4.7°) were 81 % and 82 % (area under curve 0.76, cut-off value ≤6.5°). Combination of wall motion score index difference and torsion difference for disease detection showed 91 % sensitivity and 79 % specificity (area under curve 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of speckle tracking during dobutamine stress echo could serve as an adjunct method for coronary artery disease assessment, providing quantitative diagnostic information.

Value of real-time three-dimensional adenosine stress contrast echocardiography in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.

AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of myocardial wall-motion and perfusion assessment using contrast echocardiography during real-time three-dimensional (RT3D) adenosine stress test, and compare its diagnostic accuracy with the two-dimensional (2D) method using coronary angiography as reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) have been submitted to adenosine stress contrast echocardiography and coronary angiography, within a 1-month period. Two-dimensional apical four, two, and three chamber, as well as three-dimensional (3D) pyramidal full-volume data sets were acquired at rest and at peak stress. The 17-segment division of the left ventricle was used and each segment was evaluated based on wall motion and perfusion. Sixty patients (age: 60.1 ± 8.5 years, 38 men) were enrolled, i.e. 1020 segments were evaluated at rest and at peak stress. Wall-motion analysis per patient revealed that the sensitivity and specificity of 2D to detect CAD were 80 and 82% and of RT3D echocardiography were 82 and 64%, respectively, whereas in the per patient perfusion analysis the respective percentages were 88, 64% for 2D and 90, 73% for RT3D. Regarding left anterior descending artery and right coronary system, there seems to be no statistical significant difference in terms of wall-motion and perfusion evaluation between the two modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time 3D adenosine stress echocardiography is a feasible and valuable technique to evaluate myocardial wall motion and perfusion in patients with suspected CAD, despite existing problems concerning lower spatial and temporal resolution when compared with 2D echocardiography.