Public perceptions of hospital responsibilities to those presenting without medical injury or illness during a disaster.

BACKGROUND: During natural and manmade disasters, the hospital is perceived as a central rallying and care site for the public, for both those with and without emergency medical needs. The expectations of the public may outstrip hospital plans and abilities to provide nonmedical assistance. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine the public expectations of the hospital during disasters regarding resource provision. METHODS: A survey was distributed to adult patients or family members at three emergency departments (EDs). Respondents were asked to evaluate hospital responsibility to provide nine resources to those without emergency medical needs, including vaccination, medication refill or replacement, food and water, grief/stress counseling, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) access assistance, short/long-term shelter, family reunification, and hospital. Additionally, respondents answered questions regarding prior disaster experience and demographics. RESULTS: There were 961 respondents (66.9% were female, 47.5% were white, and 44.6% were black). Respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the hospital should provide the following services: event-specific vaccination (84%), medication refill/replacement (76.5%), food and water (61%), grief or stress counseling (53%), FEMA access assistance (52%), short-term shelter (51%), family reunification (50%), long-term shelter (38%), and hospital transportation (29%). Those 36-45 years of age were less likely to expect services (p < 0.05) and non-whites and those with a family member with a medical condition requiring electricity were more likely to expect services (p < 0.001 and p < 0.05, respectively). There were no differences based on frequency of ED use, sex, income, or prior disaster experience. CONCLUSION: There is a high public expectation that hospitals will provide significant nonmedical disaster relief. Understanding these expectations is essential to appropriate community disaster planning.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Rates of Continuous Glucose Monitor Initiation and Continued Use in Children With Type 1 Diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: Racial/ethnic disparities in continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use exist among children with type 1 diabetes. It is not known whether differential rates of device initiation or sustained use are the cause of this disparity. Our objective was to compare CGM initiation rates and continued use among non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), and Hispanic children. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review including children with type 1 diabetes attending the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018. RESULTS: Of 1,509 eligible children, 726 (48%) started CGM during the study period. More NHW (54%) than NHB (31%) and Hispanic (33%) children started CGM (P < 0.001). One year after starting, fewer NHB (61%) than NHW (86%) and Hispanic (85%) children were using CGM (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lower CGM use in NHB children was due to lower rates of device initiation and higher rates of discontinuation. Interventions to address both of these barriers are needed to reduce disparities in CGM use.

Early Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Pediatric Type 1 Diabetes.

Racial-ethnic disparities in technology use have been described in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). It is not known whether these emerge early in disease management. This single-center retrospective study examined disparities in continuous glucose monitor (CGM) initiation and durability in the first-year after diagnosis of T1D in children. Of 345 eligible children, 46% started CGM within their first year. In non-Hispanic white (NHW) children, 51% started using CGM versus 28% of non-Hispanic black (NHB) children (P = 0.006). After stratifying by commercial/government insurance, a proxy for socioeconomic status, this difference persisted among those with commercial insurance. One-year post-CGM initiation, 96% (125/130) of NHW children were using CGM versus 73% (11/15) of NHB children (P = 0.003). Disparities in CGM use emerge early in care of children with T1D, with lower rates of initiation and sustained use of CGM in NHB children. Strategies addressing causes of these disparities should begin early in T1D management.

Public expectations for nonemergency hospital resources and services during disasters.

OBJECTIVE: The public's expectations of hospital services during disasters may not reflect current hospital disaster plans. The objective of this study was to determine the public's expected hospital service utilization during a pandemic, earthquake, and terrorist bombing. METHODS: A survey was distributed to adult patients or family members at 3 emergency departments (EDs). Participants identified resources and services they expect to need during 3 disaster scenarios. Linear regression was used to describe factors associated with higher expected utilization scores for each scenario. RESULTS: Of the 961 people who participated in the study, 66.9% were women, 47.5% were white, and 44.6% were black. Determinants of higher pandemic resource utilization included persons who were younger (P < .01); non-white (P < .001); had higher ED visits (P < .01), hospitalization (P = .001), or fewer primary care provider visits (P = .001) in the past year; and did not have a reunification plan (P < .001). Determinants of higher earthquake resource utilization included persons who were non-white (P < .001); who were a patient or spouse (vs parent) participating in the study (P < .05 and P = .001); and had higher ED visits in the past year (P = .001). Determinants of higher bombing resource utilization included persons who were female (P = .001); non-white (P < .001); had higher ED (P = .001) or primary care provider (P < .01) visits in past year; and experienced the loss of home or property during a past disaster (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Public expectations of hospitals during disasters are high, and some expectations are inappropriate. Better community disaster planning and public risk communication are needed.