Characterization of a Cryopreserved Split-Thickness Human Skin Allograft-TheraSkin.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of a cryopreserved split-thickness skin allograft produced from donated human skin and compare it with fresh, unprocessed human split-thickness skin. BACKGROUND: Cutaneous wound healing is a complex and organized process, where the body re-establishes the integrity of the injured tissue. However, chronic wounds, such as diabetic or venous stasis ulcers, are difficult to manage and often require advanced biologics to facilitate healing. An ideal wound care product is able to directly influence wound healing by introducing biocompatible extracellular matrices, growth factors, and viable cells to the wound bed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TheraSkin (processed by LifeNet Health, Virginia Beach, Virginia, and distributed by Soluble Systems, Newport News, Virginia) is a minimally manipulated, cryopreserved split-thickness human skin allograft, which contains natural extracellular matrices, native growth factors, and viable cells. The authors characterized TheraSkin in terms of the collagen and growth factor composition using ELISA, percentage of apoptotic cells using TUNEL analysis, and cellular viability using alamarBlue assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts), and compared these characteristics with fresh, unprocessed human split-thickness skin. RESULTS: It was found that the amount of the type I and type III collagen, as well as the ratio of type I to type III collagen in TheraSkin, is equivalent to fresh unprocessed human split-thickness skin. Similar quantities of vascular endothelial growth factor, insulinlike growth factor 1, fibroblast growth factor 2, and transforming growth factor ß1 were detected in TheraSkin and fresh human skin. The average percent of apoptotic cells was 34.3% and 3.1% for TheraSkin and fresh skin, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cellular viability was demonstrated in both TheraSkin and fresh skin.

A prospective comparison of diabetic foot ulcers treated with either a cryopreserved skin allograft or a bioengineered skin substitute.

UNLABELLED: Background. It was hypothesized that the rate of wound closure and the number of grafts required will be the same when treating diabetic foot ulcers with TheraSkin®, a cryopreserved split-thickness skin allograft (SSA), as compared to Apligraft®, a bioengineered skin substitute (BSS). METHODS: A prospective study using sequentially enrolled patients seen in a large podiatric practice encompassing multiple locations was conducted. Patients were sequentially enrolled and treated with either BSS or SSA. All other factors of treatment were standardized across the patient population. Data analysis included an analysis of co-factors in each group in order to determine if anything else may have influenced the outcomes. RESULTS: Data from 17 wounds (16 patients) treated with BSS and 12 wounds treated with SSA were analyzed. The average wound sizes were comparable, as was the average number of applications utilized. These data revealed that 41.3% of the wounds treated with BSS closed within 12 weeks, as compared to 66.7% of the wounds treated with SSA. At 20 weeks, 47.1% of the wounds in the BSS group closed, while 66.7% of the SSA wounds closed. There were a comparable number of adverse events in each group, with none that were a direct result of the biologic material being used. CONCLUSION: SSA resulted in a higher percentage of wounds closing after 12 and 20 weeks, as compared to wounds treated with BSS. There were no adverse events noted that were directly related to either graft material.