Association of Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibitors Versus Alprostadil With Survival in Men With Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) treatment is associated with reduced mortality compared with no treatment for erectile dysfunction after myocardial infarction (MI). OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the association between treatment with PDE5i or alprostadil and outcomes in men with stable coronary artery disease. METHODS: All Swedish men with a prior MI or revascularization who received PDE5i or alprostadil during 2006 through 2013 at >6 months after the event were included, using the Swedish Patient Register and the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Cox regression was used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals for all-cause mortality, MI, heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, noncardiovascular mortality, cardiac revascularization, peripheral arterial disease, and stroke in men treated with PDE5i versus alprostadil. RESULTS: This study included 16,548 men treated with PDE5i and 1,994 treated with alprostadil. The mean follow-up was 5.8 years, with 2,261 deaths (14%) in the PDE5i group and 521 (26%) in the alprostadil group. PDE5i compared with alprostadil treatment was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.79 to 0.98) and with similar associations for MI, heart failure, cardiovascular mortality, and revascularization. When quintiles (q) of filled PDE5i prescriptions were compared using q1 as reference, patients in q3, q4, and q5 had lower all-cause mortality. Among alprostadil users, those in q5 had a lower all-cause mortality compared to q1. CONCLUSIONS: In men with stable coronary artery disease, treatment with PDE5i is associated with lower risks of death, MI, heart failure, and revascularization compared with alprostadil treatment. Although the decrease in all-cause mortality was PDE5i dose dependent, the data do not permit the inference of causality or any clinical benefits of PDE5i because of the observational study design.

Trough s-infliximab and antibodies towards infliximab in a cohort of 79 IBD patients with maintenance infliximab treatment.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The anti-TNF antibody infliximab is effective in inducing remission in Crohn's disease as well as in ulcerative colitis and many patients are treated for several years with sustained clinical remission. However, the role of monitoring s-infliximab and antibodies towards infliximab during maintenance treatment remains unclear. Our aim was to correlate serum drug levels and antibodies to clinical activity, CRP, albumin and concomitant immunosuppression in a cohort on maintenance infliximab treatment. METHODS: We included 79 patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who had responded to infliximab and received maintenance treatment (4-69 infusions) in this retrospective study. Infliximab levels and antibodies towards the drug were analyzed with in-house-developed ELISA assays. RESULTS: The mean s-infliximab was significantly higher in patients in remission (4.1µg/mL) as compared with disease flare (mean 1.8µg/mL); p<0.001. The s-infliximab showed a significant negative correlation with Harvey-Bradshaw index (r=-0.21; p<0.05). Serum-infliximab progressively decreased with the number of accumulated infusions (p<0.05). In patients with undetectable trough levels, 55% of the patients with concomitant immunosuppressive were positive for antibodies against infliximab, as compared with 94% of patients on monotherapy. Patients with undetectable serum-infliximab were in clinical remission at 25% of the visits. CONCLUSIONS: The trough level 4.1µg/mL may serve as cut-off for clinical remission. Drug trough levels decreased during treatment and almost all patients with undetectable s-infliximab and monotherapy had developed antibodies against the drug.