Evaluation of the Emergency Severity Index (Version 4) in Postpartum Women after Cesarean Delivery.

OBJECTIVE: The Emergency Severity Index (ESI) version 4 is a 5-level triage system (1 being the highest acuity and 5 being the lowest acuity) used in the emergency department (ED). Our goal of the study was to compare rates of readmission according to ESI in postpartum women. STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort study of all women who presented to the ED within 6 weeks after cesarean delivery. The acuity level was assigned by triage nurses at the time of triage presentation. Our primary outcome was postpartum readmission. To examine if the addition of blood pressure to vital sign abnormalities would improve the prediction for readmission, we created a modified ESI. We identified women who had an ESI of level 3 and reassigned to a modified ESI of level 2 if blood pressure was in the severe range. Receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) were created and compared between ESI and modified ESI. RESULTS: Of 439 women, ESI distribution was 0.2% ESI 1, 23.7% ESI 2, 56.0% ESI 3, 19.4% ESI 4, and 0.7% ESI 5. Readmission rates by ESI level were 100% ESI 1, 47% ESI 2, 18% ESI 3, 2% ESI 4, and 0% ESI 5 (p < 0.001). Of 246 women who were assigned an ESI of 3, total 25 had severe range blood pressures and were reassigned to a modified ESI of 2. Of these 25 women, 14 were readmitted. The AUC of the modified ESI was statistically higher than that of the standard ESI (AUC: 0.77 and 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.82 vs. AUC: 0.73 and 95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.78; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The ESI was a useful tool to identify women who required postpartum readmission. Incorporation of severe range blood pressure as a parameter of acuity improved the prediction of readmission. KEY POINTS: · ESI does not consider blood pressure.. · The ESI version 4 was predictive of postpartum readmission.. · Consideration of a severe range blood pressure significantly improved the prediction of readmission..

Interpregnancy Body Mass Index Change and Risk of Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the association between interpregnancy body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) change and intrapartum cesarean delivery in multiparous women without a history of cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all women who had more than one singleton pregnancy at 23 weeks' gestation or greater at MedStar Washington Hospital Center from January 2009 to June 2018. We excluded women who had a history of cesarean delivery, prelabor cesarean delivery, and contraindications for vaginal delivery. Interpregnancy BMI change was calculated by the change of early pregnancy BMI measured in the office. Women were categorized according to the interpregnancy BMI change (BMI loss more than 2 kg/m2, BMI change ± 2 kg/m2, and BMI gain more than 2 kg/m2). The primary outcome was an intrapartum cesarean delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) after adjusting for predefined covariates. RESULTS: Of 2,168 women who were analyzed, 258 (12%), 1,192 (55%), and 718 (33%) had interpregnancy BMI loss more than 2 kg/m2, BMI change ± 2 kg/m2, and BMI gain more than 2 kg/m2, respectively. Women with BMI gain more than 2 kg/m2 compared with those with BMI change ± 2 kg/m2 had increased odds of intrapartum cesarean delivery (7.4 vs. 4.5%; aOR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.10-2.86) and cesarean delivery for arrest disorders (3.1 vs. 1.1%; aOR: 3.06; 95% CI: 1.30-7.15). Women with BMI loss more than 2 kg/m2 compared with those with BMI change ± 2 kg/m2 had similar rates of cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: Compared with interpregnancy BMI change ± 2 kg/m2, interpregnancy BMI gain 2 kg/m2 was associated with increased odds of intrapartum cesarean delivery. KEY POINTS: · BMI gain between pregnancies was associated with intrapartum cesarean delivery.. · BMI loss between pregnancies was not associated with intrapartum cesarean delivery.. · Our study suggests that at least maintaining weight between pregnancies is beneficial..

The Rate of Intrapartum Cesarean Delivery Based on Estimated Fetal Weight in Comparison to Previous Child's Birth Weight.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to examine whether an estimated fetal weight of the current pregnancy greater than previous birth weight is associated with increased odds of intrapartum cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all women who had more than one singleton pregnancy at 23 weeks' gestation or greater at a single labor and delivery unit. We only analyzed the second pregnancy in the dataset. We excluded women who had preterm birth in the second pregnancy. Women were categorized according to the difference between estimated fetal weight and previous birth weight-estimated fetal weight close to previous birth weight within 500 g (similar weight group); estimated fetal weight significantly (more than 500 g) greater than previous birth weight (larger weight group); and estimated fetal weight significantly (more than 500 g) lower than previous birth weight (smaller weight group). The primary outcome was intrapartum cesarean delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence interval (95% confidence interval [CI]) after adjusting for predefined covariates. RESULTS: Of 1,887 women, there were 1,415 (75%) in the similar weight group, 384 (20%) in the greater weight group, and 88 (5%) in the smaller weight group. Individuals in the larger weight group compared with those in the similar weight group had higher odds of undergoing intrapartum cesarean delivery (11.2 vs. 4.5%; aOR 2.91; 95% CI 1.91-4.45). The odds of intrapartum cesarean delivery in the smaller weight group compared with those in the similar weight group were not increased (3.4 vs. 4.5%; crude OR 0.75; 95%CI 0.23-2.42). CONCLUSION: The difference between current estimated fetal weight and previous birth weight plays an important role in assessing the risk of intrapartum cesarean delivery. KEY POINTS: · Estimated fetal weight compared with previous birth weight is an important factor.. · Cesarean delivery is infrequent if estimated fetal weight is similar to previous birth weight.. · Larger estimated fetal weight greater than the previous birth weight is associated with cesarean delivery..

Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery.

BACKGROUND: The optimal route of delivery in early-onset preeclampsia before 34 weeks is debated because many clinicians are reluctant to proceed with induction for perceived high risk of failure. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to investigate labor induction success rates and compare maternal and neonatal outcomes by intended mode of delivery in women with early preterm preeclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: We identified 914 singleton pregnancies with preeclampsia in the Consortium on Safe Labor study for analysis who delivered between 24 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks. We excluded fetal anomalies, antepartum stillbirth, or spontaneous preterm labor. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women undergoing induction of labor (n = 460) and planned cesarean delivery (n = 454) and women with successful induction of labor (n = 214) and unsuccessful induction of labor (n = 246). We calculated relative risks and 95% confidence intervals to determine outcomes by Poisson regression model with propensity score adjustment. The calculation of propensity scores considered covariates such as maternal age, gestational age, parity, body mass index, tobacco use, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, hospital type and site, birthweight, history of cesarean delivery, malpresentation/breech, simplified Bishop score, insurance, marital status, and steroid use. RESULTS: Among the 460 women with induction (50%), 47% of deliveries were vaginal. By gestational age, 24 to 27 6/7, 28 to 31 6/7, and 32 to 33 6/7, the induction of labor success rates were 38% (12 of 32), 39% (70 of 180), and 54% (132 of 248), respectively. Induction of labor compared with planned cesarean delivery was less likely to be associated with placental abruption (adjusted relative risk, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.67), wound infection or separation (adjusted relative risk, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.85), and neonatal asphyxia (0.12; 95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.78). Women with vaginal delivery compared with those with failed induction of labor had decreased maternal morbidity (adjusted relative risk, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.09-0.82) and no difference in neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: About half of women with preterm preeclampsia who attempted an induction had a successful vaginal delivery. The rate of successful vaginal delivery increases with gestational age. Successful induction has the benefit of preventing maternal and fetal comorbidities associated with previous cesarean deliveries in subsequent pregnancies. While overall rates of a composite of serious maternal and neonatal morbidity/mortality did not differ between induction of labor and planned cesarean delivery groups, women with failed induction of labor had increased maternal morbidity highlighting the complex route of delivery counseling required in this high-risk population of women.

Racial/Ethnic Differences in Labor Induction in a Contemporary US Cohort: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine labor induction by race/ethnicity and factors associated with disparity in induction. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of 143,634 women eligible for induction ≥24 weeks' gestation from 12 clinical centers (2002-2008). Rates of labor induction for each racial/ethnic group were calculated and stratified by gestational age intervals: early preterm (240/7-336/7), late preterm (340/7-366/7), and term (370/7-416/7 weeks). Multivariable logistic regression examined the association between maternal race/ethnicity and induction controlling for maternal characteristics and pregnancy complications. The primary outcome was rate of induction by race/ethnicity. Inductions that were indicated, non-medically indicated, or without recorded indication were also compared. RESULTS: Non-Hispanic black (NHB) women had the highest percentage rate of induction, 44.6% (p < 0.001). After adjustment, all racial/ethnic groups had lower odds of induction compared with non-Hispanic white (NHW) women. At term, NHW women had the highest percentage rate (45.4%) of non-medically indicated or induction with no indication (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Compared with other racial/ethnic groups, NHW women were more likely to undergo non-medically indicated induction at term. As labor induction may avoid the occurrence of stillbirth, whether this finding explains part of the increased risk of stillbirth for NHB women at term merits further research.

Maternal outcomes associated with early preterm cesarean delivery.

BACKGROUND: Data on complications associated with classic cesarean delivery are conflicting. In extremely preterm cesarean delivery (22 0/7-27 6/7 weeks' gestation), the lower uterine segment is thicker. It is plausible that the rates of maternal complications may not differ between classic and low transverse cesarean. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare maternal outcomes associated with classic versus low transverse cesarean after stratifying by gestation (23 0/7-27 6/7 and 28 0/7-31 6/7 weeks' gestation). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a multihospital retrospective cohort study of women undergoing cesarean delivery at 23 0/7 to 31 6/7 weeks' gestation from 2005 through 2014. Composite maternal outcome (postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, endometritis, sepsis, wound infection, deep venous thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, hysterectomy, respiratory complications, and intensive care unit admission) was compared between classic and low transverse cesarean. Outcomes were calculated using multivariable logistic regression models yielding adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and adjusted P values controlling for maternal characteristics, emergency cesarean delivery, and comorbidities. Analyses were stratified by gestational age categories (23 0/7-27 6/7 and 28 0/7-31 6/7 weeks' gestation). RESULTS: Of 902 women, 221 (64%) and 91 (16%) underwent classic cesarean between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 and between 28 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation, respectively. There was no increase in maternal complications for classic cesarean versus low transverse cesarean between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks' gestation. However, between 28 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation, classic cesarean was associated with increased risks of the composite maternal outcome (adjusted odds ratio, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-3.45), transfusion (adjusted odds ratio, 2.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-5.52), endometritis (adjusted odds ratio, 3.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-10.21), and intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio, 5.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-18.52) compared to low transverse cesarean. CONCLUSION: Classic cesarean delivery compared with low transverse was associated with higher maternal complication rates between 28 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks, but not between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks' gestation.

Neonatal outcomes in fetuses with cardiac anomalies and the impact of delivery route.

BACKGROUND: Congenital fetal cardiac anomalies compromise the most common group of fetal structural anomalies. Several previous reports analyzed all types of fetal cardiac anomalies together without individualized neonatal morbidity outcomes based on cardiac defect. Mode of delivery in cases of fetal cardiac anomalies varies greatly as optimal mode of delivery in these complex cases is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine rates of neonatal outcomes for fetal cardiac anomalies and examine the role of attempted route of delivery on neonatal morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: Gravidas with fetal cardiac anomalies and delivery >34 weeks, excluding stillbirths and aneuploidies (n = 2166 neonates, n = 2701 cardiac anomalies), were analyzed from the Consortium on Safe Labor, a retrospective cohort study of electronic medical records. Cardiac anomalies were determined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and organized based on morphology. Neonates were assigned to each cardiac anomaly classification based on the most severe cardiac defect present. Neonatal outcomes were determined for each fetal cardiac anomaly. Composite neonatal morbidity (serious respiratory morbidity, sepsis, birth trauma, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, and neonatal death) was compared between attempted vaginal delivery and planned cesarean delivery for prenatal and postnatal diagnosis. We used multivariate logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratio for composite neonatal morbidity controlling for race, parity, body mass index, insurance, gestational age, maternal disease, single or multiple anomalies, and maternal drug use. RESULTS: Most cardiac anomalies were diagnosed postnatally except hypoplastic left heart syndrome, which had a higher prenatal than postnatal detection rate. Neonatal death occurred in 8.4% of 107 neonates with conotruncal defects. Serious respiratory morbidity occurred in 54.2% of 83 neonates with left ventricular outflow tract defects. Overall, 76.3% of pregnancies with fetal cardiac anomalies underwent attempted vaginal delivery. Among patients who underwent attempted vaginal delivery, 66.1% had a successful vaginal delivery. Women with a fetal cardiac anomaly diagnosed prenatally were more likely to have a planned cesarean delivery than women with a postnatal diagnosis (31.7 vs 22.8%; P < .001). Planned cesarean delivery compared to attempted vaginal delivery was not associated with decreased composite neonatal morbidity for all prenatally diagnosed (adjusted odds ratio, 1.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.85-3.30) or postnatally diagnosed (adjusted odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.77-1.27) cardiac anomalies. CONCLUSION: Most fetal cardiac anomalies were diagnosed postnatally and associated with increased rates of neonatal morbidity. Planned cesarean delivery for prenatally diagnosed cardiac anomalies was not associated with less neonatal morbidity.

Induction of Labor in Women with Oligohydramnios: Misoprostol Compared with Prostaglandin E2.

Objective To compare perinatal outcomes in women with oligohydramnios and an unfavorable cervix undergoing labor induction with misoprostol to prostaglandin E2. Study Design We conducted a secondary analysis of women with oligohydramnios undergoing labor induction in the Consortium on Safe Labor study (2002-2008). Oligohydramnios was recorded in the medical chart. We evaluated perinatal outcomes. We limited the analysis to women with an unfavorable cervix defined by simplified Bishop score ≤ 4. Misoprostol was compared with prostaglandin E2. Women could have received oxytocin, underwent mechanical dilation, or had artificial rupture of membranes, but women who underwent induction with both misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 were excluded. We calculated adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals, controlling for maternal age, maternal body mass index (kg/m2), parity, and mechanical dilation. Results Among women with oligohydramnios and an unfavorable cervix who underwent induction of labor, 141 (39.4%) received misoprostol and 217 (60.6%) received prostaglandin E2. There were no significant differences in cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, postpartum hemorrhage, transfusion, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, NICU stay > 72 hours, mechanical ventilation, and neonatal sepsis. Conclusion In women with oligohydramnios and an unfavorable cervix, induction of labor with misoprostol was comparable to prostaglandin E2.

Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a known risk factor for cesarean delivery. Limited data are available regarding the reasons for the increased rate of primary cesarean in obese women. It is important to identify the factors leading to an increased risk of cesarean to identify opportunities to reduce the primary cesarean rate. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated indications for primary cesarean across body mass index (kg/m(2)) classes to identify the factors contributing to the increased rate of cesarean among obese women. STUDY DESIGN: In the Consortium of Safe Labor study from 2002 through 2008, we calculated indications for primary cesarean including failure to progress or cephalopelvic disproportion, nonreassuring fetal heart tracing, malpresentation, elective, hypertensive disease, multiple gestation, placenta previa or vasa previa, failed induction, HIV or active herpes simplex virus, history of uterine scar, fetal indication, placental abruption, chorioamnionitis, macrosomia, and failed operative delivery. For women with primary cesarean for failure to progress or cephalopelvic disproportion, dilation at the last recorded cervical examination was evaluated. Women were categorized according to body mass index on admission: normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9), and obese classes I (30.0-34.9), II (35.0-39.9), and III (≥40). Cochran-Armitage trend test and χ(2) tests were performed. RESULTS: Of 66,502 nulliparous and 76,961 multiparous women in the study population, 19,431 nulliparous (29.2%) and 7329 multiparous (9.5%) women underwent primary cesarean. Regardless of parity, malpresentation, failure to progress or cephalopelvic disproportion, and nonreassuring fetal heart tracing were the common indications for primary cesarean. Regardless of parity, the rates of primary cesarean for failure to progress or cephalopelvic disproportion increased with increasing body mass index (normal weight, overweight, and classes I, II, and III obesity in nulliparous women: 33.2%, 41.6%, 46.4%, 47.4%, and 48.9% [P < .01] and multiparous women: 14.5%, 20.3%, 22.8%, 27.2%, and 25.3% [P < .01]), whereas the rates for malpresentation decreased (normal weight, overweight, and classes I, II, and III obesity in nulliparous women: 23.7%, 17.2%, 14.6%, 12.0%, and 9.1% [P < .01] and multiparous women: 35.6%, 30.6%, 26.5%, 24.3%, and 22.9% [P < .01]). Rates of primary cesarean for nonreassuring fetal heart tracing were not statistically different for nulliparous (P > .05) or multiparous (P > .05) women. Among nulliparous women who had a primary cesarean for failure to progress or cephalopelvic disproportion, rates of cesarean prior to active labor (6 cm) increased as body mass index increased, accounting for 39.3% of women with class I, 47.1% of women with class II, and 56.8% of women with class III obesity compared to 35.2% for normal-weight women (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Similar to normal-weight women, the indication of cesarean for failure to progress or cephalopelvic disproportion was the major factor contributing to the increase in primary cesarean in obese women, but was even more prevalent with increasing obesity class. The rates of intrapartum primary cesarean prior to achieving active labor increased with increasing obesity class in nulliparous women.

Risk factors for retained placenta.

OBJECTIVE: Retained placenta complicates 2-3% of vaginal deliveries and is a known cause of postpartum hemorrhage. Treatment includes manual or operative placental extraction, potentially increasing risks of hemorrhage, infections, and prolonged hospital stays. We sought to evaluate risk factors for retained placenta, defined as more than 30 minutes between the delivery of the fetus and placenta, in a large US obstetrical cohort. STUDY DESIGN: We included singleton, vaginal deliveries ≥24 weeks (n = 91,291) from the Consortium of Safe Labor from 12 US institutions (2002-2008). Multivariable logistic regression analyses estimated the adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for potential risk factors for retained placenta stratified by parity, adjusting for relevant confounding factors. Characteristics such as stillbirth, maternal age, race, and admission body mass index were examined. RESULTS: Retained placenta complicated 1047 vaginal deliveries (1.12%). Regardless of parity, significant predictors of retained placenta included stillbirth (nulliparous adjusted OR, 5.67; 95% CI, 3.10-10.37; multiparous adjusted OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 2.08-9.94), maternal age ≥30 years, delivery at 24 0/7 to 27 6/7 compared with 34 weeks or later and delivery in a teaching hospital. In nulliparous women, additional risk factors were identified: longer first- or second-stage labor duration, whereas non-Hispanic black compared with non-Hispanic white race was found to be protective. Body mass index was not associated with an increased risk. CONCLUSION: Multiple risk factors for retained placenta were identified, particularly the strong association with stillbirth. It is plausible that there could be something intrinsic about stillbirth that causes a retained placenta, or perhaps there are shared pathways of certain etiologies of stillbirth and a risk of retained placenta.

Preterm induction of labor: predictors of vaginal delivery and labor curves.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the labor curves of patients who undergo preterm induction of labor (IOL) and to assess possible predictors of vaginal delivery (VD). STUDY DESIGN: Data from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Consortium on Safe Labor were analyzed. A total of 6555 women who underwent medically indicated IOL at <37 weeks of gestation were included in this analysis. Patients were divided into 4 groups based on gestational age (GA): group A, 24-27+6 weeks; B, 28-30+6 weeks; C, 31-33+6 weeks; and D, 34-36+6 weeks. Pregnant women with a contraindication to VD, IOL ≥37 weeks of gestation, and without data from cervical examination on admission were excluded. Analysis of variance was used to assess differences between GA groups. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess predictors of VD. A repeated measures analysis was used to determine average labor curves. RESULTS: Rates of vaginal live births increased with GA, from 35% (group A) to 76% (group D). Parous women (odds ratio, 6.78; 95% confidence interval, 6.38-7.21) and those with a favorable cervix at the start of IOL (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% confidence interval, 2.23-2.48) were more likely to deliver vaginally. Analysis of labor curves in nulliparous women showed shorter duration of labor with increasing GA; the active phase of labor was, however, similar across all GAs. CONCLUSION: Most women who undergo medically indicated preterm IOL between 24 and 36+6 weeks of gestation deliver vaginally. The strongest predictor of VD was parity. Preterm IOL had a limited influence on estimated labor curves across GAs.

Racial disparities in outcomes of twin pregnancies: elective cesarean or trial of labor?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the relationships between maternal race and obstetric outcomes in twin gestations by planned mode of delivery. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor data. Patients with twin gestations in vertex-vertex presentation greater than 32 weeks' gestational age were grouped according to race. Demographic information and neonatal and maternal outcomes were analyzed according to planned mode of delivery: elective cesarean or trial of labor (with subsequent vaginal delivery, unplanned cesarean, or combined delivery). The primary outcome was unplanned cesarean. Secondary outcomes included maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: One thousand nine vertex-vertex twin pregnancies were identified. There were no significant differences across ethnicities in the rate of unplanned cesarean delivery, which occurred in 233 of patients undergoing trial of labor (27%). Elective cesarean occurred in 151 patients (15%). African American women were less likely to have an elective cesarean compared with whites (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.3-0.8), and Asian women were more likely to have an elective cesarean compared with whites (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.4. Combined delivery occurred in 67 patients (8%) and did not differ among the groups. Subgroup analysis did not reveal any significant differences in neonatal outcomes. Adverse maternal outcomes were rare across ethnicities. CONCLUSION: Unplanned cesarean delivery rates are similar in twin pregnancies, regardless of race. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in twin gestations are similar across ethnicities, regardless of mode of delivery.

Racial disparities in maternal and neonatal outcomes in HIV-1 positive mothers.

OBJECTIVE: To compare obstetric and neonatal outcomes between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive (HIV+) and HIV negative (HIV-) women and to determine if racial disparities exist among pregnancies complicated by HIV infection. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the Consortium of Safe Labor between 2002 and 2008. Comparisons of obstetric morbidity, neonatal morbidity, and indications for cesarean delivery were examined. Included were singletons with documented HIV status, race, and antepartum admission. Chi-square, Fisher exact tests, and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Included were 178,972 patients (178,210 HIV-, 762 HIV+, 464 HIV+ black, 298 HIV+ nonblack). HIV+ women were more likely to have a cesarean delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, another sexually transmitted infection, and delivery at an earlier gestational age. Obstetric outcomes were similar between HIV+ black and HIV+ nonblack women. Neonates of HIV+ mothers had lower birth weights and higher rates of neonatal intensive care admissions. HIV+ black women had lower birth weight neonates than HIV+ nonblack women. CONCLUSION: HIV+ women have higher rates of obstetric complications and deliver at an earlier gestational age than HIV- mothers. Lower birth weight was the only notable complication among HIV+ black women compared with HIV+ nonblack women.

Accuracy of clinically estimated fetal weight in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus and obesity.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of clinically estimated fetal weight (CEFW) in patients with gestational diabetes (GDM), pregestational diabetes (DM), and obesity. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of Consortium of Safe Labor data. Subjects were classified into six groups: DM, DM and obese, GDM, GDM and obese, nondiabetic obese, and controls. The mean difference between birth weight (BW) and CEFW, the percent of accurate CEFW (defined as < 10% difference), and the sensitivity for identifying BW > 4,000 g and > 4,500 g were calculated for each group. RESULTS: The accuracy of CEFW in our population was 54.3 to 64.4% and was significantly lower in patients with DM and obesity and patients with obesity but not diabetes. When CEFW was analyzed in the >4,000-g and > 4,500-g groups, its accuracy was 20 to 51% and 14 to 40%, respectively. CEFW overestimated BW more commonly in GDM, obese GDM, and obese groups. The sensitivity of CEFW for diagnosing BW > 4,000 g or > 4,500 g was 19.6% and 9.6%, respectively, and it improved in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. CONCLUSION: CEFW is a poor predictor of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by obesity and diabetes.

Nonclinical parameters affecting primary cesarean rates in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: Cesarean is the single most common operation in United States and has reached epidemic proportions in recent decades. Our objective was to study the effect of nonclinical parameters on primary cesarean rates in a large contemporary population. STUDY DESIGN: We designed a retrospective multicenter study using data obtained from electronic medical records from 19 U.S. hospitals between 2005 and 2007 (Consortium on Safe Labor Database), which included 145,764 term, singleton, nonanomalous, vertex, live births that included labor. The impact of nonclinical parameters (patient and provider characteristics, time of delivery, institutional policies, and insurance type) was investigated using modified Poisson regression methodology and classification and regression tree analysis. RESULTS: There were 125,517 vaginal and 20,247 cesarean deliveries. Using the multivariable model, the nonclinical parameters with statistical significance for primary cesarean were delivery during evening hours, a male provider, public insurance, and nonwhite race (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean rates are associated with several nonclinical factors. Further investigation into these factors might help to develop strategies to reduce their influence and hence the rates of cesarean.

Association between surgical complications and early academic period in women undergoing cesarean delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of operative complications between the earlier and later academic periods. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing cesarean delivery at 23 weeks' gestation or greater during the academic calendar between 2012 and 2017. Our primary outcome was a composite of surgical complications including hemorrhage (4 or more red blood cell transfusion), bladder injury, bowel injury, neonatal injury, cellulitis, wound complications, intensive care unit admission, and readmission. Outcomes were compared between two periods - the earlier academic period (July and August) and the later academic period (April and May). Multivariable logistic regression or linear regression was performed, controlling for predefined covariates. RESULTS: There were 1251 and 1111 cesarean delivery in the earlier and later academic periods, respectively. The earlier academic period compared to the late academic period was associated with a minute longer incision to delivery time (9 versus 8 min, adjusted p < .01) and a 2.5-min longer surgical duration (49 versus 46.5 min, adjusted p < .01). There was no difference in the primary outcome (10.5 versus 9.6%; adjusted odds ratio 1.11 [0.84-1.46]). CONCLUSIONS: Cesarean deliveries performed in the early months of the academic period was not associated with increased odds of surgical complications.

Perioperative complications of history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cervical cerclage.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate perioperative complications of history- and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of a cohort of patients who underwent history- (n = 198) or ultrasound-indicated (n = 89) cerclage procedures. We evaluated the rates of perioperative complications based on indication for cerclage. The χ(2) was used for categorical variables and Student t test for continuous data. RESULTS: One patient (0.35%) had an intraoperative complication (unsuccessful regional anesthesia) and 1 patient (0.35%) had a postoperative complication (contractions and bleeding 2 weeks after cerclage placement, delivered a nonviable infant). Peripartum complications included chorioamnionitis (6.2%), preterm premature rupture of membranes (11%), preterm delivery (20%), and delivery before 32 weeks' gestational age (8%), and they were similar in the history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated groups. CONCLUSION: History- and ultrasound-indicated cerclages are associated with a 0.6%; 95% confidence interval, -0.26 to 1.66 risk of perioperative complications. There was no difference in perioperative complications or outcome between the 2 groups.

Expectant Management of Severe COVID-19 Pneumonia in Late Preterm Pregnancy and Subsequent Cholecystitis: Lessons Learned.

Introduction Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a pandemic in March 2020, research and guidance have been published with regard to the management of infection and considerations in pregnancy, but much is still unknown. Pregnant women with COVID-19 infection are more likely to be hospitalized and are at increased risk for intensive care unit admissions and intubation than nonpregnant women with COVID-19 infection. The optimal timing of delivery among pregnant women with COVID-19 infection has not been established at this time, especially when the infection arises in late preterm and early term gestation. It is suggested that COVID-19 infection should not be considered a sole indication for delivery. The risks and benefits of prolonging pregnancy versus delivery should be taken into consideration at any given gestational age in a patient with COVID-19 infection. Case Report We report a case of a patient in the late third trimester of pregnancy that presented with severe COVID-19 infection and was managed expectantly through her disease course with improvement of respiratory status without necessitating delivery. We also discuss the unique development of cholecystitis in her hospitalization that may represent another clinical association to COVID-19 infection. Conclusion This case illustrates that delaying delivery is an option even in later gestational ages for maternal stabilization. A multidisciplinary approach and teamwork is needed to manage pregnant women with COVID-19 infection for optimal outcomes for both mother and fetus. Key Points Delaying delivery in severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is a reasonable option even in late gestation.A multidisciplinary team is of utmost importance when managing a pregnant woman with COVID-19.Other clinical sequalae such as cholecystitis may arise in the setting of COVID-19 infection.

Maternal morbidity by attempted route of delivery in periviable birth.

OBJECTIVE: Much of the literature on clinical decision-making regarding the optimal route of delivery for periviable birth, 23 0/7-25 6/7 weeks gestation, has focused on neonatal risks. In fact, routine cesarean delivery at these early gestational ages has not been shown to improve neonatal mortality or neurological outcomes. Neonatal risks associated with the route of delivery are well known. Conversely, there is a paucity of data on maternal morbidity associated with the route of delivery. We examined maternal morbidity according to the attempted route of delivery in women undergoing periviable birth. STUDY DESIGN: In a secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor, a retrospective cohort study, maternal outcomes were compared between attempted vaginal delivery and planned cesarean delivery in women undergoing periviable birth. Analyses were repeated to compare maternal outcomes among actual mode of delivery (vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery). Multivariable Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted relative risks (aRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), controlling for predefined covariates. RESULTS: Of 678 women who underwent periviable birth, 558 (82.3%) and 120 (17.7%) attempted vaginal delivery and planned cesarean delivery, respectively. Of 558 women who attempted a vaginal delivery, 411 (73.7%) achieved a vaginal delivery. Women who attempted a vaginal delivery compared to those who had a planned cesarean delivery were less likely to have endometritis (3.1 versus 15.0%; aRR 0.18, 95% CI 0.09-0.35). Women who attempted a vaginal delivery compared to those who had a planned cesarean delivery had 7-day shorter total length of hospital stay (p < .001). Comparison of actual mode of delivery showed that women with vaginal had decreased risks of fever (2.9 versus 7.9%; aRR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.90), endometritis (0.5 versus 12.4%; aRR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01-0.13), and maternal thrombosis (0.2 versus 3.0%; aRR 0.08, 95% CI 0.01-0.93) compared to cesarean delivery. Women with vaginal delivery had 3-day shorter total length of hospital stay (p < .001) compared to cesarean delivery. CONCLUSION: The majority of women (73.7%) who attempted a vaginal delivery achieved a vaginal delivery. Attempting a vaginal delivery between 23 0/7 and 25 6/7 weeks gestation compared to a planned cesarean delivery was associated with decreased risks of maternal infectious morbidity. Deciding the route of delivery is challenging in women undergoing periviable delivery. Our analysis provides important information on short-term maternal risks when considering the risks and benefits during these discussions.

Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States.

OBJECTIVE: To describe contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Consortium on Safe Labor collected detailed labor and delivery information from 228,668 electronic medical records from 19 hospitals across the United States, 2002-2008. RESULTS: The overall cesarean delivery rate was 30.5%. The 31.2% of nulliparous women were delivered by cesarean section. Prelabor repeat cesarean delivery due to a previous uterine scar contributed 30.9% of all cesarean sections. The 28.8% of women with a uterine scar had a trial of labor and the success rate was 57.1%. The 43.8% women attempting vaginal delivery had induction. Half of cesarean for dystocia in induced labor were performed before 6 cm of cervical dilation. CONCLUSION: To decrease cesarean delivery rate in the United States, reducing primary cesarean delivery is the key. Increasing vaginal birth after previous cesarean rate is urgently needed. Cesarean section for dystocia should be avoided before the active phase is established, particularly in nulliparous women and in induced labor.