Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 27(1): 54-58, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34709116

RESUMEN

The modified Valsalva maneuver has been promoted as a safe and effective method for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia. Serious adverse events associated with the modified Valsalva maneuver are not well documented. Here we report a case of non-sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia in a pregnant patient associated with the use of the modified Valsalva maneuver by paramedics in the prehospital setting.


Asunto(s)
Taquicardia Supraventricular , Taquicardia Ventricular , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Taquicardia Supraventricular/terapia , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapia , Maniobra de Valsalva
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35270696

RESUMEN

Patients with COVID-19 who require aerosol-generating medical procedures (such as endotracheal intubation) are challenging for paramedic services. Although potentially lifesaving for patients, aerosolizing procedures carry an increased risk of infection for paramedics, owing to the resource limitations and complexities of the pre-hospital setting. In this paper, we describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of a novel pre-hospital COVID-19 High-Risk Response Team (HRRT) in Peel Region in Ontario, Canada. The mandate of the HRRT was to attend calls for patients likely to require aerosolizing procedures, with the twofold goal of mitigating against COVID-19 infections in the service while continuing to provide skilled resuscitative care to patients. Modelled after in-hospital 'protected code blue' teams, operationalizing the HRRT required several significant changes to standard paramedic practice, including the use of a three-person crew configuration, dedicated safety officer, call-response checklists, multiple redundant safety procedures, and enhanced personal protective equipment. Less than three weeks after the mandate was given, the HRRT was operational for a 12-week period during the first wave of COVID-19 in Ontario. HRRT members attended ~70% of calls requiring high risk procedures and were associated with improved quality of care indicators. No paramedics in the service contracted COVID-19 during the program.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Auxiliares de Urgencia , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Ontario/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2
3.
CJEM ; 19(4): 293-304, 2017 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27653215

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: "Deliberate practice" and "feedback" are necessary for the development of expertise. We explored clinical performance in settings where these features are inconsistent or limited, hypothesizing that even in algorithmic domains of practice, clinical performance reformulates in ways that may threaten patient safety, and that experience fails to predict performance. METHODS: Paramedics participated in two recorded simulation sessions involving airway management, which were analyzed three ways: first, we identified variations in "decision paths" by coding the actions of the participants according to an airway management algorithm. Second, we identified cognitive schemas driving behavior using qualitative descriptive analysis. Third, clinical performances were evaluated using a global rating scale, checklist, and time to achieve ventilation; the relationship between experience and these metrics was assessed using Pearson's correlation. RESULTS: Thirty participants completed a total of 59 simulations. Mean experience was 7.2 (SD=5.8) years. We observed highly variable practice patterns and identified idiosyncratic decision paths and schemas governing practice. We revealed problematic performance deficiencies related to situation awareness, decision making, and procedural skills. There was no association between experience and clinical performance (Scenario 1: r=0.13, p=0.47; Scenario 2: r=-0.10, p=0.58), or the number of errors (Scenario 1: r=.10, p=0.57; Scenario 2: r=0.25, p=0.17) or the time to achieve ventilation (Scenario 1: r=0.53, p=0.78; Scenario 2: r=0.27, p=0.15). CONCLUSION: Clinical performance was highly variable when approaching an algorithmic problem, and procedural and cognitive errors were not attenuated by provider experience. These findings suggest reformulations of practice emerge in settings where feedback and deliberate practice are limited.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea/normas , Técnicos Medios en Salud , Toma de Decisiones , Competencia Profesional , Adulto , Algoritmos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Maniquíes , Ontario
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA