RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To conduct an investigation similar to a landmark study that investigated the association between nurse-to-patient ratio and patient mortality, failure-to-rescue, emotional exhaustion and job satisfaction of nurses. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of 2709 general, orthopedic, and vascular surgery patients, and 140 staff nurses (42% response rate) caring for these patients in a large Midwestern institution. The main outcome measures were mortality, failure-to-rescue, emotional exhaustion, and job dissatisfaction. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Staffing was not a significant predictor of mortality or failure-to-rescue, nor did clinical specialty predict emotional exhaustion or job dissatisfaction. Although these findings reinforce adequate staffing ratios at this institution, programs that support nurses in their daily practice and positively impact job satisfaction need to be explored. The Nursing Research Council not only has heightened awareness of how staffing ratios affect patient and nurse outcomes, but also a broader understanding of how the research process can be used to effectively shape nurse's practice and work environments.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Admisión y Programación de Personal/organización & administración , Adulto , Agotamiento Profesional/etiología , Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Minnesota/epidemiología , Relaciones Enfermero-Paciente , Investigación en Administración de Enfermería , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/organización & administración , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Factores de Riesgo , Apoyo Social , Carga de Trabajo/psicología , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
To characterize patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) for functional studies, we made whole-genome comparisons with originating breast cancers representative of the major intrinsic subtypes. Structural and copy number aberrations were found to be retained with high fidelity. However, at the single-nucleotide level, variable numbers of PDX-specific somatic events were documented, although they were only rarely functionally significant. Variant allele frequencies were often preserved in the PDXs, demonstrating that clonal representation can be transplantable. Estrogen-receptor-positive PDXs were associated with ESR1 ligand-binding-domain mutations, gene amplification, or an ESR1/YAP1 translocation. These events produced different endocrine-therapy-response phenotypes in human, cell line, and PDX endocrine-response studies. Hence, deeply sequenced PDX models are an important resource for the search for genome-forward treatment options and capture endocrine-drug-resistance etiologies that are not observed in standard cell lines. The originating tumor genome provides a benchmark for assessing genetic drift and clonal representation after transplantation.