Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 78
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 22(1): 4-16, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38394781

RESUMEN

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the systemic therapy options for patients with advanced RCC and summarize the new clinical data evaluated by the NCCN panel for the recommended therapies in Version 2.2024 of the NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/terapia
2.
BMC Urol ; 24(1): 72, 2024 Mar 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38532371

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Consolidative resection or cytoreductive radical prostatectomy (CRP) may benefit men with non-organ confined prostate cancer. We report the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic CRP using a single-port (SP) or multi-port (MP) platform. METHODS: We reviewed consecutive men with clinical node positive or metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer who underwent IRB-approved CRP and extended pelvic lymph node dissection using the da Vinci SP or MP Surgical Systems (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA) from 2015-2022. Perioperative data and Clavien-Dindo 90-day complications were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-four men with a median age of 61 (IQR 56-69) years and prostate-specific antigen of 32.1 (IQR 21.9-62.3) ng/mL were included. Clinical N1, M1, or N1 + M1 disease were detected in 8 (33%), 9 (38%), 7 (29%) patients, respectively. There was no difference in positive margins, 41% vs. 29% (P = 0.67), lymph node yield, 21 (IQR 14-28) vs. 20 (IQR 13.5-21) nodes (P = 0.31), or estimated blood loss, 150 mL (IQR 100-200) vs. 50 mL (IQR 50-125) (P = 0.06), between the MP and SP cohorts, respectively. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter for the SP group, same-day discharge (IQR 0-0), compared to MP, 1-day (IQR 1-1), P < 0.001. One grade III bowel obstruction and lymphocele occurred in the MP cohort. No major complications occurred in the SP cohort. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic CRP is safe and feasible for select men with advanced castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Próstata , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Estudios de Factibilidad , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
3.
World J Urol ; 41(3): 747-755, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36856832

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (MIS-RN) for complex renal masses (CRM). METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of CRM patients who underwent MIS-RN and RAPN. CRM was defined as RENAL score 10-12. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS), recurrence, and complications. Multivariable analysis (MVA) and Kaplan-Meier Analysis (KMA) were used to analyze functional and survival outcomes for RN vs. PN by pathological stage. RESULTS: 926 patients were analyzed (MIS-RN = 437/RAPN = 489; median follow-up 24.0 months). MVA demonstrated lack of transfusion (HR = 1.63, p = 0.005), low-grade (HR = 1.18, p = 0.018) and smaller tumor size (HR = 1.05, p < 0.001) were associated with OS. Younger age (HR = 1.01, p = 0.017), high-grade (HR = 1.18, p = 0.017), smaller tumor size (HR = 1.05, p < 0.001), and lack of transfusion (HR = 1.39, p = 0.038) were associated with CSS. Increasing tumor size (HR = 1.18, p < 0.001), high-grade (HR = 3.21, p < 0.001), and increasing age (HR = 1.02, p = 0.009) were independent risk factors for recurrence. Type of surgery was not associated with major complications (p = 0.094). For KMA of MIS-RN vs. RAPN for pT1, pT2 and pT3, 5-year OS was 85% vs. 88% (p = 0.078); 82% vs. 80% (p = 0.442) and 84% vs. 83% (p = 0.863), respectively. 5-year CSS was 98% for both procedures (p = 0.473); 94% vs. 92% (p = 0.735) and 91% vs. 90% (p = 0.581). 5-year non-CSS was 87% vs. 93% (p = 0.107); 87% for pT2 (p = 0.485) and 92% for pT3 for both procedures (p = 0.403). CONCLUSION: RAPN in CRM is not associated with increased risk of complications or worsened oncological outcomes when compared to MIS-RN and may be preferred when clinically indicated.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Nefrectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Surg Oncol ; 127(1): 192-202, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36169200

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The feasibility of remote perioperative telemonitoring of patient-generated physiologic health data and patient-reported outcomes in a high risk complex general and urologic oncology surgery population is evaluated. METHODS: Complex general surgical/urologic oncology patients wore a pedometer, completed ePROs (electronic patient-reported outcome surveys) and record their vitals (weight, pulse, pulse oximetry, blood pressure, and temperature) via a telehealth app platform. Feasibility (% adherence) was assessed as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with a median age 58 (32-82) years were included. The readmission rate was 33% and the incidence of ≥Grade 3a morbidity was 24%. Adherence to vital sign and ePRO measurements was 95% before surgery, 91% at discharge, and 82%, 68%, and 64% at postdischarge d2, 7, 14, and 30, respectively. There was significant worsening of mobility, self-care and usual daily activity at postdischarge d2 compared to preoperative baseline (p < 0.05). Median daily preoperative steps taken by patients with

Asunto(s)
Oncología Quirúrgica , Telemedicina , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente , Estudios de Factibilidad , Cuidados Posteriores
5.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 20(1): 71-90, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34991070

RESUMEN

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC typically undergo surgery and/or receive systemic therapy. Tumor histology and risk stratification of patients is important in therapy selection. The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer stratify treatment recommendations by histology; recommendations for first-line treatment of ccRCC are also stratified by risk group. To further guide management of advanced RCC, the NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel has categorized all systemic kidney cancer therapy regimens as "Preferred," "Other Recommended Regimens," or "Useful in Certain Circumstances." This categorization provides guidance on treatment selection by considering the efficacy, safety, evidence, and other factors that play a role in treatment selection. These factors include pre-existing comorbidities, nature of the disease, and in some cases consideration of access to agents. This article summarizes surgical and systemic therapy recommendations for patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Oncología Médica
6.
BJU Int ; 126(1): 114-123, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32232920

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of minimally invasive radical nephrectomy (MIS-RN) and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in clinical T2a renal mass (cT2aRM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre, propensity score-matched (PSM) comparison of RAPN and MIS-RN for cT2aRM (T2aN0M0). Cohorts were PSM for age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, clinical tumour size, and R.E.N.A.L. score using a 2:1 ratio for RN:PN. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS), complication rates, and de novo estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Multivariable (MVA) and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses (KMSA) were conducted. RESULTS: In all, 648 patients (216 RAPN/432 MIS-RN) were matched. There were no significant differences in intraoperative complications (P = 0.478), Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥III complications (P = 0.063), and re-admissions (P = 0.238). The MVA revealed high ASA class (hazard ratio [HR] 2.7, P = 0.044) and sarcomatoid (HR 5.3, P = 0.001), but not surgery type (P = 0.601) to be associated with all-cause mortality. Increasing R.E.N.A.L. score (HR 1.31, P = 0.037), high tumour grade (HR 2.5, P = 0.043), and sarcomatoid (HR 2.8, P = 0.02) were associated with recurrence, but not surgery (P = 0.555). Increasing age (HR 1.1, P < 0.001) and RN (HR 3.9, P < 0.001) were predictors of de novo eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Comparing RAPN and MIS-RN, KMSA revealed no significant differences for 5-year OS (76.3% vs 88.0%, P = 0.221) and 5-year DFS (78.6% vs 85.3%, P = 0.630) for pT2 RCC, and no differences for 3-year OS (P = 0.351) and 3-year DFS (P = 0.117) for pT3a upstaged RCC. The 5-year freedom from de novo eGFR of <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 91.6% for RAPN vs 68.9% for MIS-RN (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RAPN had similar oncological outcomes and morbidity profile as MIS-RN, while conferring functional benefit. RAPN may be considered as a first-line option for cT2aRM.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Puntaje de Propensión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 18(9): 1160-1170, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32886895

RESUMEN

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the guidelines, including changes to certain systemic therapy recommendations for patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC. They also discuss the addition of a new section to the guidelines that identifies and describes the most common hereditary RCC syndromes and provides recommendations for genetic testing, surveillance, and/or treatment options for patients who are suspected or confirmed to have one of these syndromes.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Pruebas Genéticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/terapia
8.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 17(11): 1278-1285, 2019 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31693980

RESUMEN

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for the clinical management of patients with clear cell and non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, and are intended to assist with clinical decision-making. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel discussions for the 2020 update to the guidelines regarding initial management and first-line systemic therapy options for patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/terapia , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas
9.
World J Urol ; 37(11): 2439-2450, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30734072

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of robotic radical nephrectomy (RRN) to those of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) for large renal masses. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of RRN and LRN cases performed for large (≥ cT2) renal masses from 2004 to 2017 and collected in the multi-institutional international database (ROSULA: RObotic SUrgery for LArge renal masses). Peri-operative, functional, and oncologic outcomes were compared between each approach. Descriptive analyses were performed and presented as medians with interquartile ranges. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of peri-operative complications. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression models were used to assess survival outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 941 patients (RRN = 404, LRN = 537) were identified. There was no difference in terms of gender, age, and clinical tumor size. Over the study period, RRN had an annual increase of 11.75% (95% CI [7.34, 17.01] p < 0.001) and LRN had an annual decline of 5.39% (95% CI [-6.94, -3.86] p < 0.001). Patients undergoing RRN had higher BMI (27.6 [IQR 24.8-31.1] vs. 26.5 [24.1-30.0] kg/m2, p < 0.01). Operative duration was longer for RRN (185.0 [150.0-237.2] vs. 126 [90.8-180.0] min, p < 0.001). Length of stay was shorter for RRN (3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 5.0 [4.0-7.0] days, p < 0.001). RRN cases presented more advanced disease (higher pathologic staging [pT3-4 52.5 vs. 24.2%, p < 0.001], histologic grade [high grade 49.3 vs. 30.4%, p < 0.001], and rate of nodal disease [pN1 5.4 vs. 1.9%, p < 0.01]). Surgical approach did not represent an independent risk factor for peri-operative complications (OR 1.81 95% CI [0.97-3.39], adjusted p = 0.2). The main study limitation is the retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: This study represents the largest known multi-center comparison between RRN and LRN. The two procedures seem to offer similar peri-operative outcomes. Notably, RRN has been increasingly utilized, especially in the setting of more advanced and surgically challenging disease without increasing the risk of peri-operative complications.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Nefrectomía/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
10.
Telemed J E Health ; 25(8): 701-707, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30332329

RESUMEN

Background: Although store-and-forward teledermatology (SFT) has demonstrated good diagnostic sensitivity for melanoma, little is known about the diagnostic precision (positive predictive value [PPV]). Introduction: We conducted this investigation to ascertain the PPV of melanoma diagnosis among teledermatology readers. Materials and Methods: We reviewed teledermatology consultations on 8,706 patients completed during the period February 1, 2015-January 31, 2016. Melanoma was included in the differential diagnosis of 551 conditions. We conducted a chart review of each condition to determine the final diagnosis. Results: We ascertained a final diagnosis in 503 conditions. Sixty-nine conditions were ultimately diagnosed as melanoma, a PPV of 13.7%. There was considerable variability in PPV among readers. Image quality was associated with higher PPV. Discussion: Overall, SFT program PPV compared favorably with that found in two published studies of face-to-face dermatology clinic care. Conclusion: To increase the diagnostic precision of SFT program melanoma diagnosis, efforts should be directed toward improving selected individual reader's PPV and image quality.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología/métodos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Telemedicina/métodos , Dermatología/normas , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Telemedicina/normas
11.
BJU Int ; 121(3): 357-364, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28872774

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if eliminating the prophylactic placement of a pelvic drain (PD) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) affects the incidence of early (90-day) postoperative adverse events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this parallel-group, blinded, non-inferiority trial, we randomised patients planning to undergo RARP to one of two arms: no drain placement (ND) or PD placement. Patients with demonstrable intraoperative leakage upon bladder irrigation were excluded. Randomisation sequence was determined a priori using a computer algorithm, and included a stratified design with respect to low vs intermediate/high D'Amico risk classifications. Surgeons remained blinded to the randomisation arm until final eligibility was verified at the end of the RARP. The primary endpoint was overall incidence of 90-day complications which, based on our standard treatment using PD retrospectively, was estimated at 13%. The non-inferiority margin was set at 10%, and the planned sample size was 312. An interim analysis was planned and conducted when one-third of the planned accrual and follow-up was completed, to rule out futility if the delta margin was in excess of 0.1389. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2016, 189 patients were accrued to the study, with 92 patients allocated to the ND group and 97 to the PD group. Due to lower than expected accrual rates, accrual to the study was halted by regulatory entities, and we did not reach the intended accrual goal. The ND and PD groups were comparable for median PSA level (6.2 vs 5.8 ng/mL, P = 0.5), clinical stage (P = 0.8), D'Amico risk classification (P = 0.4), median lymph nodes dissected (17 vs 18, P = 0.2), and proportion of patients receiving an extended pelvic lymph node dissection (70.7% vs 79.4%, P = 0.3). Incidence of 90-day overall and major (Clavien-Dindo grade >III) complications in the ND group (17.4% and 5.4%, respectively) was not inferior to the PD group (26.8% and 5.2%, respectively; P < 0.001 and P = 0.007 for difference of proportions <10%, respectively). Symptomatic lymphocoele rates (2.2% in the ND group, 4.1% in the PD group) were comparable between the two arms (P = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Incidence of adverse events in the ND group was not inferior to the group who received a PD. In properly selected patients, PD placement after RARP can be safely withheld without significant additional morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Drenaje , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Anciano , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pelvis , Estudios Prospectivos , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología
12.
Cancer Treat Res ; 175: 105-126, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30168119

RESUMEN

With the ubiquitous use of cross-sectional abdominal imaging in recent years, the incidence of small renal masses (SRMs) has increased, and the evaluation and management of SRMs have become important clinical issues. Diagnosing a mass in the early stages theoretically allows for high rates of cure but simultaneously risks overtreatment. In the past 20 years, surgical treatment of SRMs has transitioned from radical nephrectomy for all renal tumors, regardless of size, to elective partial nephrectomy whenever technically feasible. Additionally, newer approaches, including renal mass biopsy, active surveillance for select patients, and renal mass ablation, have been increasingly used. In this chapter, we review the current evidence-based papers covering aspects of the diagnosis and management of SRMs.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales , Nefrectomía , Biopsia , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía
13.
Can J Urol ; 25(3): 9340-9348, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29900823

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Extended lymph node dissection (ELND) compared to limited lymph node dissection (LLND) at time of prostatectomy improves staging and lymph node (LN) yield. The effect on biochemical recurrence (BCR) and survival is less well understood. We sought to evaluate the benefit of robotic ELND and LLND with respect to BCR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2008-2012, 584 consecutive men with intermediate or high risk clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with concomitant LLND (n = 326) or ELND (n = 258). Survival estimates were made using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank statistic was used for comparison of curves. BCR predictors were determined with multivariable Cox regression analysis. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to compare discrete and continuous variables, respectively, across the two groups. RESULTS: Median follow up for ELND and LLND patients was 46 and 54 months, respectively. ELND yielded more LNs (20 versus 6, p < 0.0001) and had higher node positivity (15.1% versus 3.4%, p < 0.0001). BCR free survival (BCRFS) at 3 and 5 years for ELND and LLND was 85% and 75% (p = 0.01), and 76% and 67% (p = 0.10), respectively. In subgroup analysis, ELND was associated with higher 5 year BCRFS in node-negative patients (84% versus 68%, p = 0.0005) and in intermediate risk patients (93% versus 80%, p = 0.0002). In multivariable analysis, ELND was a significant predictor of BCRFS in node-negative (HR = 0.50, p = 0.003) and intermediate risk patients (HR = 0.54, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: ELND improves LN yield and detection of positive nodes. BCR analysis suggests a reduced risk of PSA failure for robotic ELND in intermediate risk and node-negative patients.


Asunto(s)
Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/estadística & datos numéricos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Invasividad Neoplásica , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/sangre , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pelvis , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
14.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(11): 3422-3423, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28808931

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Robotic-assisted total pelvic exenteration (TPE) can offer a minimally invasive approach to a major multi-organ operation. METHODS: In this video, we summarize a stepwise approach to robotic TPE in a 70 year-old female Jehovah's witness with a history of cervical cancer post-chemoradiation and radical hysterectomy who experienced local recurrence at the vaginal cuff involving the rectum and bladder. RESULTS: The patient was placed in the lithotomy position. A total of six robotic ports were used and the da Vinci Si robotic system was docked between the legs. We proceeded as follows: (1) the abdomen and pelvis were thoroughly explored for evidence of metastatic disease; (2) the pelvic sidewalls were mobilized and bilateral ureters identified; (3) the mesorectal plane was dissected to the level of the levators; (4) the lateral and anterior pelvic structures were completely mobilized, and parametrial tissues were mobilized to the pelvic wall; (5) the bladder was separated from the pubis symphysis, the space of Retzius entered, and the bladder and proximal urethra freed; (6) a perineal incision was made around the vagina, perineal body, and anus, which were excised; (7) an Alloderm mesh secured the pelvic floor, and an omental J flap was mobilized; and (8) a 6 cm incision was utilized for creation of an ileal conduit and a permanent-end colostomy. Final pathology was consistent with recurrent cervical squamous cell carcinoma invading into the vaginal, bladder, and rectal walls. Surgical margins and seven lymph nodes were negative for carcinoma. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted TPE is technically feasible in a Jehovah's witness under a multidisciplinary surgical team, even in the setting of prior radical hysterectomy and irradiated tissue.


Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Exenteración Pélvica/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Testigos de Jehová
15.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw ; 15(6): 804-834, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28596261

RESUMEN

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for the clinical management of patients with clear cell and non-clear cell renal carcinoma. These guidelines are developed by a multidisciplinary panel of leading experts from NCCN Member Institutions consisting of medical oncologists, hematologists and hematologic oncologists, radiation oncologists, urologists, and pathologists. The NCCN Guidelines are in continuous evolution and are updated annually or sometimes more often, if new high-quality clinical data become available in the interim.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Recurrencia , Retratamiento
16.
Int J Urol ; 24(5): 390-395, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28295645

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To report our experience with ureteroenteric anastomotic revision as initial treatment of stricture after urinary diversion. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective study was carried out. A total of 41 patients who underwent primary ureteroenteric anastamotic revision were identified between 2007 and 2015. Data analyzed included patient characteristics, type of diversion, estimated blood loss, operative time, change in renal function, length of stay, postoperative complications and time with nephrostomy/stent. Success of revision was defined as an improvement in hydronephrosis on radiographic imaging and/or reflux during pouchogram. Predictors of length of stay and complications were analyzed using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: A total of 50 renal units were revised with a success rate of 100%. The median length of stay was 6 days (2-16 days). There were a total of 15 complications (one major, 14 minor) in 14 patients (33% 30-day complication rate). The most common were wound infection (n = 4) and arrhythmia (n = 4). Robotic revision (n = 5) had a median length of stay of 3 days (2-4) with no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Primary ureteroenteric anastomotic revisions have an excellent success rate at an experienced center and might obviate the need for multiple interventions. Open revision is associated with mostly minor complications. Robotic revision might reduce the morbidity of open revision in select cases.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Derivación Urinaria/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Constricción Patológica/diagnóstico por imagen , Constricción Patológica/epidemiología , Constricción Patológica/etiología , Constricción Patológica/cirugía , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Cistectomía/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hidronefrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Hidronefrosis/epidemiología , Hidronefrosis/etiología , Hidronefrosis/cirugía , Intestinos/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico por imagen , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Reoperación/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento , Uréter/patología , Uréter/cirugía , Obstrucción Ureteral/epidemiología , Obstrucción Ureteral/etiología , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Derivación Urinaria/métodos
17.
Telemed J E Health ; 23(11): 877-880, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28498031

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Published studies have led to concern that store-and-forward teledermatology (SFT) diagnosis and management of melanomas may be inferior to face-to-face (FTF) dermatology care. INTRODUCTION: To ascertain the frequency of correctly managed and diagnosed melanomas within a population of veterans in Veterans Integrated Service Network 20 SFT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 7,960 veterans seen by SFT between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011. RESULTS: Of the 61 veterans that met inclusion and exclusion criteria, 45 (74%) melanomas were correctly diagnosed and 57 (93%) were correctly managed. DISCUSSION: Diagnostic and management accuracy of SFT is comparable to FTF. Incorrect diagnosis or management of melanomas did not prove to have significant consequences for patient care. Cases subject to analysis of this study are not demographically representative of the general population. CONCLUSION: Diagnosis and management of melanoma in SFT is comparable to FTF care.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología/organización & administración , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Telemedicina/organización & administración , Dermatología/normas , Errores Diagnósticos , Humanos , Melanoma/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Servicios de Salud Rural , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Telemedicina/normas , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
18.
Telemed J E Health ; 23(6): 517-520, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27929365

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Store-and-forward teledermatology (SFT) readers can only diagnose what is imaged. This limitation has caused concern regarding the ability of primary care to direct imaging of lesions suspicious for melanoma. Melanomas not imaged by primary care providers (PCPs) are termed unimaged melanomas. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of unimaged melanomas among Veterans referred for care in a SFT program. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All SFT patients with melanoma diagnosis were ascertained by query of the VA corporate data warehouse, Veterans Integrated Service Network 20 store-and-forward program database, and the VA Computerized Patient Record System. RESULTS: Between July 1, 2009 and December 31, 2011, 12,863 SFT consultations were conducted on 7,960 Veterans. Sixty-nine melanomas met inclusion and exclusion criteria; 13 melanomas were unimaged. The frequency of unimaged melanoma was 10.1 per 10,000 consultations. DISCUSSION: Our calculated frequency of unimaged melanomas associates SFT with noninferiority to face-to-face care. This study was conducted on an exclusively Veteran population, precluding generalizability to the general population. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs referring to store-and-forward teledermatology may fail to image melanomas.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología/normas , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Telemedicina/normas , Dermatología/métodos , Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico por imagen , Telemedicina/métodos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
19.
J Surg Oncol ; 113(1): 5-7, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26603965

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The da Vinci Xi platform provides expanded movement of the arms relative to the base, theoretically allowing increased versatility in complex multi-field or multi-quadrant surgery. We describe the initial Xi experience in oncologic surgery at a tertiary cancer center. METHODS: One hundred thirty unique robot-assisted procedures were performed using the Xi between 2014 and 2015, 112 of which were oncology surgeries. For procedures involving multiple quadrants, the robot was re-targeted. Complications were assessed according to Martin criteria and the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after operation. RESULTS: Thirteen different operations were performed in five oncology subspecialties (urology, gynecology, thoracic, hepatobiliary, and gastrointestinal surgery). Median operative times ranged from 183 min for nephroureterectomy to 543 min for esophagogastrectomy. Median estimated blood loss did not exceed 200 ml for any of the categorized procedures . No patients were transfused intraoperatively and no positioning injuries occurred. Conversions to open operation occurred in three cases (2.7%), though not related to complications or technical considerations. Overall complication rate was 26% with major complication rate of 4%. Readmissions were necessary in 11 (10%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The da Vinci Xi can be safely assimilated into a surgical oncology program. The Xi offers versatility to various oncologic procedures with satisfactory complication and readmission rates.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/instrumentación , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/instrumentación , Hepatectomía/instrumentación , Humanos , Laparoscopía/instrumentación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Registros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Torácicos/instrumentación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/instrumentación
20.
Mol Med ; 21: 381-8, 2015 May 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25998508

RESUMEN

Piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are a distinct group of small noncoding RNAs (sncRNAs) that silence transposable genetic elements to protect genome integrity. Because of their limited expression in gonads and sequence diversity, piRNAs remain the most mysterious class of small RNAs. Studies have shown piRNAs are present in somatic cells and dysregulated in gastric, breast and liver cancers. By deep sequencing 24 frozen benign kidney and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) specimens and using the publically available piRNA database, we found 26,991 piRNAs present in human kidney tissue. Among 920 piRNAs that had at least two copies in one specimen, 19 were differentially expressed in benign kidney and ccRCC tissues, and 46 were associated with metastasis. Among the metastasis-related piRNAs, we found three piRNAs (piR-32051, piR-39894 and piR-43607) to be derived from the same piRNA cluster at chromosome 17. We confirmed the three selected piRNAs not to be miRNAs or miRNA-like sncRNAs. We further validated the aberrant expression of the three piRNAs in a 68-case formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) ccRCC tissue cohort and showed the up-regulation of the three piRNAs to be highly associated with ccRCC metastasis, late clinical stage and poor cancer-specific survival.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/mortalidad , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/mortalidad , ARN Interferente Pequeño/genética , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Técnicas de Silenciamiento del Gen , Genómica , Humanos , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Familia de Multigenes , Clasificación del Tumor , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA