Image quality characterization of an ultra-high-speed kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography imaging system on an O-ring linear accelerator.

PURPOSE: The quality of on-board imaging systems, including cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), plays a vital role in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) and adaptive radiotherapy. Recently, there has been an upgrade of the CBCT systems fused in the O-ring linear accelerators called HyperSight, featuring a high imaging performance. As the characterization of a new imaging system is essential, we evaluated the image quality of the HyperSight system by comparing it with Halcyon 3.0 CBCT and providing benchmark data for routine imaging quality assurance. METHODS: The HyperSight features ultra-fast scan time, a larger kilovoltage (kV) detector, a more substantial kV tube, and an advanced reconstruction algorithm. Imaging protocols in the two modes of operation, treatment mode with IGRT and the CBCT for planning (CBCTp) mode were evaluated and compared with Halcyon 3.0 CBCT. Image quality metrics, including spatial resolution, contrast resolution, uniformity, noise, computed tomography (CT) number linearity, and calibration error, were assessed using a Catphan and an electron density phantom and analyzed with TotalQA software. RESULTS: HyperSight demonstrated substantial improvements in contrast-to-noise ratio and noise in both IGRT and CBCTp modes compared to Halcyon 3.0 CBCT. CT number calibration error of HyperSight CBCTp mode (1.06%) closely matches that of a full CT scanner (0.72%), making it suitable for adaptive planning. In addition, the advanced hardware of HyperSight, such as ultra-fast scan time (5.9 s) or 2.5 times larger heat unit capacity, enhanced the clinical efficiency in our experience. CONCLUSIONS: HyperSight represented a significant advancement in CBCT imaging. With its image quality, CT number accuracy, and ultra-fast scans, HyperSight has a potential to transform patient care and treatment outcomes. The enhanced scan speed and image quality of HyperSight are expected to significantly improve the quality and efficiency of treatment, particularly benefiting patients.

Feasibility of surface-guidance combined with CBCT for intra-fractional breath-hold motion management during Ethos RT.

PURPOSE: High-quality CBCT and AI-enhanced adaptive planning techniques allow CBCT-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) to account for inter-fractional anatomic changes. Studies of intra-fractional respiratory motion management with a surface imaging solution for CT-STAR have not been fully conducted. We investigated intra-fractional motion management in breath-hold Ethos-based CT-STAR and CT-SBRT (stereotactic body non-adaptive radiotherapy) using optical surface imaging combined with onboard CBCTs. METHODS: Ten cancer patients with mobile lower lung or upper abdominal malignancies participated in an IRB-approved clinical trial (Phase I) of optical surface image-guided Ethos CT-STAR/SBRT. In the clinical trial, a pre-configured gating window (± 2 mm in AP direction) on optical surface imaging was used for manually triggering intra-fractional CBCT acquisition and treatment beam irradiation during breath-hold (seven patients for the end of exhalation and three patients for the end of inhalation). Two inter-fractional CBCTs at the ends of exhalation and inhalation in each fraction were acquired to verify the primary direction and range of the tumor/imaging-surrogate (donut-shaped fiducial) motion. Intra-fractional CBCTs were used to quantify the residual motion of the tumor/imaging-surrogate within the pre-configured breath-hold window in the AP direction. Fifty fractions of Ethos RT were delivered under surface image-guidance: Thirty-two fractions with CT-STAR (adaptive RT) and 18 fractions with CT-SBRT (non-adaptive RT). The residual motion of the tumor was quantified by determining variations in the tumor centroid position. The dosimetric impact on target coverage was calculated based on the residual motion. RESULTS: We used 46 fractions for the analysis of intra-fractional residual motion and 43 fractions for the inter-fractional motion analysis due to study constraints. Using the image registration method, 43 pairs of inter-fractional CBCTs and 100 intra-fractional CBCTs attached to dose maps were analyzed. In the motion range study (image registration) from the inter-fractional CBCTs, the primary motion (mean ± std) was 16.6 ± 9.2 mm in the SI direction (magnitude: 26.4 ± 11.3 mm) for the tumors and 15.5 ± 7.3 mm in the AP direction (magnitude: 20.4 ± 7.0 mm) for the imaging-surrogate, respectively. The residual motion of the tumor (image registration) from intra-fractional breath-hold CBCTs was 2.2 ± 2.0 mm for SI, 1.4 ± 1.4 mm for RL, and 1.3 ± 1.3 mm for AP directions (magnitude: 3.5 ± 2.1 mm). The ratio of the actual dose coverage to 99%, 90%, and 50% of the target volume decreased by 0.95 ± 0.11, 0.96 ± 0.10, 0.99 ± 0.05, respectively. The mean percentage of the target volume covered by the prescribed dose decreased by 2.8 ± 4.4%. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the intra-fractional motion-managed treatment strategy in breath-hold Ethos CT-STAR/SBRT using optical surface imaging and CBCT. While the controlled residual tumor motion measured at 3.5 mm exceeded the predetermined setup value of 2 mm, it is important to note that this motion still fell within the clinically acceptable range defined by the PTV margin of 5 mm. Nonetheless, additional caution is needed with intra-fractional motion management in breath-hold Ethos CT-STAR/SBRT using optical surface imaging and CBCT.

Model refinement increases confidence levels and clinical agreement when commissioning a three-dimensional secondary dose calculation system.

PURPOSE: Evaluate custom beam models for a second check dose calculation system using statistically verifiable passing criteria for film analysis, DVH, and 3D gamma metrics. METHODS: Custom beam models for nine linear accelerators for the Sun Nuclear Dose Calculator algorithm (SDC, Sun Nuclear) were evaluated using the AAPM-TG119 test suite (5 Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and 5 Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans) and a set of clinical plans. Where deemed necessary, adjustments to Multileaf Collimator (MLC) parameters were made to improve results. Comparisons to the Analytic Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA), and gafchromic film measurements were performed. Confidence intervals were set to 95% per TG-119. Film gamma criteria were 3%/3 mm (conventional beams) or 3%/1 mm (Stereotactic Radiosurgery [SRS] beams). Dose distributions in solid water phantom were evaluated based on DVH metrics (e.g., D95, V20) and 3D gamma criteria (3%/3 mm or 3%/1 mm). Film passing rates, 3D gamma passing rates, and DVH metrics were reported for HD MLC machines and Millennium MLC Machines. RESULTS: For HD MLC machines, SDC gamma film agreement was 98.76% ± 2.30% (5.74% CL) for 6FFF/6srs (3%/1 mm), and 99.80% ± 0.32% (0.83% CL) for 6x (3%/3 mm). For Millennium MLC machines, film passing rates were 98.20% ± 3.14% (7.96% CL), 99.52% ± 1.14% (2.71% CL), and 99.69% ± 0.82% (1.91% CL) for 6FFF, 6x, and 10x, respectively. For SDC to AAA comparisons: HD MLC Linear Accelerators (LINACs); DVH point agreement was 0.97% ± 1.64% (4.18% CL) and 1.05% ± 2.12% (5.20% CL); 3D gamma agreement was 99.97% ± 0.14% (0.30% CL) and 100.00% ± 0.02% (0.05% CL), for 6FFF/6srs and 6x, respectively; Millennium MLC LINACs: DVH point agreement was 0.77% ± 2.40% (5.47% CL), 0.80% ± 3.40% (7.47% CL), and 0.07% ± 2.15% (4.30% CL); 3D gamma agreement was 99.97% ± 0.13% (0.29% CL), 99.97% ± 0.17% (0.36% CL), and 99.99% ± 0.06% (0.12% CL) for 6FFF, 6x, and 10x, respectively. CONCLUSION: SDC shows agreement well within TG119 CLs for film and redundant dose calculation comparisons with AAA. In some models (SRS), this was achieved using stricter criteria. TG119 plans can be used to help guide model adjustments and to establish clinical baselines for DVH and 3D gamma criteria.

Visually guided respiratory motion management for Ethos adaptive radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Ethos adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is emerging with AI-enhanced adaptive planning and high-quality cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Although a respiratory motion management solution is critical for reducing motion artifacts on abdominothoracic CBCT and improving tumor motion control during beam delivery, our institutional Ethos system has not incorporated a commercial solution. Here we developed an institutional visually guided respiratory motion management system to coach patients in regular breathing or breath hold during intrafractional CBCT scans and beam delivery with Ethos ART. METHODS: The institutional visual-guidance respiratory motion management system has three components: (1) a respiratory motion detection system, (2) an in-room display system, and (3) a respiratory motion trace management software. Each component has been developed and implemented in the clinical Ethos ART workflow. The applicability of the solution was demonstrated in installation, routine QA, and clinical workflow. RESULTS: An air pressure sensor has been utilized to detect patient respiratory motion in real time. Either a commercial or in-house software handled respiratory motion trace display, collection and visualization for operators, and visual guidance for patients. An extended screen and a projector on an adjustable stand were installed as the in-room visual guidance solution for the closed-bore ring gantry medical linear accelerator utilized by Ethos. Consistent respiratory motion traces and organ positions on intrafractional CBCTs demonstrated the clinical suitability of the proposed solution in Ethos ART. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the utilization of an institutional visually guided respiratory motion management system for Ethos ART. The proposed solution can be easily applied for Ethos ART and adapted for use with any closed bore-type system, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, through incorporation with appropriate respiratory motion sensors.

Technical Note: Comparison of the internal target volume (ITV) contours and dose calculations on 4DCT, average CBCT, and 4DCBCT imaging for lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

PURPOSE: To investigate the differences between internal target volumes (ITVs) contoured on the simulation 4DCT and daily 4DCBCT images for lung cancer patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and determine the dose delivered on 4D planning technique. METHODS: For nine patients, 4DCBCTs were acquired before each fraction to assess tumor motion. An ITV was contoured on each phase of the 4DCBCT and a union of the 10 ITVs was used to create a composite ITV. Another ITV was drawn on the average 3DCBCT (avgCBCT) to compare with current clinical practice. The Dice coefficient, Hausdorff distance, and center of mass (COM) were averaged over four fractions to compare the ITVs contoured on the 4DCT, avgCBCT, and 4DCBCT for each patient. Planning was done on the average CT, and using the online registration, plans were calculated on each phase of the 4DCBCT and on the avgCBCT. Plan dose calculations were tested by measuring ion chamber dose in the CIRS lung phantom. RESULTS: The Dice coefficients were similar for all three comparisons: avgCBCT-to-4DCBCT (0.7 ± 0.1), 4DCT-to-avgCBCT (0.7 ± 0.1), and 4DCT-to-4DCBCT (0.7 ± 0.1); while the mean COM differences were also comparable (2.6 ± 2.2mm, 2.3 ± 1.4mm, and 3.1 ± 1.1mm, respectively). The Hausdorff distances for the comparisons with 4DCBCT (8.2 ± 2.9mm and 8.1 ± 3.2mm) were larger than the comparison without (6.5 ± 2.5mm). The differences in ITV D95% between the treatment plan and avgCBCT calculations were 4.3 ± 3.0% and -0.5 ± 4.6%, between treatment plan and 4DCBCT plans, respectively, while the ITV V100% coverages were 99.0 ± 1.9% and 93.1 ± 8.0% for avgCBCT and 4DCBCT, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is great potential for 4DCBCT to evaluate the extent of tumor motion before treatment, but image quality challenges the clinician to consistently delineate lung target volumes.

Comprehensive validation of halcyon 2.0 plans and the implementation of patient specific QA with multiple detector platforms.

PURPOSE: To perform a comprehensive validation of plans generated on a preconfigured Halcyon 2.0 with preloaded beam model, including evaluations of new features and implementing the patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) process with multiple detectors. METHODS: A total of 56 plans were generated in Eclipse V15.6 (Varian Medical System) with a preconfigured Halcyon treatment machine. Ten plans were developed via the AAPM TG-119 test suite with both IMRT and VMAT techniques. 34 clinically treated plans using C-arm LINAC from 24 patients were replanned on Halcyon using IMRT or VMAT techniques for a variety of sites including: brain, head and neck, lung, breast, abdomen, and pelvis. Six of those plans were breast VMAT plans utilizing the extended treatment field technique available with Halcyon 2.0. The dynamically flattened beam (DFB), another new feature on Halcyon 2.0, was also used for an AP/PA spine and four field box pelvis, as well as ten 3D breast plans. All 56 plans were measured with an ion chamber (IC), film, portal dosimetry (PD), ArcCHECK, and Delta4. Tolerance and action limits were calculated and compared to the recommendations of TG-218. RESULTS: TG-119 IC and film confidence limits met those set by the task group, except for IMRT target point dose. Forty-four of 46 clinical plans were within 3% for IC measurements. Average gamma passing rates with 3% dose difference and 2mm distance-to-agreement for IMRT/VMAT plans were: Film - 96.8%, PD - 99.9%, ArcCHECK - 99.1%, and Delta4 - 99.2%. Calculated action limits were: Film - 86.3%, PD - 98.4%, ArcCHECK - 96.1%, and Delta4 - 95.7%. Extended treatment field technique was fully validated and 3D plans with DFB had similar results to IMRT/VMAT plans. CONCLUSION: Halcyon plan deliveries were verified with multiple measurement devices. New features of Halcyon 2.0 were also validated. Traditional PSQA techniques and process specific tolerance and action limits were successfully implemented.

Automated and robust beam data validation of a preconfigured ring gantry linear accelerator using a 1D tank with synchronized beam delivery and couch motions.

PURPOSE: To develop an efficient and automated methodology for beam data validation for a preconfigured ring gantry linear accelerator using scripting and a one-dimensional (1D) tank with automated couch motions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using an application programming interface, a program was developed to allow the user to choose a set of beam data to validate with measurement. Once selected the program generates a set of instructions for radiation delivery with synchronized couch motions for the linear accelerator in the form of an extensible markup language (XML) file to be delivered on the ring gantry linear accelerator. The user then delivers these beams while measuring with the 1D tank and data logging electrometer. The program also automatically calculates this set of beams on the measurement geometry within the treatment planning system (TPS) and extracts the corresponding calculated dosimetric data for comparison to measurement. Once completed the program then returns a comparison of the measurement to the predicted result from the TPS to the user and prints a report. In this work lateral, longitudinal, and diagonal profiles were taken for fields sizes of 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20, and 28 × 28 cm2 at depths of 1.3, 5, 10, 20, and 30 cm. Depth dose profiles were taken for all field sizes. RESULTS: Using this methodology, the TPS was validated to agree with measurement. All compared points yielded a gamma value less than 1 for a 1.5%/1.5 mm criteria (100% passing rate). Off axis profiles had >98.5% of data points producing a gamma value <1 with a 1%/1 mm criteria. All depth profiles produced 100% of data points with a gamma value <1 with a 1%/1 mm criteria. All data points measured were within 1.5% or 2 mm distance to agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This methodology allows for an increase in automation in the beam data validation process. Leveraging the application program interface allows the user to use a single system to create the measurement files, predict the result, and then compare to actual measurement increasing efficiency and reducing the chance for user input errors.

Field-in-field breast planning for a jawless, double-stack MLC LINAC using flattening-filter-free beams.

BACKGROUND: This study intends to develop an efficient field-in-field (FiF) planning technique with the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) to determine the feasibility of using the Halcyon treatment delivery system for 3D treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: Ten treatment plans were prepared on the Halcyon treatment planning system and compared to the same patients' clinically delivered TrueBeam plans which used flattened 6 MV and 10 MV beams. Patients selected for this study were treated via simple, tangential breast irradiation and did not receive radiotherapy of the supraclavicular or internal mammary lymph nodes. Planning target volumes (PTV) volumes ranged from 519 cc to 1211 cc with a mean target volume of 877 cc. Several planning techniques involving collimator, gantry rotation, and number of FiF segments were investigated as well as the use of the dynamically flattened beam (DFB) - a predefined MLC pattern that is designed to provide a flattened beam profile at 10 cm depth on a standard water phantom. For comparison, the clinically delivered TrueBeam plans remained unaltered except for normalization of the target coverage to more readily compare the two treatment delivery techniques. RESULTS: Using the physician defined PTV, normalized such that 98% of the volume was covered by 95% of the prescribed dose, the Halcyon plans were deemed clinically acceptable and comparable to the TrueBeam plans by the radiation oncologist. Resulting average global maximum doses in the test patients were identical between the TrueBeam and Halcyon plans (108% of Rx) and a mean PTV dose of 102.5% vs 101.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: From this study a practical and efficient planning method for delivering 3D conformal breast radiotherapy using the Halcyon linear accelerator has been developed. When normalized to the clinically desired coverage, hot spots were maintained to acceptable levels and overall plan quality was comparable to plans delivered on conventional C-arm LINACs.

The impact of an Advanced Practice Radiation Therapist contouring for a CBCT-based adaptive radiotherapy program.

We successfully implemented an APRT specializing in CBCT-guided online adaptive contouring. These data show statistical improvements in contouring time with APRT-led vs non-APRT led ART contouring, suggesting that an APRT specifically trained to manage the ART process may reduce physician workload and patient treatment time.

The First Reported Case of Treating the Ultra-Central Thorax With Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Stereotactic Adaptive Radiotherapy (CT-STAR).

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to the central and ultra-central thorax is associated with infrequent but potentially serious adverse events. Adaptive SBRT, which provides more precise treatment planning and inter-fraction motion management, may allow the delivery of ablative doses to ultra-central tumors with effective local control and improved toxicity profiles. Herein, we describe the first reported case of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) in the treatment of ultra-central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a prospective clinical trial (NCT05785845). An 80-year-old man with radiographically diagnosed early-stage NSCLC presented for definitive management of an enlarging ultra-central lung nodule. He was prescribed 55 Gy in five fractions with CT-STAR. A simulation was performed using four-dimensional CT, and patients were planned for treatment at end-exhale breath-hold. Treatment plans were generated using a strict isotoxicity approach, which prioritized organ at risk (OAR) constraints over target coverage. During treatment, daily CBCTs were acquired and used to generate adapted contours and treatment plans based on the patient's anatomy-of-the-day, all while the patient was on the treatment table. The initial and adapted plans were compared using dose-volume histograms, and the superior plan was selected for treatment. The adapted plan was deemed superior and used for treatment in three out of five fractions. The adapted plan provided improved target coverage in two fractions and resolved an OAR hard constraint violation in one fraction. We report the successful treatment of a patient with ultra-central NSCLC utilizing CT-STAR. This case report builds on previously published in silico data to support the viability and dosimetric advantages of CT-STAR in the ablative treatment of this challenging tumor location. Further data are needed to confirm the toxicity and efficacy of this technique.

A Pilot Study of Simulation-Free Hippocampal-Avoidance Whole Brain Radiation Therapy Using Diagnostic MRI-Based and Online Adaptive Planning.

PURPOSE: We aimed to demonstrate the clinical feasibility and safety of simulation-free hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy (HA-WBRT) in a pilot study (National Clinical Trial 05096286). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten HA-WBRT candidates were enrolled for treatment on a commercially available computed tomography (CT)-guided linear accelerator with online adaptive capabilities. Planning structures were contoured on patient-specific diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which were registered to a CT of similar head shape, obtained from an atlas-based database (AB-CT). These patient-specific diagnostic MRI and AB-CT data sets were used for preplan calculation, using NRG-CC001 constraints. At first fraction, AB-CTs were used as primary data sets and deformed to patient-specific cone beam CTs (CBCT) to give patient-matched density information. Brain, ventricle, and brain stem contours were matched through rigid translation and rotation to the corresponding anatomy on CBCT. Lens, optic nerve, and brain contours were manually edited based on CBCT visualization. Preplans were then reoptimized through online adaptation to create final, simulation-free plans, which were used if they met all objectives. Workflow tasks were timed. In addition, patients underwent CT-simulation to create immobilization devices and for prospective dosimetric comparison of simulation-free and simulation-based plans. RESULTS: Median time from MRI importation to completion of "preplan" was 1 weekday (range, 1-4). Median on-table workflow duration was 41 minutes (range, 34-70). NRG-CC001 constraints were achieved by 90% of the simulation-free plans. One patient's simulation-free plan failed a planning target volume coverage objective (89% instead of 90% coverage); this was deemed acceptable for first-fraction delivery, with an offline replan used for subsequent fractions. Both simulation-free and simulation CT-based plans otherwise met constraints, without clinically meaningful differences. CONCLUSIONS: Simulation-free HA-WBRT using online adaptive radiation therapy is feasible, safe, and results in dosimetrically comparable treatment plans to simulation CT-based workflows while providing convenience and time savings for patients.

Patient specific contouring region of interest for abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy.

Contouring during adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can be a time-consuming process. This study describes the generation of patient specific contouring regions of interest (CRoI) for evaluating the high dose fall-off in stereotactic abdominal ART. An empirical equation was derived to determine the radius of a cylindrical patient specific CRoIs. These CRoIs were applied to 60 patients and their adaptive fractions (301 unique treatment plans). Out of the 301 unique treatment plans, 284 (94%) treatment plans contained the high dose fall-off within the CRoI. There was an expected predicted average timesaving of 2.9-min-per case. Patient specific CRoIs improves the efficiency of ART.

In silico trial of simulation-free hippocampal-avoidance whole brain adaptive radiotherapy.

Background and Purpose: Hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) can be a time-consuming process compared to conventional whole brain techniques, thus potentially limiting widespread utilization. Therefore, we evaluated the in silico clinical feasibility, via dose-volume metrics and timing, by leveraging a computed tomography (CT)-based commercial adaptive radiotherapy (ART) platform and workflow in order to create and deliver patient-specific, simulation-free HA-WBRT. Materials and methods: Ten patients previously treated for central nervous system cancers with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging were included in this study. The CBCT was the adaptive image-of-the-day to simulate first fraction on-board imaging. Initial contours defined on the MRI were rigidly matched to the CBCT. Online ART was used to create treatment plans at first fraction. Dose-volume metrics of these simulation-free plans were compared to standard-workflow HA-WBRT plans on each patient CT simulation dataset. Timing data for the adaptive planning sessions were recorded. Results: For all ten patients, simulation-free HA-WBRT plans were successfully created utilizing the online ART workflow and met all constraints. The median hippocampi D100% was 7.8 Gy (6.6-8.8 Gy) in the adaptive plan vs 8.1 Gy (7.7-8.4 Gy) in the standard workflow plan. All plans required adaptation at first fraction due to both a failing hippocampal constraint (6/10 adaptive fractions) and sub-optimal target coverage (6/10 adaptive fractions). Median time for the adaptive session was 45.2 min (34.0-53.8 min). Conclusions: Simulation-free HA-WBRT, with commercially available systems, was clinically feasible via plan-quality metrics and timing, in silico.

A pilot study of same-day MRI-only simulation and treatment with MR-guided adaptive palliative radiotherapy (MAP-RT).

We conducted a prospective pilot study evaluating the feasibility of same day MRI-only simulation and treatment with MRI-guided adaptive palliative radiotherapy (MAP-RT) for urgent palliative indications (NCT#03824366). All (16/16) patients were able to complete 99% of their first on-table attempted fractions, and no grades 3-5 toxicities occurred.

Prospective imaging comparison of anatomic delineation with rapid kV cone beam CT on a novel ring gantry radiotherapy device.

INTRODUCTION: A kV imager coupled to a novel, ring-gantry radiotherapy system offers improved on-board kV-cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) acquisition time (17-40 seconds) and image quality, which may improve CT radiotherapy image-guidance and enable online adaptive radiotherapy. We evaluated whether inter-observer contour variability over various anatomic structures was non-inferior using a novel ring gantry kV-CBCT (RG-CBCT) imager as compared to diagnostic-quality simulation CT (simCT). MATERIALS/METHODS: Seven patients undergoing radiotherapy were imaged with the RG-CBCT system at breath hold (BH) and/or free breathing (FB) for various disease sites on a prospective imaging study. Anatomy was independently contoured by seven radiation oncologists on: 1. SimCT 2. Standard C-arm kV-CBCT (CA-CBCT), and 3. Novel RG-CBCT at FB and BH. Inter-observer contour variability was evaluated by computing simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) consensus contours, then computing average symmetric surface distance (ASSD) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) between individual raters and consensus contours for comparison across image types. RESULTS: Across 7 patients, 18 organs-at-risk (OARs) were evaluated on 27 image sets. Both BH and FB RG-CBCT were non-inferior to simCT for inter-observer delineation variability across all OARs and patients by ASSD analysis (p < 0.001), whereas CA-CBCT was not (p = 0.923). RG-CBCT (FB and BH) also remained non-inferior for abdomen and breast subsites compared to simCT on ASSD analysis (p < 0.025). On DSC comparison, neither RG-CBCT nor CA-CBCT were non-inferior to simCT for all sites (p > 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Inter-observer ability to delineate OARs using novel RG-CBCT images was non-inferior to simCT by the ASSD criterion but not DSC criterion.

Knowledge-based adaptive planning quality assurance using dosimetric indicators for stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to develop knowledge-based tools for robust adaptive radiotherapy (ART) planning to determine on-table adaptive DVH metric variations or planning process errors for stereotactic pancreatic ART. We developed volume-based dosimetric identifiers to identify deviations of ART plans from simulation plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two patient cohorts who were treated on MR-Linac for pancreas cancer were included in this retrospective study; a training cohort and a validation cohort. All patients received 50 Gy in 5 fractions. PTV-OPT was generated by subtracting the critical organs plus a 5 mm-margin from PTV. Several metrics that potentially can identify failure-modes were calculated including PTV & PTV_OPT V95% and PTV & PTV_OPT D95%/D5%. The difference between each DVH metric in each adaptive plan with the DVH metric in simulation plan was calculated. The 95% confidence interval (CI) of the variations in each DVH metric was calculated for the patient training cohort. Variations in DVH metrics that exceeded the 95% CI for all fractions in training and validation cohort were flagged for retrospective investigation for root-cause analysis to determine their predictive power for identifying failure-modes. RESULTS: The CIs for the PTV & PTV_OPT V95% and PTV & PTV_OPT D95%/D5% were ± 13%, ± 5%, ± 0.1, ± 0.03, respectively. We estimated the positive predictive value and negative predictive value of our method to be 77% and 89%, respectively, for the training cohort, and 80% for both in the validation cohort. DISCUSSION: We developed dosimetric indicators for ART planning QA to identify population-based deviations or planning errors during online adaptive process for stereotactic pancreatic ART. This technology may be useful as an ART clinical trial QA tool and improve overall ART quality at an institution.

Prospective In Silico Evaluation of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography-Guided StereoTactic Adaptive Radiation Therapy (CT-STAR) for the Ablative Treatment of Ultracentral Thoracic Disease.

Purpose: We conducted a prospective, in silico study to evaluate the feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT)-guided stereotactic adaptive radiation therapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of ultracentral thoracic cancers (NCT04008537). We hypothesized that CT-STAR would reduce dose to organs at risk (OARs) compared with nonadaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) while maintaining adequate tumor coverage. Methods and Materials: Patients who were already receiving radiation therapy for ultracentral thoracic malignancies underwent 5 additional daily CBCTs on the ETHOS system as part of a prospective imaging study. These were used to simulate CT-STAR, in silico. Initial, nonadaptive plans (PI) were created based on simulation images and simulated adaptive plans (PA) were based on study CBCTs. 55 Gy/5 fractions was prescribed, with OAR constraint prioritization over PTV coverage under a strict isotoxicity approach. PI were applied to patients' anatomy of the day and compared with daily PA using dose-volume histogram metrics, with selection of superior plans for simulated delivery. Feasibility was defined as completion of the end-to-end adaptive workflow while meeting strict OAR constraints in ≥80% of fractions. CT-STAR was performed under time pressures to mimic clinical adaptive processes. Results: Seven patients were accrued, 6 with intraparenchymal tumors and 1 with a subcarinal lymph node. CT-STAR was feasible in 34 of 35 simulated fractions. In total, 32 dose constraint violations occurred when the PI was applied to anatomy-of-the-day across 22 of 35 fractions. These violations were resolved by the PA in all but one fraction, in which the proximal bronchial tree dose was still numerically improved through adaptation. The mean difference between the planning target volume and gross total volume V100% in the PI and the PA was -0.24% (-10.40 to 9.90) and -0.62% (-11.00 to 8.00), respectively. Mean end-to-end workflow time was 28.21 minutes (18.02-50.97). Conclusions: CT-STAR widened the dosimetric therapeutic index of ultracentral thorax SBRT compared with nonadaptive SBRT. A phase 1 protocol is underway to evaluate the safety of this paradigm for patients with ultracentral early-stage NSCLC.

Initial clinical experience building a dual CT- and MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy program.

Introduction: Our institution was the first in the world to clinically implement MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) in 2014. In 2021, we installed a CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy (CTgART) unit, becoming one of the first clinics in the world to build a dual-modality ART clinic. Herein we review factors that lead to the development of a high-volume dual-modality ART program and treatment census over an initial, one-year period. Materials and Methods: The clinical adaptive service at our institution is enabled with both MRgART (MRIdian, ViewRay, Inc, Mountain View, CA) and CTgART (ETHOS, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) platforms. We analyzed patient and treatment information including disease sites treated, radiation dose and fractionation, and treatment times for patients on these two platforms. Additionally, we reviewed our institutional workflow for creating, verifying, and implementing a new adaptive workflow on either platform. Results: From October 2021 to September 2022, 256 patients were treated with adaptive intent at our institution, 186 with MRgART and 70 with CTgART. The majority (106/186) of patients treated with MRgART had pancreatic cancer, and the most common sites treated with CTgART were pelvis (23/70) and abdomen (20/70). 93.0% of treatments on the MRgART platform were stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), whereas only 72.9% of treatments on the CTgART platform were SBRT. Abdominal gated cases were allotted a longer time on the CTgART platform compared to the MRgART platform, whereas pelvic cases were allotted a shorter time on the CTgART platform when compared to the MRgART platform. Our adaptive implementation technique has led to six open clinical trials using MRgART and seven using CTgART. Conclusions: We demonstrate the successful development of a dual platform ART program in our clinic. Ongoing efforts are needed to continue the development and integration of ART across platforms and disease sites to maximize access and evidence for this technique worldwide.

The first reported case of a patient with pancreatic cancer treated with cone beam computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR).

BACKGROUND: Online adaptive stereotactic radiotherapy allows for improved target and organ at risk (OAR) delineation and inter-fraction motion management via daily adaptive planning. The use of adaptive SBRT for the treatment of pancreatic cancer (performed until now using only MRI or CT on rails-guided adaptive radiotherapy), has yielded promising outcomes. Herein we describe the first reported case of cone beam CT-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: A 61-year-old female with metastatic pancreatic cancer presented for durable palliation of a symptomatic primary pancreatic mass. She was prescribed 35 Gy/5 fractions utilizing CT-STAR. The patient was simulated utilizing an end-exhale CT with intravenous and oral bowel contrast. Both initial as well as daily adapted plans were created adhering to a strict isotoxicity approach in which coverage was sacrificed to meet critical luminal gastrointestinal OAR hard constraints. Kilovoltage cone beam CTs were acquired on each day of treatment and the radiation oncologist edited OAR contours to reflect the patient's anatomy-of-the-day. The initial and adapted plan were compared using dose volume histogram objectives, and the superior plan was delivered. Use of the initial treatment plan would have resulted in nine critical OAR hard constraint violations. The adapted plans achieved hard constraints in all five fractions for all four critical luminal gastrointestinal structures. CONCLUSIONS: We report the successful treatment of a patient with pancreatic cancer treated with CT-STAR. Prior to this treatment, the delivery of ablative adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer was limited to clinics with MR-guided and CT-on-rails adaptive SBRT technology and workflows. CT-STAR is a promising modality with which to deliver stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer.

Simulated computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We conducted a prospective, in silico imaging clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility and potential dosimetric benefits of computed tomography-guided stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy (CT-STAR) for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight patients with LAPC received five additional CBCTs on the ETHOS system before or after their standard of care radiotherapy treatment. Initial plans were created based on their initial simulation anatomy (PI) and emulated adaptive plans were created based on their anatomy-of-the-day (PA). The prescription was 50 Gy/5 fractions. Plans were created under a strict isotoxicity approach, in which organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints were prioritized over planning target volume coverage. The PI was evaluated on the patient's anatomy-of-the-day, compared to the daily PA, and the superior plan was selected. Feasibility was defined as successful completion of the workflow in compliance with strict OAR constraints in ≥80% of fractions. RESULTS: CT-STAR was feasible in silico for LAPC and improved OAR and/or target dosimetry in 100% of fractions. Use of the PI based on the patient's anatomy-of-the-day would have yielded a total of 94 OAR constraint violations and ≥1 hard constraint violation in 40/40 fractions. In contrast, 39/40 PA met all OAR constraints. In one fraction, the PA minimally exceeded the large bowel constraint, although dosimetrically improved compared to the PI. Total workflow time per fraction was 36.28 minutes (27.57-55.86). CONCLUSION: CT-STAR for the treatment of LAPC cancer proved feasible and was dosimetrically superior to non-adapted CT-stereotactic body radiotherapy.