Developmental surveillance: a prospective observational study on integrating occupational therapy.

The purpose of this study was to understand the interprofessional contributions of occupational therapy services within the pediatric primary care team during developmental surveillance for health promotion and prevention. A prospective observational study of 27 well-child visits was conducted. Well-child visits were conducted by a physician, physician assistant, or nursing practitioner. This research compared observed developmental surveillance from an occupational therapy perspective to identify opportunities for supporting daily childhood activity participation. Areas of occupational and developmental participation were generally well covered during developmental surveillance. While there were no observed differences in the scope of the well-child visit conducted by different primary care professionals, habits, routines, roles, rituals, and the environments and contexts that may be impacting participation for children and families were found to be an area of limited discussion during developmental surveillance. There is an opportunity for occupational therapy practitioners to be involved in developmental surveillance with an emphasis on occupational therapy's expertise in habits, routines, roles, and contextual considerations to participation and development.

Barriers and Opportunities to Support the Oral Health of Older Adults: A Rapid Review of Health Policy and Systems.

Tooth decay and gum disease are reversible, preventable, and impact approximately 68% of older adults nationwide. While the Affordable Care Act added provisions to health prevention services, it did not cover oral health prevention for adults and older adults. A rapid review process was utilized to identify literature documenting system and policy level barriers and opportunities to address oral health equity issues for older adults in the United States. Twenty-five articles met inclusion criteria for analysis. Findings revealed four barrier and three opportunity themes. Recommendations of analysis include expansion of oral health coverage under Medicare and Medicaid along with community-based and co-located medical and dental services. This will address access and utilization barriers and provide education for older adults, health providers, and the general population. Increasing oral health literacy and population awareness, and prioritizing oral health can be met by capitalizing on opportunities found in this rapid review.

Maximizing the use of the intraprofessional team to develop interprofessional pediatric primary care teams.

Pediatric well-child care focuses on growth, development, physical examination, and caregiver education for health prevention and promotion. There is limited time for providing all of these services within typical well-child visits. A series of research activities explored opportunities for interprofessional collaboration within pediatric primary care teams during well-child care. The four research activities included a focus group with occupational therapy practitioners, observations of well-child visits, and two caregiver surveys; two faculties and two students were involved as part of the intraprofessional research team. Results of the research activities identified opportunities for allied health professionals as part of the pediatric primary care team to support incongruence between current care delivery and caregiver preferences for care. While activity participation was found to be well addressed in primary care, an increased focus on understanding the impact of child and family habits, routines, and contexts on activity participation is an opportunity for interprofessional primary care teams to promote health outcomes for children.

Role of Occupational Therapy in Pediatric Primary Care: Promoting Childhood Development.

Occupational therapy practitioners have the opportunity to promote development for all children as new service delivery models are established for pediatric primary care. Three action steps are identified: (1) advocacy for legislation that requires developmental screenings and surveillance, (2) support of culturally responsive developmental monitoring, and (3) building evidence for occupational therapy in primary care settings. This article describes the role of occupational therapy practitioners on pediatric interprofessional teams in encouraging family capacity within the scope of health promotion and universal developmental monitoring.

Application of the Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance Model: A Scoping Review.

The Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) Model is one of several occupation-based models in occupational therapy. The model describes the transactional nature of person, environment, and occupation factors that support performance (doing), participation (engagement), and well-being (health and quality of life). The purpose of this study was to explore the extent and nature of evidence on the PEOP Model. We used a scoping review to identify and analyze journal articles that used the PEOP Model as a framework for study. The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) criteria were used to develop the research methods. We found 109 articles that adopted the PEOP Model as an organizing framework. The studies reviewed represent the breadth of occupational therapy practice and the transactional nature of person, environment, occupation, and performance in the PEOP Model. The PEOP Model is a useful international framework for research and practice across populations, conditions, life circumstances, settings, and areas of practice.

METHOD: We searched five databases to identify published articles that used the PEOP Model. Then, we analyzed our findings from peer-reviewed journals and peer-reviewed practice publications using a recommended process called a scoping review. We summarized how often the PEOP Model was used and the way in which it was used. FINDINGS: We found the PEOP Model was used in more than 100 published articles. The PEOP Model has been used to study everyday living for different populations, life circumstances, countries, and communities. Authors found the PEOP Model was helpful for identifying what was important to individuals and determining things that were helpful and barriers to everyday living. CONCLUSION: Authors described the PEOP Model as a useful tool in their research methods and analyses. Occupational therapy professionals may find the PEOP Model helpful in current and innovative areas of practice to help people achieve their goals related to everyday living.

The Person­Environment­Occupation­Performance (PEOP) Model: Summary of Current Research on an Occupational Therapy Lens for Everyday LivingBackground and Purpose: The Person­Environment­Occupation­Performance (PEOP) Model was developed to guide occupational therapy practice. The PEOP Model summarizes all the factors that support or limit our involvement in everyday living. By everyday living, we mean all the things we do to take care of ourselves, maintain our health and home, connect with friends and family, engage in meaningful activities, and support ourselves and our community through work and volunteering. The purpose of this study was to summarize the reasons why and the extent to which the PEOP Model was used in research and practice.

An approach to developing oral health knowledge for allied health students.

BACKGROUND: Oral health competency-based education approaches have been proposed as a mechanism to address oral health outcomes and equity issues. Recommendations for oral health education for allied health professional students include practices to increase team members' knowledge and skills in the integration of oral health and primary care practice (IOHPCP) initiative's oral health clinical competencies for primary care providers. AIMS: This study aimed to examine changes in self-reported knowledge of occupational students in the topics of oral health, the dental profession, and dental healthcare systems following participation in a series of webinars and a community-engaged learning project. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study utilized an oral health education program through webinars and a community-engaged learning project for occupational therapy students. Program evaluation measures were utilized to assess the oral health education activities through self-reported knowledge in oral health topics aligned with IOHPCP domains along with topics identified by the community partner organization. RESULTS: Findings demonstrate that asynchronous webinars can increase self-reported knowledge in occupational therapy students. DISCUSSION: Recommendations for inclusion of oral health education for allied health students related to knowledge of oral health, the dental profession, and dental healthcare systems are shared. CONCLUSIONS: Asynchronous webinars have the potential to increase self-reported oral health knowledge for allied health professionals.

Implementing a Tailored Psychosocial Distress Screening Protocol in a Head and Neck Cancer Program.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Psychosocial distress is common among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and is associated with poorer quality of life and clinical outcomes. Despite these risks, distress screening is not widely implemented in HNC care. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of psychosocial distress and its related factors in routine care of patients with HNC. METHODS: Data from medical records between September 2017 and March 2020 were analyzed. Psychosocial distress was measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network's Distress Thermometer (DT), and a modified HNC-specific problem list; depression and anxiety were assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were conducted to report prevalence of distress, depression and anxiety, and factors associated with clinical distress. Implementation outcomes, including rates of referrals and follow-up for distressed patients, are also reported. RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty seven HNC patients completed the questionnaire (age 64.3 ± 14.9 years), with a mean distress score of 4.51 ± 3.35. Of those, 57% (n = 163) reported clinical distress (DT ≥ 4). Pain (odds ratio [OR] = 3.31, 95% CI = 1.75-6.26), fatigue (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 1.1.7-5.05), anxiety (OR = 1.63, 95% CI = 1.30-2.05), and depression (OR = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.04-2.18) were significantly associated with clinical distress (P < .05). Of patients identified as distressed, 79% received same-day psychosocial evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical distress was identified in 57% of patients who completed the questionnaire, suggesting that an ultra-brief psychosocial screening protocol can be implemented in routine ambulatory oncology care, and identifies patients whose distress might otherwise go unrecognized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:1600-1608, 2022.

The impact of treatment package time on survival in surgically managed head and neck cancer in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Delays in the initiation of postoperative radiation have been associated with worse outcomes; however, the effect of the overall treatment package time (interval from surgery through the completion of radiation) remains undefined. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of package time on survival and to evaluate this effect among different subgroups of head and neck cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational cohort study, the National Cancer Database was used to identify 35,167 patients with resected nonmetastatic head and neck cancer who underwent adjuvant radiation from 2004 to 2014. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the effect of treatment package time on overall survival. RESULTS: Median package time was 96 days (interquartile range, 85-112 days). After adjusting for covariates, package times of 11 weeks or less were associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.97) compared to an interval of 12-13 weeks, whereas package times of more than 14 weeks were associated with worse survival (aHR, 1.14, 1.14, and 1.22 for 14-15, 15-17, and >17 weeks, respectively). A significant interaction was identified between package time and disease site, nodal status, and stage. Specifically, patients with oropharyngeal tumors, advanced stage (III or IV) disease, or nodal involvement experienced more pronounced increases in mortality risk with delays in treatment time. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment package time independently impacts survival. This effect may be strongest for patients with oropharyngeal tumors or advanced stage disease.

Survival impact of treatment delays in surgically managed oropharyngeal cancer and the role of human papillomavirus status.

BACKGROUND: The impact of treatment delays on survival in oropharyngeal cancer and whether the effect varies by human papillomavirus (HPV) status have yet to be defined. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the survival impact of time from diagnosis to surgery (DTS), surgery to radiation (SRT), and duration of radiation (RTD) for patients in the National Cancer Database with resected oropharyngeal cancer who underwent adjuvant radiation from 2010 to 2014. RESULTS: We identified optimal thresholds of 30, 40, and 51 days for DTS, SRT, and RTD, respectively, with treatment times exceeding these thresholds associated with significantly worse overall survival. Prolonged SRT and RTD were associated with mortality regardless of HPV status, although rising DTS was only predictive among patients with HPV-negative tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment delays significantly impact survival in oropharyngeal cancer. The consequences of prolonged DTS may be stronger in HPV-negative than HPV-positive disease. These data serve as a foundation for future research and clinical management.