Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 96(2): 393-401, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32017374

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and feasibility of treating infrapopliteal lesions using a novel drug delivery catheter locally delivering liquid paclitaxel. BACKGROUND: Balloon angioplasty is currently the Gold Standard to treat below-the-knee disease; however, restenosis continues to be a great challenge following these percutaneous revascularization procedures. METHODS: The Occlusion Perfusion Catheter for Optimal Delivery of Paclitaxel for the Prevention of Endovascular Restenosis (COPPER-A) study-Below-the-Knee Cohort was a prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter, feasibility, and safety study that enrolled 35 patients at 11 participating sites. The safety endpoints at 1, 3, and 6 months were freedom from thrombosis, major amputation in the target limb and target limb related death. The efficacy endpoints were primary patency and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization at 6 months. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the procedure well with no reports of adverse procedural events. Thirty-five patients were treated with a mean lesion length of 112 ± 81.2 mm with the lesion length range of 20-286 mm. At 6-month follow-up, primary patency was 89.3% and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization was 96.4%. No patients demonstrated thrombosis, major amputation in the target limb and target limb related death at the 1-, 3- and 6-months follow-up intervals. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this multi-center study demonstrated that infrapopliteal arteries can be safely and effectively treated with liquid paclitaxel using the occlusion perfusion catheter.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia de Balón/instrumentación , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Sistemas de Liberación de Medicamentos/instrumentación , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/terapia , Arteria Poplítea , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amputación Quirúrgica , Angioplastia de Balón/efectos adversos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Arteria Poplítea/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Poplítea/fisiopatología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular
2.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 34: 106-10, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27116905

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endovascular aneurysm repair (PEVAR) continues to evolve. Device profiles continue to decline, further reducing the physiological insult of the procedure. Anesthesia, however, has not evolved with a large proportion of patients continuing to receive general anesthesia for their increasingly less invasive procedures. We report on a novel anesthetic technique providing outstanding anesthesia in patients undergoing PEVAR in an outpatient setting. The total anesthesia used was remarkably cost effective. METHODS: Six patients underwent PEVAR in an outpatient setting. The patients received moderate intravenous (IV) access sedation using versed and fentanyl in combination with bilateral ilioinguinal nerve blocks. Patients received 25 mL bilaterally of 0.5% bupivicaine with epinephrine. All patients were American Society of Anesthesiologists class III. None received central venous access, arterial, or urinary catheters. Standard noninvasive monitoring was used. A board-certified anesthesiologist was present at all times during the procedures. RESULTS: All patients underwent successful repair. Average cost per case for anesthetic supplies averaged around $7.00. The fentanyl dose ranged from 100 to 200 µg with an average dose of 130 µg. Versed dose ranged from 2 to 3 mg with an average dose of 2.4 mg. No patient required conversion to general anesthesia. Postoperative pain relief was excellent. Two patients required pain medication before discharge. Two patients required oral narcotic analgesic the night of discharge. No patients required narcotics after that time. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral ilioinguinal nerve block, when combined with moderate IV sedation allows outstanding anesthesia for patients undergoing PEVAR. This novel combination has not been reported previously. The technique provides safe, effective, care for of a subset of patients not requiring general anesthesia. It offers a greatly reduced cost when compared with general anesthesia. Additional benefits include prolonged pain relief perioperatively as well as potentially decreasing the physiologic and cognitive effects seen with general anesthesia.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Sedación Consciente , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Bloqueo Nervioso , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/economía , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Sedación Consciente/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Costos de los Medicamentos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Fentanilo/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/economía , Masculino , Midazolam/efectos adversos , Midazolam/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueo Nervioso/efectos adversos , Bloqueo Nervioso/economía , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 22(6): 742-9, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18922675

RESUMEN

We assessed the technical success and early outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for complicated acute type B thoracic aortic dissection treated at a single institution using a commercially available device. All patients with symptomatic complicated acute type B thoracic aortic dissection treated with TEVAR since Food and Drug Administration approval of the Gore (Flagstaff, AZ) TAG endoprosthesis were identified from a prospectively maintained vascular registry. Clinical indications, operative technique, perioperative complications, follow-up imaging, and mortality were analyzed. Between March 2005 and November 2007, 127 TEVARs using the TAG endoprosthesis were performed, of which 15 (11.8%) were for complicated acute type B thoracic aortic dissection. Indications for repair were malperfusion (53%), persistent pain (27%), and primary aortic failure (33%). Technical feasibility and success with deployment proximal to the entry tear was 93.3%, requiring at least partial coverage of the left subclavian artery in seven (46.7%). Adjunctive procedures required at the time of TEVAR included renal stent (n = 2), iliac stent (n = 3), and access-artery open repair (n = 2). Twelve patients (80%) had immediate resolution of the malperfusion deficit. Major perioperative complications included paraplegia (13.3%), renal failure requiring hemodialysis (13.3%), and stroke (6.7%). Perioperative mortality was 13.3%, occurring in one patient presenting with rupture and one with profound heart failure on admission. For complicated acute type B thoracic aortic dissection, TEVAR using commercially available stent grafts showed high technical success, excellent results at resolving malperfusion, and acceptably low complications and perioperative mortality.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Prótesis Vascular , Stents , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/patología , Disección Aórtica/fisiopatología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/patología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/fisiopatología , Aortografía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paraplejía/etiología , Diseño de Prótesis , Flujo Sanguíneo Regional , Sistema de Registros , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
4.
Vasc Endovascular Surg ; 42(2): 113-9; discussion 120-1, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18270271

RESUMEN

The outcomes of endovascular repair for small abdominal aortic aneurysm (4.0-4.9 cm) is reported. All patients undergoing endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair between 2000 and 2006 with maximal diameter 4.0 to 4.9 cm form the small aneurysm study cohort. Data were analyzed retrospectively and life-table methods were used. Of 743 endovascular repairs, 132 (17.8%) were performed for small abdominal aortic aneurysm. Perioperative complication rate was 9.1%. Freedom from aneurysm expansion was 96% at 1 year, 86% at 3 years, and 77% at 5 years. Overall survival was 98%, 93%, and 84% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Perioperative 30-day mortality was 0.8% with an aneurysm-related mortality of 1.5% at 5 years. There were no deaths from delayed aneurysm rupture. Endovascular repair of small abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with low perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with published results for open repair, and treatment threshold can be reduced to 4 cm in selected patients.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Selección de Paciente , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/patología , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Femenino , Humanos , Tablas de Vida , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diseño de Prótesis , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Prevención Secundaria , Stents , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 19(2): 192-8, 2005 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15770370

RESUMEN

When polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) must be used for below-knee bypass to achieve limb salvage, effective anticoagulation with warfarin may improve graft survival. We analyzed our practice of routinely using oral anticoagulation to improve graft patency rates for PTFE grafts to below-knee popliteal and crural vessels in limb salvage procedures. We reviewed our established vascular database from February 1999 through April 2003 to identify those patients who required below-knee and tibial artery bypass with PTFE for critical limb ischemia. All patients were initiated on warfarin anticoagulation postoperatively, with an international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.0-3.0 considered therapeutic. All patients were discharged in the therapeutic range. Life-table analysis and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to compare primary patency rates with regard to INR and position of distal anastomosis. Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed to compare the patency rates for grafts with therapeutic versus subtherapeutic anticoagulation while correcting for variability in distal runoff. Between February 1999 and April 2003, 74 patients (mean age, 69.2 years; 58% men) had 77 below-knee PTFE bypasses. Indications for operation included rest pain (43), ischemic ulcer (27), and gangrene (7). Patients presenting with occluded grafts more often had a subtherapeutic INR. Patients with a subtherapeutic INR (< or = 1.9) had a median primary graft patency of 6.8 months and those with a therapeutic INR (> or = 2.0) had a median primary graft patency of 29.9 months (p = 0.0007). Analysis by Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated a significantly better graft patency rate in patients with a therapeutic INR regardless of outflow vessel. The patency rates of PTFE grafts to infrageniculate vessels may be improved by effective anticoagulation with warfarin. This improved patency rate may also result in improved limb salvage and further support the use of PTFE grafts for critical limb ischemia when autogenous vein is not available. Predictably, the best results are seen with an INR therapeutic range of 2.0 to 3.0.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Prótesis Vascular , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Politetrafluoroetileno , Grado de Desobstrucción Vascular , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Poplítea/cirugía , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA