RESUMEN
The interaction of a variety of aspartic proteinases with a recombinant tomato protein produced in Pichia pastoris was investigated. Only human cathepsin D and, even more potently, proteinase A from Saccharomyces cerevisiae were inhibited. The tomato polypeptide has >80% sequence identity to a previously reported potato inhibitor of cathepsin D. Re-evaluation of the potato inhibitor revealed that it too was more potent (>20-fold) towards yeast proteinase A than cathepsin D and so might be renamed the potato inhibitor of proteinase A. The potency towards yeast proteinase A may reflect a similarity between this fungal enzyme and aspartic proteinases produced by fungal pathogens which attack tomato and/or potatoes.
Asunto(s)
Ácido Aspártico Endopeptidasas/antagonistas & inhibidores , Catepsina D/antagonistas & inhibidores , Solanum lycopersicum , Solanum tuberosum , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Ácido Aspártico Endopeptidasas/química , Catepsina D/química , Clonación Molecular , Inhibidores Enzimáticos/farmacología , Solanum lycopersicum/genética , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Pichia/genética , Pichia/metabolismo , Plásmidos , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/enzimología , Solanum tuberosum/genéticaRESUMEN
The structures of the native Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteinase A have been solved by molecular replacement in the monoclinic and trigonal crystal forms and refined at 2.6-2.7A resolution. These structures agree overall with those of other uninhibited aspartic proteinases. However, an unusual orientation for the side chain of Tyr75, a conserved residue on the flexible "flap" that covers the active site and is important for the activity of these enzymes, was found in the trigonal crystals. A similar conformation of Tyr75 occupying the S1 substrate-binding pocket was previously reported only for chymosin (where it was interpreted as representing a "self-inhibited" state of the enzyme), but for no other aspartic proteinases. Since this orientation of Tyr75 has now been seen in the structures of two members of the family of aspartic proteinases, it might indicate that the placement of that residue in the S1 substrate-binding pocket might have some functional significance, analogous to what was seen for self-inhibited structures of serine proteinases.