RESUMEN
This open-label, randomized, Phase III study compared the efficacy and tolerability of and compliance with NuvaRing, a combined contraceptive vaginal ring releasing 15 microg of ethinylestradiol (EE) and 120 microg of etonogestrel daily, with those of and with a combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 150 microg of levonorgestrel (LNG) and 30 microg of EE. Subjects received NuvaRing or a COC for 13 cycles (3 weeks of ring/pill treatment followed by a 1-week ring-/pill-free period). A total of 1030 subjects (NuvaRing, n=512; COC, n=518) was randomized and started treatment (intent-to-treat [ITT] population). The percentage of women in the ITT population who completed the trial was 70.9% for the NuvaRing group and 71.2% for the COC group. Five in-treatment pregnancies occurred in each group, giving Pearl indices of 1.23 for NuvaRing and 1.19 for the COC. Compliance with both treatments was excellent and both were well tolerated. In conclusion, NuvaRing has comparable efficacy and tolerability with a COC containing 150 microg of LNG and 30 microg of EE and does not require daily dosing.
Asunto(s)
Anticoncepción/métodos , Dispositivos Anticonceptivos Femeninos/normas , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Dispositivos Anticonceptivos Femeninos/efectos adversos , Anticonceptivos Orales Combinados/efectos adversos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Cefalea/etiología , Humanos , Leucorrea/etiología , Sudáfrica , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vaginitis/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of tibolone on carbohydrate metabolism, and to compare these effects with those of a sequential regimen of conjugated equine estrogens and medrogestone. METHODS: This was an open-label, multicentre, comparative study. Seventy-two postmenopausal women were randomized to receive either tibolone 2.5 mg/day or conjugated equine estrogens 0.6 mg plus sequential medrogestone 5 mg (CEE/M) for six 28-day cycles. Carbohydrate metabolism was evaluated at baseline and after three and six cycles of treatment by an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). A blood sample was taken at 30, 60, 90 and 120 mm after glucose 75 mg dosing for determination of plasma glucose, insulin and connecting peptide (C-peptide) levels. RESULTS: The changes from baseline of glucose, insulin and C-peptide area-under-the-curve (AUC) values were not statistically significant after 3 and 6 months of tibolone or CEE/M treatment. There was a small transitory decrease in HbA(1C) after three cycles of treatment with tibolone. CONCLUSION: The effects of tibolone and CEE/M on carbohydrate metabolism were considered to have no clinical significance.