Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 18(1): 58, 2020 Mar 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32138734

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity can significantly reduce health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and may lead to numerous health problems even in youths. This study aimed to investigate whether HRQoL varies among youths with obesity depending on grade of obesity and other factors. METHODS: For the Youths with Extreme obesity Study (YES) (2012-2014), a prospective multicenter cohort study, a baseline sample of 431 obese and extremely obese adolescents and young adults (age 14 to 24 years, BMI ≥30 kg/m2) was recruited at four German university medical centers and one job center. Obesity grade groups (OGG) were defined according to BMI (OGG I: 30-34.9 kg/m2, OGG II: 35-39.9 kg/m2, OGG III (extreme obesity): ≥40 kg/m2). HRQoL was measured with the Euroqol-5D-3 L (EQ-5D-3 L), DISABKIDS chronic generic (DCGM-31) and the KINDLR obesity module. Differences between OGGs were assessed with logistic and linear regression models, adjusting for age, sex, and study center in the base model. In a second regression analysis, we included other characteristics to identify possible determinants of HRQoL. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-two adolescents (mean age: 16.6 (±2.4), mean BMI: 39.1 (±7.5) kg/ m2) with available HRQoL data were analysed. HRQoL of youths in all OGGs was markedly lower than reference values of non-obese adolescents. Adjusting for age and sex, HRQoL of youths in OGG III significantly impaired compared to OGG I. Youths in OGG III were 2.15 times more likely to report problems with mobility in the EQ-5D-3 L than youths in OGG I. A mean difference of 9.7 and 6.6 points between OGG III and I were found for DCGM-31 and KINDL respectively and 5.1 points between OGG II and I for DCGM-31. Including further variables into the regression models, showed that HRQoL measured by DCGM-31 was significantly different between OGGs. Otherwise, female sex and having more than 4 h of daily screen time were also associated with lower HRQoL measured by DCGM-31 and KINDL. CONCLUSION: HRQoL of adolescents with obesity is reduced, but HRQoL of adolescents with extreme obesity is particularly affected. Larger and longitudinal studies are necessary to understand the relation of extreme obesity and HRQoL, and the impact of other lifestyle or socioeconomic factors. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01625325; German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00004172.


Asunto(s)
Obesidad Mórbida/psicología , Obesidad Infantil/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de Regresión , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 38(3): 334-40, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24048144

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and effectiveness of adolescent bariatric surgery and to improve treatment recommendations for this age group. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal registry. Since January 2005, patients undergoing bariatric surgery in Germany are enlisted in an online registry called 'study for quality assurance in obesity surgeries'. SUBJECTS: Adolescents and young adults up to the age of 21 years, operated from January 2005 to December 2010. MEASUREMENTS: Weight, BMI, comorbidities, complication rates. RESULTS: N=345 primary procedures were recorded by 58 hospitals. N=51 patients were under the age of 18 years. Follow-up information was available for 48% (n=167) of patients, with an average observation period of 544±412 days (median: 388 days). The most common surgical techniques were gastric banding (n=118, 34.2%), gastric bypass (n=116, 33.6%) and sleeve gastrectomy (n=78, 22.6%). Short-term complications (intra-operative; general postoperative; specific postoperative) were slightly lower for gastric banding (0.8%; 2.5%; 0.8%) than for gastric bypass (2.6%; 5.2%; 1.7%) or sleeve gastrectomy (0%; 9.0%; 7.7%). In accordance with published findings, weight and BMI reduction were lower for gastric banding (-28 kg; -9.5 kg m(-2)) compared to gastric bypass (-50 kg; -16.4 kg m(-2)) P< 0.001 or sleeve gastrectomy (-46 kg; -15.4 kg m(-2)) P< 0.001. Outcomes did not differ between the <18 and ≥18-year-old patients. CONCLUSION: Like in adults, bariatric surgery has low short-term complication rates and results in sustained weight loss in adolescents. However, the missing long-term observations prohibit a final conclusion about lasting effectiveness and safety. Clinical trials with structured follow-up programs and mechanisms to ascertain patient adherences are needed.


Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Derivación Gástrica , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Pérdida de Peso , Adolescente , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Obesidad Mórbida/sangre , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA