Carboplatin plus etoposide versus topotecan as second-line treatment for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan is currently the only drug approved in Europe in a second-line setting for the treatment of small-cell lung cancer. This study investigated whether the doublet of carboplatin plus etoposide was superior to topotecan as a second-line treatment in patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 38 hospitals in France, we enrolled patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced stage IV or locally relapsed small-cell lung cancer, who responded to first-line platinum plus etoposide treatment, but who had disease relapse or progression at least 90 days after completion of first-line treatment. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive combination carboplatin plus etoposide (six cycles of intravenous carboplatin [area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min] on day 1 plus intravenous etoposide [100 mg/m2 from day 1 to day 3]) or oral topotecan (2·3 mg/m2 from day 1 to day 5, for six cycles). Randomisation was done using the minimisation method with biased-coin balancing for ECOG performance status, response to the first-line chemotherapy, and treatment centre. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was centrally reviewed and analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02738346. FINDINGS: Between July 18, 2013, and July 2, 2018, we enrolled and randomly assigned 164 patients (82 in each study group). One patient from each group withdrew consent, therefore 162 patients (81 in each group) were included in the intention-to-treat population. With a median follow-up of 22·7 months (IQR 20·0-37·3), median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the combination chemotherapy group than in the topotecan group (4·7 months, 90% CI 3·9-5·5 vs 2·7 months, 2·3-3·2; stratified hazard ratio 0·57, 90% CI 0·41-0·73; p=0·0041). The most frequent grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (18 [22%] of 81 patients in the topotecan group vs 11 [14%] of 81 patients in the combination chemotherapy group), thrombocytopenia (29 [36%] vs 25 [31%]), anaemia (17 [21%] vs 20 [25%]), febrile neutropenia (nine [11%] vs five [6%]), and asthenia (eight [10%] vs seven [9%]). Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the topotecan group (both were febrile neutropenia with sepsis) and no treatment-related deaths occurred in the combination group. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that carboplatin plus etoposide rechallenge can be considered as a reasonable second-line chemotherapy option for patients with sensitive relapsed small-cell lung cancer. FUNDING: Amgen and the French Lung Cancer Group (Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie).

PD-L1-expression patterns in large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung: potential implications for use of immunotherapy in these patients: the GFPC 03-2017 "EPNEC" study.

BACKGROUND: Few data are available on programmed cell-death-protein-1-ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression on large-cell neuroendocrine carcinomas of the lung (LCNECs). We analyzed PD-L1 expression on tumor (TCs) and inflammatory cells (ICs) from LCNEC patients to assess relationships between this expression, clinical characteristics, and disease outcomes. METHODS: PD-L1 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry with monoclonal antibody 22C3 in consecutive LCNEC patients managed in 17 French centers between January 2014 and December 2016. RESULTS: After centralized review, only 68 out of 105 (64%) patients had confirmed LCNEC diagnoses. Median overall survival (OS) (95% CI) was 11 (7-16) months for all patients, 7 (5-10), 21 (10-not reached) and not reached months for metastatic, stage III and localized forms (p = 0.0001). Respectively, 11% and 75% of the tumor samples were TC+ and IC+, and 66% had a TC-/IC+ profile. Comparing IC+ versus IC- metastatic LCNEC, the former had significantly longer progression-free survival [9 (4-13) versus 4 (1-8) months; p = 0.03], with a trend towards better median OS [12 (7-18) versus 9.5 (4-14) months; p = 0.21]. Compared to patients with TC- tumors, those with TC+ LCNECs tended to have non-significantly shorter median OS [4 (1-6.2) versus 11 (8-18) months, respectively]. Median OS was significantly shorter for patients with TC+/IC- metastatic LCNECs than those with TC-IC+ lesions (2 versus 8 months, respectively; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: TC-/IC+ was the most frequent PD-L1-expression profile for LCNECs, a pattern quite specific compared with non-small-cell lung cancer and small-cell lung cancer. IC PD-L1 expression seems to have a prognostic role.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring HER2 Mutations: Clinical Characteristics and Management in a Real-Life Setting. Cohort HER2 EXPLORE GFPC 02-14.

BACKGROUND: Mutation of human receptor tyrosine kinase epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) is a rare event, found in approximately 1% non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC). The objective was to investigate the clinical characteristics and management of HER2-mutated NSCLCs in a real-life setting. METHODS: This multicenter study described NSCLCs harboring HER2 mutations diagnosed between January 2012 and December 2014, according their clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes: response rate (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirty patients were included: 66.7% women; median age 65.2 ± 12 years; never or former smokers 73.3%. Of the stage IV patients (n = 23), 86% received first-line platin doublet chemotherapy: RR 61.5% and PFS 6.7 (95% CI 5.9-9.5) months; 52.1% received a second-line therapy: RR 18.2% and PFS 4.9 (95% CI 2.5-11.9) months. Median OS of stage IV was 10.7 months and 2-year OS was 27.2% (95% CI 11.7-63.2). All patients with stage I-III NSCLCs were alive at 2 years. CONCLUSION: The rarity of HER2-mutated NSCLCs requires specific studies.

A Brief Report of Transformation From NSCLC to SCLC: Molecular and Therapeutic Characteristics.

INTRODUCTION: Histologic transformation from NSCLC to SCLC is a mechanism of resistance in EGFR-mutant tumors but is also occasionally observed in nonmutated NSCLC. METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective collection of cases presenting between 2005 and 2017. The objectives were to analyze survival data and to define epidemiologic, clinical, treatment and histomolecular characteristics at both the time of diagnosis of NSCLC and of SCLC. RESULTS: Forty-eight EGFR-mutant NSCLC and 13 non-EGFR-mutant cases were registered. Most EGFR-mutant tumors retained the same EGFR mutation after transformation. The median time to SCLC transformation was shorter in the EGFR-mutant group than in non-EFGR mutants (16 months versus 26 months (p = 0.01)). Both tumors were responsive to platinum etoposide regimens (45% partial response for the EGFR-mutant group versus 40% for non-EFGR mutants). The median overall survival rates were 28 months in the EGFR-mutant group versus 37 months in the non-EFGR-mutant group, respectively. After transformation, the median overall survival was 9 months in the non-EGFR-mutant group versus 10 months in the EGFR-mutant group. CONCLUSIONS: Transformation into SCLC seems to occur more quickly in EGFR mutated tumors; however, once the tumor is transformed its survival and response to treatment seems comparable to that of classical SCLC.