Modifying Risks in Ventral Hernia Patients With Prehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether preoperative nutritional counseling and exercise (prehabilitation) in obese patients with ventral hernia repair (VHR) results in more hernia-free and complication-free patients. BACKGROUND: Obesity and poor fitness are associated with complications following VHR. These issues are prevalent in low socioeconomic status patients. METHODS: This was a blinded, randomized controlled trial at a safety-net academic institution. Obese patients (BMI 30 to 40) seeking VHR were randomized to prehabilitation versus standard counseling. VHR was performed once preoperative requirements were met: 7% total body weight loss or 6 months of counseling and no weight gain. Primary outcome was the proportion of hernia-free and complication-free patients. Secondary outcomes were wound complications at 1 month postoperative and weight loss measures. Univariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: Among 118 randomized patients, prehabilitation was associated with a higher percentage of patients who lost weight and achieved weight loss goals; however, prehabilitation was also associated with a higher dropout rate and need for emergent repair. VHR was performed in 44 prehabilitation and 34 standard counseling patients. There was a trend toward less wound complication in prehabilitation patients (6.8% vs 17.6%, P = 0.167). The prehabilitation group was more likely to be hernia-free and complication-free (69.5% vs 47.5%, P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible to implement a prehabilitation program for obese patients at a safety-net hospital. Prehabilitation patients have a higher likelihood of being hernia-free and complication-free postoperatively. Although further trials and long-term outcomes are needed, prehabilitation may benefit obese surgical patients, but there may be increased risks of dropout and emergent repair. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02365194).

Differences of alternative methods of measuring abdominal wall hernia defect size: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of defect size, there are no standardized recommendations on how to measure ventral hernias. Our aims were to determine (1) if any significant differences existed between various methods of measuring ventral hernias and (2) the effect of these methods of measurement on selection of mesh size. METHOD: A prospective study of all patients enrolled in a randomized trial assessing laparoscopic ventral hernia repair at a single institution from 3/2015 to 7/2016 was eligible for inclusion. Abdominal wall hernia defect size was determined by multiplying defect length and width obtained separately using each of five methods: radiographic (CT), intraoperative with abdomen desufflated, intraoperative with abdomen insufflated to 15 mmHg (intra-abdominal aspect), intraoperative with abdomen insufflated to 15 mmHg (extra-abdominal aspect), and clinical. The primary outcome was intraclass correlation between the five different methods of measurement for each patient. Secondary outcome was changes in mesh selection assuming a 5 cm overlap in each direction. RESULTS: Fifty patients met inclusion criteria for assessment. The five different measurement methods had an intraclass correlation for each patient of 0.533 (95% CI 0.373-0.697) (weak correlation) for length; 0.737 (95% CI 0.613-0.844) (moderate correlation) for width; and 0.684 (95% CI 0.544-0.810) (moderate correlation) for area. Different types of measurements affected mesh selection in up to 56% of cases. CONCLUSION: Among five common methods of measuring abdominal wall hernia defect, sizes are only weakly to moderately correlated. Further studies are needed to determine which method results in optimally sized abdominal wall prostheses and superior ventral hernia repair.

Laparoscopic repair reduces incidence of surgical site infections for all ventral hernias.

BACKGROUND: The role of laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias remains incompletely defined. We hypothesize that laparoscopy, compared to open repair with mesh, decreases surgical site infection (SSI) for all ventral hernia types. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were reviewed to identify studies evaluating outcomes of laparoscopic versus open repair with mesh of ventral hernias and divided into groups (primary or incisional). Studies with high risk of bias were excluded. Primary outcomes of interest were recurrence and SSI. Fixed effects model was used unless significant heterogeneity, assessed with the Higgins I square (I(2)), was encountered. RESULTS: There were 5 and 15 studies for primary and incisional cohorts. No difference was seen in recurrence between laparoscopic and open repair in the two hernia groups. SSI was more common with open repair in both hernia groups: primary (OR 4.17, 95%CI [2.03-8.55]) and incisional (OR 5.16, 95%CI [2.79-9.57]). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic repair, compared to open repair with mesh, decreases rates of SSI in all types of ventral hernias with no difference in recurrence. These data suggest that laparoscopic approach may be the treatment of choice for all types of ventral hernias.

Decreasing Surgical Site Infections after Ventral Hernia Repair: A Quality-Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) remain prevalent after ventral hernia repair (VHR). In 2013-2014, a safety-net academic hospital initiated a two-pronged quality-improvement (QI) project: (1) Development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines; and (2) creation of a specialized hernia clinic to manage challenging patients and complex ventral hernias. Our objective was to decrease SSI rates after elective VHR. METHODS: The primary outcome was SSI 30 days post-operatively, which was assessed in aggregate and with a stratified analysis based on case complexity using the χ2 test. RESULTS: A total of 399 patients in the pre-QI period and 390 patients in post-QI period (178 patients in general surgery clinics; 212 patients in the specialty hernia clinic) underwent VHR. Patients treated in the post-QI period were less likely to experience an SSI (13.5% vs. 1.5%; p < 0.001). On subgroup analysis of the post-QI clinics, specialty hernia clinic patients had an even lower risk of SSI than those in general surgery clinics (1.4% versus 1.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The QI initiatives of evidence-based guidelines and the specialty hernia clinic were associated with lower SSI rates. Differences in peri-operative management included differences in patient selection and pre-operative preparation and increased use of synthetic mesh and laparoscopy. Future studies must investigate the long-term outcomes of these initiatives.

A novel missense mutation in the transmembrane domain of neuregulin 1 is associated with schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: Although genetic factors are known to play an important role in schizophrenia, the identification of genes involved in this disorder has remained elusive. The neuregulin 1 gene is among the few candidate genes to have been implicated in schizophrenia susceptibility in several populations. However, no causal mutations within this gene have been identified. METHODS: In attempts to identify polymorphisms within the neuregulin 1 gene, we performed DNA sequencing using 12 subjects with a history of psychosis from the Central Valley of Costa Rica. DNA genotyping and association studies were then performed in an extended cohort of 142 affected individuals and their relatives from the same population. RESULTS: We identified a novel missense mutation (Val to Leu) in exon 11, which codes for the transmembrane region of the neuregulin 1 protein. Association analysis by the Family Based Association Test (FBAT) revealed that this mutation is associated with psychosis (p = .0049) and schizophrenia (p = .0191) in this population. CONCLUSIONS: We report the finding of a missense mutation in the neuregulin 1 gene associated with schizophrenia. Additional analyses of an independent sample as well as detailed functional studies should be performed to determine the relevance of this novel polymorphism to the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Is nighttime the right time? Risk of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy at night.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomies can be performed at night in high-volume acute care hospitals. We hypothesized that nonelective nighttime laparoscopic cholecystectomies are associated with increased postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a single-center retrospective review of consecutive laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients between October 2010 and May 2011 at a safety-net hospital in Houston, Texas. Data were collected on demographics, operative time, time of incision, length of stay, 30-day postoperative complications (ie, bile leak/biloma, common bile duct injury, retained stone, superficial surgical site infection, organ space abscess, and bleeding) and death. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA software (version 12; Stata Corp). RESULTS: During 8 months, 356 patients had nonelective laparoscopic cholecystectomies. A majority were female (n = 289 [81.1%]) and Hispanic (n = 299 [84%]). There were 108 (30%) nighttime operations. There were 29 complications in 18 patients; there were fewer daytime than nighttime patients who had at least 1 complication (4.0% vs 7.4%; p = 0.18). On multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio = 1.06 per year; 95% CI, 1.02-1.10; p = 0.002), case duration (odds ratio = 1.02 per minute; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02; p = 0.001), and nighttime surgery (odds ratio = 3.33; 95% CI, 1.14-9.74; p = 0.001) were associated with an increased risk of 30-day surgical complications. Length of stay was significantly longer for daytime than nighttime patients (median 3 vs 2 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Age, case duration, and nighttime laparoscopic cholecystectomy were predictive of increased 30-day surgical complications at a high-volume safety-net hospital. The small but increased risk of complications with nighttime laparoscopic cholecystectomy must be balanced against improved efficiency at a high-volume, resource-poor hospital.

Defining risk for infectious complications on extracorporeal life support.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Little is known about potentially modifiable risk factors associated with infectious complications (IC) acquired during extracorporeal life support (ECLS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry was accessed, and data on patient demographics, run characteristics, infections, and outcomes were collected. Patients who developed IC while on ECLS were compared to those that did not. Regression analysis was performed. Results are expressed as odds ratios, with P < .05 considered significant. RESULTS: Infectious complications developed in 10.2% of 38,661 patients and was associated with increased odds of death. Risk factors for IC included increasing age, diagnosis, more remote decade, complications, presence of multiple complications, and ECLS mode. The risk of IC increased with the number of complications (P < .001). Patients with positive cultures before ECLS also had increased odds of IC (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.92-2.34, P < .001). Those with IC were more likely to have cultures grow aggressive organisms (non-lactose fermenting gram negative rods, methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and fungi). CONCLUSIONS: Strategies to reduce IC while on ECLS should be aimed at prevention of complications and treatment of pre-existing infections. Future studies should address whether broader spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis and/or empiric coverage for suspected sepsis is indicated in ECLS patients.

Antimicrobial prophylaxis and infection surveillance in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: a multi-institutional survey of practice patterns.

The goal of this study was to characterize antimicrobial prophylaxis and infection surveillance practices at centers treating patients with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). A 37-question web-based survey was sent to all ECMO coordinators and directors at Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) participating centers. Data were reported by center. The most complete response was used when multiple surveys were returned from a single center, and respondents' answers from the same center were analyzed for concordance. Responses were obtained from 76% of ELSO centers (132/173) and 41% of survey recipients (223/548). Most centers administer antibiotic prophylaxis (74%, 97/132), and almost half have a standardized protocol (49%, 64/132). Routine antibacterial but not antifungal prophylaxis is common (42%, 62/132 vs. 2/132, 2%). There is significant variation in the antibiotic choices and duration of prophylaxis, regardless of whether the center has a protocol or not. Almost half of centers (49%, 64/132) perform routine surveillance cultures but at variable intervals. There is significant heterogeneity in antibiotic prophylaxis and infection surveillance practice patterns among ELSO centers.

Compliance with guidelines to prevent surgical site infections: As simple as 1-2-3?

BACKGROUND: the purpose of this study was to assess predictive factors and compliance with surgical site infection (SSI) prevention guidelines at 2 county hospitals. DESIGN: chart review and analysis of laparotomy patients undergoing colorectal, hysterectomy, or abdominal vascular procedures over two 6-month periods 1 year apart and evaluation of safety climate using the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ). RESULTS: overall compliance with all antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines was 62% (n = 442). Gynecologic surgery was an independent predictor of compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines in elective cases, and nonemergency status was an independent predictor when all cases were considered. Postoperative normothermia was predicted by hospital, procedure length, initial intraoperative temperature, and service. The SAQ had a 91% response rate. Contrary to expected, safety domain scores and agreement with statements on collaboration and teamwork were not predictive of compliance. CONCLUSION: interventions to improve poor compliance with infection prevention guidelines must be multifaceted, hospital- and service-specific, and resilient during emergencies. Good safety and teamwork climate are not sufficient.

Local variations in the epidemiology, microbiology, and outcome of necrotizing soft-tissue infections: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Necrotizing soft-tissue infections (NSTIs) are rare and highly lethal. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with NSTIs treated at 6 academic hospitals in Texas between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2007. Patient demographics, presentation, microbiology, treatment, and outcome were recorded. Analysis of variance, chi-square test, and logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Mortality rates varied between hospitals from 9% to 25% (n = 296). There was significant interhospital variation in patient characteristics, microbiology, and etiology of NSTIs. Despite hospital differences in treatment, primarily in critical care interventions, patient age and severity of disease (reflected by shock requiring vasopressors and renal failure postoperatively) were the main predictors of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Significant center differences occur in patient populations, etiology, and microbiology of NSTIs, even within a concentrated region. Management should be based on these characteristics given that adjunctive treatments are unproven and variations in outcome are likely because of patient disease at presentation.

A tale of 2 hospitals: a staggered cohort study of targeted interventions to improve compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the effectiveness of targeted interventions to improve compliance with antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines (timing, spectrum, and discontinuation) at 2 university-affiliated hospitals. METHODS: Based on barriers identified previously, hospital-specific interventions were developed such as educational conferences, standardized forms, an extended time-out, and feedback. Guideline compliance and surgical site infection (SSI) data were recorded on all patients who underwent elective laparotomies for colorectal procedures, vascular operations, and hysterectomies during four 6-month study periods. Prestudy data from July to December 2006 served as a baseline. One year later, a prospective cohort study was performed. The interventions were introduced to the 2 hospitals in a staggered fashion with 2-month implementation periods before reassessing compliance during the 6-month study periods. General linear modeling was performed (P < .05 significant). RESULTS: Compliance with all 3 guidelines combined improved during the year preceding the study, after attention only, at both hospitals. Hospital-specific differences were found in the effectiveness of the intervention package on individual guidelines. Hospital 2 but not 1 improved in timing after the interventions; both hospitals improved in spectrum, and neither hospital improved in discontinuation. Overall compliance with all 3 antibiotic prophylactic measures was greater at hospital 1, but hospital 2 had lower SSI rates. CONCLUSION: Simply increasing attention to a quality problem can result in a significant and sustained improvement. Quality improvement interventions should be evaluated rigorously for effectiveness given hospital-specific differences in effectiveness and for correlation of guideline compliance with outcome.