Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency Dosing Guidelines for Pancreatic Enzyme Replacement Therapy Vary Widely Across Disease Types.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) is the standard treatment for exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI). However, many individuals are inadequately treated, with gaps in clinical dosing, guidelines, and tools to aid individual titration. METHODS: A systematic review identified research and guidelines on PERT dosing recommendations across conditions, systematically reviewing and synthesizing total PERT intake, meal/snack guidelines, and changes over time to provide an up-to-date look at the most common doses used in studies and guidelines. RESULTS: This review of 257 articles found wide variability in PERT dosing guidelines within and across conditions. Many patients with EPI are underdosed, with guidelines differing globally and by disease type, and clinician prescribing may also play a role. The most common dosing guidelines focus on starting doses at 40,000-50,000 units of lipase/meal with increases of up to two to three times this amount before pursuing additive therapies. Guidelines and studies typically focus only on fat digestion, and comparison by total daily dose shows underdosing is common. Most PERT studies are on safety and efficacy rather than optimal titration. CONCLUSION: The current guidelines for PERT in EPI demonstrate substantial variability in dosing recommendations, both within and across disease types. This variation highlights the need for further research to optimize PERT dosing and improve patient outcomes. Healthcare providers should consider individualizing PERT dosing based on nutritional status and response to therapy, ensuring regular follow-up with patients for dose titrations with consideration that most guidelines are framed as initial doses rather than upper limits.

Novel Application of Microdosing Glucagon for Hypoglycemia After Total Pancreatectomy and Autologous Islet Transplant.

Total pancreatectomy and autologous islet transplantation (TPAIT) is a procedure to ameliorate dysglycemia associated with post-pancreatectomy. Patients who undergo TPAIT are at risk of developing hypoglycemia postoperatively. The current literature suggests that hypoglycemia may be due to a glucagon-deficiency state. To date, there is minimal literature available that explores treatment options to minimize hypoglycemia in these patients. In this case, a 29-year-old female patient was administered a microdosing glucagon protocol post TPAIT and experienced improvements in hypoglycemia. We describe the dosing regimen of the protocol and provide continuous glucose monitoring data to support our findings. This case adds to the limited evidence on effective treatment options for these rare patients. To our knowledge, this is the first application of a microdosing glucagon protocol to treat hypoglycemia associated with TPAIT.

Empowering emerging adults with type 1 diabetes: crafting a financial and health insurance toolkit through community-based participatory action research.

BACKGROUND: Emerging adults aged 18-30 years face challenges during life transitions, with an added burden of navigating the health care system and additional costs associated with diabetes. This stress is compounded by overall low levels of health insurance literacy in this population, as people may not know about available financial and health care resources to minimize suboptimal diabetes outcomes. This study aimed to tailor a financial and health insurance toolkit to emerging adults with type 1 diabetes, including racially, ethnically diverse, and Medicaid-insured individuals, through community-based participatory action research. METHODS: An academic research team and community members from a national organization held six online community advisory board (CAB) content-creation meetings to understand how to tailor a financial and health insurance Toolkit. The CAB was comprised of six racially and insurance-diverse emerging adults with type 1 diabetes and four content experts (clinical, financial, and insurance). Six 60-minute online CAB meetings were held via University Hospitals (UH)-encrypted Zoom over five months. Pre-reading materials were emailed to CAB members before the meetings. A moderator established the purpose of each meeting and briefly discussed meeting rules before each meeting commenced. During the meetings, the moderator guided the discussions and provided the CAB members opportunities to respond and build on one another's feedback. A deductive thematic qualitative analysis was utilized. Three researchers independently coded the cross-referenced and de-identified CAB meeting transcripts and then convened to reach a group consensus. Two CAB members performed member-checking. RESULTS: The following key themes emerged to tailor the Toolkit: ensuring that content covers empowerment and self-advocacy, including genuine stories and multimedia visuals for aesthetics, addressing clinician bias, acknowledging racial and ethnic disparities in care, incorporating cultural representation, and demystifying Medicaid stigma. CONCLUSIONS: By successfully partnering with the CAB and a community organization through a community-based participatory action research approach, we will develop a financial and health insurance Toolkit tailored to the needs of racially and ethnically diverse and Medicaid-insured emerging adults with type 1 diabetes.

AIM OF THE RESEARCH: This study aims to tailor a financial and health insurance Toolkit to emerging adults, ages 18­30, with type 1 diabetes. Including the insight from racially and ethnically diverse and Medicaid-insured individuals in developing the Toolkit is essential. BACKGROUND TO THE RESEARCH: Emerging adults with type 1 diabetes have stressful challenges such as navigating the healthcare system, the costs of diabetes, and general diabetes self-management. This stress is worsened by low levels of health insurance literacy and leads to suboptimal diabetes outcomes. This issue affects many individuals but dramatically impacts those who are racially and ethnically diverse or Medicaid-insured. DESIGN AND METHODS USED: Six online content-creation meetings were held to understand the Toolkit content needs and preferences. We analyzed the meeting transcripts to uncover common themes. Patient and public involvement: An academic research team, a national organization (The Diabetes Link), and a Community Advisory Board (CAB) partnered together. The CAB members were racially and insurance-diverse emerging adults with type 1 diabetes and content (financial, insurance, clinical diabetes) experts. We will continue to collaborate with the CAB members to develop a research protocol to test the effects of the Toolkit. DISSEMINATION: The research findings will be shared with young adult type 1 diabetes stakeholders, healthcare providers, and community and professional organizations. Dissemination strategies will include publications, community and scientific conference presentations, community events, and social media resources and content. The finalized Toolkit will be publicly available on the Diabetes Link Resource Hub.

Simulation Platform Development for Diabetes and Technology Self-Management.

BACKGROUND: Specialized education is critical for optimal insulin pump use but is not widely utilized or accessible. We aimed to (1) test the usability and acceptability of A1Control, a simulation platform supporting insulin pump education, and (2) determine predictors of performance. METHOD: Rural adult insulin pump users with type 1 diabetes (T1D) participated in a mixed methods usability study in 2 separate rounds. Participants navigated 3 simulations (ie, infusion site occlusion, hypoglycemia, exercise). Net Promoter Score (NPS) and Systems Usability Scale (SUS) were administered. Semi-structured interviews and direct observation were used to assess perceived usability, acceptability and performance. Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique was used to fit predictive models for visualization of patterns leading to good or poor A1Control performance. RESULTS: Participants (N = 13) were 28-70 years old, 10 used automated insulin delivery and 12 used continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Mean NPS was 9.5 (range 9-10) and positive sentiment during interviews indicated very high acceptability. SUS (mean 88.5, range 70-100) indicted a high perceived usability. CGM percent wear ≥ 94%, time spent in hypoglycemia ≤ 54 mg/dl of <0.01%, and <70 mg/dl of 0.5% predicted successful site-occlusion scenario performance with 100% accuracy. BOLUS score ≥ 2, TDD ≥ 34, and technology brand predicted exercise scenario success with 100% accuracy. There were an insufficient number of failed hypoglycemia scenarios to assess predictors. CONCLUSION: A1Control shows potential to increase access and frequency of self-management and technology education. Additional study is needed to determine sustained engagement and benefit.

From Consultant to Co-investigator: One Diabetes Research Team's Journey of Patient Engagement.

Patients with diabetes are experts in the lived experience of self-management, making patient engagement beyond the role of research "subject" imperative for the creation of health care solutions that meaningfully address the problems they identify. We discuss our research team's relationship with our university's College Diabetes Network (CDN), an advocacy and support group for emerging adults with diabetes. Our collaborative research relationship has spanned three years, and multiple research studies with members serving as co-designers, consultants, and co-investigators. We discuss the CDN's role in two particular studies in which CDN members made substantive contributions to study design, instrument adaptation, and interpretation of findings. Key CDN members played a larger role in research activities and facilitated sustained engagement with the larger university CDN chapter. Barriers encountered included navigating research regulatory requirements while engaging CDN members in research and facilitating sustained engagement as CDN membership changes.