Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nursing ; 54(10): 44-47, 2024 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39302751

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Allergic rhinitis (AR), commonly called hay fever, is primarily caused by the release of histamine after exposure to an allergen. This article reviews over-the-counter nasal spray options for the prevention and treatment of AR, including mechanisms of action, risks and benefits, and patient education.


Asunto(s)
Rociadores Nasales , Medicamentos sin Prescripción , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Humanos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/administración & dosificación , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/efectos adversos
2.
Nursing ; 54(8): 42-45, 2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39051958

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: Seasonal allergies have a negative impact on patients' quality of life. Nurses must be aware of the different treatment options and lifestyle modifications to help patients manage their symptoms. This article discusses the benefits and risks of over-the-counter medications for seasonal allergies and other implications for nurses.


Asunto(s)
Medicamentos sin Prescripción , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional , Humanos , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/efectos adversos , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Rinitis Alérgica Estacional/enfermería , Antialérgicos/uso terapéutico
3.
J Allergy Clin Immunol ; 143(4): 1465-1473, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30654049

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis, a rare and potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction, can occur after vaccination. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe reports of anaphylaxis after vaccination made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) during 1990-2016. METHODS: We identified domestic reports of anaphylaxis within VAERS using a combination of Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activity queries and Preferred Terms. We performed a descriptive analysis, including history of hypersensitivity (anaphylaxis, respiratory allergies, and drug allergies) and vaccines given. We reviewed all serious reports and all nonserious reports with available medical records to determine if they met the Brighton Collaboration case definition for anaphylaxis or received a physician's diagnosis. RESULTS: During the analytic period, VAERS received 467,960 total reports; 828 met the Brighton Collaboration case definition or received a physician's diagnosis of anaphylaxis: 654 (79%) were classified as serious, and 669 (81%) had medical records available. Of 478 reports in children aged less than 19 years, 65% were male; childhood vaccines were most commonly reported. Of 350 reports in persons aged 19 years or greater, 80% were female, and influenza vaccines were most frequently reported. Overall, 41% of reports described persons with no history of hypersensitivity. We identified 8 deaths, 4 among persons with no history of hypersensitivity. CONCLUSION: Anaphylaxis after vaccination is rare in the United States and can occur among persons with no history of hypersensitivity. Most persons recover fully with treatment, but serious complications, including death, can occur.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Anafilaxia/etiología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(4): 91-94, 2019 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30703077

RESUMEN

Recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV; Shingrix), an adjuvanted glycoprotein vaccine, was licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for adults aged ≥50 years in October 2017 (1). The previously licensed live-attenuated zoster vaccine (ZVL; Zostavax) is recommended for adults aged ≥60 years. RZV is administered intramuscularly as a 2-dose series, with an interval of 2-6 months between doses. In prelicensure clinical trials, 85% of 6,773 vaccinated study participants reported local or systemic reactions after receiving RZV, with approximately 17% experiencing a grade 3 reaction (erythema or induration >3.5 inches or systemic symptoms that interfere with normal activity). However, rates of serious adverse events (i.e., hospitalization, prolongation of existing hospitalization, life-threatening illness, permanent disability, congenital anomaly or birth defect, or death) were similar in the RZV and placebo groups (2). After licensure, CDC and FDA began safety monitoring of RZV in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) (3). During the first 8 months of use, when approximately 3.2 million RZV doses were distributed (GlaxoSmithKline, personal communication, 2018), VAERS received a total of 4,381 reports of adverse events, 130 (3.0%) of which were classified as serious. Commonly reported signs and symptoms included pyrexia (fever) (1,034; 23.6%), injection site pain (985; 22.5%), and injection site erythema (880; 20.1%). No unexpected patterns were detected in reports of adverse events or serious adverse events. Findings from early monitoring of RZV are consistent with the safety profile observed in prelicensure clinical trials.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Vacunas Sintéticas/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos
6.
Br J Clin Pharmacol ; 84(12): 2928-2932, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30229993

RESUMEN

AIMS: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines prevent infection with oncogenic virus types. We analysed reports to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of adverse events (AE) following bivalent HPV vaccine (2vHPV). METHODS: We conducted descriptive analysis of 2vHPV reports, reviewed individual reports, calculated crude AE reporting rates and conducted empirical Bayesian data mining. RESULTS: Of 241 2vHPV reports, 158 were in females, 64 in males (2vHPV is approved for females only) and 19 with unknown sex; 95.8% were classified as nonserious. Dizziness, headache, nausea and injection site reactions were the most common symptoms. Crude AE reporting rates were 33.3 reports per 100 000 doses distributed overall, and 1.4 per 100 000 for serious reports. Empirical Bayesian data mining identified disproportional reporting for three types of medical errors; assessment indicated findings that were probably driven by inadvertent 2vHPV use in males. CONCLUSIONS: We did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns in our review of 2vHPV reports to VAERS.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Teorema de Bayes , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
7.
Clin Infect Dis ; 61(6): 980-7, 2015 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26021988

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Vaccines are among the safest medical products in use today. Hundreds of millions of vaccinations are administered in the United States each year. Serious adverse reactions are uncommon. However, temporally associated deaths can occur following vaccination. Our aim was to characterize main causes of death among reports submitted to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous vaccine safety surveillance system. METHODS: We searched VAERS for US reports of death after any vaccination from 1 July 1997 through 31 December 2013. Available medical records, autopsy reports, and death certificates were reviewed to identify cause of death. RESULTS: VAERS received 2149 death reports, most (n = 1469 [68.4%]) in children. Median age was 0.5 years (range, 0-100 years); males accounted for 1226 (57%) reports. The total annual number of death reports generally decreased during the latter part of the study period. Most common causes of death among 1244 child reports with available death certificates/autopsy reports included sudden infant death syndrome (n = 544 [44%]), asphyxia (n = 74 [6.0%]), septicemia (n = 61 [4.9%]), and pneumonia (n = 57 [4.6%]). Among 526 adult reports, most common causes of death included diseases of the circulatory (n = 247 [46.9%]) and respiratory systems (n = 77 [14.6%]), certain infections and parasitic diseases (n = 62 [11.8%]), and malignant neoplasms (n = 20 [3.8%]). For child death reports, 79.4% received >1 vaccine on the same day. Inactivated influenza vaccine given alone was most commonly associated with death reports in adults (51.4%). CONCLUSIONS: No concerning pattern was noted among death reports submitted to VAERS during 1997-2013. The main causes of death were consistent with the most common causes of death in the US population.


Asunto(s)
Causas de Muerte , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/mortalidad , Vacunas/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 60(10): e58-65, 2015 May 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25637587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited data exist on the safety of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine in adults. We reviewed reports of adverse events (AEs) to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to assess safety in this previously understudied group. METHODS: VAERS is the national spontaneous vaccine safety surveillance system coadministered by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the US Food and Drug Administration. We searched the VAERS database for US reports of adults aged ≥19 years who received the MMR vaccine from 1 January 2003 to 31 July 2013. We clinically reviewed reports and available medical records for serious AEs, pregnancy reports, and reports for selected prespecified outcomes. RESULTS: During this period, VAERS received 3175 US reports after MMR vaccine in adults. Of these, 168 (5%) were classified as serious, including 7 reports of death. Females accounted for 77% of reports. The most common signs and symptoms for all reports were pyrexia (19%), rash (17%), pain (13%), and arthralgia (13%). We did not detect any new safety findings in empirical Bayesian data mining. We identified 131 reports of MMR vaccine administered to a pregnant woman; the majority of these vaccinations were in the first trimester and in 83 (62%), no AE was reported. CONCLUSIONS: In our review of VAERS data, we did not detect any new or unexpected safety concerns for MMR vaccination in adults. We identified reports of pregnant women exposed to MMR, which is a group in whom the vaccine is contraindicated, suggesting the need for continued provider education on vaccine recommendations and screening.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/patología , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artralgia/inducido químicamente , Artralgia/epidemiología , Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. , Exantema/inducido químicamente , Exantema/epidemiología , Femenino , Fiebre/inducido químicamente , Fiebre/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Dolor/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
9.
J Pediatr ; 166(4): 992-7, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25598306

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize adverse events (AEs) after Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccines reported to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting surveillance system. STUDY DESIGN: We searched VAERS for US reports after Hib vaccines among reports received from January 1, 1990, to December 1, 2013. We reviewed a random sample of reports and accompanying medical records for reports classified as serious. All reports of death were reviewed. Physicians assigned a primary clinical category to each reviewed report. We used empirical Bayesian data mining to identify AEs that were disproportionally reported after Hib vaccines. RESULTS: VAERS received 29,747 reports after Hib vaccines; 5179 (17%) were serious, including 896 reports of deaths. Median age was 6 months (range 0-1022 months). Sudden infant death syndrome was the stated cause of death in 384 (51%) of 749 death reports with autopsy/death certificate records. The most common nondeath serious AE categories were neurologic (80; 37%), other noninfectious (46; 22%) (comprising mainly constitutional signs and symptoms); and gastrointestinal (39; 18%) conditions. No new safety concerns were identified after clinical review of reports of AEs that exceeded the data mining statistical threshold. CONCLUSION: Review of VAERS reports did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns for Hib vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Haemophilus/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Haemophilus/efectos adversos , Haemophilus influenzae tipo b/inmunología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Cápsulas Bacterianas , Teorema de Bayes , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Infecciones por Haemophilus/mortalidad , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
10.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 210(6): 561.e1-6, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24378675

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize adverse events (AEs) after hepatitis A vaccines (Hep A) and hepatitis A and hepatitis B combination vaccine (Hep AB) in pregnant women reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting surveillance system. STUDY DESIGN: We searched VAERS for AEs reports in pregnant women who received Hep A or Hep AB from Jan. 1, 1996-April 5, 2013. Clinicians reviewed all reports and available medical records. RESULTS: VAERS received 139 reports of AEs in pregnant women; 7 (5.0%) were serious; no maternal or infant deaths were identified. Sixty-five (46.8%) did not describe any AEs. For those women whose gestational age was available, most were vaccinated during the first trimester, 50/60 (83.3%) for Hep A and 18/21 (85.7%) for Hep AB. The most common pregnancy-specific outcomes following Hep A or Hep AB vaccinations were spontaneous abortion in 15 (10.8%) reports, elective termination in 10 (7.2%), and preterm delivery in 7 (5.0%) reports. The most common nonpregnancy specific outcome was urinary tract infection and nausea/vomiting with 3 (2.2%) reports each. One case of amelia of the lower extremities was reported in an infant following maternal Hep A immunization. CONCLUSION: This review of VAERS reports did not identify any concerning pattern of AEs in pregnant women or their infants following maternal Hep A or Hep AB immunizations during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Hepatitis A/inmunología , Hepatitis B/inmunología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis Viral/efectos adversos , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Nacimiento Prematuro/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología
11.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 63(35): 773, 2014 Sep 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25188496

RESUMEN

Annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons aged ≥6 months. Two vaccine types are approved in the United States, injectable inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV), which is administered intranasally. Influenza vaccine typicaly becomes widely available beginning in late summer or early fall. IIV has a standard expiration date of June 30 for any given influenza season (July 1 through June 30 of the following year). In contrast, after release for distribution, LAIV generally has an 18-week shelf life (Christopher Ambrose, MedImmune, personal communication, 2014). Because of its relatively short shelf life, LAIV might be more likely than IIV to be administered after its expiration date. To assess that hypothesis, CDC analyzed reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of expired LAIV administered during July 1, 2007, through June 30, 2014.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vacunas Atenuadas/administración & dosificación , Almacenaje de Medicamentos , Humanos , Estados Unidos
12.
Clin Infect Dis ; 54(11): 1608-14, 2012 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22441652

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In December 2009, a new high-dose, trivalent, inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV-HD) was licensed for adults aged ≥65 years. We characterized clinical patterns of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) among older adults who received TIV-HD. METHODS: We searched VAERS for reports involving persons aged ≥65 years who received TIV-HD or TIV (standard dose) from 1 July 2010 through 31 December 2010. Medical records were requested for serious reports (ie, those associated with death, hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization, life-threatening illness, or disability). Clinicians reviewed information and assigned a diagnostic category to each report. Empirical Bayesian data mining was used to identify disproportional reporting following TIV-HD in VAERS. Reporting rates were calculated for reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome and anaphylaxis. RESULTS: VAERS received 606 reports after TIV-HD in persons aged ≥65 years (8.2% of reports involved serious events). The number of reports yielded by searches using the terms "ocular hyperemia" and "vomiting" exceeded the data mining threshold; >80% of these reports were nonserious. Clinical review of serious reports found that a greater proportion involving gastrointestinal events were made after TIV-HD receipt (5 of 51 [9.8%]) than after TIV receipt (1 of 123 [0.8%]). Four persons who received TIV-HD had gastroenteritis, and 1 had multiple gastrointestinal symptoms; all recovered. A higher proportion of cardiac events were noted after receipt of TIV-HD (9 of 51 [17.6%]) than after receipt of TIV (6 of 123 [4.9%]). No concerning clinical pattern was apparent. The reporting rates of Guillain-Barré syndrome and anaphylaxis after TIV-HD receipt were 1.4 and 1.0 reports per million doses distributed, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: During the first year after US licensure of TIV-HD, no new serious safety concerns were identified in VAERS. Our analyses suggested a clinically important imbalance between the reported and expected number of gastrointestinal events after TIV-HD receipt. Future studies should assess this potential association.


Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Femenino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/efectos adversos
13.
Am J Epidemiol ; 175(11): 1110-9, 2012 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22582209

RESUMEN

Because of widespread distribution of the influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine (pH1N1 vaccine) and the prior association between Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) and the 1976 H1N1 influenza vaccine, enhanced surveillance was implemented to estimate the magnitude of any increased GBS risk following administration of pH1N1 vaccine. The authors conducted active, population-based surveillance for incident cases of GBS among 45 million persons residing at 10 Emerging Infections Program sites during October 2009-May 2010; GBS was defined according to published criteria. The authors determined medical and vaccine history for GBS cases through medical record review and patient interviews. The authors used vaccine coverage data to estimate person-time exposed and unexposed to pH1N1 vaccine and calculated age- and sex-adjusted rate ratios comparing GBS incidence in these groups, as well as age- and sex-adjusted numbers of excess GBS cases. The authors received 411 reports of confirmed or probable GBS. The rate of GBS immediately following pH1N1 vaccination was 57% higher than in person-time unexposed to vaccine (adjusted rate ratio = 1.57, 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 2.21), corresponding to 0.74 excess GBS cases per million pH1N1 vaccine doses (95% confidence interval: 0.04, 1.56). This excess risk was much smaller than that observed during the 1976 vaccine campaign and was comparable to some previous seasonal influenza vaccine risk assessments.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiología , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Vigilancia de la Población , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
14.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 207(1): 59.e1-7, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22727350

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of pregnant women who received tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap). STUDY DESIGN: We searched VAERS for reports of pregnant women who received Tdap from Jan. 1, 2005, through June 30, 2010. We conducted a clinical review of reports and available medical records. RESULTS: We identified 132 reports of Tdap administered to pregnant women; 55 (42%) described no adverse event (AE). No maternal or infant deaths were reported. The most frequent pregnancy-specific AE was spontaneous abortion in 22 (16.7%) reports. Injection site reactions were the most frequent non-pregnancy-specific AE found in 6 (4.5%) reports. One report with a major congenital anomaly (gastroschisis) was identified. CONCLUSION: During a time when Tdap was not routinely recommended in pregnancy, review of reports to VAERS in pregnant women after Tdap did not identify any concerning patterns in maternal, infant, or fetal outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra Difteria, Tétanos y Tos Ferina Acelular/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
15.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 21(5): 546-52, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22407672

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Emerging Infections Program implemented active, population-based surveillance for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following H1N1 vaccines in 10 states/metropolitan areas. We report additional analyses of these data using self-controlled methods, which avoid potential confounding from person-level factors and co-morbidities. METHODS: Surveillance officers identified GBS cases with symptom onset during October 2009-April 2010 and ascertained receipt of H1N1 vaccines. We calculated self-controlled relative risks by comparing the number of cases with onset during a risk interval 1-42 days after vaccination with cases with onset during fixed (days 43-84) or variable (days 43-end of study period) control intervals. We calculated attributable risks by applying statistically significant relative risks to an independent estimate of GBS incidence. RESULTS: Fifty-nine GBS cases received H1N1 vaccine with or without seasonal vaccine. The relative risk was 2.1 (95%CI 1.2, 3.5) by the variable-window and 3.0 (95%CI 1.4, 6.4) by the fixed-window analyses. The corresponding attributable risks per million doses administered were 1.5 (95%CI 0.3, 3.4) and 2.8 (95%CI 0.6, 7.4). CONCLUSIONS: These attributable risks are similar to those of some previous formulations of seasonal influenza vaccine (about one to two cases per million doses administered), suggesting a low risk of GBS following the H1N1 vaccine that is not clearly higher than that of seasonal influenza vaccines.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/epidemiología , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Síndrome de Guillain-Barré/etiología , Humanos , Lactante , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vigilancia de la Población , Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
16.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 205(5): 473.e1-9, 2011 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21861964

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate and summarize reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting system, in pregnant women who received influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine to assess for potential vaccine safety problems. STUDY DESIGN: We reviewed reports of adverse events (AEs) in pregnant women who received 2009-H1N1 vaccines from Oct. 1, 2009, through Feb. 28, 2010. RESULTS: VAERS received 294 reports of AEs in pregnant women who received 2009-H1N1 vaccine: 288 after inactivated and 6 after the live attenuated vaccines. Two maternal deaths were reported. Fifty-nine women (20.1%) were hospitalized. We verified 131 pregnancy-specific outcomes: 95 spontaneous abortions (<20 weeks); 18 stillbirths (≥20 weeks); 7 preterm deliveries (<37 weeks); 3 threatened abortions; 2 preterm labor; 2 preeclampsia; and 1 each of fetal hydronephrosis, fetal tachycardia, intrauterine growth retardation, and cleft lip. CONCLUSION: Review of reports to VAERS following H1N1 vaccination in pregnant women did not identify any concerning patterns of maternal or fetal outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Seguridad del Paciente , Embarazo , Vacunas Atenuadas/efectos adversos
17.
Vaccine ; 37(11): 1516-1520, 2019 03 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30739795

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Trivalent adjuvanted influenza vaccine (aIIV3; Fluad®) was approved in the United States (U.S.) in 2015 for adults aged ≥65 years and has been in use since the 2016-17 influenza season. METHODS: We analyzed U.S. reports for aIIV3 submitted from July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018 to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a national spontaneous reporting system. Medical records were reviewed for serious reports. Among individuals ≥65 years of age, the relative frequency of the most commonly reported adverse events (AEs) after aIIV3 were compared with non-adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccines given to adults aged ≥65 years, high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3-HD) and trivalent or quadrivalent vaccines (IIV3/IIV4). Data mining analyses were undertaken to identify whether AEs for aIIV3 occurred disproportionately more than expected compared to all influenza vaccines. RESULTS: VAERS received 630 reports after aIIV3, of which 521 (83%) were in adults aged ≥65 years; 79 (13%) in persons <65 years and in 30 (5%) reports age was missing; 19 (3%) reports were serious, including two deaths (0.4%) related to myocardial infarction and Sjogren's syndrome. The most common AEs reported in adults aged ≥65 years were injection site pain (21%) and erythema (18%), with similar proportions reported for IIV3-HD (17% and 19%, respectively) and for IIV3/IIV4 (15%, each). Except for reports related to vaccination of inappropriate age (n = 79) and syringe malfunction (n = 6), data mining did not identify other disproportionately reported AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Although our review of aIIV3 in VAERS did not identify any unexpected health conditions of concern, we observed more than twice the expected number of reports with administration of the vaccine to persons outside of the age range for which the vaccine is approved in the U.S. Health care providers should be educated on the age groups for whom aIIV3 is recommended.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/efectos adversos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Minería de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la Influenza/clasificación , Reacción en el Punto de Inyección , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
18.
Vaccine ; 37(9): 1229-1234, 2019 02 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30660400

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (9vHPV) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2014. 9vHPV is not recommended during pregnancy, but some women of childbearing age may be inadvertently exposed. This study aims to evaluate reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of pregnant women exposed to 9vHPV. METHODS: We searched the VAERS database, a national post-licensure vaccine safety surveillance system, for reports of pregnant women vaccinated with 9vHPV in the United States between December 10, 2014 and December 31, 2017. Disproportionate reporting of adverse events (AEs) was assessed using proportional reporting ratios (PRRs). RESULTS: A total of 82 pregnancy reports were identified. Sixty reports (73.2%) did not describe an AE and were submitted only to report the vaccine exposure during pregnancy. The most frequently reported pregnancy-specific AE was spontaneous abortion (n = 3; 3.7%), followed by vaginal bleeding (n = 2; 2.4%). Among non-pregnancy-specific AEs, injection site reaction (n = 3; 3.7%) was most common. No disproportionate reporting of any AE was found. DISCUSSION: No unexpected AEs were observed among these pregnancy reports.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/efectos adversos , Mujeres Embarazadas , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Humanos , Reacción en el Punto de Inyección , Embarazo , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Adulto Joven
19.
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen ; 23(1): 77-83, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18276960

RESUMEN

We previously reported that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) decrease the rate of cognitive decline in elderly patients with hypertension, but their impact on patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) is not known. A total of 62 elderly patients with AD were enrolled, and 52 completed the study for 6 months. Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE), Clock Draw Test (CDT), working memory (Digit Ordering), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale, and the Screen for Caregiver Burden (SCB) were collected at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. AD patients receiving ACEI (N = 15) demonstrated a slower rate of decline in digit forward (P = .003) and IADL scale (P = .003) and an improved measure of caregiver burden (P = .04) but not MMSE (P =.15) or CDT (P =.9) compared with those not receiving ACEI after adjusting for other risk factors. This study suggests that use of ACEI in AD patients is associated with slower rate of AD progression. A randomized clinical trial is needed to confirm our finding.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/farmacología , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Trastornos del Conocimiento/epidemiología , Cognición/efectos de los fármacos , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Trastornos del Conocimiento/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
20.
Vaccine ; 36(1): 50-54, 2018 01 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29174107

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The safety of hepatitis B vaccination during pregnancy has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE: We characterized adverse events (AEs) after hepatitis B vaccination of pregnant women reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a spontaneous reporting surveillance system. METHODS: We searched VAERS for AEs reports involving pregnant women who received hepatitis B vaccine from January 1, 1990-June 30, 2016. All reports and available medical records were reviewed by physicians. Observed AEs were compared to expected AEs and known rates of pregnancy outcomes to assess for any unexpected safety concern. RESULTS: We found 192 reports involving pregnant women following hepatitis B vaccination of which 110 (57.3%) described AEs; 12 (6.3%) were classified as serious; one newborn death was identified in a severely premature delivery, and there were no maternal deaths. Eighty-two (42.7%) reports did not describe any AEs. Among pregnancies for which gestational age was reported, most women were vaccinated during the first trimester, 86/115 (74.7%). Among reports describing an AE, the most common pregnancy-specific outcomes included spontaneous abortion in 23 reports, preterm delivery in 7 reports, and elective termination in 5 reports. The most common non-pregnancy specific outcomes were general disorders and administration site conditions, such as injection site and systemic reactions, in 21 reports. Among 22 reports describing an AE among infants born to women vaccinated during pregnancy, 5 described major birth defects each affecting different organ systems. CONCLUSION: Our analysis of VAERS reports involving hepatitis B vaccination during pregnancy did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/efectos adversos , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Aborto Espontáneo/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anomalías Congénitas/etiología , Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Femenino , Edad Gestacional , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/virología , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Registros Médicos , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo/epidemiología , Nacimiento Prematuro/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA