[Prostate cancer screening in France: Results from the EDIFICE surveys]. / Dépistage du cancer de la prostate en France : résultats des enquêtes EDIFICE.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer amongst men in 2018 in Europe. The issue of PCa screening in the general population has been debated following the publication of international European (ERSPC) and North American (PLCO) studies. There is currently no organised PCa screening. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the practice of PCa screening in the French population with no history of cancer between 2005 and 2016. METHODS: Since 2005, the EDIFICE surveys have focused on the knowledge and behaviour of French people with regard to cancer screening. The practice of screening was evaluated according to the answer to the question: "Have you ever done PCa screening?" Responses were analysed according to age, socio-professional category and level of social precariousness. RESULTS: After a strong increase between 2005 and 2008 (from 36% to 49%, P≤0.01), a significant decrease in the reported PCa screening rate was observed between 2014 (49%) and 2016 (42%; P=0.02). This decrease was mainly reflected in the socially advantaged categories and in the youngest age group (50-54 years). Screening practices remain the same in older men. CONCLUSION: The perception of the effectiveness of PCa screening could explain the changes of behavior in the French population. This decrease in participation in PCa screening requires monitoring to avoid a general loss of confidence in cancer screening. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Maintaining professional activity during breast cancer treatment.

The question of returning to work and pursuing professional activity during cancer treatment is an increasingly important consideration. The present work focuses on factors affecting the feasibility of maintaining professional activity during treatment for breast cancer, for women who wished to do so. Written questionnaires were collected from 216 patients between March and November 2012. Since the onset of their treatment, 31.4% of the women (68/216) had not been on sick-leave. The main factors associated with the pursuit of professional activity were: considering the availability of their physician to answer questions as unimportant [OR = 18.83 (3.60-98.53); P ≤ 0.05]; considering the diagnosis of cancer as likely to have a weak impact on career perspectives [OR = 4.07 (2.49-6.64); P ≤ 0.05]; not having any children in the household [OR = 3.87 (2.38-6.28); P ≤ 0.05]; being in a managerial position [OR = 3.13 (1.88-5.21); P ≤ 0.05]. Negative predictive factors were: physician mentioning adverse effects of the treatment [OR = 0.31 (0.16-0.58); P ≤ 0.05], and patient rating workload as high [OR = 0.26 (0.15-0.46); P ≤ 0.05]. As a result of advances in therapeutic strategies, more patients will expect healthcare professionals, as well as employers and occupational health societies, to prioritise issues pertaining to the maintenance of professional activities during cancer treatment.

Prostate cancer screening: contrasting trends.

PURPOSE: Our previously published data showed rapidly increasing rates of prostate cancer screening in men aged 50-74, which rose from 36% in 2005 to 48% in 2008. Based on men's reported intentions at that time, this was expected to rise to 70% in 2011. Here we report the actual rate of prostate cancer screening. METHOD: Three nationwide observational telephone surveys (EDIFICE opinion polls) were conducted in 2005, 2008, and 2011. The overall target was a representative sample of > 1,500 individuals living in France and aged 40-75 years, including 481 men aged 50-74 years. RESULTS: Within this male population, the rate of screening reported remained stable between 2008 and 2011 (48 and 49%, respectively). However, comparison of privileged versus disadvantaged populations showed significant differences, with a relative decrease in screening among those of higher socioprofessional status (p = 0.03) and from higher-income groups (p = 0.02). For households with a monthly income above 2,500€, the screening rate decreased from 61% in 2008 to 51% in 2011 (p = 0.05), while for those with an income below 2,500€, it increased from 36% in 2008 to 44 % in 2011 (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: A plateau or even a reduction in prostate cancer screening is currently being observed; this is possibly due to progressive recognition among the population at large of the controversy surrounding prostate cancer screening, whereas this speculation was formerly limited to health-care professionals. After previously being more likely to undergo prostate cancer screening, it is the younger, wealthier populations that are currently showing the most noteworthy step backwards.

Sun exposure profile in the French population. Results of the EDIFICE Melanoma survey.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of melanoma is increasing worldwide, causing significant economic burden at community and individual levels. Ultraviolet radiation, from natural sunlight or artificial sources, is the main environmental, modifiable risk factor for melanoma. OBJECTIVES: The present analysis assesses the profile of sun exposure in the French population as well as the level of awareness about ultraviolet risk and protection. METHODS: The survey was conducted via telephone interviews in September and October 2011. In total, 1502 respondents were questioned about their own sun exposure with the question "do you ever, even occasionally, spend time in the sun, during leisure-time, vacation or your professional occupation?" They were also asked about sun protection measures used: protective clothing, a hat or sunscreen. RESULTS: More than three respondents out of four (78%) declared exposing themselves to the sun, with an average of 113 days per year. Of these, 38% did not use appropriate sun protection measures. We identified the following characteristics of individuals declaring high sun exposure: chiefly men under the age of 40, higher socio-professional levels, and adults with no children. Individuals who make a poor use of protective measures are mostly men and of low educational levels. Individuals declaring low sun exposure were chiefly: women, individuals over the age of 60, and those with no professional activity. The high sun protection population comprises mostly: women, higher socio-professional levels, with no specific age-group profile. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the EDIFICE Melanoma survey provides information about the attitudes of the French population towards sun exposure. The most frequent contexts of sun exposure and the associated socio-demographic characteristics of the population with at-risk attitudes regarding sun exposure are identified. This deeper insight into the profile of at-risk populations will allow interventions to be more accurately targeted, thus potentially improving public health benefits.

EDIFICE Melanoma survey: knowledge and attitudes on melanoma prevention and diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma incidence is increasing worldwide thus justifying information campaigns aimed at reducing ultraviolet exposure levels and promoting early diagnosis. OBJECTIVES: We set out to assess awareness, knowledge and attitudes of the French population with regard to melanoma prevention and early diagnosis, following more than 15 years of nationwide information campaigns. METHODS: The French nationwide observational survey, EDIFICE Melanoma, was conducted after the summer (September to October 2011) through structured telephone interviews of a representative sample of 1502 individuals aged ≥18 years, using the quota method. All French regions were represented. RESULTS: Respondents had heard of sun-induced skin damage: 92% knew that sun increases melanoma risk. Knowledge of sun-protection measures was also good: 97% correctly cited at least one method of photoprotection (clothing 80%, sunscreens 69%) and 97% declared that sun exposure should be reduced between 12 pm and 4 pm in France. Knowledge of melanoma was encouraging: 70% of respondents could define the disease accurately and 60% knew the ABCDE rule for early diagnosis. However, self-tanning and sunbed use were considered by 25% and 13% of respondents, respectively, to provide protection from skin cancer. Although 43% of respondents (58% of high-risk respondents) declared they had consulted a doctor at least once for a suspect skin lesion, their actual behaviour was less encouraging: 30% declared never or almost never protecting their skin; 25% declared regularly checking their skin for atypical nevi; 12% declared checking the entire skin surface. Declared behaviour was better in fair-skin responders and those with a history of sunburn or skin cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Awareness of melanoma, early-diagnosis procedures and preventive behaviour has improved in the general French population since 1990. However, despite the good level of information, numerous misconceptions persist. Improved information campaigns in the future may help reduce the ever-increasing incidence of melanoma in France.

Comparison of sun protection modalities in parents and children.

BACKGROUND: Routine sun protection is recommended to prevent skin cancer. The aims of the present analysis were to assess and compare modalities of sun protection in parents and their children. METHODS: EDIFICE Melanoma is a French nationwide observational survey. It was conducted through phone interviews among a representative sample of 1502 individuals aged ≥18 years, using the method of quotas. The survey took place shortly after the summer, from 28 September to 20 October 2011. RESULTS: Of the 1502 subjects interviewed, 1067 reported sun exposure (SE) at least 10 days per year, 748 were parents and 319 had no children. Sun protection measures seemed adequate in both the 'parents' and 'non-parents' groups: 74% used clothing and 43% used sunscreen, which was reapplied regularly in 57% of cases. Sun protection measures used by SE parents for SE children were superior, both qualitatively and quantitatively, to those used for themselves, i.e., 50% of parents reported using clothing, sunglasses and hats for their children vs. 23% for themselves. In 87% of cases, parents reported regular re-application of sunscreen for their children vs. 44% for themselves. The sunscreen SPF (Sun Protection Factor) was significantly lower for parents than for their children. CONCLUSIONS: Sun protection awareness appears to be globally satisfactory in the French population, with no difference between adults who are parents and those who are not. From both qualitative and quantitative standpoints, French parents use sun protective measures more efficiently for their children than for themselves.

Evolution of sun-protection measures for children.

BACKGROUND: The prevention of melanoma can be significantly improved by targeting information directly towards the subpopulation of children and, as a means to achieve it, towards young parents. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this analysis was to determine the evolution over time of the sun-protection measures adopted by parents for their young children. METHODS: The Edifice Melanoma survey was based on telephone interviews of a representative sample of 1502 subjects aged ≥18 years. This particular analysis focuses on 864 adults whose children are exposed to the sun for more than 10 days a year. We compared the characteristics and attitudes of two sub-groups of parents with regard to sun protection of young children: current-day behaviour of parents with children <15 years and behaviour in the past of parents whose children are now ≥15 years. RESULTS: Present-day parents are more likely than those of previous generations to systematically or often use hats (96% vs. 90%, P < 0.01), protective clothes (92% vs. 84%, P < 0.01), sunscreen (89% vs. 80%, P < 0.01) and sunglasses (63% vs. 44%, P < 0.01) for their children. Systematic application of sunscreen is also more frequent today than several years ago as reported by 81% of present-day parents vs. 74% of those in the past (P < 0.05). Cream is reapplied every 2 h by 41% of present-day parents, compared to 33%, in the past (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The attitude of parents towards sun protection for their children has improved over the past decade.

Personal vs. intrinsic melanoma risk awareness: results of the EDIFICE Melanoma survey.

BACKGROUND: The efficiency of skin cancer prevention programmes is strongly correlated with the information dispensed, and with the level of risk awareness, of the overall population on one hand, and on the other, of specific sub-populations, according to their risk profiles. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this analysis was to establish a correlation between individual perceptions of the risk of developing a melanoma, and the recognized intrinsic risk factors for a given individual. Secondary objectives were to assess factors that are potentially associated with acceptable, high or low perception of melanoma risk. METHODS: The EDIFICE Melanoma survey was conducted in 2011 via telephone interviews of a representative sample of 1502 individuals aged 18 and older in the French population. RESULTS: Although most respondents (73%) had a true estimation of their intrinsic risk for melanoma, those who did not (underestimation, 17%; overestimation, 10%) had an attitude towards environmental risk factors (sun exposure, sun protection, sunbed use) that did not compensate for this misplaced perception. CONCLUSIONS: Skin cancer prevention messages need to be reinforced, new methods of evaluating understanding of the messages need to be implemented, and both need to be included into personal risk assessment.

Prevalence of sunbed use, and characteristics and knowledge of sunbed users: results from the French population-based Edifice Melanoma survey.

BACKGROUND: In addition to natural sunlight, indoor tanning has emerged as a common source of ultraviolet (UV) radiation associated with an increased risk of melanoma. It is classified as a class I human carcinogen by the World Health Organization. OBJECTIVES: This analysis presents data on the prevalence of sunbed use in France, on factors associated with sunbed use, and on risk factors, attitude and awareness of risk among sunbed users and non-users. METHODS: Edifice Melanoma, a nationwide observational survey, was conducted in France via telephone interviews among a representative sample of 1502 subjects aged ≥18 years, using the quota method. Sunbed users were defined as individuals who reported having used a sunbed at least once in their lifetime. Logistical regressions were conducted in order to identify which factors differentiate the population of sunbed users from that of non-users. RESULTS: One in ten respondents was a sunbed user and three out of four declared having used tanning facilities for over one year. In multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with the sunbed-user group were female gender (OR = 3.897 [2.573-5.903], P < 0.001), a higher socio-professional category (OR = 2.227 [1.542-3.217]; P < 0.001), fair hair (OR = 1.583 [1.025-2.447], P = 0.039), fair skin (OR = 1.879 [1.086-3.253]; P = 0.024), freckles (OR = 1.570 [1.071-2.302]; P = 0.021) and a history of smoking (OR = 2.383 [1.633-3.476]; P < 0.001). In a second multivariate model, the fact of having a large number of melanoma risk factors was strongly associated with sunbed use (P = 0.001). Sunbed users were more likely to be informed of the role of sun exposure in reducing the skin's regenerative capacity (OR = 2.181 [1.319-3.607]; P = 0.002) but were nevertheless more likely to consider that a tan makes a person look more attractive (OR = 2.309 [1.312-4.064]; P = 0.004) and protects the skin (OR = 2.490 [1.532-4.046]; P < 0.001); they were also more frequently exposed to natural sunlight (OR = 2.214 [1.196-4.102]; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to non-users, sunbed users cumulate risk factors for melanoma. Knowledge, attitudes and intentions of individuals are critical targets for public education programmes. However, awareness campaigns focusing on sunbed use, and more generally on skin cancer, should also take social and cultural norms into account.

Melanoma risk-takers: fathers and sons.

OBJECTIVES: The incidence of skin cancers, melanoma in particular, is increasing rapidly. Consequently, specific recommendations for sun-protection measures now exist. This survey set out to assess the compliance of the general population with these guidelines. METHODS: The French nationwide observational survey, EDIFICE Melanoma, was conducted (28 September to 20 October 2011) through phone interviews of a representative sample of 1502 subjects aged ≥ 18 years, using the quota method. Sun-protection was defined as frequent or systematic use of clothes or sunscreen. The group of individuals who declared exposure to the sun (N = 1172) was subdivided: risk-takers (N = 442), and those who used sun protection (N = 730). RESULTS: Risk-takers were significantly more often male (62% vs. 44%, P < 0.01), had a lower level of education (40% vs. 26%, P < 0.01), lower incomes (2587 euros vs. 2948 euros/month) and were more often smokers (42% vs. 31%, P < 0.01). In contrast, age, marital status and use of sunbeds were not significantly different between the two groups. Interestingly, risk-takers had less risk factors for melanoma. However, they were less well-informed about high-risk exposure and optimal use of sunscreen. Sun-protection measures for their children were less stringent than those of the group who used sun protection: systematic/frequent use of sunglasses (42% vs. 59%, P < 0.01), systematic use of sunscreen (77% vs. 86%, P < 0.01), and frequent renewal (69% vs. 82%, P < 0.01), high sun protection factors (SPF) (46% vs. 56%, P < 0.01), use of clothing (84% vs. 92%, P < 0.01) and hats (88% vs. 94%, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Risk-takers are characterized by a lesser understanding of sun-protection measures and behaviours. Their children benefit less from protective measures than those of people who use sun protection themselves. Improved understanding may well improve behaviours; one can therefore legitimately predict a considerable impact on parents' attitude to their own protection and that of their children.