Efficacy of early administration of sacubitril/valsartan after coronary artery revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation: a randomized controlled trial.

Effects of angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI) on ventricular remodeling in patients with heart failure, especially heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), are better than those of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI). Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by mitral regurgitation exacerbates ventricular remodeling and increases the risk of heart failure. There is limited evidence on the effects of early administration of ARNI in patients with AMI complicated by mitral regurgitation. The aim of this trial was to examine the effectiveness and the safety of early administration of sacubitril/valsartan after coronary artery revascularization in patients with AMI complicated by moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation. This was a randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial. From June 2021 to June 2022, we enrolled 142 consecutive patients with AMI complicated by moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation and followed them for 12 months. The patients received standard treatment for AMI and were randomly assigned to receive ARNI or benazepril. The primary efficacy end points were the differences in mitral regurgitant jet area (MRJA), mitral regurgitant volume (MRV), concentration of n-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume (LVEDV and LVESV) between groups and within groups at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Secondary end points included the rates of heart failure hospitalization, all-cause mortality, refractory angina, malignant arrhythmias, recurrent myocardial infarction, and stroke. Safety end points included the rates of hyperkalemia, renal dysfunction, hypotension, angioedema, and cough. The ARNI group had significantly lower NT-proBNP levels than the benazepril group at 1 month and later (P < 0.001). MRJA and MRV significantly improved in the ARNI group compared with the benazepril group at 12 months (MRJA: - 3.21 ± 2.18 cm2 vs. - 1.83 ± 2.81 cm2, P < 0.05; MRV: - 27.22 ± 15.22 mL vs. - 13.67 ± 21.02 mL, P < 0.001). The ARNI group also showed significant reductions in LVEDV and LVESV (P < 0.05) and improvement in LVEF (P < 0.05). Secondary end point analysis showed a significantly higher rate of heart failure hospitalization in the benazepril group compared with the ARNI group (HR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.12-3.68, P = 0.021). Safety end point analysis showed a higher rate of hypotension in the ARNI group (P < 0.05). Early use of sacubitril/valsartan after coronary artery revascularization in patients with AMI complicated by moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation can significantly reduce mitral regurgitation, improve ventricular remodeling, and decrease heart failure hospitalization. Nevertheless, caution is needed to avoid hypotension. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100054255) registered on December 11, 2021.

Application of tirofiban in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with diabetes and undergoing emergency interventional therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the application of tirofiban in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated with diabetes and undergoing emergency interventional therapy. METHODS: Two hundred patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) complicated with diabetes who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and found to have high thrombus burden in coronary artery admitted to our hospital from September 2018 to September 2020 were selected as subjects, and were divided into two groups according to the randomization method: the intravenous tirofiban bolus group and the intracoronary tirofiban bolus group, with 100 cases in each group. The levels of LVEF, LVESD and LVEDD were detected immediately after admission and 15 days after therapy, and the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was utilized to detect the levels of CK-MB, MMP-9 and hs-CRP. Furthermore, the levels of BNP, TNI, CR and UREA of the patients were analyzed, and the levels of ESR and FIB were detected with an automatic blood rheology analyzer to analyze the TIMI classification and the incidence of MACE in the two groups. RESULTS: Significant differences were seen between the two groups in the levels of various indicators after therapy. Fifteen days after therapy, the levels of LVEF and LVEDD were higher and the level of LVESD was lower in the intracoronary tirofiban bolus group than in the intravenous tirofiban bolus group (p<0.05); 3d after therapy, the levels of CK-MB, MMP-9 and BNP in the intracoronary tirofiban bolus group were lower than those in the intravenous tirofiban bolus group (p<0.05); 3d after therapy, the levels of TNI (p<0.05), CR and UREA in the intracoronary tirofiban bolus group were lower than those in the intravenous tirofiban bolus group, with no statistical difference (p>0.05); Similarly, 3d after therapy, the levels of TNI, Cr and Urea, as well as ESR, FIB and hs-CRP were lower in the intracoronary tirofiban bolus group than in the intravenous tirofiban bolus group (p<0.05). Compared with the intravenous tirofiban bolus group, the intracoronary tirofiban bolus group had a lower number of patients with Grade-0 and Grade-1, but a higher number of patients with Grade-2 and Grade-3 (p<0.05); Moreover, the incidence of MACE in the intracoronary tirofiban bolus group was lower than that in the intravenous tirofiban bolus group (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In patients with STEMI complicated with diabetes who underwent PCI and found to have high thrombus burden in coronary artery, intracoronary bolus of tirofiban boasts superior therapeutic efficacy over intravenous bolus of tirofiban in significantly improving cardiac function, reducing myocardial cell damage, and improving renal function and myocardial inflammation of patients.

The effect of trimetazidine treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for AMI.

PURPOSE: Trimetazidine (TMZ) improves clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure and stable coronary artery disease. No study has yet evaluated the efficacy of TMZ in type 2 diabetes patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). We performed this study to evaluate the efficacy TMZ in DM patients with AMI undergoing PCI, such as the effect on reductions in myocardial enzyme, improvements in liver function, modulation of glucose levels, and improvement in cardiac function. METHODS: For this randomized study, we enrolled 173 AMI patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing PCI between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2016. All patients received aspirin and ticagrelor upon admission and throughout their hospitalization. Patients in the experimental group were treated with a loading dose of 60mg TMZ at admission, and 20 mg TMZ three times a day thereafter. 89 patients were included in experimental group, and 84 patients were included in control group. All patients received PCI treatments. The endpoints evaluated were serum creatine kinase and its isoenzyme (CK and CK-MB), cardiac troponin I (cTNI), serum creatinine (Cr), serum urea, blood glucose, serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (ALT), serum glutamic oxaloacetictransaminase (AST), left atrial dimension (LA), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD), and cardiac output (CO). FINDINGS: Compared with the control group, TMZ treatment significantly reduced CK and CK-MB on the second day in hospital ([797±582] vs. [1092±1114]; [80±60] vs. [105±100]; p=0.029, p=0.041, respectively), and cTNI after one and six days in hospital ([13.5±12.7] vs. [19.8±19.2]; [3.3±3.2] vs. [4.8±4.7]; two-tailed p=0.012). In addition, TMZ significantly lowered liver enzymes (ALT, AST) at 6days ([29.0±11.6] vs. [42.4±24.5]; [39.8±17.3] vs. [69.2±70.0]; two-tailed p=0.000), lowered glucose after 6days ([6.80±2.12] vs. [7.59±2.24]; p=0.019), and increased LVEF after ten to fourteen days ([58.4±8.6] vs. [54.9±8.4]; p=0.008). There were no significant effect on Cr and serum urea (p=0.988, p=0.569, respectively), nor on LA, LVEDD, and CO ([36.3±4.5] vs. [37.0±4.1], p=0.264; [52.0±4.9] vs. [53.1±4.6], p=0.128; [5.4±0.9] vs. [5.4±0.9], p=0.929, respectively). IMPLICATIONS: Among type 2 diabetic patients with AMI undergoing PCI, TMZ significantly reduces serum myocardial enzyme, improves liver function, adjusts blood glucose and improves cardiac function.

Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel Treatment in Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

AIMS: Ticagrelor improves the clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). However, few studies have directly compared the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor against clopidogrel, an oral, thienopyridine-class antiplatelet drug. This study compared the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI. METHODS: We enrolled 400 patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI at the Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University and the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, China, between January 01, 2013 and April 30, 2015. All patients received 300 mg of aspirin and were randomized to receive one of the following treatments: (1) a loading dose of clopidogrel (600 mg) before PPCI followed by clopidogrel (75 mg once daily for 1 year) post PPCI or (2) a loading dose of ticagrelor (180 mg) before PPCI followed by ticagrelor (90 mg twice daily for 1 year) post PPCI. Some patients were treated by intracoronary bolus of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GPIIb/IIIa) inhibitor [tirofiban (10 µg/kg) plus maintenance infusion (0.15 µg·kg·min) for 24-36 hours] in accordance with specified guidelines. The primary end points evaluated were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) [defined as a composite of overall death, myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned revascularization, or stroke], stent thrombosis, and the composite end point of CV death, nonfatal MI, and stroke. The supplemental use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in the clopidogrel and ticagrelor groups was monitored as another study end point, although the secondary safety end point evaluated was the incidence of bleeding events. RESULTS: Compared with the clopidogrel-treated group, ticagrelor treatment significantly reduced the incidence of MACCE [5 vs. 14; odds ratio (OR), 0.341; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.120-0.964; P = 0.034] and the composite end points of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and stroke (4 vs. 13; OR, 0.294; 95% CI, 0.094-0.916; P = 0.026). Fewer patients in the ticagrelor group received GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors after PPCI compared with those in the clopidogrel group (10 vs. 21; OR, 0.449; 95% CI, 0.206-0.979; P = 0.040). However, there were no significant differences between the groups in the incidences of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, unplanned revascularization, stroke, stent thrombosis (P = 0.522, P = 0.246, P = 0.246, P = 0.217, P = 0.246, respectively), or bleeding events (10 vs. 7; OR, 1.451; 95% CI, 0.541-3.891; P = 0.457). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI undergoing PPCI, ticagrelor reduces the incidence of MACCE and the composite end point of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, and stroke compared with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor also reduces the need for GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors. However, no significant difference was observed in the risk of bleeding between the 2 groups.

Vertical distribution of aerosol optical properties based on aircraft measurements over the Loess Plateau in China.

Vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties based on aircraft measurements over the Loess Plateau were measured for the first time during a summertime aircraft campaign, 2013 in Shanxi, China. Data from four flights were analyzed. The vertical distributions of aerosol optical properties including aerosol scattering coefficients (σsc), absorption coefficients (σab), Angström exponent (α), single scattering albedo (ω), backscattering ratio (ßsc), aerosol mass scattering proficiency (Qsc) and aerosol surface scattering proficiency (Qsc(')) were obtained. The mean statistical values of σsc were 77.45 Mm(-1) (at 450 nm), 50.72 Mm(-1) (at 550n m), and 32.02 Mm(-1) (at 700 nm). The mean value of σab was 7.62 Mm(-1) (at 550 nm). The mean values of α, ßsc and ω were 1.93, 0.15, and 0.91, respectively. Aerosol concentration decreased with altitude. Most effective diameters (ED) of aerosols were less than 0.8 µm. The vertical profiles of σsc,, α, ßsc, Qsc and Qsc(') showed that the aerosol scattering properties at lower levels contributed the most to the total aerosol radiative forcing. Both α and ßsc had relatively large values, suggesting that most aerosols in the observational region were small particles. The mean values of σsc, α, ßsc, Qsc, Qsc('), σab and ω at different height ranges showed that most of the parameters decreased with altitude. The forty-eight hour backward trajectories of air masses during the observation days indicated that the majority of aerosols in the lower level contributed the most to the total aerosol loading, and most of these particles originated from local or regional pollution emissions.

Effects of Tirofiban in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Diabetes Mellitus undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of early vs. late tirofiban administration in the treatment of patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). METHODS: 120 patients with STEMI and DM treated with pPCI were randomly divided into an observation group (n=60) and a control group (n=60). The observation group and the control group were intravenously injected with a bolus of tirofiban preoperatively or intraoperatively, respectively; both groups were then given an intravenous infusion over 24 h at 0.15 µg/kg/min. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade flow, myocardial perfusion index, and functional heart parameters, as well as major adverse cardiovascular events and bleeding, were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Functional heart parameters, including left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac output, were significantly improved in the observation group 6 months after discharge. Thrombus aspiration, inflammatory factors, and cardiac troponin I (cTNI) were more significantly decreased in the observation group than in the control group. The sum-ST-segment elevation at 2 h after pPCI treatment in the observation group was better than that in the control group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions and bleeding between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The administration of tirofiban before reperfusion therapy compared with after reperfusion therapy is more effective in reducing the hyperthrombotic load, thrombus aspiration, inflammatory factors, and cTNI and can effectively improve myocardial perfusion and heart function.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection complicated with cardiovascular diseases.

Objective: To investigate the clinical characteristics and risk factors of patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection complicated with cardiovascular diseases. Methods: A retrospective analysis of general clinical data was conducted on patients with SARS-CoV-2 omicron infection complicated with hypertension, coronary heart disease, and heart failure admitted to one hospital in Guangdong Province from December 1, 2022, to February 28, 2023. Clinical symptoms, laboratory tests, imaging examinations, treatment, and clinical outcomes were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection complicated with cardiovascular diseases. ROC curves were drawn to evaluate the predictive value of CRP, D-dimer, and CK-MB in predicting the risk of death. Results: A total of 364 confirmed cases were included, divided into the asymptomatic group, mild to moderate group, and severe to critically ill group based on the symptoms of COVID-19. There were 216 males (59.34%) and 148 females (40.66%), with a median age of 75 years. The differences between the three groups in terms of sex and age were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The top three underlying diseases were hypertension (288 cases, 79.12%), coronary heart disease (100 cases, 27.47%), and diabetes (84 cases, 23.08%). The differences in unvaccinated and triple-vaccinated patients among the three groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). The common respiratory symptoms were cough in 237 cases (65.11%) and sputum production in 199 cases (54.67%). In terms of laboratory tests, there were statistically significant differences in neutrophils, lymphocytes, red blood cells, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, aspartate aminotransferase, and creatinine among the three groups (p < 0.05). In imaging examinations, there were statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of unilateral pulmonary inflammation, bilateral pulmonary inflammation, and bilateral pleural effusion (p < 0.05). There were statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of antibiotic treatment, steroid treatment, oxygen therapy, nasal cannula oxygen inhalation therapy, non-invasive ventilation, and tracheal intubation ventilation (p < 0.05). Regarding clinical outcomes, there were statistically significant differences among the three groups in terms of mortality (p < 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that CRP (OR = 1.012, 95% CI = 1.004-1.019) and D-dimer (OR = 1.117, 95% CI = 1.021-1.224) were independent risk factors for patient mortality. The predictive value of CRP, D-dimer, and CK-MB for the risk of death was assessed. D-dimer had the highest sensitivity (95.8%) in predicting patient mortality risk, while CRP had the highest specificity (84.4%). Conclusion: For patients with COVID-19 and concomitant cardiovascular diseases without contraindications, early administration of COVID-19 vaccines and booster shots can effectively reduce the mortality rate of severe cases. Monitoring biomarkers such as CRP, D-dimer, and CK-MB and promptly providing appropriate care can help mitigate the risk of mortality in patients.

Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous tirofiban in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of intracoronary (IC) tirofiban compared to intravenously administered tirofiban in STEMI patients treated with PPCI. METHODS: This study included 180 STEMI patients who were underwent PPCI. Patients were randomized into an IC group ( n = 90) and intravenous (IV) group ( n = 90). During the procedure, the both groups were administered IC or IV injections of tirofiban, respectively, followed by an IV infusion of tirofiban for 24 hours. Changes in TIMI flow grading, TMP grade 3, Sum-STR two hours after the operation, the number of thrombus aspirations during the operation, myocardial enzyme, inflammatory factors,cardiac functional parameters, MACE and bleeding were investigated. RESULTS: Following treatment, TIMI flow grading and TMP grade 3 were improved in the IC tirofiban compared to the IV group ( P = 0.022 and P = 0.014, respectively). Additionally, the Sum-STR two hours after operation, the incidence of MACEs, levels of AST, CRP, ESR, and TNI in the IC group was improved, compared with the IV group (all P < 0.05). Furthermore. Cardiac function including CO and LVEF were significantly improved in the IC group 6 months after discharge. CONCLUSION: This study found that IC administration of tirofiban in patients with STEMI who underwent PPCI improved TIMI, TMP flow and cardiac function 6 months after discharge, and reduced CRP, ESR, and TNI. However, the incidence of bleeding between the two groups was comparable. These findings suggest that IC administration should be applied in certain acute STEMI patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Intracoronary versus Intravenous Administration of Tirofiban during Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is known as the most effective treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, without proper therapy and patient management, stent thrombosis after PCI may lead to another myocardial infarction. In addition to aspirin and clopidogrel, tirofiban is often used as an antiplatelet therapy in patients with ACS. To date, there has been no comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy and safety of intracoronary (IC) tirofiban administration for ACS patients undergoing PCI compared with intravenous (IV) administration. Therefore, this meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the clinical efficiency and safety of IC versus intravenous (IV) tirofiban in ACS patients undergoing PCI. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Medline for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IC versus IV administration of tirofiban in ACS patients undergoing PCI. We evaluated the effects of tirofiban on thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade 3 flow after PCI, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade 3 (TMP grade 3), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), target vessel revascularization (TVR), death, reinfarction and adverse drug effects (specifically bleeding events). RESULTS: Seven trials involving 1,027 patients were included in this meta-analysis. IC administration of tirofiban significantly increased TIMI grade 3 flow (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.02 to 4.37; P = 0.04) and TMP grade 3 (OR 2.67; 95% CI 1.09 to 6.49; P = 0.03, I2 = 64%) while reducing MACE (OR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.75; P = 0.002) compared with IV administration of tirofiban. No significant differences were observed in the occurrence of TVR, death, reinfarction and the incidence of bleeding events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis supports the use of IC over IV administration of tirofiban in patients with ACS to improve TIMI flow, TMP flow and MACE. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of bleeding complications between the two groups.

Milrinone for the Treatment of Acute Heart Failure After Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Despite advancements in modern medicine, the treatment of acute heart failure (AHF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains challenging. Milrinone is effective in the treatment of chronic congestive heart failure, but its safety and efficacy in patients with AHF after AMI have not been systematically evaluated. This meta-analysis was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of milrinone in patients with AHF after AMI. We used a pre-designed protocol to search electronic databases for randomized trials assessing milrinone for the treatment of AHF after AMI. Data were abstracted from relevant studies. Heterogeneity was assessed qualitatively using a Q test and quantified using the I(2) statistic. Pooled risk estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained using fixed-effects models unless substantial heterogeneity was observed (I(2) ≥ 50% and heterogeneity p ≤ 0.1). Four randomized trials met the inclusion criteria. However, there were no significant differences in deaths, blood pressure, premature ventricular contractions, gastrointestinal reactions, or ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (all p > 0.05) between control group and milrinone treatment group. Pooled estimates showed that milrinone significantly increased the left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 5.69; 95% CI 4.27 to 7.10; p < 0.00001) and cardiac output (MD 0.35, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.56; p = 0.002, I(2) = 24%). While studies to date are few and limited by small sample sizes and poor quality, they suggest that treatment with milrinone may be safe and effective for patients with AHF after AMI. However, this meta-analysis did not show that milrinone could improve prognosis or the survival rate.