A-T Flap for Reconstruction of Nasal Dorsum Skin Defects.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of nasal defects can be challenging, especially when encountering larger defects. We describe the use of a single-stage conversion of an 'A' shaped defect to a 'T' shaped scar of large nasal skin defects in the cosmetically sensitive supra-tip and supra-alar regions. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether an A-T flap is a suitable option for nasal reconstruction and if so where and what size defects it can be used for. METHODS: Retrospective case series review over an 8-year period (2011-2019) in a tertiary referral center in the United Kingdom. Case analysis was undertaken in 2020 including all patients who underwent A-T reconstruction of nasal defects. A review of histology, case notes, and clinical photography was undertaken. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients were identified-13 (48%) female and 14 (52%) male. The median age was 73 years (range 31-90 years). Defect locations were supra-tip (48%) and supra-alar (52%). The largest defect closed was 895 mm2 (30 × 38 mm). Range 35 to 895 mm2 (median 264 mm2). No patient required revision or corrective procedures. No functional impairment was identified. Patient and clinician reported aesthetic outcomes as good in all cases. No reports of this technique could be identified in the literature. CONCLUSION: The A-T flap is a viable option for supra-tip and supra-alar skin defects (up to 895 mm2 in our series). It aligns well with the basic principles of nasal reconstruction. The flap can be performed under local anesthesia in one stage, resulting in good functional and aesthetic outcomes and so can be considered a valuable tool for the nasal reconstructive surgeon.

Bilateral nasal septal chemical cautery: a safe and effective outpatient procedure for control of recurrent epistaxis, our experience in 134 patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness and complications of bilateral nasal septal cautery using silver nitrate in anterior nasal epistaxis. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out on 180 consecutive patients presenting with epistaxis to a general ENT clinic. Local anaesthetic cautery was performed using 5% lidocaine hydrochloride and 0.5% phenylephrine hydrochloride spray in all the patients except eight children that were 4 years or younger that were done under general anaesthetic. Visible vessels in Little's areas were cauterised using two silver nitrate sticks each side. Patients were prescribed naseptin cream and followed-up. We classified re-bleeds as follow: 0-1 episodes: significant improvement, 2-3 episodes: moderate improvement, 4 + episodes: no improvement. RESULTS: We analysed 134 (74%) patients who were seen at follow-up. Age range was 5-88 years (mean 25, median 15), there were 89 (67%) males. Children made up 60% (81) of the study population (aged 16 years and under), of these 56 (69%) were male. Significant improvement was seen in 93% (124) of the study population, but there were relapses in two children (1.5%) and only moderate improvement in eight patients (6%). There was no significant complication in the study population, but 11 patients had crusting at the sites of cautery at follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral silver nitrate cauterisation is an effective method of treating recurrent epistaxis with low risk of complications.

Evaluation of a bundle of care to reduce incisional surgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) is associated with morbidity, mortality and increased care costs; many SSIs are considered preventable. The aim of the present study was to test implementation of a pragmatic, evidence-based bundle designed to reduce incisional SSI after emergency laparotomy and elective major lower gastrointestinal surgery. METHOD: This was a prospective before-and-after study. Data were collected before the intervention and for two separate subsequent time periods. An evidence-based bundle of care (BOC) was implemented; the primary outcome measure was incisional SSI at 30 days. The secondary outcome measure was 30-day unplanned readmissions. The initial post-intervention group, Group 2, assessed a variable number of potential impacting factors; however, due to funding and staffing levels the second post-bundle group, Group 3, focused on the core aspects of the BOC and rates of incisional SSI and readmission. RESULTS: In total, 99 patients were included in the 'before' group; and 71 in Group 2 and 92 in Group 3, the post-intervention groups. The incisional SSI rate was 29.3% (29/99) before and 28.2% (20/71) in Group 2 (P=0.873) and 21.7% (20/92) in Group 3 (P=0.234) after the intervention. After adjustment for confounders, the care bundle was associated with a non-significant reduction in SSI (Group 2: odds ratio [OR] = 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.45-1.93, P=0.0843). However, it was associated with significantly reduced readmissions 18.1% (18/99) before versus 5.6% (4/71) in Group 2 (OR = 0.236, 95% CI = 0.077-0.72, P=0.012) and 8.7% (8/92) in Group 3 (OR = 0.38, 95% CI = 0.16-0.9, P=0.029). Comparing the pre-bundle group to the post-bundle groups, there was an overall significant reduction in readmissions (P=0.003). This implies a number needed to treat of 8-11 patients to prevent one readmission. Adherence to antibiotic prophylaxis with the Trust guidelines increased from 91% to 99% (1 vs. 2, P=0.047). CONCLUSION: Introduction of the bundle was associated with a reduction in the observed rate of incisional SSI from 29.3% to 21.7%; significantly fewer patients required unplanned readmission. Use of the bundle was associated with significantly improved compliance with appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis.

The impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on elective paediatric otolaryngology outpatient services - An analysis of virtual outpatient clinics in a tertiary referral centre using the modified paediatric otolaryngology telemedicine satisfaction survey (POTSS).

INTRODUCTION: Virtual outpatient clinics (VOPC) have been integrated into both paediatric and based adult outpatient services due to a multitude of factors, including increased demand for services, technological advances and rising morbidity secondary to ageing populations. The novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has accentuated pressures on the National Health Service (NHS) infrastructure, particularly elective services, whilst radically altering patterns of practice. AIM: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on paediatric otolaryngology outpatient services whilst collating patient feedback to elicit long-term sustainability post COVID-19. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of VOPCs was undertaken at a tertiary paediatric referral centre over a 3-month capture period during the COVID-19 pandemic. Demographic, generic clinic (presenting complaint, new vs. follow-up, consultation type), as well as outcome data (medical or surgical intervention, discharge vs. ongoing review, onward referral, investigations, and conversion to face-to-face) was collated. Additionally a modified 15-point patient satisfaction survey was created. The Paediatric Otolaryngology Telemedicine Satisfaction survey (POTSS), was an adaptation of 4 validated patient satisfaction tools including the General Medical Council (GMC) patient questionnaire, the telehealth satisfaction scale (TESS), the telehealth usability questionnaire (TUQ), and the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire (TSUQ). RESULTS: Of 514 patients reviewed virtually over a 3-month period, 225 (45%) were randomly selected to participate, of which 200 met our inclusion criteria. The most common mode of consultation was telephony (92.5%, n = 185). Non-attendance rates were reduced when compared to face-to-face clinics during an equivalent period prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. A significant proportion of patients (29% compared to 26% pre-VOPC) were discharged to primary care. Nine percent were listed for surgery compared to 19% pre-VOPC. A subsequent face-to-face appointment was required in 10% of participants. Overall, the satisfaction when assessing the doctor-patient relationship, privacy & trust, as well as consultation domains was high, with the overwhelming majority of parents' content with the future integration and participation in VOPCs. CONCLUSION: An evolving worldwide pandemic has accelerated the need for healthcare services to reform in order to maintain a steady flow of patients within an elective outpatient setting without compromising patient care. Solutions must be sustainable long-term to account for future disruptions, whilst accounting for evolving patient demographics. Our novel survey has demonstrated the vast potential that the integration of VOPCs can offer paediatric otolaryngology services within a carefully selected cohort of patients.

Novel Minimal Access Bone Anchored Hearing Implant Surgery and a New Surface Modified Titanium Implant, the Birmingham Experience.

BACKGROUND: Bone anchored hearing implants (BAHI) are widely used and highly successful, accompanied with a high level of patient satisfaction across most techniques. A large UK teaching hospital switched from the previously used wide diameter titanium fixture and drilling system to the novel minimally invasive technique and laser ablated titanium implant. Before this change the rates of fixture failure and skin problems necessitating abutment change were 1% each. METHODS: Retrospective case note review of consecutive BAHI patients drawn from an electronic database between January 2015 and October 2016. RESULTS: Data from a total of 118 procedures were reviewed, with different combinations of surgical techniques and implant types. Sixty procedures were performed via the novel minimally invasive technique with 21 failures (35%). Fourty-eight modified minimally invasive technique procedures were performed with seven failures. In 64 of the procedures, laser ablated titanium fixtures were placed with 21 failures (32.8%). In 54 procedures wide diameter titanium fixtures were placed with eight failures (5%). CONCLUSION: Initial experience with the novel minimally invasive technique and laser ablated titanium fixture showed significantly higher failure rates than expected. This prompted a change to an open technique and subsequent abandonment of the laser ablated titanium fixture and custom drilling solution in our institution.

Inter-rater Reliability and Validity of Holgers Scores for the Assessment of Bone-anchored Hearing Implant Images.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to review the utility and interassessor reliability of Holgers classification by simultaneously testing various professionals of the bone-anchored implant team for their impression of a series of randomized images. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of a randomized series of bone-anchored implant fixture clinical photographs from the database at a tertiary referral university hospital. Raters were blinded to the contemporaneous Holgers grading assigned by the Clinical Nurse Specialist at initial assessment. Multivariate analysis was performed for correlation between scores for assessors and between grades of assessor. SETTING: Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK a tertiary center for BAHIs. PATIENTS: Patients implanted from May 2012 until November 2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Photographs of fixture sites of adult patients were taken following bone-anchored hearing implant surgery using either a tissue reduction (a split skin graft or linear incision technique was used) or tissue preservation approach, at 1 week, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. On a single occasion 263 images were reviewed by 10 assessors (2 consultants, 2 higher surgical trainees, 3 junior doctors, and 3 audiologists). Images were displayed at 10-second intervals and were scored by each assessor. Assessors were blinded to patient identity, time points and to each other's scores. Results were then compared against the real-time scoring of Holgers grades done by the BAHI specialist nurse to compare scores. RESULTS: Overall 227 (86.2%) images were with tissue reduction technique of which 110 (41.8%) were with linear incision and 117 (44.4%) were with a split skin graft (SSG); and 36 (13.6%) were with tissue preservation technique. Of these 263 images, 104 were at 1 week (39.5%), 70 were at 6 months (26.6%), and 89 were at 12 months (33.9%). The cumulative scores for each grade scored by blinding the time points were: 0 = 1132 (43.04%), total 1 = 995 (37.83%), total 2 = 346 (13.15%), total 3 = 141 (5.36%), total 4 = 16 (0.6%). 2630 data points had a variance of only 0.6415 for each nominal. Multivariate correlation between all assessors was r =0.7230 (Pearson's R). Correlations between consultants r=0.6317, higher surgical trainees r=0.7351, junior doctors r=0.7599, and audiologists r=0.7981.There is a good correlation (r=0.89) with no statistically significant differences between the SSG and linear incision groups (p>0.05), possibly suggesting Holgers score is comparable within both these tissue reduction techniques.There is a moderate correlation (r=0.58) with statistically significant differences between tissue preservation versus tissue reduction groups (p<0.05), possibly suggesting tissue preservation gives better results with lower Holgers scores than tissue reduction. CONCLUSION: Holgers scoring system is a reliable tool with respect to inter-rater variability across all levels of experience. Correlation was closer with audiologists and lesser experienced assessors.